The Edwards Diaries
Test pilot Glen Edwards kept book on the Flying Wing. Now we know what he thought of the airplane he died in.
- By Daniel Ford
- Air & Space magazine, July 1997
(Page 2 of 5)
By 1941 German troops occupied most of Europe's capitals and appeared ready to capture London and Moscow next. Fearing it might have to fight a transatlantic war, the U.S. Army wanted a super-bomber that could carry 10,000 pounds of bombs to Germany from North America. Northrop built the B-35, a Flying Wing, while Consolidated Aircraft developed the B-36, conventional in every respect but its size (see "B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads," Apr./May 1996).
Even the Wing was huge by the standards of the day: It spanned 172 feet, weighed 100 tons, and developed 12,000 horsepower from four huge engines. It was such a giant leap from the N-1M that the Army also agreed to fund an intermediate version. One-third the size of the big bomber, the N-9M was supposed to be aerodynamically identical. So it was a bad omen when the first one was delivered late, cost more than budgeted, rattled and shook, failed to deliver the promised range, and then crashed, killing its pilot.
Lacking a fuselage and tail, a Flying Wing can rotate easily around its lateral axis--the imaginary line running spanwise through the wings--and even Jack Northrop fretted that his design might be inherently unstable. While he was experimenting with moving the N-9M's center of gravity forward and aft, the test pilot apparently let the nose point so high that the wing stalled.
Now, if you stall a Cessna, you can release back pressure on the control stick and the airplane will drop its nose naturally and resume flying. A Flying Wing is not so polite. In the N-9M and other all-wing aircraft of the time, the airflow separation at the stall rendered the trailing-edge control surfaces ineffective (see "Go With the Flow," June/July 1995). Or worse, the forces on the controls reversed, slamming the control stick into the pilot. The Wing might go into a tail slide, flip over backwards, or fall off to one side in a spin.
In time, the team of Northrop, von Karman, and Sears tamed the N-9M, but the Army was losing patience with the development problems at Northrop and Consolidated. Development of the B-36 was behind schedule, and the XB-35, which was even more of an engineering challenge, had yet to fly. So the production contract was canceled, leaving only two X (experimental) and 13 Y (service test) B-35s on order.
The XB-35 finally took to the air in June 1946, almost a year after Japan had surrendered. Company pilot Max Stanley flew it to Muroc Army Air Base. "No trouble," he reported. The same couldn't be said of the XB-35 thereafter: Its engines overheated, its propeller shafts vibrated, its propeller gearbox broke down, and its auxiliary power unit (a gasoline-powered electrical generator) failed. In the end, the X models would manage to fly for a total of 36 hours, for an amortized cost of $1.8 million per hour.
It didn't matter, because the Army had already decided to adapt its super-bombers to jet propulsion. Consolidated (now called Convair) would hang four turbojets on its B-36, outboard of its piston engines. Northrop's Flying Wing would get an even more radical makeover, its engines replaced by eight turbojets, along with a new designation: the B-49. Because the airframe had proved airworthy, it could go straight into flight test, and with little delay: The first YB-49 was rolled out in October 1947. "Spewing a twin trail of black smoke, the sky monster swept into the air before the awed thousands gathered to witness the historic take-off," gushed a company press release. Max Stanley was again at the controls, and again it was a delivery flight to Muroc--now the property of the newly independent United States Air Force.
In theory, company pilots performed the initial flight tests on new airplanes to prove their airworthiness, then military pilots put them through acceptance tests. In fact, the Air Force's Bomber Test Branch was involved from the first day. When the second YB-49 was ready, Major Robert Cardenas flew it from the factory to Muroc. Cardenas was also the pilot on February 23, 1948, when the nosewheel door blew off the "Two" (the test pilots coined a shorthand to refer to the first two airplanes--the One and the Two). With jet engines, the Wing simply took off too fast. Thereafter, Cardenas lifted the nose as soon as the wheels left the ground, bleeding off speed until the wheels retracted. "Then you leveled off," he recalls, "and you'd sit there rocking in your seat, back and forth, in unison with the slosh of the fuel." The B-49 had no fuel-cell baffles.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »





Comments (9)
Great article, I've wondered what the story was behind the loss of the YB-49.
