Airliner Repair, 24/7
Boeing's traveling fix-it team has one goal: Get it airborne.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Air & Space magazine, November 2008
Fred Chadwick and Ron Beatty (foreground) install temporary fasterners that hold the skin in place for riveting.
Rick Turnbaugh / Boeing Creative Services
(Page 5 of 6)
Still, damaged aircraft rarely go back together exactly as they rolled out of the factory. Change—as routine as replacing a stripped bolt with an oversized substitute—happens. “Any time you change the configuration of anything in the structure, you have to document it,” Craig Oppedal says. Every deviation from “drawing config,” the blueprint gospel of an aircraft as originally constructed, is subjected to his scrutiny and triggers a Field Rework Record (FRR). Oppedal’s been on AOG repairs that produced just a few FRRs, and others that resulted in 280. But there’s always something. All FRRs become part of the voluminous documentation that follows an airliner around for life.
The replacement pressure bulkhead has no deviations to document. In 1978, a Boeing AOG team repaired the bulkhead of a Japan Airlines 747 damaged in a tail-drag incident. Seven years later, the repair failed in flight, resulting in an explosive depressurization that tore off the vertical fin and severed all hydraulics systems. Some 30 minutes later, the aircraft slammed into a mountainside; 520 people died in the second worst airline disaster in history. Investigators determined that the AOG repair did not comply with Boeing’s own Structural Repair Manual. Boeing accepted 80 percent of the liability for the crash, while JAL accepted the remainder for neglecting signs that the repaired bulkhead was weakening.
Every night at 7:30, the day crew logs out and the second shift “ties in.” The playlist mellows, and reassembly continues around the clock. Mangled skin is replaced with new aluminum. The new bulkhead is sealed into the 48 section, fuselage segments are reunited, and the vertical fin is dropped back into its slot.
The critical task of reconnecting the control cables and hydraulics that operate the tail’s rudder and elevators belongs to rigger Randy Pratt. He’s required to adjust the 175-foot tungsten steel cables back to Boeing factory specs to produce the flying characteristics the airplane came off the production line with—no matter how far out of whack the airline flew it. “They’ll say ‘Hey, what did you do to my airplane?’ ” Pratt tells me. Adjustments made for the flight preferences of particular pilots, or an accumulation of skin patches that skew the airplane’s aerodynamics, produce differences from manufacturer’s suggested settings. Soon after recouping their airplane, airline mechanics typically set about undoing Pratt’s precision work, adjusting cables and neutral positions to customize control to taste.
On day 18 the airplane is towed out into a squall of rain and snow. “We’ve got a page and a half of functional tests to do,” Mike Carpenter says. Control surfaces aft of the separation point are actuated and electrical components energized. The auxiliary power unit then over-pressurizes the fuselage for the “high-blow” test. Made of expandable, credit-card-thin aluminum, the pressure bulkhead in normal service holds seven pounds per square inch. In addition to testing the join ring seal, the 12-psi high-blow stretches the new bulkhead’s elasticity nearly to its limit. The test also results in instant break-in: Stretching and fatigue during routine lower pressurizations are thus minimized.
It’s day 20, and make-readies continue down to the last minute. At a sit-down with airline officials, every item on the survey list is verbally closed out. Mike Carpenter and Paul Amrine sign their names to a document attesting that the aircraft has been repaired to the standards of the Boeing Company and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA standards are published online; the AOG team references them constantly) and is ready to return to service. Then the whole movable factory packs up.
Like now. “We’ve literally had passengers with tickets in their hands looking out the window of the gate at us as we were boxing up our equipment to leave,” Jim Testin says.
Corporate carriers with three-figure fleets and thousands of flights daily rely on Boeing’s AOG teams to discreetly get airplanes flying again, ASAP. But its real clients show up in ones and twos, clutching boarding passes and tripping over shoelaces untied for security checks. “There’s a tremendous effort that’s put forth on behalf of the traveling public,” Testin told me back in Everett, “to make these planes the safest in the world. If an airline calls, we’ll have somebody there.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (2)
I just wanted to let you know how much I enjoyed this article on airliner repair. I'm a non-pilot but love watching planes at the airport and love travel by air. I'm one of those people begging for a window seat who never sees the movie because my nose is glued to the window looking down on earth. I loved reading about how the Boeing team works and of the types of repairs they are called upon to do. I once asked on the internet about the maintenance requirements of (say) a jumbo jet on a turnaround in Toronto (my home town) from Europe. This question led to my meeting a senior maintenance tech from a major airline who invited me to the airport maintenance hangar and gave me a guided tour of the facility, explaining all the repairs that were underway. This was before 9/11. I find the topic of airliner maintenance and repair really interesting and I thank Stephen Joiner for writing such an informative and fascinating article.
Jeff Bowen
Toronto
Posted by Jeff Bowen on October 13,2008 | 09:44 PM
Great article! And cum laude to the author for his fast, crisp, descriptive writing style.
Congrats also to Smithsonian A&S website for presenting consistently excellent material. J.O'L.
Posted by Jack O'Leery on October 25,2008 | 02:59 PM
As a former "airline brat" of the sixties through the eighties, my love for planes grew with the size of the planes (what other kid on the block got a Chevron "Civil Aircraft Fueling Guide" for Christmas?). To my good fortune, my mom worked in the UAL maintenance office,giving me the great opportunity to see the work of the A&P mechanics up close. This was back when planes weren't that reliable (always a spare engine or two in the shop), things were a little greasier and a kid like me could still get his arms across the exhaust end of a DC-8 engine. This article brought back many happy memories, with the realization that these professionals fix not just airplanes, but airplanes for people. Mike Tober, Honolulu (HNL)
Posted by Mike Tober on October 28,2008 | 06:11 AM
the video of the AOG is from national geographic channel's
the worlds biggest fixes show
Posted by Dylan on November 27,2008 | 02:59 PM
Hello to MIKE TOBER! I enjoyed reading about your memories
as a kid, putting your arms around a DC-8 engine exhaust.
I recall Honolulu before and after 9/11__you could go out to the airfreight hangers and see BIG jets! I recall seeing the GE 747 test unit with an unusually big inboard engine on port side__the other engines were standard 747's design.
An older guy (my generation) explained to me that this was standard fare delivery of an engine to somebody who needed
it and/or the 747 was a test vehicle for BOEING. A note from
a BOEING rep sort of confirmed that incident as possibly
an engine designed for 777. Good article, well written!
Smokescreen
Posted by John S. Mournian on June 27,2009 | 10:15 AM
This video is a lot of fun. I did some A&P'ing back in the day. Some AOG's and structural stuff. The music on this video seems to have changed from AirSpace Mag's "original" version. Anyone know what the original background music was? The artist or song title?
Posted by Rick Ganci on September 27,2009 | 04:55 PM