Aircraft That Changed the World
We fearlessly (or foolishly) pick 10.
- By The Editors
- Air & Space magazine, July 2008
(Page 5 of 5)
The Learjet 23 carried a crew of two and up to seven passengers. It had a range of 1,800 miles and cruised at 485 mph.
Larson notes that the jet succeeded in part because “the company sold the airplanes very effectively, offering to ‘recourse,’ or buy back, an airplane if things weren’t working out for the company that bought it. That brought a lot of individual entrepreneurs and people like [celebrity lawyer] F. Lee Bailey on board.”
The first production 23 was delivered in October 1964. Cost: $550,000. Says transportation writer John W. Smith: “A whole new class of aircraft had been created: the personal jet.”
9. Boeing 747
So magnificent a technological achievement was the Boeing 747 airliner that cultural historians have called it the 20th century’s cathedral. Nearly 40 years after its first flight, it remains, along with the photograph of Buzz Aldrin standing on the moon, the most recognizable symbol of U.S. engineering brilliance. When it was introduced, airports the world over reinforced runways and made other infrastructure changes to receive it.
Still, it is not grandeur or technology or even impact on infrastructure that qualifies it for a place on this list. It was, after all, an evolutionary design. Its creators—Boeing president Bill Allen and Pan American Airways legend Juan Trippe—believed it was merely an interim answer to the demand that airlines would eventually meet with a revolutionary supersonic transport. The SST, they predicted, would relegate the 747 to hauling cargo.
But as wise as those two were, they could not see the future. And what qualifies the Boeing 747 as a world changer is that since it entered service in 1970, 96 carriers around the world have used the wide-bodies to fly 3.5 billion people to their destinations. Consider the impact of all of those trips: the business deals made or altered, the information exchanged, the exposures to other cultures, the families and friends reunited.
10. General Atomics MQ-1 Predator
In November 2002, a vehicle traveling in Yemen and believed to be carrying terrorists was destroyed by a Hellfire missile. What makes the kill historic is that it was executed by a flying robot. The first unmanned aerial vehicle to kill human beings, the MQ-1 Predator has changed the rules of warfare.
Built by General Atomics Aeronautical Systems, the Predator has been operational in Bosnia since 1995 and now is flying missions in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Air Force deployed the latest version, the MQ-9 Reaper, to Afghanistan last October.
The Predator, which has an operational ceiling of 50,000 feet, is flown remotely by a “pilot” and two sensor operators housed in a trailer on the ground. The UAV has a nose camera, variable-aperture TV and infrared cameras, and a synthetic aperture radar to see through smoke, clouds, or haze. The RQ (R for “reconnaissance,” Q for “un-manned”) model flies long-endurance, medium-altitude surveillance missions, while the MQ (“multi-role”) version can carry up to four Hellfire II anti-armor missiles, two laser-guided bombs, and a 500-pound, GPS-guided Joint Direct Attack Munition precision bomb.
Today, the United States and other countries are increasing their use of UAVs for civilian missions, such as law enforcement, border control, and ocean surveillance. Even Hollywood has discovered their potential, putting them to work as movie camera platforms. Here’s an aircraft that has changed not just the real world but the world of fantasy as well.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5





Comments (42)
How could anyone compile a list like this, and not include the aircraft that:
revolutionised passenger air travel (made it profitable, long range and safe),
was licensed and copied all over the world
made one of the greatest contributions to the second world war of any piece of equipment,
was the backbone of post WW2 air travel and freight haul, and
was even operational in the Vietnam war?
The DC3/C47 surely should be top of the list
Posted by Jim Trewin on May 11,2008 | 11:03 PM
A previous commenter speaks about the DC3, which I support. They are still used in some parts of the world. I think that the Ford Tri Motor which launched passenger service in the 1920's and the Pan-Am Clippers that established some of the first world-wide service should also have been considered.
Posted by Rick Eckhart on May 14,2008 | 12:54 PM
I applaud the A&S editors for having the guts (or lunacy?) to pick a "Top Ten" out of so many worthy aircraft. The process is as thankless as attempting to single out a favorite child from a large family. Some will bristle and defend while others cheer. The comments posted around this article may prove more interesting than the article itself! I can't wait to read on...
Posted by Karen Escalona on May 17,2008 | 01:25 PM
Regarding the Boeing 747 in the ten aircraft that changed the world, the statement that "96 carriers around the world have used the wide bodies to fly 3.5 million people to their destinations." The figure 3.5 million seems a bit low, perhaps by a factor of several thousand. This is an inaccurate bit of information to find in a publication that specializes in aviation. In more of a nit than a challenge of statistics, the nice little story on restoring the Arrow Sport, Mr. Rhode is noted as having accumulated 35,000 hours with National and Pan American airlines. Technically correct but I would think that to maintain accuracy, the editor would have given each airline its proper corporate name which was National Airlines and Pan American World Airways.
