• About Air & Space
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
airspacemag.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Smithsonian magazine
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Subscribe

  • Flight Today

Viewport: The Urge to Tinker

  • By George C. Larson
  • Air & Space Magazine, January 01, 2001

Article Tools

  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit

    The Federal Aviation Regulations represent the rule of law in the air. They govern all forms of flight, and like most regulations, they contain an equal measure of good advice and courtesies mixed with constraints on the occasional impulse (for example, buzzing your in-laws’ house). But a law or regulation can’t prevent a nasty outcome—not directly anyway. All it can do is stipulate a penalty after the fact. And the same holds true for the FARs: They have never directly prevented an accident, which, by definition, entails some regulation being violated. In truth, we rely on the human instinct for survival to provide a happy ending.

    We’d better maintain some perspective on the relationship between regulation and desired outcome because from time to time the urge to freshen up the FARs becomes irresistible. That urge seems strong right now, as the Federal Aviation Administration is staring at huge changes in the world of aviation.

    In some nations, the important role of air traffic management—Job One for our own FAA—has been privatized. Many advocate a similar approach here and elsewhere, despite strident opposition from many who use the system. If it comes, it will be the most significant change in the agency’s history.

    Challenges arise in the marketplace as well. “Fractional” sales of corporate aircraft, in which a company buys, say, a one-fourth share of a business jet, have enabled many companies that could not otherwise afford it to own an airplane. But charter operators complain that the stricter rules governing charter flying increase their cost. They think the charter rules (Part 135) should also apply to fractionals. Members of the National Business Aviation Association recently voted their endorsement of such a change, perhaps in part because they fear a threat to the rules that govern non-revenue-earning flights (Part 91).

    Airplane operators worry about wholesale changes in rules because they fear the revision process itself, which is usually lengthy. It can also lead to unpredictable results when various interest groups see themselves in conflict with each other. Regulations can emerge that may promise improved safety but with costs and complexity users are not willing to bear.

    Realizing all this, fliers are finding ways to enhance human performance based on self-help. One example can be seen in aerobatic pilot Debbie Gary’s account of a formation flying school. The guiding principle is that if your own act is cleaned up, rule-makers won’t be so tempted to fine-tune it.

    An experienced airline pilot once told me: “Flying involves being thousands of feet in the air, going hundreds of miles an hour. Of course it’s dangerous.” But thousands of us do it every day, and it’s remarkable how often everything turns out all right. That’s the single most dangerous thing about flying and the reason that a pilot’s experience may not be a perfect predictor of performance. While we can’t be perpetual novices, success heaped upon success eventually dulls the wariness that we are blessed with when we’re new at something. The history of accidents is filled with lapses by pilots deemed so capable that investigators are left shaking their heads. Still, it would be futile to look to the rules and regulations alone in the hope that we can perfect human nature.

    —George C. Larson

    The Federal Aviation Regulations represent the rule of law in the air. They govern all forms of flight, and like most regulations, they contain an equal measure of good advice and courtesies mixed with constraints on the occasional impulse (for example, buzzing your in-laws’ house). But a law or regulation can’t prevent a nasty outcome—not directly anyway. All it can do is stipulate a penalty after the fact. And the same holds true for the FARs: They have never directly prevented an accident, which, by definition, entails some regulation being violated. In truth, we rely on the human instinct for survival to provide a happy ending.

    We’d better maintain some perspective on the relationship between regulation and desired outcome because from time to time the urge to freshen up the FARs becomes irresistible. That urge seems strong right now, as the Federal Aviation Administration is staring at huge changes in the world of aviation.

    In some nations, the important role of air traffic management—Job One for our own FAA—has been privatized. Many advocate a similar approach here and elsewhere, despite strident opposition from many who use the system. If it comes, it will be the most significant change in the agency’s history.

