(Page 3 of 5)
The tour set the industry abuzz. TCA warmed a little, sending their operations manager and their chief test pilot for flights. Dixon Speas, assistant to the president of American Airlines, defected to Avro to head up a new marketing office in New York. He began calling on Capital, United, National, American, Eastern, and TWA airlines, as well as the U.S. Navy. National discussed a contract to purchase four Jetliners with an option for six more. The second Jetliner would incorporate the airline’s requirements: longer fuselage for 60 passengers, increased range, double-slotted flaps, and a provision for whatever engine a customer wanted.
Meanwhile, the Air Transport Board released a study of the TCA route. The board said that running the Jetliner on the popular Toronto-Montreal-New York route, despite each leg being well short of the Jetliner’s design range, would be 20 percent cheaper than using North Stars. Not only that, the Jetliner could do the routes in two-thirds the time with three airplanes—one fewer than the number of North Stars required. And, the board wrote, as the lengths of the legs along a route grew, costs would improve, producing even greater net revenues.
So by mid-July 1950, less than a year after its first flight, the prospects for the Jetliner looked bright. But 1950 was another war year: Korea. The United States and Canada were gearing up in case it escalated into a wider conflict. Avro was committing more workers and nearly all of its space to CF-100 production. Avro’s commitment soon grew to 720 CF-100s—25 a month—and the second Jetliner was squeezed into a hangar corner.
Floyd pressed on. Through early 1951 several demonstrations were run carrying airline executives as far south as Miami and as far west as Los Angeles, confounding air traffic controllers along the way as they reported unheard-of airliner speeds and altitudes. Even the U.S. Air Force got into the picture, inviting the Avro team to come to Wright Field in Dayton, Ohio. With its high speed and cruise altitude, the Jetliner was the closest thing out there to the new bombers, so the Air Force thought the airplane would make the ideal crew training platform.
But the priority both nations put on building warplanes was leading to the Jetliner’s demise.
One hundred years agO, Clarence Decatur Howe left the land his ancestors settled in the 1630s near Waltham, Massachusetts, and crossed the Canadian border to take his first job: professor of civil engineering at Halifax’s Dalhousie University. By 1935, he was a member of Parliament, and soon after rose to become Canada’s wartime Minister of Munitions and Supply. A go-getter, he was dubbed in 1947 “our new dictator” by an opposition member when Howe got a new cabinet post as the country’s first Minister of Transport. From there, he would drive the final nails in the Jetliner’s coffin.
Although Howe oversaw TCA, he never warmed to the Jetliner. With the overwhelming CF-100 commitment, he ordered Avro to withdraw the airliner from consideration by National, end promotions to other U.S. airlines, and stop work on a second aircraft. Floyd continued courting U.S. Air Force interest, and had the jet flown to the Wright Air Development Center for a thorough trial by Air Force engineers, pilots, bombardiers, and maintenance crews. A month later, they submitted a report card: eminently suitable as a multi-jet-engine trainer for pilots and bombardiers, with a bonus idea—air refueling tanker. Speas heard from the sales manager for the Allison division of General Motors, who said the Air Force told him it had put aside $20 million to buy 20 Jetliners; according to Floyd’s book, the U.S. Navy was also interested.
But back home at Malton, all was not so rosy. The second CF-100 prototype had crashed, and production of the fighter and its engines was way behind schedule. Avro management continued to shift workers from the jetliner to the fighter program, and transferred Floyd’s chief aerodynamicist to a new, secret, all-weather, supersonic interceptor project to replace the CF-100; the interceptor would evolve into the Arrow. Floyd’s team didn’t even have the manpower to engineer the installation of the Allison J33 engines the Air Force wanted. Worse, Floyd himself was asked to leave the Jetliner project to troubleshoot the fighter production line—“not the happiest period of my career,” he wrote. Twisting the knife was a visit to the plant by Howe, who told Floyd, “I suggest you forget that airplane and put your energy into getting the CF-100s out.” Soon afterward, a senior civil servant named Crawford Gordon, who had worked under Howe, was made Avro’s president.


Comments
Thank you for this well written article.
Posted by Lorenzo on January 22,2009 | 03:29PM
Interesting to read about Avro's early leadership in jets both in airliners and military aircraft. I was calling on them in 1957 to meet their flight testing requirements in instrumentation(multichannel tape recorders). Deifenbaker was prime minister at the time and had promised the farmers of Canada a subsidy for certain crops so he became an "Instant Ace" by shooting down the CF-105 program and destroying all five planes! This despite the outstanding performance of their new aircraft. He settled for the Lockheed F-104 more commonly known as "The Widow Maker", an interceptor that demanded skillful pilots for landings.
Posted by Cliff Barber on January 24,2009 | 07:10AM
An article on just how many great and potentially great aircraft never made it past government ineptitude would probably be a fascinating read. Include aircraft that were built, but never progressed,(TSR2, etc) as well as aircraft that were forced to be redesigned for roles they were never intended for (ME262, etc)and, I suppose the list would be huge. Of course, you could then go on to the repercussions of those decisions, which in some cases were huge. It would probably take up a full edition.
Posted by Jim Trewin on January 24,2009 | 04:40PM
Excelletnt article on a truly great Candian Aircraft that had so much potential. It is really to bad that politicians end up destroying the future because it does not fit with their agenda. The Avro Arrow was a follow up to the Jetliner that had it's potential cut short bu short-sighted politicians. It makes one wonder where aviation in Canada and the world would really be if these two aircraft had been allowed to grow to maturity.
Posted by Bob Geoghegan on February 2,2009 | 04:35PM
This brings back old memories. I was an observer on one of the first Jetliner demonstration flights for U.S. airlines. Dixon Speas, an old friends from my MIT days, invited my boss, Andre Priester, VP&Chief Engineer of Pan Am to participate on an early flight. Priester sent me. This was in November 1950. We were then talking with Lockheed, Douglas, and Boeing about a jet transport capable of flying our tranoceanic routes across the Atlantic and the Pacific. The Jetliner did not have this capability, but we wanted to be educated. I flew up to Toronto on a Trans Canada DC-4M (equipped with Rolls-Royce Merlin engines -- very noisy) one Saturday, met Dixon and visited the AVRO plant. Next morning we flew to Chicago. It was a very smooth quiet flight of about an hour. When the airplane returned to Toronto I flew back to New York on a UAL DC-6, slower and lower. Unfortunately my notes on that flight are long gone. We continued our search for a transoceanic jet. In 1952, when no U.S. (or Canadian) manufacturer was ready to commit for one, Juan Trippe sent Frank Gledhill to England to sign a letter of intent for an advanced version of the Comet, the Comet III. In December 1952 I was on a Pan Am team sent to de Havilland to work on the specification. That airplane was cancelled by de Havilland after a series of Comet I and II crashes. By then the Boeing prototype Dash 80 was flying and in October 1955 we reached agreement with Boeing to become launch customer for the Boeing 707. Then just over fifty years ago on October 26, 1958 Pan Am Flight 114 from New York to Paris inaugurated U.S. jet service to Europe. That was long ago, but I still remember that 1950 flight in the AVRO Jetliner. Robert Wallace Blake, Pan Am retired
Posted by Robert Wallace Blake on February 16,2009 | 01:47PM
The genius of Canadian Design has always been subject to the Uk or the USA. Avro and its designers and pilots have always suffered at the hands of the industrial magnets of there friends. Let us hope Nafta, will allow Canadian ingenuity,to triumph.
Posted by Richard Shenton on February 19,2009 | 03:59PM