Posted by Walt Coleman on May 19,2008 | 08:26 PM
There are several planes missing from this list, most notably Rutan's plane which rocketed into space.
Posted by Luke Buhrman on May 29,2008 | 01:51 PM
I agree with the previous posters, the DC-3/C-47 should DEFINITELY be included, as I believe it was the MOST influential aircraft ever built.
One could also include the DeHavilland Comet for ushering in the age of jet airliners. Even more than that, the Comet's failure changed the way we design aircraft, with respect to metal fatigue. The Comet experience is reflected in every single aircraft designed since.
Another could be the Piper J-3 Cub, for revolutionizing general aviation. Just like today there are few pilots who have never flown a Cessna 172 or 150, for years there were very few pilots who had never flown a Cub.
Posted by Alex Rudy on May 29,2008 | 06:30 PM
Okay - what astonishes me is that there are no pictures of the airplanes on this story!!
I know, I know, all I have to do is google the airplane name for a picture - but here you've got this cool site - and there are all those ads there all over the place, so don't tell me it's a band-width issue or something.
Posted by David M Bowman on June 7,2008 | 12:54 AM
After I read this story I knew I had to post a comment. When I opened the article on line I found that first two comments had already voiced shock that the DC-3/C47 was omitted. This plane first flew for American Airlines in the mid 1930's and a few are still WORKING today; not just flying as restored antiques, but working. This plane truly led the transition into the modern era of flight.
While any top 10 list will bring questions about items left off, I wondered if omission of the DC-3 and Piper Cub, a plane that was the leader of post WWII private aviation, was an effort to spark a reaction from your readers. All 10 of your planes have made significant contributions to aviation and world history, but I would only rank the Wright brothers invention above the DC-3 and Piper Cub.
Posted by Richard Beltle on June 8,2008 | 09:01 PM
I would have to include the Canadian Avro Arrow as a quantum leap in fighter technology. Unfortunately scuttled by politics. Many of the engineers ended up in California working on advanced US fighters.
Posted by Malcolm Barnes on June 11,2008 | 05:43 PM
Let me be the millionth person to notice the omission of the DC-3/C-47, which may be the single most significant aircraft of all time. I just flew out of Long Beach (LGB) & viewed 2 separate (and beautiful) examples on the tarmac. Other candidates: The 707 & the Vickers Viscount seemed to have had greater impact than the Boeing 747 or 314. The B-47 set the layout for many aircraft to come. The Me 262, while suffering many problems, was possibly the greatest leap forward in operational combat aircraft technology in wartime. The Mirage III/5 series, Douglas A-4 Skyhawk, and the English Electric Canberra (and B-57 version) were simply the world’s best combat aircraft for many years. The B-52 may serve as a front-line combat aircraft longer than any other flying machine, unless the Russians keep flying the Tupolev Tu-95. The C-130 will probably be carrying stuff long after the last B-52 and Tu-95 are grounded.
Posted by Doug Peterson on June 11,2008 | 11:34 PM
Hello,
I dare to say the B-747 is not so significant. Rather choose the B-737, if you look at the future, the B-787 is closer to the 737 or the 767, rather then the Jumbo Jet. Four engines bad, two engines good is the eternal mantra, because airlines operate on maintenance related savings, rather than majesticity.
On the other hand I think it should be the Tu-95, rather then the MiG-15 for the soviet mention. That giant commie bomber with its german designed windmill engines really made the USA scared and led to a huge missile and B-52 build-up. The MiG-15 was a short range fighter, which never threatened the CONUS.
I agree on the Junkers F-13 choice, congrats. Here is Budapest we have one in the museum, the best condition original in the world, never used since 1921 (the occasion of a failed monarchist coup d' etat). The DC-3 was wrongly omitted, that's a shame.
To choose a UAV is silly. We still don't know if that is the future. May very well be just hacker-fodder. I would never trust anything that can be remotely accessed and reprogrammed. It is just a stupid computer with wings, which has no sense of loyalty or patriotism, unlike that redneck from Texas. A computer will serve the chinese or the russians gladly if given the right buffer overflow.
Thanks for your attention, regards: Tamas Feher from Hungary.
Posted by Tamas Feher from Hungary on June 12,2008 | 10:09 AM
Pictures please. Re do the article. Show pictures of all aircraft and put the DC/3 as #2.
