I Was There: When the DC-8 Went Supersonic
The day a Douglas DC-8 busted Mach 1.
- By Bill Wasserzieher
- Air & Space magazine, August 2011
It takes a village to reach Mach 1.01. The flight and ground crews for the DC-8 supersonic run included flight test engineer Richard H. Edwards, third from left, and pilot Bill Magruder, in white shirt behind sign.
Courtesy Richard H. Edwards
On August 21, 1961, pilot William Magruder, copilot Paul Patten, flight engineer Joseph Tomich, and flight test engineer Richard H. Edwards took Douglas DC-8-43 no. N9604Z for a test flight at Edwards Air Force Base in California. The aircraft exceeded Mach 1—the only intentional supersonic flight by an airliner other than the Concorde and the Tu-144. Bill Wasserzieher interviewed Richard Edwards in May 2007.
BW: Tell me about the supersonic DC-8 flight.
RHE: That was Bill Magruder’s idea. Very smart—get it out there, show the airplane can survive this and not fall apart. Boeing will never try it [with the 707] because they don’t want to be second. I’m sorry if that affects anybody but that’s just the way it was. We took it up to 10 miles up, 52,000 feet—that’s a record—and put it in a half-a-G pushover. Bill maintained about 50 pounds of push. He didn’t trim it for the dive so that it would want to pull out by itself. In the dive, at about 45,000 feet, it went to Mach 1.01 for maybe 16 seconds, then he recovered. But the recovery was a little scary. When he pulled back, the elevator was ineffective; it didn’t do anything, so he said, “Well, I’ll use the stabilizer,” and the stabilizer wouldn’t run. It stalled, because of the load. What he did, because he was smart, is something that no other pilot would do: He pushed over into the dive more, which relieved the load on the stabilizer. He was able to run the [stabilizer] motor, with the relieved load, and he recovered at about 35,000 feet. That’s an unofficial supersonic record, payload record, and of course an altitude record for a commercial transport. I think it took about 10 years for the SSTs to beat that.
BW: Magruder won the Society for Experimental Test Pilots award, the Iven Kincheloe.
RHE: Yes, he also gave a speech on the Mach 1 dive, and warned pilots that a similar problem might happen to them. He was well known in the industry and very articulate, well educated, with a lot of new ideas. I think Douglas would have liked him to stay, but he made the decision to go to Lockheed.
BW: How much planning went into the flight?
RHE: They had to determine the pushover load factor, the dive angle, to be sure they got to Mach 1.01 at a rather high altitude, so the airspeed wouldn’t be that high up there. [The speed of sound at altitude] is not 700 miles per hour: it’s a lot less. The aerodynamics department, I think under Roger Shaufele, prepared a set of charts. The Mach number itself isn’t used in a dive as a target because it’s much more accurate to use airspeed. So every thousand feet I would read off to Bill the airspeed [he needed] at the next altitude. As we were coming down, I was talking almost all the time because at a descent rate of 500 feet per second, every two seconds we were 1,000 feet lower. Looking out the window—which I stopped doing—it looked like it was straight down.
We took off at Long Beach and flew to Edwards. We only had fuel for a half-hour flight once we got there, because we wanted to be light, to climb. The night before, at Long Beach, somebody had dinged the slots [devices under the wing leading edges that improved low-speed lift], and they didn’t work. We took off with flaps up, which is kind of a no-no because at takeoff thrust, you can’t control the airplane if it loses an engine with flaps up—there’s an interlock on the rudder.
BW: Was it a tug or something that dinged up the slots?
RHE: I’m not sure. It was something that happened in maintenance. The question was: Do we go or not? Bill said, “Well, we can take off with no flaps and the airplane will be all right—if we don’t lose an engine.”
BW: Amazing the number of times people with tugs moving airplanes have managed to do that.
RHE: I did it myself, calibrating the flaps. We’d go down in two-degree increments and hand-mark the dials in the cockpit so the pilot would know where the flaps [settings] are. The crew chief told me to put the flaps down. Nobody saw the crew [work] stand out there, and we dinged [a flap]. Fortunately, the crew chief was a nice guy and took the blame: He said he should have looked.
Comments (8)
Somewhere that DC8 is bent.
Posted by Jose Pinero on August 21,2011 | 11:20 PM
Your August 1, 2011 DC-8 article indicates it is the only airliner to exceed Mach 1 before the Concorde or Tu-144.
Didn't you do an article in the early 1960s indicating that the Convair 880 or 990 exceeded Mach 1?
Regards,
John K. Lewis
Posted by John K. Lewis on August 22,2011 | 07:24 AM
In reference to my previous email about the DC-8 Mach 1 flight I believe that Aviation Week did the article I mentioned.
John K. Lewis
Posted by John K. Lewis on August 22,2011 | 07:38 AM
My dad (standing in front white shirt/tie hands folded)
was the crew chief.
His last job before he retired was foreman for an aircraft parts warehouse (American Jet). it was owned by Allen Paulson who founded a small company, Gulfstream.
Posted by Thomas Irwin III on August 27,2011 | 01:41 PM
There was also a KC-135 out of Grissom AFB that went supersonic, inadvertantly. They split-S instead of a nose-low recovery after an autopilot malfunction. The wing was bent, and replaced with a B-707 wing(versus the -80 wing). Because of the longer wingspan and larger area, it outperformed other tankers on range, climb, takeoff data, etc. It was still flying in the late 1980s, but I don't know about now.
Posted by Dean Marvin on October 17,2012 | 08:36 PM
A really good story. I started at long Beach,CA 1964. It was sad moment for the co. when he took the rap for the DC-10 that nosed in France. You never hear of shock that reverberates throughout the plant. You will never convince me or any who had the slightest contact with that aircraft. It's what uncle SAM wanted! I guess we will never know why. So sorry to such a great name disappeare.
Posted by Anthony Hazard on October 30,2012 | 07:18 PM
Some years ago (10? 20?) I met a retired airline pilot who got pretty talkative. I don't remember his name, or the name of his company. That's probably just as well, because he claimed that the Boeing 727 could be flown above Mach 1.
As I recall, he got evasive when asked if he'd done it himself, but his description of technique was interesting. If I remember rightly, it went something like this: "You go to full power, and pitch down into a shallow dive. As you accelerate, you open the speed brakes [on the top of the wing] just a hair. That keeps the airplane stable as you go supersonic."
I've always wondered how much truth was in his story . . .
Posted by John Amneus on January 9,2013 | 07:46 PM
Curious - the DC-8 became CF-CPG with Canadian/CP Air and was broken up at Opa Locka in 1981. This DC-8 had a plaque attacted to the bulk head commemorating this historic event.
Anyone try to track down this plaque - now that would be kool.
Posted by Robert Reid on April 10,2013 | 07:22 AM