50 Years of Hercules
As utilitarian as a bucket and just as plain, Lockheed's C-130 has flown almost everything to almost everywhere.
- By Carl Posey
- Air & Space magazine, September 2004
Resplendent in U.S. Navy Blue Angels livery, a Marine Corps C-130T fires its jet-assisted takeoff bottles, which add 8,000 pounds of thrust for a super-short takeoff.
Saul McSween/U.S. Navy
ON AUGUST 23, 1954, LOCKHEED TEST PILOTS Stan Beltz and Roy Wimmer powered up the latest of their company’s improbable designs, and after an 855-foot ground roll, pulled it up into the southern California sky on its first flight, bound for Edwards Air Force Base. Designated the YC-130A, the new airplane was the second of two prototypes built at Lockheed’s Burbank plant. The aircraft looked nothing like its contemporaries. Its wings lay like a plank balanced on beefy shoulders. Power came not from great reciprocating radials but four General Motors Allison turboprops. Its aft fuselage sharpened to form a wedge capped by an enormous vertical fin. Its narrow landing gear dropped out of pods on the fuselage. Its flight deck lay beneath a multi-pane greenhouse and above a beak-like nose. It had an earnest, surprised, round face that only, as some have opined, a mother could love.
Indeed, by Lockheed standards, the newcomer was exceedingly plain; one might have asked how a company that produced such glamorous aircraft as the Lightning, Constellation, Shooting Star, and U-2 could have brought forth the Hercules. But this ugly duckling would grow into something much greater than a swan. In time, the plangent roar of its engines would signal that help, in the form of food, fuel, medicine, materiel, or firepower, was at hand.
It began with a Request for Proposal for Medium Cargo Airplane, a modest document issued by the U.S. Air Force on February 2, 1951, during the first year of the Korean War. U.S. military transports then consisted of Fairchild’s C-119B Flying Boxcar and the C-123 Provider, both powered by twin piston engines, and such World War II leftovers as the C-47 and C-54. Long-distance hauling was left to the four-engine C-124A Globemaster II, a huge double-decker fuselage astride a familiar Douglas wing. The Air Force asked for an airplane that would carry a 25,000-pound payload over a 1,150-mile radius of action, and 20,000 pounds for 2,530 miles.
A probably apocryphal account has engineers at Ohio’s Wright-Patterson Air Force Base measuring the interior of a railroad box car to size this imaginary airplane. “When we got the request,” says Willis Hawkins, then with Lockheed’s advanced design department, “Hibbard [Hall J. Hibbard, Lockheed’s chief engineer] asked us to look it over.” At the time Lockheed’s only four-engine design was the Constellation. For the C-130, Hawkins says, “there was no preceding model. A clean piece of paper.”
Hawkins and his team sized the new airplane around high-use equipment. The height (nine feet) and width (10 feet) of the cargo compartment accommodated the Army’s M5A-3 High-Speed Tractor with its top gun stowed. Length was based on what a 1.5-ton truck and semi-trailer would need: 41 feet. “We saw to it that the structure had no obstructions to loads coming in the back door,” Hawkins says. “It was designed to be used in a tactical situation where there weren’t any nice, clean places to take care of it.
“We picked a turboprop engine, which was pretty new for those days,” he says. “We thought the powerplant would have a lot of stretch in it. Propellers were high to keep the powerplant out of the dust and dirt. Narrow undercarriage so you could operate from roads. Getting paratroopers out, dumping loads, dictated where to put the doors.” There was never any thought of a forward ramp of the kind on the C-124. “A nose door got you all involved with the cockpit,” Hawkins explains.
With design in hand, Hawkins and his team went to Hibbard to have their proposal approved. “We had a small model, 15 inches. ‘Has Kelly seen this?’ Hibbard wanted to know,” referring to Clarence J. “Kelly” Johnson of Skunk Works fame, then Hibbard’s assistant. “ ‘Kelly better see it before we send it in.’ Nobody’d seen Kelly in weeks, but he came in. He looked at the model, then he looked at Hibbard. ‘Hibbard,’ he said, ‘if you send this proposal in, you’ll destroy the Lockheed Company.’ Kelly didn’t like it because it didn’t go Mach 3 or shoot or drop bombs,” Hawkins says. “But we finally convinced Hibbard: The thing is due, we have to get it mailed today. So we did. And lo and behold, we won.”
On July 2, 1951, Lockheed was awarded a contract for two prototypes. Just over a year later, the Air Force asked for seven production airplanes—this nearly two years before Beltz and Wimmer made their first flight in the prototype. The company moved C-130 production from Burbank, where space was limited, to Marietta, Georgia. The town’s confluence of railroads, which had attracted William T. Sherman as a potential supply line during his Civil War march to the sea, led World War II planners in 1942 to construct a sprawling aircraft factory. At its peak, the plant employed 28,000 people. Under license from Boeing, Bell Aircraft built 668 B-29s—what locals still call the Bell Bomber—between November 1943 and V-J day. Within a month of victory in the Pacific, however, the plant was closed, and the workers returned to the rural Georgia economy.





Comments (11)
As a former Crew Chief at Poe AFB, (circa 1972) I am always impressed by the C-130 of any model of its versatility. Thanks for a great aircraft.
Posted by Steven C. Davenport on April 27,2008 | 08:55 PM
As an Aircraft Loadmaster For 17 years, Being assigned to the C-130 A,B,E,and H models. Had some great unusal payloads.
