Mach Match
Did an XP-86 beat Yeager to the punch?
- By Al Blackburn
- Air & Space magazine, January 1999
The North American XP-86 Sabre, in flight over the Mojave Desert. Was it the first to break the so-called sound barrier?
USAF. NASM photo no. A-38492-C
(Page 2 of 6)
Welch knew that the engineers had carefully reviewed the analytical data and wind tunnel test results the Germans had obtained from their swept-wing designs, and that North American had also run its own wind tunnel tests. Storms told him that they were almost certain that top speed at altitude would be better than Mach 0.9 in level flight. He explained to Welch that at that Mach number, the center of lift would start to move aft on the wing and that he would have to pull back on the stick and start trimming…but very carefully. Changing the angle of the whole stabilizer at that speed and a changing Mach number could get pretty tricky.
“So I’m doing nine-tenths at, say, 35,000 feet and push the nose over into a 25- to 30-degree dive. What then?” Welch asked the designers.
Greene couldn’t contain himself. “By 30,000 feet you’re supersonic.”
“What’s the risk?”
Greene shook his head. “We really don’t know. Our best guess is that it’s not very great.”
“My guess is virtually zero,” Welch said. He described a recent visit to New Mexico, where he’d spent the night just south of the Army’s White Sands Missile Test Range. Another group of experimenters there were launching V-2 missiles brought from Germany. Welch talked to several men who had witnessed some launches, and they told him about the blasts of shock waves that hit the mountain top about 30 seconds after each V-2 had taken off. “A big ba-boom just like von Kármán predicted,” Welch said. “Hell, that V-2 is bigger than the Sabre, or the X-1 for that matter, and it slides through the so-called sonic wall like a surfer riding a big wave.” Welch thought that too big a deal was being made over faster-than-sound flights, a theory he intended to test.
Welch came to Muroc in September and stayed at his usual hangout, Pancho Barnes’ Fly Inn, later to be named the Happy Bottom Riding Club. It comprised some 400 acres bordering Muroc Field on the south. In addition to rooms, there were suites, a restaurant, a bar, a swimming pool, riding stables, and airsrip. Many of the North American crew would show up—flight test supervisor Roy Ferren and flight test mechanic Bob Cadick—as well as members of the X-1 team: NACA leader Walt Williams, Jack Ridley, Chuck Yeager, and Bell project engineer Dick Frost. The usual bevy of Pancho’d down-on-their-luck ladies added their own leaven of lust and luster in more or less equal measure. Pancho herself was unique. Born wealthy of distinguished forebears, she chose what might be called today an alternative lifestyle. Her friends included Jimmy Doolittle, Chuck Yeager, Buzz Aldrin, and many of the Hollywood set, for whom she had done stunt flying in the early days of aviation films. Her conversation was punctuated with obscenities that would make a boatswain’s mate blush.
Among the ladies at Pancho’s, Welch had formed a special relationship with one Millie Palmer. Palmer was quieter and more serious than most of the other girls. When Welch and Palmer had dinner together at Pancho’s, he drank less and got to bed earlier.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (11)
I would love to see a documentary of this race,fight for MACH 1 rights with video clips and all the bells and whistles from your archives.
Posted by James Kinder on April 16,2008 | 05:27 PM
Spelling error:
"...National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch..."
Should be "BELL" Aircraft Company
Posted by Andrew Cook on April 22,2008 | 01:11 PM
How is mach 1 measured?
Posted by Mikey Bowie on June 4,2008 | 12:29 PM
With great difficulty! Well to measure it accruately you will require ground based radar.
The regular air speed machmeter will jump from about M.98 to M 1.12. as the shock wave forms over the pitot tube. And at that speed part of the airflow over the wing will be part supersonic and part subsonic. Not until well in excess of M 1.2 will the aircraft be considered supersonic.
I will stick my head out and say that no aircraft can sit on Mach 1.0. As it will pass through mach 1.0, the machmeter jumping from M.98 to mach 1.12.
Posted by John MILLER on August 11,2008 | 04:13 PM
I wondered if you might be able to point me in the right direction? I am trying find out more information on 1st Lt. Fred Mueller, known as "The Red Ass Bird", and was later in the "Mach Buster's Club." This was around 1955. He was then a 2nd Lt. Thank you in advance. EDITORS' REPLY: Try the U.S. Air Force Association.
Posted by Chris Searfoss on March 18,2009 | 11:26 AM
Wasn't the XP-86 then only temporarily supersonic (on account of diving and not drilling the pilot into the desert) whilst the X-1 made sustained supersonic flight in a climb?
Posted by TL on February 17,2010 | 10:49 AM
My cousin's wife's family was stationed at Muroc after the Second World War from 1946-1949. "Susan" (not her real name)
told me that her father (a USAAF captain) regularly told Sue and her brothers that he HEARD three sonic booms before Yeager launched at 1030 PST on 14 October 1947.
