Share
Digg
StumbleUpon
RedditThe judges who awarded this year’s Collier Trophy didn’t choose an airplane or its designers; they selected something that is more of a concept than a piece of hardware. Actual operational equipment for Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) has only a toehold so far on the world’s air traffic management (ATM) systems. Still, the technology is so promising that almost everyone in the industry favors ADS-B to replace the radar-based systems that have served ATM so well since the Federal Aviation Agency was formed in 1958 to oversee air traffic safety.
In its day, radar was regarded as the near-miraculous technology that had helped the Allies win World War II. It displayed aircraft position night or day in all weather, enabling controllers to radio the information and instructions to pilots. But radar is expensive and hard to maintain. It can’t reach past the horizon, and high terrain blocks it, creating blind spots for controllers. To scan the entire sky, its antennas have to be rotated by electric motors, and its electronics are complex. Radar was improved by the addition of aircraft-mounted transponders that transmit a four-digit identity code and altitude in hundreds of feet, enabling controllers to identify whose blip was whose and keep the traffic separated. Computers that processed the radar and data helped even more.
But the current system has two remaining drawbacks: Information has to be passed by voice and the information is in the wrong place—on a radar screen on the ground. When airspace is congested, voice communication is a clumsy way to move information. There are simply too many people talking at once. Every call by a controller or pilot has to be acknowledged to ensure it was heard. If two pilots key their mikes simultaneously, the calls are blocked, and at busy terminals this happens all the time, forcing callers to repeat themselves.
In ADS-B, satellite-borne transceivers use GPS and other navigation aids (such as an Inertial Reference Unit) to obtain aircraft position information, then transmit it to the electronic displays of everybody who needs it—not just air traffic controllers but other aircraft in the area as well (see “How Things Work: Aircraft Identification,” Oct./Nov. 2006). And the system does this without requiring any voice communication, so in the future, the only times controllers will need to talk to a pilot by radio is when they see something abnormal. There are no blind spots, and the hardware involved (perhaps with the exception of the satellite systems) is simple and cheap and has no moving parts. And the transceivers, flying over the oceans and both poles, will be able to track aircraft in locations no radar could ever reach.
ADS-B is already operating in China, Australia, and other areas with less extensive or entrenched radar-based systems, and is also being used by general aviation pilots in Alaska and air transport carriers in the Ohio River Valley; the FAA says that by the end of next year, the technology will be providing tracking information in the Gulf of Mexico, where dozens of helicopters fly workers to their oil rig platforms.
You can learn more about ADS-B at the Web site United States and other details.
—George C. Larson, Member, NAA
Comments
As long as the ADS-B system is working on each aircraft everything is fine, but what happens when one or more malfunction? What if an aircraft is hi-jacked and the system is disabled? There should be a back-up system like ground based high powered radar to keep air traffic safe. IFF and other transponder systems should also be maintained. You can never be too safe!
Posted by Bruce Colvil on May 17,2008 | 06:45AM
A sensible product evolved from the IFF family but, please reassure us that some intellegent idiot Or malign Government will not be able to scrabble, mask replicate or jam the coded data transmissions? Security coding still has to be secure. Please reserve a prototype model for later gift to the UK Natonal Radar and Defence Electronics Prservation Centre. The next generation needs to be told about these ideas preferably before they are superseded!IMBAR
Posted by Ian BARRETT on August 17,2008 | 06:36PM
Sounds great, but yet another space-dependant system with no soft-fail or redundancy if denied the GPS satellite swarm. Keep the radars and at least some VOR stations. More concerning is US military dependence on similar systems as well as satellite dependence for GPS targeting and munitions guidance. Satellite dependent communications (including data links relying on low-detection "upward-only" emitters) are cornerstones of our much-vaunted sensor fusion and inter-platform synergies. Point is, in both the civilian and military context, the US is setting itself up for a potentially catastrophic single-point vulnerability. Several well-placed space detonations of nuclear devices, well away from overhead of the continental US, would "de-smart" nearly every critical US warfighting platform (and de-stealth others). Welcome to 1967. ADS-B & adoption cost... how cheap is this ever going to get for, say, a 1982 C172? Owners of older aircraft, in order to keep operating in controlled airspace, are faced with the very real prospect of having to buy avionics costing more than their aircraft is worth. Here is hoping one of the major avionics mfrs takes the initiative, develops a solid, basic, generic, easily produced model and commits to mass production. By "buying-in" upfront, they would hope to capture economies of scale early and with the resulting price-point become the de-facto standard kit for older aircraft. We can hope...
Posted by Johann K on February 17,2009 | 02:58PM