Posted by Bruce "Bud" Miller on May 14,2008 | 06:10 PM
I spent almost 21 years on C-130 frames, both as a mechanic and as a crew member with over 2,500 flying hours. My frames were: C-130A/B/E/H, AC-130H, MC-130E. They kept me safe in Viet Nam, Granada, Panama, Equador, ElSalvador and from one coast to the other. I lost an engine or two, took a few rounds but dodged many more, sat in an armored chair, layed on an armored couch, hung off the ramp and looked thru a blister. Now I drive every where I go because I don't know the crews or trust the aircraft the civilians fly. Hurks are the strongest, toughest, most versitile aircraft I believe has ever been built and I have no idea how they could ever be replaced. My time in and on these airframes was the best time of my life. I have had a few loves in my life but the 130 is right up there with my family. I hope in 50 years they are still trying to think up a replacement. (But never do)
Posted by Skip Allen, SMSgt Retired on May 14,2008 | 12:27 AM
Flew the C-130B, C-130E, MC-130E, went to Education With Industry at Lockheed Marietta, was in the System Manager Office at Warner Robins ALC in the 70s and was System Manager in the early 80s. Assignments in the 130 were at Langley twice, Mactan Island PI once, Ramstein Germany once, Pope AFB (was rated supplement maintenance officer then), and Kadena AB Okinawa. Still fond of the C-130. It was a pilots cargo aircraft and as we know had a multitude of USAF uses and Majcoms and was sold to countries all over the world. It participated in many historical events world wide in combat and humanitarian roles. Nice articel. Regards.
Posted by Darrell W. Grapes on May 15,2008 | 08:43 AM
I'm trying to find information about a relation of mine - Roy Wimmer who was a test pilot with Lockheed Burbank in the 1950s and 1960s.
Posted by Ray Thomas on December 14,2008 | 12:08 PM
I flew the C-130 for a lot of years that covered France, Germany, South America. South Korea, and three tours in Viet Nam and I know they will never find another work horse to fill the shoes of the C-130. It is the most forgiving aircraft I have ever known.
Posted by James F. Spence, M/Sgt Ret. on January 31,2009 | 10:02 PM
Commanded the USN Antarctic Development Squadron (VXE-6)in the mid 70's. We operated LC130-F and LC-130R models out of McMurdo Station. My previous squadron flew P3A Orions, but I quickly fell in love with the ski-equipped Hercules. We moved scientists, food, fuel, construction materials, and mail in all sorts of weather and wind extremes. She's a proud bird and I was saddened when USN gave up the mission to Air Force National Guard. Rickety-rack-to-the-Pole-and-back!!!! Fly on Hercules.
Posted by Fred Holt on February 4,2011 | 01:23 PM
Flying the C-130E was a real adventure that probably could not have been done by any other aircraft. It was reliable, capable, and easy to land wherever it was required. The short field capability of the bird made it useful where others might have failed. I've dropped para-troopers at night from over 20,000 feet in training, carried loads at night into a 3,000 ft long strip on a Marine base in Viet Nam, never worrying about stopping. That reverse thrust would easily stop the plane and back it around for take-off. The Marines were very good at unloading the bird and getting us out of there. I became an Instructor Pilot in that very capable air plane and enjoyed every minute of it,thanks to its reliability and the crew that I had. I was the Commander of a C-130E squadron.
Posted by Ralph A. Yates, Col USAF Retired on September 8,2011 | 06:37 PM
During Project Senior Bowl, Herk crews also caught an 800-pound data pack dropped by the Mach 3 D-21 ramjet-powered reconnaissance drone, initially launched by a modified A-12 (predecessor of the SR-71), and later by B-52 motherships.
Are there any other instances you know of where fixed-wing aircraft were used for drone recovery? As far as I know it was mostly helicopters.
Posted by Gray Stanback on June 4,2012 | 10:18 PM
I started out on C-130Es at Pope, went to A-models at Naha then after a year hiatus in C-141s, went to Bs at Clark. I've dropped cargo, troops, flares, leaflets and bombs and was in a Split-S in one up in Route Pack Two. Not to mention writing a number of articles and a couple of books about them. The old Herkybird tops the pyramid when it comes to transport airplanes. It can do everything all of the others can and some things they can't. It was in the Congo in 1964 that it really caught the world's attention. Khe Sanh was just one of many operations in Vietnam (and C-123s were involved there as Herks.) Most people don't know the J-model was first proposed in 1966. Lockheed has been turning them out since 1954 and will for a long time yet to come.
Posted by Sam McGowan on July 6,2012 | 09:22 PM
I started out on C-130Es at Pope, went to A-models at Naha then after a year hiatus in C-141s, went to Bs at Clark. I've dropped cargo, troops, flares, leaflets and bombs and was in a Split-S in one up in Route Pack Two. Not to mention writing a number of articles and a couple of books about them. The old Herkybird tops the pyramid when it comes to transport airplanes. It can do everything all of the others can and some things they can't. It was in the Congo in 1964 that it really caught the world's attention. Khe Sanh was just one of many operations in Vietnam (and C-123s were involved there as Herks.) Most people don't know the J-model was first proposed in 1966. Lockheed has been turning them out since 1954 and will for a long time yet to come.
Posted by Sam McGowan on July 6,2012 | 09:22 PM