Ode to the Bubble
The Bell 47, famous as the star of “Whirlybirds,” was the DC-3 of helicopters. Could it make a comeback?
- By Mark Huber
- Air & Space magazine, November 2012
The trademark plexiglass sphere enclosing its cockpit gave the Bell 47 its nickname and provides the pilot cruising this beach a glorious view of a Florida sunset.
Frank Steinkohl
(Page 3 of 4)
Although World War II was over by the time the Bubble was certified, the war influenced the 47’s development. The late-1940s bust in the aviation industry left a scarcity of resources to develop new parts, and the war’s end had left airplane makers with big stockpiles of fixed-wing military aircraft parts. (During the war, Bell built the P-39 Airacobra, the P-63 Kingcobra, and the first U.S. jet, the P-59 Airacomet.) According to Scott Churchill, all those leftovers played pivotal roles in the design and manufacture of the 47. “It was developed from World War II surplus parts that came off the shelves or fixed-wing aircraft after the war,” he says. “They were proven parts. The universal joint on the tail boom was the same one used on wing flaps on World War II fighters. The swashplate [a device used to provide pitch control of the main rotor blades] used off-the-shelf bearings; they didn’t design the part for a new bearing. Little things like that kept the cost down. It is sort of like a farm tractor: You can buy a new bearing for it anywhere. That’s how they wanted to build it.”
As the Korean War ramped up in 1950, one thing Larry Bell had a big supply of were 200-horsepower Franklin O335-3 engines for a military version of the 47, designated the H-13. Initially, H-13s were used as scout aircraft, but once in the battlefield, pilots began adapting them to other missions, including medevac. On January 3, 1951, Lieutenants Willie Strawn and Joe Bowler, both in H-13s, flew Army medevac missions with skid-mounted litters improvised by Army Captain Albert Sebourn. But those missions were not the first medevacs of the Korean War. The Marines of VMO-6 beat the Army by less than a week, also flying the Bell H-13 (designated HTL-4).
By the time of the 1953 armistice, according to the National Air and Space Museum’s Roger Connor, almost 40,000 wounded troops had been evacuated by helicopter, more than half in H-13s.
After the war, the services ordered 1,500 model 47 variants as primary and instrument trainers as well as gunships. However, it was the helicopter’s Korean War performance that made it a legend. The dramatization of its work as an aerial ambulance, in both the 1970 movie M*A*S*H and the subsequent television series, made the H-13/47 the world’s most recognized helicopter. Each of the television show’s 251 episodes, which ran from 1972 to 1983, opened with a pair of Bell H-13s carrying wounded soldiers on side-mounted stretchers and landing at the Mobile Army Surgical Hospital. The Bubble’s effect on two generations was the work of one director: Robert Altman, who directed the film version of M*A*S*H, had years earlier directed episodes of “Whirlybirds.”
Although Model 47 variants would fly in the Vietnam War, by then the Army preferred Bell’s new turbine-powered models, the UH-1 Huey and the Hughes OH-6 Cayuse. In the civilian market, Bell introduced the Model 206 JetRanger in 1967. The debut of the 206 marked the beginning of the end of the 47. After Bell ended 47 production in 1974, the company continued to support the helicopter, but spare parts became increasingly expensive. Operators of the piston-powered relic came to believe that it was a nuisance to the company.
“A lot of people were falling out of love with Bell Helicopter,” says Joey Rhodes.
As the animus between Bell and the 47 community grew, a handful of operators decided to take action. In 2000, led by Jack Kelly and Charlie Hollinger, they formed the Bell 47 Helicopter Association. Rhodes says the group’s immediate goal was to “form a new relationship with Bell Helicopter because the old one was in the gutter.” Bell assigned 47 guru Don Maguire to work with them.
Today the director of customer support for Scott’s Bell 47, Maguire explains Bell Helicopter’s predicament at the time the association was formed. “Nobody is in the business to build parts to put them on the shelf,” he says, and since operators often considered Bell the supplier of last resort, there were times when the company sold one part in a year. “If a part is a high-volume sale item, the manufacturer can stock it, and the cost is minimized.” In addition, Bell’s position at the time, says Maguire, is the same as Scott’s Bell 47’s position today: Helicopters that were once in military service and their parts are ineligible for civilian certification and therefore unsupportable. The Bell 47 Helicopter Association, says Joey Rhodes, takes the same stand.
One of the association’s first tasks was to stem the stream of bogus 47 parts coming onto the market. Most of these had been stripped from decommissioned military helicopters and, at the very least, lacked the proper documentation to be used legally on civil 47s. An undocumented part could have been flown longer than its specified life, Rhodes says, and could pose a real danger.
Just as the association was solving that problem, the FAA issued an emergency airworthiness directive that threatened to ground 75 percent of the U.S.-based 47 fleet—possibly for good.
