Airliner Repair, 24/7
Boeing's traveling fix-it team has one goal: Get it airborne.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Air & Space magazine, November 2008
Fred Chadwick and Ron Beatty (foreground) install temporary fasterners that hold the skin in place for riveting.
Rick Turnbaugh / Boeing Creative Services
(Page 2 of 6)
And increasingly they are. As airlines downsize workforces, a busted airplane far from its corporate hub may not be swarmed by a phalanx of mechanics in company jumpsuits. Sometimes, says Rund, “There’s one avionics guy with a screwdriver.”
Owners of damaged airliners occasionally call with a one-item wish list. “They just want to know if they can fly the plane without doing anything,” Rund says. He cites an airline maintenance director pressing for flight approval after sustaining a hammering in a hailstorm. Boeing engineers determined that wing components were damaged beyond limits. Ten minutes of a carefully worded reality check, plus an offer to rush replacement parts to the site, persuaded the impatient carrier to fix instead of fly. “Part of our job is to be the voice of reason,” Rund says.
Incident reports advance to the center’s resident engineers. With broad experience across the aircraft types in Boeing’s fleet, these frontline troubleshooters huddle to prescribe the most immediate relief. In cases of structural damage, which make up 60 percent of the calls, the solution usually involves collaboration with specialized engineers elsewhere in the company—what Rund terms “the brain surgeons.”
“We get the customer on the line, we get the brain surgeons of Boeing on the line, and we sit in a collaboration room and videoconference,” he says. Plasma screens with smart boards facilitate sketches on digitized blueprints and photos. By now, an AOG survey team in Washington State has been alerted and is standing by. After each engineer confirms his understanding of the damage and votes a course of action, the plan is presented to the airline.
Order is supplanting chaos. Just getting the aircraft into Boeing hands has a therapeutic effect on stressed-out airline execs. It’s also a healthy antidote to denial when damage is severe. “By this point, in most cases the airline recognizes that— and will tell us—‘This is beyond our capabilities,’ ” Rund says. “Then it’s time to get Jim’s team involved.”
“This, By Far, is the best job in Boeing,” AOG mechanic Bernie Dalien shouts over rivet guns and rock ’n’ roll. “The boring, the mundane, the everyday thing—that’s not our gig.”
We’re in an enormous halogen-lit hangar in Western Europe, standing between two separated segments of a 767. Earsplitting music thunders from an iPod boom-box. Widebody X is the one recently spindled on the fence.
As the last of its deplaned passengers straggled to their destinations, the AOG survey team was en route. The four-member first wave is often in the air from Seattle on just four hours’ notice. Says Paul Amrine, quality assurance supervisor on this project, “Sometimes we go to work in the morning and end up having to ask our wives to bring us a packed suitcase.” Amrine himself arrived at the hangar after back-to-back surveys of incidents in Shannon, Ireland, and Taipei, Taiwan. The team appraises the aircraft, documenting what Boeing calls “discrepancies” (a torn-off wing, for example). Man-hours, parts and resources, and a time-flow to a rock-hard completion date are calculated. Back in Everett, a contract is drawn up that includes a firm price. “And the customer either says yea or nay,” Amrine says. In the death match of airline competition, the yeas usually have it.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (2)
I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed this article on airliner repair. I'm a non-pilot but love watching planes at the airport and love travel by air. I'm one of those people begging for a window seat who never sees the movie because my nose is glued to the window looking down on earth. I loved reading about how the Boeing team works and of the types of repairs they are called upon to do. I once asked on the internet about the maintenance requirements of (say) a jumbo jet on a turnaround in Toronto (my home town) from Europe. This question led to my meeting a senior maintenance tech from a major airline who invited me to the airport maintenance hangar and gave me a guided tour of the facility, explaining all the repairs that were underway. This was before 9/11. I find the topic of airliner maintenance and repair really interesting and I thank Stephen Joiner for writing such an informative and fascinating article.
Jeff Bowen
Toronto
Posted by Jeff Bowen on October 13,2008 | 09:44 PM
Great article! And cum laude to the author for his fast, crisp, descriptive writing style.
Congrats also to Smithsonian A&S website for presenting consistently excellent material. J.O'L.
Posted by Jack O'Leery on October 25,2008 | 02:59 PM
As a former "airline brat" of the sixties through the eighties, my love for planes grew with the size of the planes (what other kid on the block got a Chevron "Civil Aircraft Fueling Guide" for Christmas?). To my good fortune, my mom worked in the UAL maintenance office,giving me the great opportunity to see the work of the A&P mechanics up close. This was back when planes weren't that reliable (always a spare engine or two in the shop), things were a little greasier and a kid like me could still get his arms across the exhaust end of a DC-8 engine. This article brought back many happy memories, with the realization that these professionals fix not just airplanes, but airplanes for people. Mike Tober, Honolulu (HNL)
Posted by Mike Tober on October 28,2008 | 06:11 AM
the video of the AOG is from national geographic channel's
the worlds biggest fixes show
Posted by Dylan on November 27,2008 | 02:59 PM
Hello to MIKE TOBER! I enjoyed reading about your memories
as a kid, putting your arms around a DC-8 engine exhaust.
I recall Honolulu before and after 9/11__you could go out to the airfreight hangers and see BIG jets! I recall seeing the GE 747 test unit with an unusually big inboard engine on port side__the other engines were standard 747's design.
An older guy (my generation) explained to me that this was standard fare delivery of an engine to somebody who needed
it and/or the 747 was a test vehicle for BOEING. A note from
a BOEING rep sort of confirmed that incident as possibly
an engine designed for 777. Good article, well written!
Smokescreen
Posted by John S. Mournian on June 27,2009 | 10:15 AM
This video is a lot of fun. I did some A&P'ing back in the day. Some AOG's and structural stuff. The music on this video seems to have changed from AirSpace Mag's "original" version. Anyone know what the original background music was? The artist or song title?
Posted by Rick Ganci on September 27,2009 | 04:55 PM