Mach Match
Did an XP-86 beat Yeager to the punch?
- By Al Blackburn
- Air & Space magazine, January 1999
The North American XP-86 Sabre, in flight over the Mojave Desert. Was it the first to break the so-called sound barrier?
USAF. NASM photo no. A-38492-C
(Page 3 of 6)
On Monday evening, September 29, after some XP-86 taxi tests, Welch was at Pancho’s having dinner with Palmer. He was quietly pleased at how well the first outing had gone. He noted that the X-1 crowd looked pretty glum. The little rocketship hadn’t flown in more than two weeks. Palmer reported the rumor that Ridley was working on giving Yeager more pitch control through the trim mechanism. “It looks as though Wednesday is my big chance,” Welch told Palmer. “A supersonic dive is for sure not on the flight card for the first flight, so I’ll have to do it without recording data. It’s agreed that I’ll pull up the landing gear, just to get a feel for how it flies in the clean condition. Without making a record in the usual way, you’ll have to be my data bank. If on Wednesday morning you hear a sharp boom like a clap of thunder, be sure and write it down—what it sounded like, what time, reaction from others, stuff like that.”
The first flight of the XP-86 did indeed take place on Wednesday, October 1. Welch climbed with full power to 10,000 feet above sea level, which was 7,700 feet above the Mojave Desert floor. On his wing was North American engineering test pilot Bob Chilton in a P-82 Twin Mustang. The right cockpit of the dual-fuselage fighter was occupied by a cameraman.
In a little more than 10 minutes, Welch had reach 35,000 feet. Leveling out, he watch the indicated airspeed climb to 320 knots. He estimated that should be Mach 0.90. He had been heading east and was just passing over the El Mirage dry lake. Rolling into a 40-degree dive, he turned to the west. His aircraft was pointing at Pancho’s hacienda, several miles south of Rogers Dry Lake. The airspeed indicator seemed to be stuck at about 350 knots, but the Sabre was behaving just fine. At 29,000 feet there was a little wing roll. Correcting the roll, Welch pushed into a steeper dive. The airspeed indicator suddenly jumped to 410 knots and continued to rise. At 25,000 feet he brought the Sabre back to level flight and reduced power. The wing rocked again and the airspeed jumped from nearly 450 back to 390. Welch pulled up into a barrel roll to the left followed by one to the right, not unlike the victory rolls used in the recent war by returned fighter pilots to let their crews know they had bagged an enemy aircraft.
Before he left for Los Angeles to brief the Sabre project people, Welch called Palmer, who reported that a big ba-boom had nearly bounced her out of bed. She added that Pancho, a big Yeager supporter, had heard it too but attributed it to some mining operation up in the hills.
(Bell program manager Dick Frost recalled the first boom laid down on the dry lake in February 1947 as Bell pilot Slick Goodlin did his crack-the-whip maneuver in the X-1 model with the thicker wing, pulling 8.7 Gs at Mach 0.80 and snapping back abruptly, to negative Gs. It was a sharp crack, not the ba-boom that would later become so familiar over the Mojave.
After the first flight of the XP-86, Welch dropped into Horkey’s office at the Inglewood plant in Los Angeles to talk about some “funny” readings on the airspeed indicator. He explained the “stuck” phenomenon he encountered at 350 knots while accelerating downhill, then the sudden jump to 410 knots, then the drop back to 350 knots as he leveled out at 25,000 feet. Horkey asked if the flight recorder showed anything odd. Welch confessed that the dive wasn’t on the flight card. “I was just feeling it out, so I wasn’t running the camera,” he told Horkey. “You know how brassed off the instrumentation guys get when I run out of film for the landing. Anyway, they said there wasn’t anything wrong with the airspeed system. They checked it out after I landed.”
Horkey thought Welch may have run into some Mach effects and told him to take another look next time he was up at altitude. (Down the road, before Mach indicators became standard equipment, the only signal to the pilot that the aircraft was going supersonic was the hangup on the airspeed indicator as the shock wave passed over the indicator’s static source, followed by the hump in the indicated airspeed. This occurred at various airspeeds, depending on the altitude and temperature at which Mach 1 was exceeded.)
“Meanwhile, I’ll see about getting NACA to help us out,” Horkey said. “They have that fancy new radar theodolite at Muroc that can tell us how fast, how high, and where you are within a gnat’s ass. But we have to get on their schedule.”
Welch knew that the new NACA equipment was being used to track Yeager’s lights in the X-1. He also knew that North American didn’t have a prayer of getting on the theodolite until Yeager had done his thing. Welch was on his own.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (11)
I would love to see a documentary of this race,fight for MACH 1 rights with video clips and all the bells and whistles from your archives.
Posted by James Kinder on April 16,2008 | 05:27 PM
Spelling error:
"...National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch..."
Should be "BELL" Aircraft Company
Posted by Andrew Cook on April 22,2008 | 01:11 PM
How is mach 1 measured?
Posted by Mikey Bowie on June 4,2008 | 12:29 PM
With great difficulty! Well to measure it accruately you will require ground based radar.
The regular air speed machmeter will jump from about M.98 to M 1.12. as the shock wave forms over the pitot tube. And at that speed part of the airflow over the wing will be part supersonic and part subsonic. Not until well in excess of M 1.2 will the aircraft be considered supersonic.
I will stick my head out and say that no aircraft can sit on Mach 1.0. As it will pass through mach 1.0, the machmeter jumping from M.98 to mach 1.12.
