Mach Match
Did an XP-86 beat Yeager to the punch?
- By Al Blackburn
- Air & Space magazine, January 1999
The North American XP-86 Sabre, in flight over the Mojave Desert. Was it the first to break the so-called sound barrier?
USAF. NASM photo no. A-38492-C
(Page 4 of 6)
On October 9, Welch’s wife delivered a baby boy. When she called her mother to announce the birth, she also dropped the news of another blessed event. The new dad had days earlier made aviation history by becoming the first pilot to fly faster than the speed of sound. She made her mother promise not to tell anyone, explaining that it wasn’t just a family confidence, but a military secret.
One week after Welch had pushed the XP-86 over into what he believed was a Mach 1 dive, the X-1 flew at Mach 0.925, faster than the Mach 0.92 achieved on October 10. Yeager was sure he had done it. Ridley had worked his magic on the horizontal stabilizer trim mechanism and Yeager was certain he had popped through. The entire X-1 flight test team was at Pancho’s that Friday evening waiting for the data reduction people to show up with the official figures. Yeager and Pancho were huddled in a corner. The X-1 pilot had a furrowed brow. He was trying to explain to Pancho that he might not have been pointing toward the Fly Inn when he finally pushed through the big barrier. That might explain the absence of a boom earlier in the day, when he was virtually certain he had finally made the first supersonic flight. When Pancho pointed out that Welch had sure made one hell of a boom more than a week ago, Yeager insisted that it was just a fluke. Pancho arched her eyebrows and noted that it had heated up a stable full of fillies at her hacienda.
Then the data sifters showed up, half elated, half despondent. Yeager had gone a lot faster than ever before. He had come as close as you can get and still had not made the ultimate penetration. The most careful analysis showed that on the morning flight, the X-1 had attained Mach 0.997. Another pint of rocket fuel and it would have slid through.
On October 13, Welch called Ferren to check on the status of the Sabre, which Ferren reported would be ready first thing next morning. “By the way, L.A. is insisting that like the last two flights, the next one be made with the gear down, ” he added.
“We can focus on gear-down tests on the next two flights, but I want the option to retract the gear if I need to,” Welch replied, his mind working at warp speed. Why were they doing this? Was the Air Force making sure there would be no more surprise, albeit unofficial, booms?
Early Tuesday morning, October 14, Welch taxied the company Navion onto the ramp of North American’s hangar at Muroc’s North Base. The XP-86 had already been rolled out. Also on the ramp was the P-82 chase plane. Fellow test pilot Bob Chilton would be flying chase again.
“The Air Force is kinda looking down our throats on this flight, aren’t they?” said Chilton. He also knew that Yeager might bust Mach 1 that morning, and, knowing what Welch was up to, noted that there might be an awkward 15 minutes between Welch’s reported performance of test card maneuvers and his eventual return to base. He suggested that Welch stretch out the test card, letting the narration over the radio trail the actual performance of the maneuvers. That way, when people on the ground heard a boom, they might think it was Yeager.
Welch climbed to the 10,000 feet and ran through the lateral and directional stability checks on the test card, but he reported the results via radio to the North American flight test engineer at Muroc on only half of them. He retracted the landing gear and waited for Chilton to slide underneath to check on his gear doors. Chilton gave him a thumbs-up and Welch advanced the throttle to full military power. During his climb to 37,000 feet, he kept reading out the results of the tests not yet reported. As he reached his altitude goal, 2,000 feet above the starting point for his successful sound barrier penetration of nearly two weeks earlier, he once more rolled into a dive of at least 40 degrees and headed westward with the nose of his Sabre pointing directly at Pancho’s. On the way down, he called out the results of the next to last test point on the card.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (11)
I would love to see a documentary of this race,fight for MACH 1 rights with video clips and all the bells and whistles from your archives.
Posted by James Kinder on April 16,2008 | 05:27 PM
Spelling error:
"...National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch..."
Should be "BELL" Aircraft Company
Posted by Andrew Cook on April 22,2008 | 01:11 PM
How is mach 1 measured?
Posted by Mikey Bowie on June 4,2008 | 12:29 PM
With great difficulty! Well to measure it accruately you will require ground based radar.
The regular air speed machmeter will jump from about M.98 to M 1.12. as the shock wave forms over the pitot tube. And at that speed part of the airflow over the wing will be part supersonic and part subsonic. Not until well in excess of M 1.2 will the aircraft be considered supersonic.
I will stick my head out and say that no aircraft can sit on Mach 1.0. As it will pass through mach 1.0, the machmeter jumping from M.98 to mach 1.12.
Posted by John MILLER on August 11,2008 | 04:13 PM
I wondered if you might be able to point me in the right direction? I am trying find out more information on 1st Lt. Fred Mueller, known as "The Red Ass Bird", and was later in the "Mach Buster's Club." This was around 1955. He was then a 2nd Lt. Thank you in advance. EDITORS' REPLY: Try the U.S. Air Force Association.
Posted by Chris Searfoss on March 18,2009 | 11:26 AM
Wasn't the XP-86 then only temporarily supersonic (on account of diving and not drilling the pilot into the desert) whilst the X-1 made sustained supersonic flight in a climb?
