A Full Retaliatory Response
When President John Kennedy contemplated nuclear war, what went through the minds of the U.S. bomber crews?
- By Thomas Jones
- Air & Space magazine, November 2005
To boost launch, crews loaded B-47s with jet-assisted takeoff bottles.
Augustine R. Letto, USAF
STANDING ON A STEPLADDER IN THE GLOOM of the B-52’s cavernous bomb bay, I squeezed between the lower pair of torpedo-shaped nukes—B28FI thermonuclear weapons— and aimed an inspection mirror and flashlight at the circular viewports on each: “safe” indicators visible, yield settings correct. Satisfied that our bomb load was dormant, the navigator and I connected the mechanical bomb door actuators and backed carefully out of the bay. With the pilot and gunner, we shouldered the heavy doors, sticky with hydraulic fluid, and slammed the latches home with a solid thunk.
In the crew compartment, the radar navigator—who on a B-52 serves as the bombardier—and the electronic warfare officer wrapped up their inventory of our code documents and strike folders. Then the six of us hopped into an Air Force-blue, six-passenger pickup and headed to “the vault.” For the next three hours, we sat within a guarded, windowless, single-story, cinder-block bunker to study the inconceivable: the part we’d play in global thermonuclear war.
Our sortie was just one strike mission in the Single Integrated Operational Plan, a Strategic Air Command script for thousands of aircraft and missile attacks against the Russian homeland in response to a Soviet assault. Laid out in meticulous detail in our strike folder were flight routes, refueling tracks, bomb run airspeeds, our positive-control turnaround point—where we would turn back unless we received a radio order to strike—and finally, deep in the Soviet Union, four targets, one for each of our 1.1-megaton weapons.
In the vault, my crewmates, who ordinarily wouldn’t go more than a few minutes without a joke or good-natured ribbing, were deadly serious. As we concentrated on the maps, the nav team explained how they would take us in and out of the target areas; we discussed countermeasures, fuel reserves, how we would link up if forced to bail out. I was on alert from 1979 until 1983, and each time we studied the SIOP, I knew our six-man combat crew was ready—skilled, trained, willing—to execute a mission from which we would likely not return.
I have wondered since then what went through the minds of other Strategic Air Command crews who, 20 years before my crew met in the vault, came much closer to flying those missions than we did. The bomber crews on alert during the 1962 Cuban missile crisis were studying the SIOP at the only time in the history of the cold war when U.S. forces reached Defense Condition 2. At DEFCON 1, those SAC crews would have been dropping bombs.
“I thought it was unlikely that we would complete the entire mission,” says Augustine R. “Gus” Letto, who, when the missile crisis broke, was a captain and EB-47E copilot with the 353rd Bomb Squadron at Lockbourne Air Force Base in Ohio. “My personal hope was that we could complete enough of the mission to support the low-flying strike aircraft.” The EB-47s were high-altitude jammers, exposed to fighters and surface-to-air missiles. “I decided that the world as we knew it would be at an end,” Letto continues, “and that my family, if they were lucky, would not survive the initial nuclear exchange.”
Letto, 30 at the time, was pulling the week-long ground alert tour required of every SAC crew member nearly twice a month. Crews on ground alert were expected to take off, ready for combat, within 15 minutes of the order to launch. For the entire week they were on alert, they lived in a partially buried, concrete-block alert shack. “We had spent the whole afternoon [of October 22, 1962] in the ‘mole hole’ when they announced a meeting for aircraft commanders only,” he says. Outside, Letto saw crew chiefs and technicians at work on the wing’s EB-47s: topping fuel tanks, loading 20-mm ammo for the twin tail cannon, installing JATO (jet-assisted takeoff) bottles—in short, preparing the bombers for combat.
To the Brink
Six days earlier, on October 16, President John F. Kennedy’s Executive Committee had begun to act on intelligence gathered by U.S. Air Force U-2 reconnaissance aircraft: The Soviet Union was preparing to deploy medium-range R-12 missiles in Cuba. The missiles had 2.3-megaton warheads and a 1,100-mile range. They could reach Philadelphia, St. Louis, Oklahoma City, San Antonio, and the Panama Canal. (Photo-interpreters discovered that Soviet technicians were also preparing sites for 16 intermediate-range R-14 ballistic missiles, with a range of 2,300 miles.)
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next »





Comments (9)
During the same period we were on cockpit alert (12 on, 12 0ff) in our B 57s at Kunsan, Korea. Our target was twenty minutes away. We were in revetments nose-to-nose with ten other B-57s similarly nuke armed and ready to hit the start switches.
