Mach Match
Did an XP-86 beat Yeager to the punch?
- By Al Blackburn
- Air & Space magazine, January 1999
The North American XP-86 Sabre, in flight over the Mojave Desert. Was it the first to break the so-called sound barrier?
USAF. NASM photo no. A-38492-C
Editors’ note: October 14, 1947, was a day of undercover celebration at the Muroc Army Air Field in California’s Mojave Desert. Captain Chuck Yeager had broken the so-called sound barrier in the experimental Bell XS-1, and the news was immediately locked away in the vaults of the newly independent U.S. Air Force and the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics. Although the X-1 program was classified and there were no independent observers, Yeager was able to claim an official record because all airspeed, Mach number, pressure, and temperature data from test flights were tracked, recorded, and documented. Such documentation, like that produced by the Wright brothers, who painstakingly recorded all details of their flights, ensures an unassailable place in history.
But there was another high-speed experimental aircraft flying over the desert that autumn. And although claims that the North American XP-86 achieved Mach 1 are merely anecdotal, Al Blackburn, a former North American test pilot, interviewed eyewitnesses, researched historical accounts, and reconstructed the events of those memorable months in the 1998 book Aces Wild: The Race for Mach 1, from which this excerpt has been adapted.
Going supersonic for the first time is clearly a historic aeronautical event, just as the Wright brothers’ first flights are. But I can never remember which brother did it first. They did it on the same day, and whether it was Wilbur, then Orville, or Orville, then Wilbur, doesn’t seem to matter much. In the supersonic event, was it George Welch, then Chuck Yeager, or Yeager, then Welch? Looking at the record, it could have been Welch by a fortnight or Yeager by four weeks.
The fall of 1947 in California’s Mojave Desert was an incandescent time to be alive—for the crazy-ass pilots who were testing myriad new aircraft and for the lovely, loving, hopeful ladies who attended their safe return. So soon after the war, the prevailing mood was akin to the euphoria of victory but blessed with much smaller casualty lists. Much of the exhilaration centered on a little orange rocketship being sent aloft from Muroc Army Air Field with growing frequency, attched to a B-29 mothership. Everyone knew that this represented a substantial national effort, bringing together the resources of the U.S. Army Air Forces (soon to be renamed the US Air Force), the National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch the first manned aircraft design solely to fly faster than sound.
The word from the X-1 camp at Muroc was that Army Air Forces Captain Chuck Yeager had come very close to going supersonic on September 12. Surely on the next flight he would push it through. But then the X-1 flights were postponed. Rumors of a seirous pitch control problem drifted out of the Bell camp. There was evidence of a lot of scrambling. Yeager was pressing fellow pilot and engineer Jack Ridley, the one man on the X-1 team in whose hands he’d entrust his life. He wanted Ridley’s assurances that the changes would work—he wanted no more running out of pitch control at Mach .94.
North American test pilot George Welch could only smile as these tales leaked out of traded confiences. His money was on another contender. The first XP-86 aircraft, Army Air Forces serial number PU597, was rolled out of his company’s plant in Los Angeles on August 8. The more involved Welch had gotten in the development of the Sabre, the more he was convinced that he could capture the laurels of the first supersonic flight for North American Aviation.
Welch had joined North American in the middle of 1944, at the height of the war and the peak of demand for North American’s prime product, the P-51 Mustang. He’d been there only a month or two when Fred Borsodi visited from Wright Field and showed his film of shock waves on a Mustang’s wings as it dove at max power straight down from 40,000 feet. Theodore von Kármán, the legendary aerodynamicist from the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, was at that screening, and observed that when an entire aircraft, not just the air accelerating over the thickest part of the wing, went supersonic, shock waves would be sent to the ground. He theorized that people nearby would hear and feel the passing of that pressure pulse. Listening intently to all this were Ed Horkey, a former student of von Kármán’s and Harrison Storms and Larry Greene, who were leaders in the aerodynamics section of North American’s advance design group. Another observer was George Welch.
Over the next three years, Welch stayed in touch with Horkey, Storms, and Greene as they created the XP-86. And he spent time with Walt Spivak, who had cut out the pieces and put them together on the shop floor. Welch also spent a lot of time in the Sabre’s cockpit at Muroc and observed the flight test crew as they checked out all the systems and instrumentation for this sleek new fighter.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (11)
I would love to see a documentary of this race,fight for MACH 1 rights with video clips and all the bells and whistles from your archives.
Posted by James Kinder on April 16,2008 | 05:27 PM
Spelling error:
"...National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch..."
Should be "BELL" Aircraft Company
Posted by Andrew Cook on April 22,2008 | 01:11 PM
How is mach 1 measured?
Posted by Mikey Bowie on June 4,2008 | 12:29 PM
With great difficulty! Well to measure it accruately you will require ground based radar.
The regular air speed machmeter will jump from about M.98 to M 1.12. as the shock wave forms over the pitot tube. And at that speed part of the airflow over the wing will be part supersonic and part subsonic. Not until well in excess of M 1.2 will the aircraft be considered supersonic.
I will stick my head out and say that no aircraft can sit on Mach 1.0. As it will pass through mach 1.0, the machmeter jumping from M.98 to mach 1.12.
Posted by John MILLER on August 11,2008 | 04:13 PM
I wondered if you might be able to point me in the right direction? I am trying find out more information on 1st Lt. Fred Mueller, known as "The Red Ass Bird", and was later in the "Mach Buster's Club." This was around 1955. He was then a 2nd Lt. Thank you in advance. EDITORS' REPLY: Try the U.S. Air Force Association.
