Mach Match
Did an XP-86 beat Yeager to the punch?
- By Al Blackburn
- Air & Space magazine, January 1999
The North American XP-86 Sabre, in flight over the Mojave Desert. Was it the first to break the so-called sound barrier?
USAF. NASM photo no. A-38492-C
(Page 5 of 6)
Once again he experience some wing roll as his airspeed indicator hung up, then popped through to greater readings. Because he had started at a higher altitude, the Mach-related transients were less pronounced than they had been on the first flight. Instead of a gentle, throttle-back recovery like he’d flown on that first outing, Welch left full power on and performed a four-G pull-up, little realizing that this would greatly increase the impact of the shock wave aimed at Pancho’s place. He carefully throttled back and called off his last point on the test card as though he had just completed it.
Welch had shut down and dismounted and was heading for the locker room to drop his parachute and helmet before debriefing with the flight-test engineers when he heard a distant but distinct ba-boom. His watch read 10:30.
A security clamp was immediately placed on Yeager’s penetration of the sound barrier. Consequently, a celebration at Pancho’s was out of the question. Instead the X-1 team started their whoop-de-do at Yeager’s house, and later, when Yeager ran out of booze, they adjourned to Dick Frost’s. It’s not that Pancho’s closed down for the evening. The North American crew showed up, if only to get a reading from their own highly sensitized boom detectors at Pancho’s. Welch and North American pilot Bud Poage were making careful mental notations while ascribing all credit to Yeager and the X-1. Both Millie Palmer and Mona (soon to be Poage’s bride) were on hand to provide authentication, especially of the first boom, which cracked a couple of windows in two of the rooms facing east. Major General Joe Swing, a Pancho’s regular, found it strange that there were two ba-booms some 20 minutes apart. Didn’t it take at least two days to get the X-1 ready to fly again? With only four minutes of fuel at best, it certainly couldn’t make two ba-booms in such a short interval. Welch shrugged and suggested with a straight face that maybe a V-2 had flown off course out of White Sands.
Welch flew the Sabre the next morning. The following week he made four flights and the subsequent Monday, October 27, he flew four flights in one day. He then surrendered the Sabre to Bob Chilton for a couple of familiarization flights. Chilton was no shrinking violet. It is entirely possibly he laid a boom or two on his own. On November 3, Welch commenced a series of high-Mach dive flights, so labeled in his flight log.
This persistent barrage of ba-booms at the Air Force test base finally precipitated permission to use the high-precision radar theodolite facility that had confirmed Yeager’s climb to immortality. Welch’s dives in the Sabre were measured during two flights on November 13. His first dive was clocked at Mach 1.02, the second at 1.04. The ba-booms were finally officially acknowledged, but only under tight security. The North American flight test reports are asterisked with a notation that data concerning speeds in excess of Mach 0.90 have been detailed in an amplifying document under higher security. This amplifying data could not be found in the North American archives. In Welch’s handwritten flight log, these flights are variously classified as “Hi Mach No. Dive” or simply “Hi Mach.” Between November 3, 1947, and the end of February 1948, Welch flew 23 flights in the XP-86 that are so characterized. Almost certainly each flight included at least one incursion into the realm of the supersonic. More likely two or three were made per flight. By way of comparison, during the same four-month period, the X-1 made seven flights, attaining supersonic speed on three of them, but no more than once per flight.
The Air Force’s Wright Field XP-86 project officer, Major Ken Chilstrom, gave a glowing report on the aircraft while flying it to a maximum altitude of 45,000 feet and a Mach number of 0.90 during Phase II evaluation in early December 1947. Why didn’t Chilstrom push the Sabre through the sound barrier? Probably because he was Colonel Boyd’s chief of fighter test. Al Boyd kept a tight reign on Air Force Flight test operations. He had just carefully nursed Yeager through Mach 1 after 28 flights spread over a year and a half. He no doubt had difficulty even conceiving that a prototype fighter only two months past its first flight could be ready to explore the supersonic realm. He was a great friend of Pancho’s and had no doubt heard the rumors that floated out of her hacienda of Sabre ba-booms. But the fall of 1947 was an era in which the sonic boom phenomenon was not yet broadly understood, even by technically very sophisticated people. Pancho had assembled some very nice young ladies, but none were CalTech graduates. Moreover, such knowledge as might have surfaced as a consequence of Yeager’s flight was still highly classified. Similar restrictions were applied to details of the Sabre dances.