General Yeager remains one of the greatest test pilots to have survived that wild and wooly time but the fact is that he HAD to follow orders due to the byzantine politics of the day:
Stuart Symington and Louis Johnson did their worst to try to destroy U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aviation after
WWII and Edward Brassley's great history "Revolt of the Admirals" details the ham fisted efforts by Symington and Johnson to force the Convair B-36 down the nation's throat
while scrapping the USS United States nine days after the keel was laid.
Same thin-skinned egotism was evident in late summer 1947 at Muroc...
George Welch broke Mach 1 first. Case closed.
Posted by IceBreaker406 on March 23,2010 | 02:50 PM
The XP-86 MYTH GOES ON. For those of you that insist on propagating the myth of a supersonic XP-86 there are many significant facts the purveyors of this gross falsehood seem to have forgotten or ignored.
The very first facts are:
1.) That the XP-86 flew with an ad hoc Chevrolet J35-C-3 engine that didn’t produce 4,000-pounds of thrust at sea level. (Muroc elevation = 2302-ft. MSL) The production F-86 was powered by the J47-GE.
2.) The highest 1947 Mach number recorded from North American flight-tests was 0.929 on flight 22 on 13 November. This data point is recorded in NAA’s Flight Test Progress Report 9 dated 11/14/47.
3.) The book Aces Wild stated that Mach number “was clocked.” Mach number is a ratio and can’t be clocked or determined from radar!
4.) NACA determined Mach numbers from XS-1 recorded air data pressures.
5.) The public loves a conspiracy, but in this case there was none, the supersonic XP-86 is a hoax!
6.) Sonic booms generated by airplanes were never herd before so how did the alleged witnesses know what they were hearing? Frequently weak sonic booms never reach the ground observers.
Posted by Robert W. Kempel, Aerospace Engineer (Ret.) on April 1,2010 | 06:22 AM
As a former civilian test pilot at Edwards during the 1950s I became aware of the possibility that George Welch was the first to break the sound barrier in his F-86. Many years later both Al Blackburn and Warren Bodie wrote more definitive stories supporting that belief. To learn more, in the mid 2000s I wrote to the USAF Historical Office at the Pentagon asking for their then current view, recognizing that for the prior 50 years they had supported the claim that "Yeager was the first to break the sound barrier". Their response was ... While it is probable that (Welch) in the F-86 did break the sound barrier before Yeager, he obviously did so in a dive. And therefore we do not recognize that flight since we only recognize records set in level flight. While the (old) plaque to Yeager in the Air and Space Museum in Washington credits him as being "the first to break the sound barrier", a more recent plaque in the Hartford Air and Space museum credits him with being the "first to break the sound barrier in level flight." The USAF therefore appears to now support Blackburn's thesis that Yeager was second to break the sound barrier, as does the Hartford Museum. The additional words "in level flight" makes a huge difference.
Posted by Harry Schmidt on September 11,2011 | 04:32 PM
I asked Yeager about George "Wheaties" Welsh at a Society of Experimental Test Pilots symposium he briefly attended in Anaheim, CA, and specifically about the XF-86 capability to reach Mach 1. He stated that he had flown that airplane, and it didn’t have the thrust to make the jump. When pressed about diving the airplane at high altitude, Yeager got a bit agitated and stated that “It couldn’t do it” as he walked away. His tone and body language implied to me that it really could.
As to “clocking” Mach, all that needs to be known is Pressure Altitude and Calibrated Airspeed. Radar shows Ground Speed, Phototheodolite shows Speed and Altitude based upon geometry. The term “clocking” has been used with stopwatches. The police “clock” your groundspeed on the freeway to issue a ticket, sometimes with radar, sometimes by pacing. This airplane was clocked using its own pitot tube and static reference. After all, Mach 1 is only 313 kts CAS at 40,000 feet.
The concept of a Sonic Boom was well established… the German V-2’s produced one very easily and were reported long before the XF-86 or X-1. Poncho and the girls were well briefed on what to expect.
George Welsh is an American Hero. Like Byrd’s and Bennett’s flight over the North Pole, reality is often defined by the politics of the moment, and thus reality & myth merge to make history. The FX-86 was engineered for supersonic flight, and it made ‘the jump” aerodynamically. The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust.
Posted by Gary Possert on April 3,2012 | 05:18 AM
"The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust."
As far as anyone can tell, stub wings, thrust and little else is the description of the F-104 starfighter and the same recipe (big engine, small plane) was also applied to the A-4 Skyhawk and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. X planes are research projects, the lab in wich technology is created and later applied in produtcion aircraft. The Sabre just used German research instead of American research, and as the X-1 is the greatfather of the F-104 the Me-262/Me-163 are the parents df the sabre. If the Germans had not researched into swept wing planes the sabre might not even existed.
Posted by Daniel on June 12,2012 | 03:19 PM