Posted by Chris Searfoss on March 18,2009 | 11:26 AM
Wasn't the XP-86 then only temporarily supersonic (on account of diving and not drilling the pilot into the desert) whilst the X-1 made sustained supersonic flight in a climb?
Posted by TL on February 17,2010 | 10:49 AM
My cousin's wife's family was stationed at Muroc after the Second World War from 1946-1949. "Susan" (not her real name)
told me that her father (a USAAF captain) regularly told Sue and her brothers that he HEARD three sonic booms before Yeager launched at 1030 PST on 14 October 1947.
General Yeager remains one of the greatest test pilots to have survived that wild and wooly time but the fact is that he HAD to follow orders due to the byzantine politics of the day:
Stuart Symington and Louis Johnson did their worst to try to destroy U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aviation after
WWII and Edward Brassley's great history "Revolt of the Admirals" details the ham fisted efforts by Symington and Johnson to force the Convair B-36 down the nation's throat
while scrapping the USS United States nine days after the keel was laid.
Same thin-skinned egotism was evident in late summer 1947 at Muroc...
George Welch broke Mach 1 first. Case closed.
Posted by IceBreaker406 on March 23,2010 | 02:50 PM
The XP-86 MYTH GOES ON. For those of you that insist on propagating the myth of a supersonic XP-86 there are many significant facts the purveyors of this gross falsehood seem to have forgotten or ignored.
The very first facts are:
1.) That the XP-86 flew with an ad hoc Chevrolet J35-C-3 engine that didn’t produce 4,000-pounds of thrust at sea level. (Muroc elevation = 2302-ft. MSL) The production F-86 was powered by the J47-GE.
2.) The highest 1947 Mach number recorded from North American flight-tests was 0.929 on flight 22 on 13 November. This data point is recorded in NAA’s Flight Test Progress Report 9 dated 11/14/47.
3.) The book Aces Wild stated that Mach number “was clocked.” Mach number is a ratio and can’t be clocked or determined from radar!
4.) NACA determined Mach numbers from XS-1 recorded air data pressures.
5.) The public loves a conspiracy, but in this case there was none, the supersonic XP-86 is a hoax!
6.) Sonic booms generated by airplanes were never herd before so how did the alleged witnesses know what they were hearing? Frequently weak sonic booms never reach the ground observers.
Posted by Robert W. Kempel, Aerospace Engineer (Ret.) on April 1,2010 | 06:22 AM
As a former civilian test pilot at Edwards during the 1950s I became aware of the possibility that George Welch was the first to break the sound barrier in his F-86. Many years later both Al Blackburn and Warren Bodie wrote more definitive stories supporting that belief. To learn more, in the mid 2000s I wrote to the USAF Historical Office at the Pentagon asking for their then current view, recognizing that for the prior 50 years they had supported the claim that "Yeager was the first to break the sound barrier". Their response was ... While it is probable that (Welch) in the F-86 did break the sound barrier before Yeager, he obviously did so in a dive. And therefore we do not recognize that flight since we only recognize records set in level flight. While the (old) plaque to Yeager in the Air and Space Museum in Washington credits him as being "the first to break the sound barrier", a more recent plaque in the Hartford Air and Space museum credits him with being the "first to break the sound barrier in level flight." The USAF therefore appears to now support Blackburn's thesis that Yeager was second to break the sound barrier, as does the Hartford Museum. The additional words "in level flight" makes a huge difference.
Posted by Harry Schmidt on September 11,2011 | 04:32 PM
I asked Yeager about George "Wheaties" Welsh at a Society of Experimental Test Pilots symposium he briefly attended in Anaheim, CA, and specifically about the XF-86 capability to reach Mach 1. He stated that he had flown that airplane, and it didn’t have the thrust to make the jump. When pressed about diving the airplane at high altitude, Yeager got a bit agitated and stated that “It couldn’t do it” as he walked away. His tone and body language implied to me that it really could.
As to “clocking” Mach, all that needs to be known is Pressure Altitude and Calibrated Airspeed. Radar shows Ground Speed, Phototheodolite shows Speed and Altitude based upon geometry. The term “clocking” has been used with stopwatches. The police “clock” your groundspeed on the freeway to issue a ticket, sometimes with radar, sometimes by pacing. This airplane was clocked using its own pitot tube and static reference. After all, Mach 1 is only 313 kts CAS at 40,000 feet.
The concept of a Sonic Boom was well established… the German V-2’s produced one very easily and were reported long before the XF-86 or X-1. Poncho and the girls were well briefed on what to expect.
George Welsh is an American Hero. Like Byrd’s and Bennett’s flight over the North Pole, reality is often defined by the politics of the moment, and thus reality & myth merge to make history. The FX-86 was engineered for supersonic flight, and it made ‘the jump” aerodynamically. The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust.
Posted by Gary Possert on April 3,2012 | 05:18 AM
"The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust."
As far as anyone can tell, stub wings, thrust and little else is the description of the F-104 starfighter and the same recipe (big engine, small plane) was also applied to the A-4 Skyhawk and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. X planes are research projects, the lab in wich technology is created and later applied in produtcion aircraft. The Sabre just used German research instead of American research, and as the X-1 is the greatfather of the F-104 the Me-262/Me-163 are the parents df the sabre. If the Germans had not researched into swept wing planes the sabre might not even existed.
Posted by Daniel on June 12,2012 | 03:19 PM