If you want make it the "Top 11" or call it:
The Top 10 + 1.
Posted by Bob Katz on June 12,2008 | 12:07 PM
How can you possibly miss:
Commercial aircraft:
Douglas DC-3
Boeing 707
de Havilland DHC-2 Beaver
All three are still flying after more than 50 years in commercial service.
Military aircraft:
Hawker Hurricane
AVRO Lancaster
These two carried the load during early part of WWII. Besides, you can't mistake the sound of the 4 Merlins in the Mynarski Lancaster flying over Toronto.
Posted by David Slater on June 12,2008 | 12:39 PM
Sorry folks! There is a huge mistake in this list. The first airplane was the 14-Bis (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/14_Bis), not this Wright Bros lie.
Posted by Roberto on June 12,2008 | 02:19 PM
I would argue that the Predator isn't really an airplane; it's a remote-controlled two-stage missile.
And I second the inclusion of the Me-262 - twin jet engines and 4x 30mm cannons in 1941! - and the Avro Arrow and it's amazing Iroquois engines - accelerating straight up, fly-by-wire controls and potential to hit Mach 3 - all in 1957! And at the risk of sounding redundant and repetitive, the DC-3 - an example of which I recently had the slightly scary pleasure of taking to Chichen Itza.
I think the biggest mistake in your list, though, was your attempt to limit a technology that has seen such staggering advances in the last 100 years to just 10 examples :-) Still, kudos for trying!
Posted by Dale P on June 29,2008 | 10:17 PM
Historically, the Spitfire Mk I won the battle of Britain. This Victory allowed for D-Day. Which airplane did more to change the world we live in?
Also, the Hindenburg changed the flying machines world, its disaster dooming airships in favor of winged aircraft.
Posted by Dentarthurdent on July 3,2008 | 05:36 AM
Dentarthurdent, If you were to include the Spitfire because of it's work in the Battle of Britain, then it follows that you would also have to include the aircraft that did most of the work that the Spitfire took all the glory for; the Hurricane. Anyway, you would be more interested in space travel wouldn't you? (or do you restrict your hitchiking to Earth now?)
Posted by Jim Trewin on July 7,2008 | 01:22 AM
No SR71 Blackbird? Or U2? hmmmm...
Posted by jim on July 9,2008 | 11:56 AM
It is obviously a thankless task to pick a top ten but even so the DC3/C47 is a glaring ommission. Transporting airborne troops and urgently needed supplies to D-Day troops, flying over the Himalayas to supply troops in the Asian theatre, the Berlin Airlift to save a whole city, and a stalwart of civil airilnes until recently. It might be American but it is a giant in the history of aviation!
And then I might be an insular Brit, but I cannot but say that you have to chose either the Hawker Hurricane, the Supermarine Spitfire or the P-51 Mustang. My choice- the Hurricane; it bore the brunt of the Battle of Britain and if we had been defeated then today's western world would be different.Emotionally the Spitfire becuae it is gorgeous to behold and the Mustang protected day-time bombers. But without the Hurricane thetre would not have been the airfields to take-off from.
But top ten is a real challenge; make it a top 25 to make it easier
Posted by Mike Daly on July 11,2008 | 04:24 PM
You have to include the U2. It may have been the plane that help avert WWIII.
Posted by Dave T on July 16,2008 | 02:35 PM
there have been only two airplanes built, concorde and all of the rest. (concorde captain and piper cub owner)
Posted by manton fain on July 19,2008 | 06:48 PM
In response to Don P and his June 29th posting... the Predator is NOT a missile (curious where you got your information, it isn't correct) and I think deservedly belongs on this list of incredible aircraft due to the overwhelming impact it has had on warfare as we know it and will know for years to come.
The omission of the DC3 from this list is noteworthy as its storied history was remarkable in every way
The 747 has had, and continues to do so, an impact on passenger travel on a global scale, although, there were other aircraft that have lasted longer and I can see the arguement for this aircraft not being on the list.
I'm sure a tremendous amount of thought went in to this list and I sincerely appreciate the efforts of all those involved. (Even if you left the mighty F-14 Tomcat off the list!) :)
Thanks for the hard work in putting this together!!!
Posted by Ken on August 22,2008 | 05:25 PM
When I saw the title of this post, the first plane that came to mind was the DC3. I agree with previous posters that you could not compile this list correctly without it. I also think the U2 belongs on this list.
But the worst sin committed here was not having photos of each and every plane on the list.