I was raised on south central LA and became an airplane nut at the old age of 6, I lived on the approach path of the LA airport,and spent hours doing Plane Identification in my front yard. I'm now 64 and still a plane nut.
I used to watch the YB-49 flying to and from Muroc field over my house.
William Edwards, Simi Valley CA
Posted by william edwards on February 25,2009 | 07:14 PM
Great article, I've wondered what the story was behind the loss of the YB-49.
I was raised on south central LA and became an airplane nut at the old age of 6, I lived on the approach path of the LA airport,and spent hours doing Plane Identification in my front yard. I'm now 64 and still a plane nut.
I used to watch the YB-49 flying to and from Muroc field over my house.
William Edwards, Simi Valley CA
Posted by william edwards on February 25,2009 | 07:14 PM
i was stationed at edwards afb in the early 70's as an air policeman and remember strange events at the old mercury and atlas rocket testing site southwest of the lake bed. one night, it was an orb hovering above the area change colors from red to yellow to white but the distance could not be determined. this lasted about a half hour. i never reported it.
Posted by glenn gomes on May 31,2009 | 04:50 PM
mr. Northrops son lived across the street fom where i grew up....when he got older he came to live with them......i was young(5-9) but i remember pictures of the flying wing at their house and speaking with Mr. Nortrop....wish i had been a little older!
Posted by tim martin on June 19,2009 | 12:51 AM
Thanks for the comments. The article was a first run at preserving the Edwards diaries for posterity, and led to a full-length book, Glen Edwards: A Bomber Pilot's Diary, published by Smithsonian Institution Press. Some of the photographs for the book are posted . Blue skies! -- Dan Ford
Posted by Oldpilot on July 7,2009 | 12:39 PM
An interesting article. I was fortunate to see the XB-49 fly at an air show at March AFB in California. I believe it was 1948. It made 2 passes and that was it. The information was enlightening as not much was ever put into the news at that time. The aircraft was definitely a thing of beauty. It is ashame that the concept was ahead of technology.
Posted by Donald Burg on May 15,2010 | 02:25 AM
Hi,
I am hoping someone might answer a question for me. In the 1960's I remember attending quite a few airshows with my father. Both my mother and I remember seeing a flying wing at the show. I know they shut them down in 1948 (?) I think, but could there have been any flying exhibitions in the 60's? I have been told no, but is it possible?
Thanks to all!!
Posted by Kevin Wright on July 13,2010 | 05:15 PM
Pretty good article, but some disagreement with what I learned in a many hours long interview with Chuck Tucker, the Northrop test pilot who took over the YB-49 test program after Major Forbes pulled the outer wings off YB-49 No. 2, starting the stall too low and without a G-meter to avoid over stressing the wing.
After Forbes' crash the AF pilots refused to fly the no. 1 YB-49 but the AF wanted the stall tests flown because they had already decided to order 30 jet Wings ... which they did just weeks later. Chuck said the No. 1 was for performance, and the no.2 was instrumented for stability. He wound up flying all the stall tests, even at CGs aft of 30% GMAC, and recovered it from a spin, documented with photos from the chase plane. He flew the YB-49 for more than 100 hours, including the stability tests and autopilot (yaw) system, and said, "... the AF claims the Wjng was unstable were 'bullshit'. The plane was solid as a rock. A good airplane." Chuck also was flyign co-pilot when the Wing demonstrated radar-invisibi9lity -- it was Stealthy -- in several flights over the AF's new CGI radar at Half Moon Bay, north of San Francisco, but the AF ignored it. In the cross country speed comparison to the Boeing B-47 the AF juggled the range and takeoff/start, and the actual elapsed time, corrected, was the same for the YB-49. The Strategic Air Command need was for a 4000-mile-target plane, unescorted, that could get through 19,000 Russian interceptors. The huge B-36 couldn 't. The Stealthy Wing could.
Posted by Terrence O'Neill on April 18,2012 | 03:36 PM
The last line of the article was a laugh. How do you "miss" with an atomic bomb?
Posted by Wayne on May 22,2012 | 05:13 AM