On the morning of August 13, 1998, a Bell 47G-2 cropdusting near Windsor, Ontario, crashed. Canada’s Transportation Safety Board investigating the accident found that one of the main rotor blades had separated in flight because a grip connecting it to the drive shaft and hub had failed. Based on that report, the U.S. FAA mandated on August 31, 2000, an inspection of the 47’s main rotor blade grips every 200 flight hours and their replacement after 1,200 flight hours. Each grip inspection was estimated to cost at least $2,000; a new set of grips, $7,200. This for a helicopter that was then worth less than $80,000, flown by operators who worked at razor-thin profit margins. With the imposition of a 1,200-hour lifetime, three-quarters of the fleet was out of compliance overnight, and Bell had nowhere near enough new grips to sell to the affected owners. The FAA’s rotorcraft directorate was swamped by requests from operators for approved Alternate Means of Compliance; they petitioned to keep flying while they waited for grips. Meanwhile, the Experimental Aircraft Association led an industry coalition that eventually persuaded the FAA to relax the new restrictions, but not until mid-2001. “If it hadn’t been for the EAA, most Bell 47s would have stayed grounded because of a very isolated event in Canada,” says Rhodes.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »





Comments (12)
As a young boy in Kenora Ontario Canada, I remember the 47s taking off from the Lands and Forests Base(Later to become the Ministry of Natural Resources)that was shared with OCA. Loud and low. Most were on floats. I later became a fixed wing pilot but those little bubbles were the machines that made me want to fly. I was 8 or 9 at the time. They also flew Cansos (PBYs) Beavers,Otters and Noresmans out of the same base. There was even a Junkers on floats. Feel pretty privaledged to have witnessed those oldies at work.
Posted by Mark Weare on September 20,2012 | 11:20 AM
In the Photo Gallery picture about the two 47G's exported to London I found two items of interest. The first is that Bell assigned United States "N" registration numbers to export models as opposed to "G" for Great Britain (I'm guessing that this is a legal issue), and secondly to confirm that the picture was definitely early 1960's: note the appearance of the triple tail section of the Lockheed Constellation in the background. Today the Connie would be considered an antique, but the 47's style looks as fresh in 2012 as it did 50+ years ago.
Great story about a great helicopter.
Posted by Jake Kulik on September 22,2012 | 11:01 AM
In the summer of 1967, my job was senior geologist on an Anaconda American Brass Ltd. field party in Ontario, just across the line from Minnesota. We had a leased Bell 47 from Dominion Helicopters for the summer. The pilot wouldn't stay in camp, but rather stayed at a hotel nearby that catered to the fishermen. He'd take off about 4 o'clock and fly over to camp for breakfast with us. I often wondered if a few non-fishermen didn't hate the early morning Lycoming starting up.
Maintenance was by a mechanic who flew a float-equipped Cessna into our lake every once in a while. The joke between him and the Bell 47 pilot was that there were whole number on the metal bits in the oil filter.
The pilot was an ex-RCAF Saber jet pilot.
Interesting summer, going to work daily in the DeHavilland Beaver, the Bell 47, or a motor boat, canoe, pickup truck, or station wagon.
Posted by Richard Lockwood on September 22,2012 | 12:43 PM
How does one get on the list of possible buyers of the 13, should it go into manufacturing. I am currently duel rated and have owned two fixed wing aircraft. I first flew the OH-13 at Ft. Wolters Texas and would love to get reaquainted with this remarkable aircraft. Thanks you, Jim
Posted by Jim Guidone on September 22,2012 | 03:58 PM
I wonder: Is there some mystical quality to the number "47" that results in it being attached to aircraft that are durable and useful beyond any reasonable expectation? CH-47, C-47, Bell 47...
Posted by Don Lee on September 23,2012 | 12:05 PM
Great article, thanks Mark.
I would like to see it back in production- perhaps with a little Williams turbine and carbon construction. It would be interesting to see just how light the airframe could be made.
Posted by GaryChurch on September 23,2012 | 11:00 PM
Having been born in Daytona Beach, Florida, I remember as a kid Bell 47's being flown off the beachside pier by Harry Doan as a tourist attraction. He and two passengers would fly up and down the beachfront.
This enterprise sadly ended on August 24th, 1974, with the crash of a Doan Bell 47 just off the beach, resulting in 3 fatalities. Since that date, no helicopters were flown off the pier.
Note: its really tough, trying to find the NTSB report on this, at least I was able to find a news report in the Daytona Beach News Journal for that date.
Posted by Eric T. Deem on September 24,2012 | 08:55 AM
Must be something special about the 47. Check this photo of the lobby of
MOMA (Museum of Modern Art) in NYC.
Posted by Donald Kalinowski on September 26,2012 | 02:21 AM
At age 16 in September 1967 I enjoyed my first helicopter ride in a Model 47 from a helipad on the U.S. side of Niagara Falls. I still have the 8mm footage (now transferred to DVD) my Dad filmed of my brother and me boarding, lifting off aboard, and disembarking from that 47. Then Dad went up for a ride, filmed Niagara Falls from inside that 47's super-view bubble, and in the bright sunlight captured the rainbow formed in the falls' mist. A splendid memory of a thrilling ride in that splendid aircraft, all recorded in gorgeous 8mm Kodachrome.
Posted by Jordynne Olivia Lobo on September 28,2012 | 02:55 AM
I would like to offer the donation of time in assisting the transfer of the Bell 47's paper/mylar blueprints into CAD. I truly enjoy drafting and have been doing so for 20+ years ranging from inking sketches to the use of high end CAD software. I'm born & raised Kansan & can certainly provide credentials. Any consideration would be an honor. With due respect,
- Andy Coffman
Posted by Nathan A. (Andy) Coffman on September 30,2012 | 03:09 AM
I flew H-13 for instrument flight at Ft. Rucker and H-23's for primary training
at Ft. Walters. Between the two the 13 was great but for toughness the H-23 was like a farm tractor. They were both fun and simple but the H-23 was bounced down the lanes and wobbled through the air by many a terrified 10 hr. WOC with few mechanical issues.
David Lee
Posted by DAVID lEE on November 12,2012 | 09:21 PM