Too Ugly to Print in a Magazine
Four aircraft so ugly they could only be published on the web...
- By Air & Space staff
- Air & Space magazine, June 1997
Northrop Tacit Blue
United States
Nominated by the staff of the Air Force Flight Test Center History Office at California's Edwards Air Force Base.
An experimental stealth technology demonstrator flown in the mid-1980s, Tacit Blue's bloated appearance earned it the nickname Whale. "You look at the plane and say, 'Wow, that doesn't look very aerodynamic,' " said Air Force test pilot Ken Dyson. "Then you look at the aerodynamics of it and you say, 'Wow, that doesn't look very aerodynamic.' " Dyson added that Tacit Blue lived up to its other nickname, HUM, for Highly Unstable Mother. "I can't believe how many times I crashed it in the simulator," he said.
Moscow Aviation Institute Thermoplane
Russia
Nominated by the staff of Air & Space/Smithsonian.
One of Russia's latest designs, which resembles a Big Mac with wings, is a cross between a dirigible and a fixed-wing aircraft. Conceived in the early 1980s, the prototype is undergoing testing at the Ulianovsky Avia Industrial Complex. By combining slow-flight and hovering capability with a standard wing and twin piston engines, its promoters hope to market the utilitarian craft for equipment hauling, environmental monitoring, rescue missions, and leisure cruises.
SNECMA Coleoptere
France-Germany
Nominated by aviation archeologists Peter Merlin and Tony Moore
"Without question, the ugliest aircraft ever built." So decree Peter Merlin and Tony Moore, independent aviation archeologists who search for remains of historic X-planes (see "The X-Hunters," Feb./Mar. 1995). The vat-like Coleoptere was developed collaboratively by the French Societe Nationale D'Etude et de Construction de Moteurs D'Aviation and the Federal German Ministry of Defense for research on vertical-takeoff-and landing craft. It first flew in 1959; shortly afterward, while transitioning from vertical to horizontal flight at 250 feet, the aircraft crashed. The ring-like wing inspired nominator Peter Merlin to observe: "It looks like a keg on wheels."
Mil Mi-24
Russia
Nominated by the staff of Air & Space/Smithsonian
The Russians put their faith in God and helicopters and over the years have built a wide variety of military choppers. One of the best-known is the Mil Mi-24, NATO name Hind, which first flew in 1969 and achieved a production run of 2,300 with numerous variants. A gunship with formidable assault capabilites, its looks can kill, but the casual observer will die laughing.
Comments (2)
What about the A-10Aa thunderbolt II ???
It may be a formidable warplane, capable of deliver a lot of devastation, carries a huge quantity and variety of weapons and needless to talk about the GAU-8/A cannon...
But eventhough all this; it's a ugly plane... sacrificing beauty against roughness, deadliness and survivability. Although thinking it better, maybe it's beauty lies in been capable of bringing it's pilot back in one piece after been seriously damaged.
Posted by federico trejos on September 25,2009 | 04:54 PM
All the listed other than one have a common thread, FAILURE! The Hind D was an effective and deadly machine,and if you want ugly? Other helicopters in history take the prize.
Posted by Don Hillberg on October 23,2010 | 04:15 PM