The Pride of Cherry Grove
With little more than Bernard Pietenpol's plans, anybody could build an airplane.
- By Marshall Lumsden
- Air & Space magazine, May 2010
(Page 3 of 6)
More than 300 Pietenpols are registered with the Federal Aviation Administration. Perhaps dozens more Pietenpols are under construction. They have been built in Canada, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Brazil, and small but enthusiastic groups can be found in Australia and New Zealand. Recently a Piet was spotted in Russia.
There’s no mistaking a Pietenpol Air Camper: the high parasol wing, boxy fuselage, and angular tail structures. Yet of the hundreds in existence, no two are exactly alike. Pietenpol kept making changes to the Air Camper, and he openly encouraged others to do the same. Says Don: “My dad used to say that he built the best airplane he could, and if somebody can build a better one, go ahead and do it.” (Pietenpol liked improvements, but he wasn’t much for frills. Somebody once said that if the Shakers had built airplanes, they would have looked like Pietenpols.)
The original plans, whether deliberately or not, seem to demand experimenting. “There are a number of places where the plans do not have certain dimensions, and there are other places where the dimensions are actually wrong,” says Doc Mosher, a retired corporate pilot and editor of a newsletter about the Pietenpol. “And we all find this out after a while, and then we all laugh and have a beer and say, ‘Well, that’s why it’s called experimental.’ ”
Some changes, however, have gone too far, fueling the argument over what is and what isn’t a true Pietenpol. “If it wasn’t built from the original plans, it’s not a Pietenpol,” says Don.
Not considered real Air Campers: at least one biplane model, an ultralight, and a low-wing version. One major modification occurred in the late 1950s, when Ohioan John Grega decided to modernize the design by incorporating parts from the Piper J-3 Cub, including the landing gear and tail wheel. Grega powered his tweaked airplane with a Continental A65 engine. Called the GN-1 Air Camper, it has been much copied over the years (with further modifications), although some are still reluctant to welcome it into the Pietenpol flock. Don Pietenpol is adamant when he says that Grega’s design “is in no way” a Pietenpol. Nevertheless, some pilots say it flies like one, and to the unschooled eye, it looks like one.
“It’s fun building Pietenpols,” says Ed Sampson, a retired hardware dealer in Belview, Minnesota. “It isn’t hard.” He should know: He’s built eight Air Campers, one of which he still owns, although his health now prevents him from flying it. “Bernard told me once he’d like to build one more airplane, and all it would have in it was basic controls and an on/off switch,” says Sampson. “He told me if you don’t put it on there, it doesn’t give you trouble. That was his philosophy.”
To keep weight at a desirable 600 to 800 pounds, many builders today still forgo items such as self starters (with their heavy batteries), radios, and wheel brakes. Those who couldn’t resist adding weight had to look for an engine with more power than the Ford Model A. As a result, the Air Camper has been flown with more kinds of engines—at least 30, and maybe as many as 60—than probably any other airframe in history.
Michael Cuy, an engineering technician at NASA’s Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio, had just bought a half-interest in an Aeronca Champ when a friend gave him a ride in a Pietenpol. “I had never heard of a Piet before,” he says. “It took me by surprise. I realized how much fun and how economical it was. We didn’t have a starter, generator, electric—nothing. Just an engine and a sectional chart. I thought, Wow, I can fly wherever and whenever I want at a real reasonable price.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (6)
I have a Pietenpol Air Camper (CF-AUN) which I built and have been flying since 1970. The article describes rather well the affection Pietenpol builders and owners have for this little airplane. I consider building and flying mine to be one of the most satisfying things I have ever done. It has only a little over 800 hours on it because our long cold Alberta, Canada winters discourage open cockpit flying for perhaps five months per year. All 800(+) were quality hours, though.
In 1982, my friend (also a Pietenpol builder)and I visited BHP at Cherry Grove on our way home from Oshkosh by car. We never forgot that visit and often talked about it. We found Mr. Pietenpol to be a very gracious man and left feeling we had somehow known him for a very long time.