We pondered about the SAC planes getting to their targets in three to six hours if'the balloon went up'.
We thought about where we could go after the LABS bomb drop. All the good choices were gone--or would be. We decided we could get to Chejudo, an island unlikely to be targeted by either side, and we could hang out in a fishing village for the duration.
It was an interesting couple of weeks.
Posted by robert mans on July 22,2008 | 09:40 AM
Most of the information was accurate. I was at Altus AFB, OK. I was a 1st Lt. Co-pilot. I had my parents come to Altus and take my wife and baby son to Missouri.
Posted by L. R. Busby on July 22,2008 | 11:47 PM
When the crisis began, I was an Air Force Major assigned to a satellite test facility in California. Some time prior, the AF had successfully launched an experimental, rudimentary weather reconnaissance satellite. I was the project's test controller responsible for seeing that the test mission was performed on each orbit. Suddenly the test plan was thrown out the window and we began "targeting" the satellite to gather weather (cloud cover) data over Cuba in support of U-2 and other flights. This support continued for sometime after the conclusion of the emergency.
Posted by K. R. Smith on July 23,2008 | 11:50 AM
As a B-29MR and later RB-36 crewman in the early fifties I shared a common goal (and risk)in our EWP as the author did in later years. One major difference was that it was a one-way mission for the B-29 even with in-flight refueling).
If possible I would like to compare SAC experiences with Dr. Jones by including my e-mail address (or request that it be passed along to Dr. Jones separate from this comment).
Frank Way b29gunner [at] sbcglobal.net
Posted by Frank Way on December 12,2009 | 11:54 AM
Our family was stationed at Altus air force base during the Cuban missile crisis; my father was a copilot on the 52's. I remember as a young child being brought out to the alert bunkers to have the ability to visit. I begin to explore and ended up walking out of the bunker and I went up the bunkers ramp to the tarmac and saw lots of guys with weapons and german shepherd dogs around all these B 52 bombers. When I tried to get back into the bunker I was locked out. Luckily my mom got word and came looking for me and found me quickly. It was a very scary moment in my life.
Posted by R. Tetzner on April 10,2011 | 07:51 PM
I have recently authored a collection of fiction short stories entitled "Over The Shoulder" in which the lead story,"Almost Defcon 1", is about a B-47 crew during the Cuban Crisis. See:
www.createspace.com/3742977
Enjoy!
Posted by Lewis King on January 23,2012 | 11:11 PM
Retired engineer,mathematician in Ozark Mtns. I went to Los Alamos Sci Lab (LASL) from Grad School when LA was still a closed, secret town. I was on Operation Dominic Joint Task Force Eight (Google it); was LASL Sr Sci Rep for nuclear test bombs, prepared bombs at NASBP (Naval Air Station Barber*s Point) Hawaii. We checked the bombs, loaded them in B-52#013, I armed them and signed bombs over to custody of Air Force crew. Then I flew with Genreal *Sam* as weapon monitor. Three 135s (LASL, Livermore, Sandia labs) monitored the pre-dawn explosion as the bomb fell, parachute retarded. The B-57s (U-2 types)did air sampling,recovered to hot pads on Johnston Isl. I went EOD school and briefed military EOD teams at Pearl, Johnston Isl. in event B-52 went down with bomb. At Cuban-Missile crisis SAC came and took *our* B-52, loaded it with WR bombs. Understand ole #013 is now at National Atomic Museum Albuquerque. I took a short nap sleeping on the bombs in bay of 013. Prepared the CHAMA bomb on my birthday. Little significant I do not know about nuclear weapons. Some time past there was a group of old B-52 grey beards. Wonder if any still around ?
Posted by Robert L. Chaney on January 1,2013 | 12:06 PM
Strategic Nuclear War. At Los Alamos Sci Lab in NM mountians. We had 1 or 2 year supply of food, water. In Intel. Community we knew Soviet stockpile, missiles, etc. Estimate of Intel. and SAC was 90% of US population would be killed, all east of the Mississippi River. We knew the SIOP well as well as Russian nuclear strikes, which was almost everywhere, and US wind patterns. Thus where to go while radiation fields decayed. Thought was only perhaps India would survive to carry civilization forward, little in the northern hemisphere. In that era many knew how to best survive radiation (fallout). Now almost none know.
Posted by Robert Chaney on January 1,2013 | 12:25 PM
In 1963 I was assigned to an Air Force Reserve Unit at the Ventura County airport whos mission was the support dispersed SAC A/C..The squadron designation was not included in my records and I cannot find these units in any AF History ????.
Posted by Bert on February 10,2013 | 05:49 PM