Boyd was keenly aware of his route to stardom. He knew the X-1 program has special protection from high places. Being first to go supersonic was important to the Air Force. For the Bell Aircraft Company, it was absolutely vital. The X-1’s sole purpose was to pave a way through the sound barrier. Millions of taxpayer dollars had been spent to make that happen. Now it had been done. For North American Aviation to come along and say “Hey, what’s the big deal? Our new fighter does it as an incidental piece of cake” certainly wasn’t going to be helpful. Boyd could see that it was in the Air Force’s best interests that the X-1 be clearly first by a considerable margin and that the Sabre rattling be quelled as long as it might take to keep the press away.
The Air Force wanted Yeager to push the mark a little higher. On November 6, Yeager raised the mark to Mach 1.35 at 48,600 feet. When the number two X-1 was ready for NACA, the Langley leadership wanted to make sure one of their pilots—Herb Hoover—became the first civilian to break the sound barrier. On March 10, 1948, Hoover flew the NACA X-1 to Mach 1.065. At that point, North American Aviation and the Air Force deemed it acceptable to announce that the Sabre had indeed gone supersonic as of April 26, a month a half after Hoover managed to struggle through.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (11)
I would love to see a documentary of this race,fight for MACH 1 rights with video clips and all the bells and whistles from your archives.
Posted by James Kinder on April 16,2008 | 05:27 PM
Spelling error:
"...National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics, and the Benn Aircraft Company to launch..."
Should be "BELL" Aircraft Company
Posted by Andrew Cook on April 22,2008 | 01:11 PM
How is mach 1 measured?
Posted by Mikey Bowie on June 4,2008 | 12:29 PM
With great difficulty! Well to measure it accruately you will require ground based radar.
The regular air speed machmeter will jump from about M.98 to M 1.12. as the shock wave forms over the pitot tube. And at that speed part of the airflow over the wing will be part supersonic and part subsonic. Not until well in excess of M 1.2 will the aircraft be considered supersonic.
I will stick my head out and say that no aircraft can sit on Mach 1.0. As it will pass through mach 1.0, the machmeter jumping from M.98 to mach 1.12.
Posted by John MILLER on August 11,2008 | 04:13 PM
I wondered if you might be able to point me in the right direction? I am trying find out more information on 1st Lt. Fred Mueller, known as "The Red Ass Bird", and was later in the "Mach Buster's Club." This was around 1955. He was then a 2nd Lt. Thank you in advance. EDITORS' REPLY: Try the U.S. Air Force Association.
Posted by Chris Searfoss on March 18,2009 | 11:26 AM
Wasn't the XP-86 then only temporarily supersonic (on account of diving and not drilling the pilot into the desert) whilst the X-1 made sustained supersonic flight in a climb?
Posted by TL on February 17,2010 | 10:49 AM
My cousin's wife's family was stationed at Muroc after the Second World War from 1946-1949. "Susan" (not her real name)
told me that her father (a USAAF captain) regularly told Sue and her brothers that he HEARD three sonic booms before Yeager launched at 1030 PST on 14 October 1947.
General Yeager remains one of the greatest test pilots to have survived that wild and wooly time but the fact is that he HAD to follow orders due to the byzantine politics of the day:
Stuart Symington and Louis Johnson did their worst to try to destroy U.S. Navy and Marine Corps aviation after
WWII and Edward Brassley's great history "Revolt of the Admirals" details the ham fisted efforts by Symington and Johnson to force the Convair B-36 down the nation's throat
while scrapping the USS United States nine days after the keel was laid.
Same thin-skinned egotism was evident in late summer 1947 at Muroc...
George Welch broke Mach 1 first. Case closed.
Posted by IceBreaker406 on March 23,2010 | 02:50 PM
The XP-86 MYTH GOES ON. For those of you that insist on propagating the myth of a supersonic XP-86 there are many significant facts the purveyors of this gross falsehood seem to have forgotten or ignored.
