Ever since audiences first saw British secret agent number 007, tangling with a claw-handed villain in the 1962 film Dr. No, James Bond has branded the concept of cool. This November, he’s back—in a new Bond film, Quantum of Solace, which, like its predecessors, showcases the kind of fare worthy of Ian Fleming’s suave super-spy: girls, gadgets, sports cars, and, best of all, airplanes.
At some point in every Bond film, the action takes to the sky. The aircraft, ranging from Harriers to Cessnas to hang gliders and flown by friend and foe, are typically cutting-edge for the time. The Bell Aerosystems rocket belt that propelled Bond to safety in Thunderball (1965) had been recently developed under a U.S. Army contract. The little autogyro in You Only Live Twice (1967) was a fresh design of record-setting pilot Ken Wallis. In Moonraker (1979), the now-familiar space shuttle blasted off the big screen two years before the maiden launch of the real thing. But in the upcoming Quantum of Solace, the airplanes have been around a while—a Douglas DC-3A built in 1939 shares the screen with a sleek and sinister black SIAI-Marchetti SF.260TP, a descendant of a 1960s design.
Sure, these aircraft are cool. But are they Bond cool? We ask real-life pilots to weigh in.
Wallis WA-116 “Little Nellie” Autogyro
The autogyro—a rotorcraft using an unpowered overhead rotor acting as a circular wing to create lift—has been around a long time. In 1931, Amelia Earhart set a woman’s world altitude record in one—a Pitcairn PCA-2 that she flew to 18,415 feet. But Harold Pitcairn could not have imagined his design’s mutation into the tiny terror of You Only Live Twice (1967). Bond’s WA-116, nicknamed “Little Nellie,” is armed to the teeth with missiles, machine guns, rocket launchers, and even flame-throwers. Bond needs all these weapons to dispatch four bullet-spitting SPECTRE helicopters in hot pursuit. Score for the day: Bond 4, SPECTRE 0.
Nellie’s creator, Wing Commander Ken Wallis, became a Royal Air Force pilot in World War II. After retiring from the RAF in 1964, he concentrated full time on developing autogyro technology. He’s set many autogyro records, including speed, time to climb, duration, and altitude.
Wallis himself flew his WA-116 in the Bond movie. Now 92 and living in Norfolk, England, Wallis recalls, “I did 85 takeoffs and landings, and flew for 46 hours,” which translated into seven and a half minutes of pure excitement on the screen. “The helicopter pilots had to ask me to slow down, because they could not keep up with Little Nellie in level flight and while climbing.”
Film footage alternates between air-to-air views of Wallis from a distance and close-ups of Sean Connery in the cockpit. The two men were similar in build, “but Connery’s arms were considerably hairier, and that can be seen in the movie if you look closely,” says Wallis. Connery’s scenes were filmed in a studio before a blue screen (to enable fake backgrounds to be used), while Wallis’ were filmed high in the skies over Spain and over Japan’s Sakurajima volcano.


Comments
Anyone remember if there was a gas turbine backpack ever flown - I remember seeing it on the front cover of Popular Mechanics in the 1970s (I think).........I thougt that was way cool.
Posted by Jackjet on July 15,2008 | 01:56PM
The SAM chasing after Bonds Acrostar was nothing more than a flare attatched to a cable towed behing the jet..and it still looks cool.this in the days before 'digital animation'.And the C-130 in the 'Living daylightes' transforms into a C-123 for the duel on the tail ramp scene.and as for a rear passenger trying to strangle the front pilot in an LC-39..well..good luck with that.But the 'suitcase'gyrocopter in YOL2 had to be the coolest of the Bond toys.
Posted by brendan king on July 19,2008 | 09:18PM
What? No mention of the cool and beautiful SeaBee amphibian in The Man With The Golden Gun?
Posted by Jim Bryant on July 24,2008 | 02:10PM
hi anyone know how the second part of the stunt was pulled off? when the plane exits the hanger before the doors close? was it a model?
Posted by steve on August 3,2008 | 07:28AM
the famed 'hanger stunt' was filmed in 'real time-in camera' but also with a full scale mock up(for the interior hanger shot)miniatures and i have heard, with matte painting parts of the hanger.the seperate scenes then 'mixed' in the editing room.the story behind the stunt(and other bond films) can be found in 'for my eyes only' by john glen,the director of several bond films.(isbn#1-57488-369-0)
Posted by brendan k on August 28,2008 | 09:58PM
the hanger stunt was actually an effects shot and not a 'real' stunt.in director john glen's book 'for my eyes only',he tells that the film of the real jet flying through a hanger for a japanese commercial looked 'dull'.so they used both a full scale mockup and a miniature radio controlled jet and even some matte painting to pull off the hanger fly-through.it looks great,but notice how long it takes for the jet to fly through the hanger.
Posted by brendan on September 1,2008 | 02:02PM
We own a Piper Cherokee Pa 28 and its history is that she is one of the Pussy Galore fleet with an American reg at the time, but then used by Hamble for training, I would like to verify this so can anyone tell me the registrations (American)at the time so I can check her logs, thanks .
Posted by Janet Acres on October 29,2008 | 06:17AM
love to see the Marchetti SF 260 in action,...used to fly this aircraft during the mid 1990s as a cadet pilot in Brunei,.. Hey what about those beautiful PPc Powered Parachute seen in one of Bond movies,..
Posted by Raizal M on November 19,2008 | 11:47PM
Though they mention the SF-260 burns a lot of fuel and has issues with temperature because it's powered by a turboprop, later in the article they say, "Some Bond-watchers were surprised by the choice of this older, somewhat exotic piston airplane". I realize that there are versions of this plane that have piston engines, but I would suspect this is a bit confusing to readers who don't know much about the SF-260. Though I am no particular fan of the Aero L-39, and as an ex USAF pilot who has flow much higher performance aircraft I recognize that the L-39 can't even begin to match the performance of a modern fighter, but it's a heck of a lot faster than the Wallis autogyro, SF-260, Piper Cherokee, or even the BD-5 jet. In fact the only aircraft that were used in James Bond movies that would outperform the L-39 were the Vulcan Bomber (only in speed and possibly climb), the Harrier (in every way) and the Jetstar (in top speed at altitude only)
Posted by captbilly on December 3,2008 | 03:55PM
Janet, I found the list of N numbers for the Cherokee fleet listed on an obscure web site. N5781W, N6056W, N7489W, N7641W and N8729W
Posted by Dave on January 25,2009 | 07:53PM