Posted by Graham Hansen on March 18,2010 | 12:26 AM
I want to thank Marshall Lumsden for his article on the Pietenpol (“The Pride of Cherry Grove”). He does a great job of explaining not only the history of this wonderful home-built aircraft, but more importantly, he aptly captures the “Piet Building Experience”. Shortly after retiring as a fighter pilot several years ago, I started building a Pietenpol and have enjoyed the process as much as I know I will flying “Low and Slow”, vice at the speed of sound. People often ask “how much longer until you are done?” The standard aircraft builder’s answer is: “I’m 90% complete and I have 90% to go”. However, my answer is usually more thoughtful and considerate, offering insights into the whole experience; “I wish it would never end, and here’s why...” Honestly, the most frustrating activity involved in building a Piet (I say this tongue and cheek), is finding words to adequately answer the question most often asked by onlookers, friends and family; simply, “Now, why are you building a P-p-p-Piet-N-what”? Mr. Lumsden has provided us with a marvelous article with which to tackle this problem, and I will certainly point to his article often. Kindred spirits will quickly understand and gather a better appreciation, and may even get the bug. Assuredly, skeptics will still remain as they did in Bernard Pietenpol’s time…”These flying machines are just a fad and will never catch on…”
Thank you Mr. Pietenpol, for your adventurous spirit, and your fine airplane.
Thank you Mr. Lumsden, for your service in WWII, and for your terrific article.
Steve Chase
Owings, MD
chase143@aol.com
Posted by Steve Chase on March 19,2010 | 10:58 AM
A very nice and complete article. I've been working on a Pietenpol since 1968 and am finally building a shop large enough to put all the pieces I have constructed together. It has been frustratingly slow but the Piet lends itself to building around jobs, building houses, family demands etc. and, in my case, a desire to keep costs down since my wife doesn't share my passion for airplanes and so I can't justify using much family funds for materials.
Posted by Mac Zirges on March 19,2010 | 01:04 AM
Yes, as mentioned above, we flew the two pietenpols from San Diego to Broadhead, Wi. then on to Eastern Ky. Tenn.,Ark.,Texas, NM., Az.,and Ca. Slept under the wings in our pup tents. Low and slow, the way to go. Sparky Sparks
Posted by Sparky Sparks on March 21,2010 | 12:13 PM
Thank you for such a well written and researched article. Typically there are technical errors that are easily spotted by the subject patticipants but yours was a welcome exception.
My Air Camper took 8 years and cost $8,000 to build. What a great return on such a modest investment! I have pretty much covered all the midwestern states and have made a lot of friends and enlightened many folks as I have criss-crossed the heartland. As a retired military (U.S. Coast Guard) and airline (Comair) pilot, I couldn't have chosen a better or more relaxing relaxing way to fly into retirement.
Whether I land at an airport or a farm field, I am always welcomed and have a hard time leaving quickly because of the questions from spectators that seem to materialize. The Air Camper is a crowd magnet no matter what other aircraft happens to be on the ramp with it.
We Pietenpol builder/flyers consider ourselves a brotherhood and your words have reflected much of that. Thanks again!
Larry Williams N899LW
Posted by Larry Williams on April 23,2010 | 02:51 PM
I enjoyed the article very much. I always enjoy reading Pietenpol History as in my younger years when we lived in Cherry Grove I wasn't to impressed with what was going on as I thought that if this was happening in little Cherry Grove it must be a commonplace occurance in other areas. When I was 2 years old my Dad (Orrin Hoopman) would set me in his lap and take me for rides in his plane, the Original Sky Scout. Unfortunatley I don't remember these flights. I must have enjoyed it or it would have happened only once. I am married to John Finke and his Uncle was Don Finke, who flew to Wold Chamberlain to prove that Airplanes could fly with car engines.
Bernis Hoopman Finke
Posted by Bernis Hoopman Finke on October 3,2011 | 02:58 PM