Posted by Conibear Trapp on September 24,2008 | 11:11 AM
Must add comments about the C-47 Skytrain (DC-3 military version) to further endorse the universal appreciation of this over-looked but long-lived, durable and fun-to fly workhorse -- still around and still 100% reliable. The "gooney bird" is tough, dependable and can handle rough weather, overloads and short fields. Comparable, and as resilient and even more rugged, was the larger C-46 Curtiss Commando, the "super goon". She's still hauling goods, too. Both rightfully earned reputations as bush pilot and military jock favorites, whether crossing the "hump" (Burma-China theater), carrying troops, cargo and mail in Europe (WW II), handling troop carrier/combat cargo workloads in Korea, or doing vital AC-47 work in SVN. I'm compelled to mention and compare these two "survivors" as I have many fond, although a few rather tense, memories of piloting these venerable flying machines to where we had to go.
Posted by Bob Throckmorton on September 25,2008 | 11:59 PM
Before seeing you chose a Predator -which obviously I dissagree- I was thinking on "Concorde", but in fact, Concorde changed nothing finally. I would say that the "Enola Gay" B29 should not be in the list; B29s had been flying for years before, while later DC3 were for long time cheap workhorses for military and civilian use. Congratulations, you did a good job, though it is impossibel to make happy all your readers, it was a very good try. maybe in the future...
Posted by Alfredo A. Gonzales on October 1,2008 | 09:53 PM
Must add comments about the C-47 Skytrain (DC-3 military version) to further endorse the universal appreciation of this over-looked but long-lived, durable and fun-to fly workhorse -- still around and still 100% reliable. The "gooney bird" is tough, dependable and can handle rough weather, overloads and short fields. Comparable, and as resilient and even more rugged, was the larger C-46 Curtiss Commando, the "super goon". She's still hauling goods, too. Both rightfully earned reputations as bush pilot and military jock favorites, whether crossing the "hump" (Burma-China theater), carrying troops, cargo and mail in Europe (WW II), handling troop carrier/combat cargo workloads in Korea, or doing vital AC-47 work in SVN. I'm compelled to mention and compare these two "survivors" as I have many fond, although a few rather tense, memories of piloting these venerable flying machines to where we had to go.
Posted by Bob Throckmorton on September 25,2008 | 08:59PM
Before seeing you chose a Predator -which obviously I dissagree- I was thinking on "Concorde", but in fact, Concorde changed nothing finally. I would say that the "Enola Gay" B29 should not be in the list; B29s had been flying for years before, while later DC3 were for long time cheap workhorses for military and civilian use. Congratulations, you did a good job, though it is impossibel to make happy all your readers, it was a very good try. maybe in the future...
Posted by kaitlyn on November 6,2008 | 04:05 PM
Where is Santos Dumont in this book?
Posted by Martin Afonso Farias on September 21,2009 | 06:57 AM
Need the F-22 Raptor in there somewhere. EDITORS' REPLY: Interesting. Can you make the case that the Raptor has already been world-changing?
Posted by alec on December 23,2009 | 12:21 PM
To Roberto:
The Wikipedia page you posted states that 14-Bis was the first to fly in Europe, not the first to fly in the world. 14-Bis flew on 23 October 1906. The Wright Flyer took off almost three years earlier, on December 17, 1903.
Posted by Jacob L on January 28,2010 | 04:15 PM
i just need to know the name of the guy/woman who wrote this article? EDITORS' REPLY: The editors of the magazine wrote it, a mix of guys and women.
Posted by Joel on May 19,2010 | 10:51 PM
How has space travel affected the world and its people?
from melissa :) EDITORS' REPLY: Good question, Melissa. There is no short answer. We suggest you go to this site and explore: http://www.nasa.gov/audience/forstudents/index.html
Posted by melissa davies on June 14,2010 | 09:58 AM
My picks:
Fokker D7: specifically mentioned in the surrender treaty of WW1, the welded tubular steel structure was common through to WW2)
DC2/3 (of course!)
DH Mosquito: pioneering composite construction methods/adhesives, reliance on speed and stealth instead of defensive guns (so normal today, that probably few would realize how revolutionary this was)
Lockheed Constellation: in 1944 Flight magazine archive, there is a photo of a very impressive looking Connie that had flown to Britain , in the same issue is an article about recriminations in parliment over the USAs huge advantage in airliner design.
B29: heavy gauge stamped skin, first true production line aircraft, pioneered modern airliner construction methods.
Douglas Skyhawk: Ed Heinman masterpiece of weight reduction, perhaps the most influential military aircraft of the latter 20th century)
Posted by Ian on December 17,2010 | 03:55 AM
I flew (1950's) with the muscles moving the control surfacs. I've been asked when the power-assisted controls were introduced. I remember ww2 bombers with auto-pilot sytems relieving the pilots. please advise.
