Airliner Repair, 24/7
Boeing's traveling fix-it team has one goal: Get it airborne.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Air & Space magazine, November 2008
Fred Chadwick and Ron Beatty (foreground) install temporary fasterners that hold the skin in place for riveting.
Rick Turnbaugh / Boeing Creative Services
(Page 4 of 6)
Nor is an AOG career designed for your inner nine-to-fiver. “We work two 12-hour shifts, around the clock, seven days a week, until we’re done,” Jim Testin says. “We don’t take holidays. My first 11 years in AOG, I missed Christmas nine times.” He pauses to tally the number of passports he’s filled—six—then shakes his head. “I told my wife I would only do this for three years.”
Still, for an average of just one opening per year, Testin gets as many as 500 applicants. Part of the draw is the mystique. Some of the feats the Boeing AOG operation has performed are commercial aviation legends. In 1988, a 747 aborting a takeoff bellied into a mud flat adjacent to New Delhi airport. Fully 70 percent of the airplane required AOG repair or replacement, at a total cost of $75 million. Then a mechanic, Testin worked 126 days straight in a circus-size tent dubbed the New Delhi Dome. Boeing returned the resurrected jumbo as pristine as one just off the assembly line. Two decades later, it’s still flying.
As it turns out, pulling a 767 in half is a straightforward procedure. “Everything about these aircraft is designed to be taken apart,” mechanic Fred Chadwick says. Before the tail section could be separated from the rest of the fuselage, the towering vertical stabilizer had to be removed. Overhead clearance in the hangar was three feet short, but resourceful AOG mechanics hyper-extended the airliner’s nose gear to tilt the tail down. A gantry crane hoisted the enormous fin to within inches of the rafters, then shuttled it over the airplane and lowered it to a jig on the floor. The tightness of the quarters made it a hold-your-breath procedure that dragged through an entire shift. But AOG tool engineer Jason Lockwood was over his first hurdle.
“When they told me I was going to be on this job, I didn’t sleep for a month,” he admits. Lockwood designs and directs heavy lifting operations. On this repair, heavy lift included the startling act of removing the 48 section—the unwieldy 12,000-pound final fuselage segment that includes the vertical fin, the horizontal stabilizers, and the damaged pressure bulkhead. A 48 separation was a career first for Lockwood. “I’d seen the videos of all the things that can go wrong,” he says.
Just aft of the rear lavatories, the 48 section meets the 46. At a join ring encircling the fuselage, the two fifths of the airplane are held together by 200 bolts—heat-treated, aircraft-grade fasteners (though they look unsettlingly similar to some you might have in a coffee can in the garage). A cable yoke descended from the ceiling crane and attached at five lift points on the tail section. After the crane applied 12,000 pounds of lift, the bolts were removed in a pre-determined sequence. Since the cable tension matched the section’s weight, “theoretically, we should just be able to take out all the bolts and the section will just sit there,” Lockwood says. In practice, determining the suspended segment’s exact center of gravity required some fine-tuning. A few bolts were left loose but threaded as final tweaks were made to the pitch of the yoke. “Once we’ve convinced ourselves it’s in a neutral attitude,” Lockwood says, “we take out those last bolts. Hopefully, it just hangs there.” If it pitches, binds, or pendulums, it could damage the precisely machined mating surfaces of the sections.
With barely a twitch, the fuselage de-mated. The crane backed off, bearing the 48 section, exposing the ruptured bulkhead, and providing mechanics in the now-gaping 46 with a view you hope you never get on your way to the lavatory.
Lockwood slept better thereafter. “It’s actually easier to put it back together than it is to take it apart,” he says.
The intimacy with the way Boeing airplanes dismantle now influences how they’re built. “We put three AOG team members on the 777 design teams, and we’ve followed that up on the 787 and the next-generation 737,” Jim Testin says. Specific design changes were integrated to minimize damage in common incidents and expedite AOG repairs afterward.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (2)
I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed this article on airliner repair. I'm a non-pilot but love watching planes at the airport and love travel by air. I'm one of those people begging for a window seat who never sees the movie because my nose is glued to the window looking down on earth. I loved reading about how the Boeing team works and of the types of repairs they are called upon to do. I once asked on the internet about the maintenance requirements of (say) a jumbo jet on a turnaround in Toronto (my home town) from Europe. This question led to my meeting a senior maintenance tech from a major airline who invited me to the airport maintenance hangar and gave me a guided tour of the facility, explaining all the repairs that were underway. This was before 9/11. I find the topic of airliner maintenance and repair really interesting and I thank Stephen Joiner for writing such an informative and fascinating article.
Jeff Bowen
Toronto
Posted by Jeff Bowen on October 13,2008 | 09:44 PM
Great article! And cum laude to the author for his fast, crisp, descriptive writing style.
Congrats also to Smithsonian A&S website for presenting consistently excellent material. J.O'L.
Posted by Jack O'Leery on October 25,2008 | 02:59 PM
As a former "airline brat" of the sixties through the eighties, my love for planes grew with the size of the planes (what other kid on the block got a Chevron "Civil Aircraft Fueling Guide" for Christmas?). To my good fortune, my mom worked in the UAL maintenance office,giving me the great opportunity to see the work of the A&P mechanics up close. This was back when planes weren't that reliable (always a spare engine or two in the shop), things were a little greasier and a kid like me could still get his arms across the exhaust end of a DC-8 engine. This article brought back many happy memories, with the realization that these professionals fix not just airplanes, but airplanes for people. Mike Tober, Honolulu (HNL)
Posted by Mike Tober on October 28,2008 | 06:11 AM
the video of the AOG is from national geographic channel's
the worlds biggest fixes show
Posted by Dylan on November 27,2008 | 02:59 PM
Hello to MIKE TOBER! I enjoyed reading about your memories
as a kid, putting your arms around a DC-8 engine exhaust.
I recall Honolulu before and after 9/11__you could go out to the airfreight hangers and see BIG jets! I recall seeing the GE 747 test unit with an unusually big inboard engine on port side__the other engines were standard 747's design.
An older guy (my generation) explained to me that this was standard fare delivery of an engine to somebody who needed
it and/or the 747 was a test vehicle for BOEING. A note from
a BOEING rep sort of confirmed that incident as possibly
an engine designed for 777. Good article, well written!
Smokescreen
Posted by John S. Mournian on June 27,2009 | 10:15 AM
This video is a lot of fun. I did some A&P'ing back in the day. Some AOG's and structural stuff. The music on this video seems to have changed from AirSpace Mag's "original" version. Anyone know what the original background music was? The artist or song title?
Posted by Rick Ganci on September 27,2009 | 04:55 PM