Posted by John MILLER on August 11,2008 | 04:13 PM
I wondered if you might be able to point me in the right direction? I am trying find out more information on 1st Lt. Fred Mueller, known as "The Red Ass Bird", and was later in the "Mach Buster's Club." This was around 1955. He was then a 2nd Lt. Thank you in advance. EDITORS' REPLY: Try the U.S. Air Force Association.
Posted by Chris Searfoss on March 18,2009 | 11:26 AM
Wasn't the XP-86 then only temporarily supersonic (on account of diving and not drilling the pilot into the desert) whilst the X-1 made sustained supersonic flight in a climb?
Posted by TL on February 17,2010 | 10:49 AM
My cousin's wife's family was stationed at Muroc after the Second World War from 1946-1949. "Susan" (not her real name)
told me that her father (a USAAF captain) regularly told Sue and her brothers that he HEARD three sonic booms before Yeager launched at 1030 PST on 14 October 1947.
General Yeager remains one of the greatest test pilots to have survived that wild and wooly time but the fact is that he HAD to follow orders due to the byzantine politics of the day:
Stuart Symington and Louis Johnson did their worst to try to destroy U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aviation after
WWII and Edward Brassley's great history "Revolt of the Admirals" details the ham fisted efforts by Symington and Johnson to force the Convair B-36 down the nation's throat
while scrapping the USS United States nine days after the keel was laid.
Same thin-skinned egotism was evident in late summer 1947 at Muroc...
George Welch broke Mach 1 first. Case closed.
Posted by IceBreaker406 on March 23,2010 | 02:50 PM
The XP-86 MYTH GOES ON. For those of you that insist on propagating the myth of a supersonic XP-86 there are many significant facts the purveyors of this gross falsehood seem to have forgotten or ignored.
The very first facts are:
1.) That the XP-86 flew with an ad hoc Chevrolet J35-C-3 engine that didn’t produce 4,000-pounds of thrust at sea level. (Muroc elevation = 2302-ft. MSL) The production F-86 was powered by the J47-GE.
2.) The highest 1947 Mach number recorded from North American flight-tests was 0.929 on flight 22 on 13 November. This data point is recorded in NAA’s Flight Test Progress Report 9 dated 11/14/47.
3.) The book Aces Wild stated that Mach number “was clocked.” Mach number is a ratio and can’t be clocked or determined from radar!
4.) NACA determined Mach numbers from XS-1 recorded air data pressures.
5.) The public loves a conspiracy, but in this case there was none, the supersonic XP-86 is a hoax!
6.) Sonic booms generated by airplanes were never herd before so how did the alleged witnesses know what they were hearing? Frequently weak sonic booms never reach the ground observers.
Posted by Robert W. Kempel, Aerospace Engineer (Ret.) on April 1,2010 | 06:22 AM
As a former civilian test pilot at Edwards during the 1950s I became aware of the possibility that George Welch was the first to break the sound barrier in his F-86. Many years later both Al Blackburn and Warren Bodie wrote more definitive stories supporting that belief. To learn more, in the mid 2000s I wrote to the USAF Historical Office at the Pentagon asking for their then current view, recognizing that for the prior 50 years they had supported the claim that "Yeager was the first to break the sound barrier". Their response was ... While it is probable that (Welch) in the F-86 did break the sound barrier before Yeager, he obviously did so in a dive. And therefore we do not recognize that flight since we only recognize records set in level flight. While the (old) plaque to Yeager in the Air and Space Museum in Washington credits him as being "the first to break the sound barrier", a more recent plaque in the Hartford Air and Space museum credits him with being the "first to break the sound barrier in level flight." The USAF therefore appears to now support Blackburn's thesis that Yeager was second to break the sound barrier, as does the Hartford Museum. The additional words "in level flight" makes a huge difference.
Posted by Harry Schmidt on September 11,2011 | 04:32 PM
I asked Yeager about George "Wheaties" Welsh at a Society of Experimental Test Pilots symposium he briefly attended in Anaheim, CA, and specifically about the XF-86 capability to reach Mach 1. He stated that he had flown that airplane, and it didn’t have the thrust to make the jump. When pressed about diving the airplane at high altitude, Yeager got a bit agitated and stated that “It couldn’t do it” as he walked away. His tone and body language implied to me that it really could.
As to “clocking” Mach, all that needs to be known is Pressure Altitude and Calibrated Airspeed. Radar shows Ground Speed, Phototheodolite shows Speed and Altitude based upon geometry. The term “clocking” has been used with stopwatches. The police “clock” your groundspeed on the freeway to issue a ticket, sometimes with radar, sometimes by pacing. This airplane was clocked using its own pitot tube and static reference. After all, Mach 1 is only 313 kts CAS at 40,000 feet.
The concept of a Sonic Boom was well established… the German V-2’s produced one very easily and were reported long before the XF-86 or X-1. Poncho and the girls were well briefed on what to expect.
George Welsh is an American Hero. Like Byrd’s and Bennett’s flight over the North Pole, reality is often defined by the politics of the moment, and thus reality & myth merge to make history. The FX-86 was engineered for supersonic flight, and it made ‘the jump” aerodynamically. The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust.
Posted by Gary Possert on April 3,2012 | 05:18 AM
"The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust."
As far as anyone can tell, stub wings, thrust and little else is the description of the F-104 starfighter and the same recipe (big engine, small plane) was also applied to the A-4 Skyhawk and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. X planes are research projects, the lab in wich technology is created and later applied in produtcion aircraft. The Sabre just used German research instead of American research, and as the X-1 is the greatfather of the F-104 the Me-262/Me-163 are the parents df the sabre. If the Germans had not researched into swept wing planes the sabre might not even existed.
Posted by Daniel on June 12,2012 | 03:19 PM