Buried at the Bottom of the World
When people die serving their country, to what lengths must a government go to recover the bodies?
- By Carl Hoffman
- Air & Space magazine, July 2007
James Robbins (front row, right) poses with some of his shipmates. Behind him are Lopez (to the left) and Hendersin (to the right).
Courtesy Lopez Family
(Page 6 of 6)
“We just decided it was a physical impossibility,” explains Commander Mike Maus, deputy chief of public affairs at Atlantic Fleet. “There’s a greater risk going after it than [there is] getting it. If it’s reasonable to do, we’ll do it. But if it’s not feasible, you’re better off just leaving it where it is.” The Navy estimated the operation would cost $32 million. Ken Terry calls the estimate “ridiculous.”
And so, 60 years after Max Lopez, Wendell Hendersin, and Fred Williams died in service to the United States, it seems to come down to this: How much is a body worth? Must the Navy try to satisfy every family’s deep cultural and emotional need to bid farewell to the remains of a loved one? Or can the service with a long tradition of burial at sea decide that recovery is just too costly? Lieutenant Colonel Rumi Nielson-Green, a spokeswoman at JPAC, says, “We have 80,000 still MIA from World War II and we have a budget. Do you spend all your money on one site and forgo hundreds of others?”
Fabik and Robbins, now 80, feel betrayed by Admiral Hoewing and the Navy they served for so many years. “He told me he was going to do it and then he retired,” Robbins says. And the relatives of the dead men aren’t giving up. Betty Jean Spencer, Hendersin’s 80-year-old sister, recalls that during the 2004 presidential campaign, what were thought to be the remains of Democratic candidate Howard Dean’s younger brother were recovered from Laos; why not her brother? Says Kate Beebe, Fred Williams’ niece: “Somebody should try to get them. We go everywhere in the world looking for oil, but we can’t retrieve those bodies? I think this should be one of the Navy’s priorities, to bring back the remains.”
Beebe, Spencer, Fabik, and Robbins are writing letters to the White House, their senators, the Navy. “I’m not going to stop until those men are home,” says Fabik.
All of this is unsettling to Ken Terry, of the Navy’s casualty office. “We know where the wreckage is,” he says. “Recovering those men would be feasible. It’s expensive, but it’s the right thing to do. When that plane crashed, it was 10 miles from the coast. Now it’s three, so the wreckage and the remains are slowly sliding to the coast and soon will fall off. I leave you with that.”
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6





Comments (3)
This is such a sad story. I can understand how the families feel, I would be sick if my loved one was buried in that ice for all these years. I would like to see them brought home, but I worry that others may die in the process and I know the families would not like that to happen. There is no easy answer. But maybe those brave men that died that day are resting peacefully where they lie and don't want to be disturbed. My thoughts are with those men and their families.
Posted by Mary Beerman on April 2,2010 | 09:39 PM
Only one other comment. It's an interesting story, but what I find the saddest is that no one knows about it. There are countless stories similiar to this one, and it does come down to the questions, how much is a body worth? For the people who are affected, they obviously want relief and an end to their grieving. But does that justify spending a lot of money and effort?
Reading this story, I was wondering if it would have been possible to somehow combine a recovery operation with a scientific mission; therefore, decreasing the costs and providing another reason to go there. I'm sure there must be plenty of scientific expeditions that travel to the Antarctic for various reasons (core samples etc). The icebreaker, while anchored near the recovery site, could also allow scientists to go ashore and collect samples. I think something along these lines could have been worked out.
Anyway, its a sad story and unfortunate that no one knows about these types of stories. They don't mean a lot to the majority of us, but to those affected, they really affect their lives.
Posted by Andrew on January 7,2012 | 03:00 AM
Andrew is right. Nobody does know about George 1. The fact that nobody knows about this is the key. If more of the American public knew that there were unrecovered bodies in Antarctica, I'm sure it would be a media sensation, perhaps even a topic in presidential candidate debates. It might embarrass the Navy. If even a letter outlining the situation was simply mailed to President Obama it could be a step in the right direction. Another option might be to get a major network, like the History Channel, to run a special on it. That will inform the public. Until then, I don't see anyway the Navy could be pressured into at least trying to recover the bodies.
Knowledge is power, Power to one day bring these boys home.
Posted by Daniel on February 28,2012 | 03:17 PM