Posted by TL on February 17,2010 | 10:49 AM
My cousin's wife's family was stationed at Muroc after the Second World War from 1946-1949. "Susan" (not her real name)
told me that her father (a USAAF captain) regularly told Sue and her brothers that he HEARD three sonic booms before Yeager launched at 1030 PST on 14 October 1947.
General Yeager remains one of the greatest test pilots to have survived that wild and wooly time but the fact is that he HAD to follow orders due to the byzantine politics of the day:
Stuart Symington and Louis Johnson did their worst to try to destroy U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aviation after
WWII and Edward Brassley's great history "Revolt of the Admirals" details the ham fisted efforts by Symington and Johnson to force the Convair B-36 down the nation's throat
while scrapping the USS United States nine days after the keel was laid.
Same thin-skinned egotism was evident in late summer 1947 at Muroc...
George Welch broke Mach 1 first. Case closed.
Posted by IceBreaker406 on March 23,2010 | 02:50 PM
The XP-86 MYTH GOES ON. For those of you that insist on propagating the myth of a supersonic XP-86 there are many significant facts the purveyors of this gross falsehood seem to have forgotten or ignored.
The very first facts are:
1.) That the XP-86 flew with an ad hoc Chevrolet J35-C-3 engine that didn’t produce 4,000-pounds of thrust at sea level. (Muroc elevation = 2302-ft. MSL) The production F-86 was powered by the J47-GE.
2.) The highest 1947 Mach number recorded from North American flight-tests was 0.929 on flight 22 on 13 November. This data point is recorded in NAA’s Flight Test Progress Report 9 dated 11/14/47.
3.) The book Aces Wild stated that Mach number “was clocked.” Mach number is a ratio and can’t be clocked or determined from radar!
4.) NACA determined Mach numbers from XS-1 recorded air data pressures.
5.) The public loves a conspiracy, but in this case there was none, the supersonic XP-86 is a hoax!
6.) Sonic booms generated by airplanes were never herd before so how did the alleged witnesses know what they were hearing? Frequently weak sonic booms never reach the ground observers.
Posted by Robert W. Kempel, Aerospace Engineer (Ret.) on April 1,2010 | 06:22 AM
As a former civilian test pilot at Edwards during the 1950s I became aware of the possibility that George Welch was the first to break the sound barrier in his F-86. Many years later both Al Blackburn and Warren Bodie wrote more definitive stories supporting that belief. To learn more, in the mid 2000s I wrote to the USAF Historical Office at the Pentagon asking for their then current view, recognizing that for the prior 50 years they had supported the claim that "Yeager was the first to break the sound barrier". Their response was ... While it is probable that (Welch) in the F-86 did break the sound barrier before Yeager, he obviously did so in a dive. And therefore we do not recognize that flight since we only recognize records set in level flight. While the (old) plaque to Yeager in the Air and Space Museum in Washington credits him as being "the first to break the sound barrier", a more recent plaque in the Hartford Air and Space museum credits him with being the "first to break the sound barrier in level flight." The USAF therefore appears to now support Blackburn's thesis that Yeager was second to break the sound barrier, as does the Hartford Museum. The additional words "in level flight" makes a huge difference.
Posted by Harry Schmidt on September 11,2011 | 04:32 PM
I asked Yeager about George "Wheaties" Welsh at a Society of Experimental Test Pilots symposium he briefly attended in Anaheim, CA, and specifically about the XF-86 capability to reach Mach 1. He stated that he had flown that airplane, and it didn’t have the thrust to make the jump. When pressed about diving the airplane at high altitude, Yeager got a bit agitated and stated that “It couldn’t do it” as he walked away. His tone and body language implied to me that it really could.
As to “clocking” Mach, all that needs to be known is Pressure Altitude and Calibrated Airspeed. Radar shows Ground Speed, Phototheodolite shows Speed and Altitude based upon geometry. The term “clocking” has been used with stopwatches. The police “clock” your groundspeed on the freeway to issue a ticket, sometimes with radar, sometimes by pacing. This airplane was clocked using its own pitot tube and static reference. After all, Mach 1 is only 313 kts CAS at 40,000 feet.
The concept of a Sonic Boom was well established… the German V-2’s produced one very easily and were reported long before the XF-86 or X-1. Poncho and the girls were well briefed on what to expect.
George Welsh is an American Hero. Like Byrd’s and Bennett’s flight over the North Pole, reality is often defined by the politics of the moment, and thus reality & myth merge to make history. The FX-86 was engineered for supersonic flight, and it made ‘the jump” aerodynamically. The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust.
Posted by Gary Possert on April 3,2012 | 05:18 AM
"The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust."
As far as anyone can tell, stub wings, thrust and little else is the description of the F-104 starfighter and the same recipe (big engine, small plane) was also applied to the A-4 Skyhawk and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. X planes are research projects, the lab in wich technology is created and later applied in produtcion aircraft. The Sabre just used German research instead of American research, and as the X-1 is the greatfather of the F-104 the Me-262/Me-163 are the parents df the sabre. If the Germans had not researched into swept wing planes the sabre might not even existed.
Posted by Daniel on June 12,2012 | 03:19 PM