The Pride of Cherry Grove
With little more than Bernard Pietenpol's plans, anybody could build an airplane.
- By Marshall Lumsden
- Air & Space magazine, May 2010
Once upon a time in rural Michigan, where I grew up, people used to stop what they were doing when an airplane flew over and watch it until it was almost out of sight. Many of the flights we saw were made by Sherman Edgar, a farmer who lived in an adjacent township.
Edgar had taught himself to fly by building a tail assembly and a wing, then attaching them to a truss-shaped fuselage to make a glider. One day in the early 1930s, my dad took me to watch Edgar’s friend tow him furiously across a field with a Model A Ford. After all the fuss, Edgar gained enough altitude for only a few moments of flight.
Before long, though, the glider morphed into a wood-and-fabric high-wing monoplane constructed from a set of mail-order plans and powered by a Model A Ford engine. Throughout the 1930s, on quiet summer evenings after the chores were done, we became accustomed to the sight and sound of Sherm puttering overhead. As I stood watching Edgar sail past one night in 1938, our last year on the farm, I couldn’t have imagined that four years hence I would be wearing a U.S. Army Air Forces flightsuit while training to fly some of the nation’s newest fighters.
Several years ago, in a hangar discussion with other pilots, I was reminded of the story of Sherman Edgar’s marvelous homebuilt aircraft. “Oh yeah,” somebody said, “that was a Pete ’n’ Paul.” Of course, he meant “Pietenpol,” as in Bernard H. Pietenpol, who in 1929 designed and built the first of this type. Furthermore, I soon found out that an airplane I had thought was ancient history still existed and even thrived, like a population of rare birds nesting next to dirt and grass strips and the runways of small-town airports.
To many of the people who build and fly them, the Piet, as it is affectionately known, is an almost mystical symbol of two intrinsically American values—self-reliance and freedom—and a time machine back to the early days of aviation.
The Piet’s story began in the hamlet of Cherry Grove, in southeast Minnesota, near Iowa. In 1919, with little more than an eighth grade education and an innate talent for mechanics, Pietenpol opened an auto repair shop in his father’s barn. He soon developed a reputation for being able to fix anything, from farm equipment to motorcycles.
Along the way, he discovered airplanes. He experimented with constructing a series of biplanes by working with materials purchased from lumberyards and hardware stores, including unbleached muslin, which he used to cover the fuselage and control surfaces. Since he couldn’t afford to buy an aircraft engine for his first biplane—a shaky, hardly airworthy contraption—he decided to power the aircraft with an engine from a Model T Ford automobile.
Pietenpol took a few flying lessons in a Curtiss JN-4D, the World War I-era biplane, and even bought one when they were sold off as military surplus. But he never liked it, and soon got rid of it.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (6)
I have a Pietenpol Air Camper (CF-AUN) which I built and have been flying since 1970. The article describes rather well the affection Pietenpol builders and owners have for this little airplane. I consider building and flying mine to be one of the most satisfying things I have ever done. It has only a little over 800 hours on it because our long cold Alberta, Canada winters discourage open cockpit flying for perhaps five months per year. All 800(+) were quality hours, though.
In 1982, my friend (also a Pietenpol builder)and I visited BHP at Cherry Grove on our way home from Oshkosh by car. We never forgot that visit and often talked about it. We found Mr. Pietenpol to be a very gracious man and left feeling we had somehow known him for a very long time.
Posted by Graham Hansen on March 18,2010 | 12:26 AM
I want to thank Marshall Lumsden for his article on the Pietenpol (“The Pride of Cherry Grove”). He does a great job of explaining not only the history of this wonderful home-built aircraft, but more importantly, he aptly captures the “Piet Building Experience”. Shortly after retiring as a fighter pilot several years ago, I started building a Pietenpol and have enjoyed the process as much as I know I will flying “Low and Slow”, vice at the speed of sound. People often ask “how much longer until you are done?” The standard aircraft builder’s answer is: “I’m 90% complete and I have 90% to go”. However, my answer is usually more thoughtful and considerate, offering insights into the whole experience; “I wish it would never end, and here’s why...” Honestly, the most frustrating activity involved in building a Piet (I say this tongue and cheek), is finding words to adequately answer the question most often asked by onlookers, friends and family; simply, “Now, why are you building a P-p-p-Piet-N-what”? Mr. Lumsden has provided us with a marvelous article with which to tackle this problem, and I will certainly point to his article often. Kindred spirits will quickly understand and gather a better appreciation, and may even get the bug. Assuredly, skeptics will still remain as they did in Bernard Pietenpol’s time…”These flying machines are just a fad and will never catch on…”
Thank you Mr. Pietenpol, for your adventurous spirit, and your fine airplane.
Thank you Mr. Lumsden, for your service in WWII, and for your terrific article.
Steve Chase
Owings, MD
chase143@aol.com
Posted by Steve Chase on March 19,2010 | 10:58 AM
A very nice and complete article. I've been working on a Pietenpol since 1968 and am finally building a shop large enough to put all the pieces I have constructed together. It has been frustratingly slow but the Piet lends itself to building around jobs, building houses, family demands etc. and, in my case, a desire to keep costs down since my wife doesn't share my passion for airplanes and so I can't justify using much family funds for materials.
Posted by Mac Zirges on March 19,2010 | 01:04 AM
Yes, as mentioned above, we flew the two pietenpols from San Diego to Broadhead, Wi. then on to Eastern Ky. Tenn.,Ark.,Texas, NM., Az.,and Ca. Slept under the wings in our pup tents. Low and slow, the way to go. Sparky Sparks
Posted by Sparky Sparks on March 21,2010 | 12:13 PM
Thank you for such a well written and researched article. Typically there are technical errors that are easily spotted by the subject patticipants but yours was a welcome exception.
My Air Camper took 8 years and cost $8,000 to build. What a great return on such a modest investment! I have pretty much covered all the midwestern states and have made a lot of friends and enlightened many folks as I have criss-crossed the heartland. As a retired military (U.S. Coast Guard) and airline (Comair) pilot, I couldn't have chosen a better or more relaxing relaxing way to fly into retirement.
Whether I land at an airport or a farm field, I am always welcomed and have a hard time leaving quickly because of the questions from spectators that seem to materialize. The Air Camper is a crowd magnet no matter what other aircraft happens to be on the ramp with it.
We Pietenpol builder/flyers consider ourselves a brotherhood and your words have reflected much of that. Thanks again!
Larry Williams N899LW
Posted by Larry Williams on April 23,2010 | 02:51 PM
I enjoyed the article very much. I always enjoy reading Pietenpol History as in my younger years when we lived in Cherry Grove I wasn't to impressed with what was going on as I thought that if this was happening in little Cherry Grove it must be a commonplace occurance in other areas. When I was 2 years old my Dad (Orrin Hoopman) would set me in his lap and take me for rides in his plane, the Original Sky Scout. Unfortunatley I don't remember these flights. I must have enjoyed it or it would have happened only once. I am married to John Finke and his Uncle was Don Finke, who flew to Wold Chamberlain to prove that Airplanes could fly with car engines.
Bernis Hoopman Finke
Posted by Bernis Hoopman Finke on October 3,2011 | 02:58 PM