The very first facts are:
1.) That the XP-86 flew with an ad hoc Chevrolet J35-C-3 engine that didn’t produce 4,000-pounds of thrust at sea level. (Muroc elevation = 2302-ft. MSL) The production F-86 was powered by the J47-GE.
2.) The highest 1947 Mach number recorded from North American flight-tests was 0.929 on flight 22 on 13 November. This data point is recorded in NAA’s Flight Test Progress Report 9 dated 11/14/47.
3.) The book Aces Wild stated that Mach number “was clocked.” Mach number is a ratio and can’t be clocked or determined from radar!
4.) NACA determined Mach numbers from XS-1 recorded air data pressures.
5.) The public loves a conspiracy, but in this case there was none, the supersonic XP-86 is a hoax!
6.) Sonic booms generated by airplanes were never herd before so how did the alleged witnesses know what they were hearing? Frequently weak sonic booms never reach the ground observers.
Posted by Robert W. Kempel, Aerospace Engineer (Ret.) on April 1,2010 | 06:22 AM
As a former civilian test pilot at Edwards during the 1950s I became aware of the possibility that George Welch was the first to break the sound barrier in his F-86. Many years later both Al Blackburn and Warren Bodie wrote more definitive stories supporting that belief. To learn more, in the mid 2000s I wrote to the USAF Historical Office at the Pentagon asking for their then current view, recognizing that for the prior 50 years they had supported the claim that "Yeager was the first to break the sound barrier". Their response was ... While it is probable that (Welch) in the F-86 did break the sound barrier before Yeager, he obviously did so in a dive. And therefore we do not recognize that flight since we only recognize records set in level flight. While the (old) plaque to Yeager in the Air and Space Museum in Washington credits him as being "the first to break the sound barrier", a more recent plaque in the Hartford Air and Space museum credits him with being the "first to break the sound barrier in level flight." The USAF therefore appears to now support Blackburn's thesis that Yeager was second to break the sound barrier, as does the Hartford Museum. The additional words "in level flight" makes a huge difference.
Posted by Harry Schmidt on September 11,2011 | 04:32 PM
I asked Yeager about George "Wheaties" Welsh at a Society of Experimental Test Pilots symposium he briefly attended in Anaheim, CA, and specifically about the XF-86 capability to reach Mach 1. He stated that he had flown that airplane, and it didn’t have the thrust to make the jump. When pressed about diving the airplane at high altitude, Yeager got a bit agitated and stated that “It couldn’t do it” as he walked away. His tone and body language implied to me that it really could.
As to “clocking” Mach, all that needs to be known is Pressure Altitude and Calibrated Airspeed. Radar shows Ground Speed, Phototheodolite shows Speed and Altitude based upon geometry. The term “clocking” has been used with stopwatches. The police “clock” your groundspeed on the freeway to issue a ticket, sometimes with radar, sometimes by pacing. This airplane was clocked using its own pitot tube and static reference. After all, Mach 1 is only 313 kts CAS at 40,000 feet.
The concept of a Sonic Boom was well established… the German V-2’s produced one very easily and were reported long before the XF-86 or X-1. Poncho and the girls were well briefed on what to expect.
George Welsh is an American Hero. Like Byrd’s and Bennett’s flight over the North Pole, reality is often defined by the politics of the moment, and thus reality & myth merge to make history. The FX-86 was engineered for supersonic flight, and it made ‘the jump” aerodynamically. The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust.
Posted by Gary Possert on April 3,2012 | 05:18 AM
"The .50 caliber shaped, stubby-winged X-1 did it with brute rocket force. The XF-86 went on to become a front-line fighter, the X-1 went on to hang from cables in a museum. The Swept-Wing F-86 showed us how to build fast airplanes, and the X-1 showed that even a brick will fly supersonic with enough thrust."
As far as anyone can tell, stub wings, thrust and little else is the description of the F-104 starfighter and the same recipe (big engine, small plane) was also applied to the A-4 Skyhawk and the F-16 Fighting Falcon. X planes are research projects, the lab in wich technology is created and later applied in produtcion aircraft. The Sabre just used German research instead of American research, and as the X-1 is the greatfather of the F-104 the Me-262/Me-163 are the parents df the sabre. If the Germans had not researched into swept wing planes the sabre might not even existed.
Posted by Daniel on June 12,2012 | 03:19 PM