Posted by paul hill on January 6,2011 | 05:10 PM
I belive a little plane called the Bell X-1 had a little impact.
Posted by Michael Cherkinian on March 19,2011 | 01:44 PM
RE: Need the F-22 Raptor in there somewhere.
EDITORS' REPLY: Interesting. Can you make the case that the Raptor has already been world-changing?
I get what the terse comment was going for and here's my take:
The amazing costs involved with the F-22 have moved the USA (and everyone else) towards UAV's. Without the wake up call from the F-22 budget battles and relatively narrow mission profiles, we'd still be focused on human carrying vehicles. The search for something cheaper and more flexible has led us down the UAV path and now, with armed UAV jet versions on the drawing board, the F-22 may be the last of its kind. When you're so expensive you force a technological change across the world's air forces, including your own, isn't that a world-changing plane?
Posted by Ducksoup on May 6,2011 | 06:45 PM
And the Concorde is where?
Posted by conor madden on May 7,2011 | 02:23 PM
AWESOME for school because we are doing a time line.
Posted by hotgirl123 on August 23,2011 | 04:08 AM
I luv aircraft. I am gonna be an engineer!
Posted by Roslun on September 13,2011 | 08:32 PM
What about the R-7 missile? Although not technically an "aircraft", it certainly had enormous impact on how military aviation developed from 1957 onward.
B-29 is not a groundbreaking concept at all: it is a logical continuation of the already existing concept of strategic bomber.
MiG-15 is not worthy of the list, either. It is not the first Russian jet fighter, it is not head and shoulders above competition, and its engine is a copy of Rolls-Royce Nene.
Posted by Tim on September 15,2011 | 03:30 PM
No less than honorable mention should be given to the aircraft that identified a whole generation. An aircraft that has been in continuous production for over 50 years. The aircraft that made the transition of rotary wing aviation from flying oddity to worldwide usage. THE helicopter of the "helicopter war", the UH-1 "Huey". Millions and millions of people, around the world, many of which can't tell a Cessna, from a Piper, from a Boeing, can look at that aircraft and say "it's a Huey". And a lot of those people don't even have to see it. They know what it is just by hearing it's familiar "wop wop wop". I don't know of any other aircraft that has that distinction.
Posted by John LaDue on January 14,2012 | 09:03 AM
I have a request (inquiry) that I would like to post regarding a U.S. Navy C-47 aircraft, BUNR 17254, that went missing in Chile (South America) on August 4, 1969. This aircraft has NEVER been located and virtually forgotten in terms of any historical record.
At the time I was a young dependent child of a U.S. Air Force service member stationed in Chile and we knew some of the passengers.
U.S. Military investigative documentation on the disappearance of the U.S. Navy C-47 is available at the following webpage for the U.S. Navy Judge Advocate General’s Corps, JAG Manual Investigations:
http://www.jag.navy.mil/library/jagman_investigations.htm
At this webpage you can access the rather lengthy investigative documentation by clicking on “Download” for the following description:
1969 04 AUG MISSING AIRCRAFT BUNO 17254 Download
According to the report, the U.S. Navy aircraft was on a scheduled maintenance flight to Buenos Aires, Argentina and on board were 16 passengers (U.S. Navy/Air Forcs personnel along with several spouses).
Radio contact with the U.S. Navy aircraft was lost after the aircraft was approximately 27 miles south of the capital city of Santiago somewhere between Rancagua, Chile and Angostura, Chile.
The lost radio contact happened at least 15 minutes before the aircraft was even scheduled to reach the southern beacon point at Curico, Chile.
A search was conducted at the time by Chilean military and civilian personnel along with some American military aircraft. It ended on August 14, 1969. This tragedy was overshadowed due in part to the fact that on July 24, 1969 the Apollo 11 Astronauts had just returned from the first successful moon landing.
New technology would be very helpful in locating any wreckage. This incident needs to be brought to the attention of our government, the Chilean government and anyone else that might have expertise in finding and recovering lost and missing aircraft.
Posted by Brad Burris on March 21,2012 | 03:04 PM
the omission of the DC3 renders this list absurd.
Posted by AB Buttacavoli on December 6,2012 | 08:38 AM
Using of 13x6.5 Carbon Fiber Propeller Set is also a great way to increase your engine capacity of a UAV. See
http://www.aerobot.com.au
Posted by Unmanned aerial vehicles on January 4,2013 | 04:21 AM
the first air plane went about 120 feet and lasted 12 sec. in the air
Posted by sam on February 4,2013 | 07:19 PM