    Challenges arise in the marketplace as well. “Fractional” sales of corporate aircraft, in which a company buys, say, a one-fourth share of a business jet, have enabled many companies that could not otherwise afford it to own an airplane. But charter operators complain that the stricter rules governing charter flying increase their cost. They think the charter rules (Part 135) should also apply to fractionals. Members of the National Business Aviation Association recently voted their endorsement of such a change, perhaps in part because they fear a threat to the rules that govern non-revenue-earning flights (Part 91).

    Airplane operators worry about wholesale changes in rules because they fear the revision process itself, which is usually lengthy. It can also lead to unpredictable results when various interest groups see themselves in conflict with each other. Regulations can emerge that may promise improved safety but with costs and complexity users are not willing to bear.

    Realizing all this, fliers are finding ways to enhance human performance based on self-help. One example can be seen in aerobatic pilot Debbie Gary’s account of a formation flying school. The guiding principle is that if your own act is cleaned up, rule-makers won’t be so tempted to fine-tune it.

    An experienced airline pilot once told me: “Flying involves being thousands of feet in the air, going hundreds of miles an hour. Of course it’s dangerous.” But thousands of us do it every day, and it’s remarkable how often everything turns out all right. That’s the single most dangerous thing about flying and the reason that a pilot’s experience may not be a perfect predictor of performance. While we can’t be perpetual novices, success heaped upon success eventually dulls the wariness that we are blessed with when we’re new at something. The history of accidents is filled with lapses by pilots deemed so capable that investigators are left shaking their heads. Still, it would be futile to look to the rules and regulations alone in the hope that we can perfect human nature.

    —George C. Larson


     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:

    Comments are moderated, and will not appear until AirSpaceMag.com has approved them. Air & Space reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



    Advertisement


    Most Popular Video

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed

    Signs of an Active Moon

    (08:44)

    The Last Missing WASP

    (08:44)

    Truck Killer: The A-26

    (04:34)

    Go For Launch!

    (3:52)

    View All Newest Videos »

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    (03:55)

    Go For Launch!

    (3:52)

    Truck Killer: The A-26

    (04:34)

    Refueling Over Iraq

    Refueling Over Iraq

    (02:20)

    View All Most Popular Videos »

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    1. The Gosh of Oshkosh
    2. The Truth is Out There
    3. The Curse of the Cargomaster
    4. The 727 that Vanished
    5. Case Closed
    6. Inside the Enola Gay
    7. Department of Flying Saucers
    8. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    9. Cold Case
    10. Cause Unknown
    1. Flights and Fancy: How to Degauss a Cat
    2. The Real Top Gun
    3. Sightings: Water Striders
    4. The 727 that Vanished
    5. A&S Interview: Story Musgrave
    6. All and Nothing
    7. In the Museum: The Mysterious Second Seat
    8. The Disorient Express
    9. The Last to Die
    10. Where the Sun Does Shine
    1. The Curse of the Cargomaster
    2. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    3. The 727 that Vanished
    4. Panther Paint Job
    5. Monster Bomber
    6. Aircraft That Changed the World
    7. A Hard Day's Night
    8. Department of Flying Saucers
    9. Ravens of Long Tieng
    10. Above & Beyond: Mission Unaccomplished

    Advertisement


    In the Magazine

    September 2010

    • The Truth is Out There
    • Lost In Space
    • Cold Case
    • Department of Flying Saucers
    • Checking In...
    • The Curse of the Cargomaster

    View Table of Contents »

    Join Us

    Twitter

    Follow Air & Space magazine on Twitter

    Snapshot

    Man, Metal, and Sky

    Even an engine can become artwork.

    Reader Scrapbook

    Send In Your Photos

    Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.

    Need to Know

    What determines an airplane’s lifespan?

    Some keep flying for decades, while others end up on the scrap heap.

    • Smithsonian Store
    • Smithsonian Journeys

    Air Force One Model

    Item No. 67981

    Northern Lights of Canada

    Marvel at nature's most magnificent phenomena - the Northern Lights - during this fascinating adventure into Canada's wilderness (Sep 9 - 13, 2010)



    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • Sep 2010


    • Aug 2010


    • Jul 2010

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Student Travel
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability