The Thin Aluminum Line
Supersonic airplanes and a screen of radar stood ready during the cold war to avert the end of the world.
- By Carl Posey
- Air & Space magazine, January 2007
The Soviets' first atomic bomb test in 1949, in background, prompted tense aerial duels between (top to bottom) Soviet Tu-95 bombers, F-101s, and F-102s. Bottom: The blast effects of a one megaton bomb exploding over Pittsburgh.
David Peters; Sources: NASM (SI Neg. #85-16420); NASM (SI Neg. #1B44791); SOVFOTO
In the 1950s, everyone knew how the Third World War would be fought. Hundreds of Soviet bombers would sweep south across the Arctic, hauling thermonuclear loads destined for U.S. cities. The response, too, was a given. Fighters would rise to meet the intruders as they crossed into North American airspace, taking down as many bombers as possible. As the battle moved south, anti-aircraft missiles would also rise to knock out the bombers.
Some enemies would get through. Air defense, in the view of those within the newly created Strategic Air Command, was like boxing. You took a few punches, then knocked the other guy out with your own city-incinerating bombers.
To prevent this exchange, Pentagon strategists concentrated on building offensive weapons that would guarantee delivery of massive strikes. So, at the expense of fighters, SAC developed increasingly capable strategic bombers. In the early 1950s the only aircraft waiting to counter the Soviet long-range bomber fleets were the aging workhorse aircraft of the Korean War. The United States stationed a contingent of these aircraft at forward-deployed bases in Alaska.
The Lockheed F-94As and F-82 Twin Mustangs standing alert at these bases were hardly equipped for the task. “A [Soviet] Il-28 Beagle coming over, we were supposed to intercept him and force him to land by aiming a .45 pistol at him,” jokes Guy Sherrill, a retired Air Force colonel who flew F-94s from Galena and King Salmon airbases in 1953.
Sherrill had been chosen to train on a new all-weather jet interceptor, Northrop Grumman’s F-89, a big, straight-wing, twin-engine two-seater. Someone discerned a stinger in the high T-tail and dubbed the low-slung machine “Scorpion.”
The F-89 had first flown in August 1948, but even in the early years of production had acquired a bad reputation. At the time Sherrill was supposed to train on them, the Scorpions were grounded, he says, “because their wings were falling off.” Instead, he got interceptor training in a B-25 and went on to fly the F-94. Later, he would stand his fair share of Arctic alerts with the Scorpion’s improved J version, whose wings stayed on in flight.
Scorpions entered service in 1950, but by then they were already antiquated. “The bombers were ahead of us,” Sherrill says, citing training attempts to intercept a B-52 at 46,000 feet. “Only way to do it was straight up. [You] finally got a firing position, then started sliding backwards.”
Fast new bombers were also appearing on the Soviet side. The Tupolev Tu-16 Badger was seen in 1953, and the Tu-95 Bear, a swept-wing turboprop giant, a year later. No mere knockoffs of Western designs, they were as different from their U.S. counterparts as Klingon Birds of Prey are from Federation Starships. “We had the -89J for a couple of years,” recalls Alex McDonald, who ended his North Dakota Air National Guard career as a major general. “Despite being slow and heavy, we were very successful in our intercepts against B-58s and that sort of airplane. But we couldn’t chase them down.”
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next »





Comments (9)
Your site is useless. The article is covered by an ad, Credit Suisse, that can't be closed. I would like to read the article and bookmark your site - but with an ad overlaying the article this is not possible.
Posted by Sydney Miller on April 1,2008 | 05:15 AM
Was a Weapons Control System Mechanic on the F-106's with the 4756th A&E Maint. Sqdn., based at Tyndall AFB, Panama City, Florida in the 1960-63 time frame. Anyone else out there who would like to chat about their eperiences with the "Six" or the MA1/ANSQ25 is welcome to contact me. Also, anyone know of any model manufacturer of the "B" model? The B was a lot sleeker looking bird.
Frederic H. Vogelpohl (sandravogelpohl@aol.com)
Posted by Frederic H. Vogelpohl on July 24,2009 | 02:44 PM
Most of the DEW Line sites here in Alaska are still functioning albeit upgraded with better radar and remotely operated.
Frederick, Monogram (now Revell) makes a 1/48 scale F-106. A company called C&H miniatures produces a resin conversion kit turning the Monogram/Revell F-106 into an F-106B. Both are great kits!
Sydney, Haven't the foggiest idea on your problems with the site. What a great article covering an important era in the Cold War.
Posted by Sal Provenzano on November 10,2009 | 09:25 PM
Most of the DEW Line sites here in Alaska are still functioning albeit upgraded with better radar and remotely operated.
Frederick, Monogram (now Revell) makes a 1/48 scale F-106. A company called C&H miniatures produces a resin conversion kit turning the Monogram/Revell F-106 into an F-106B. Both are great kits!
Sydney, Haven't the foggiest idea on your problems with the site. What a great article covering an important era in the Cold War.
Posted by Sal Provenzano on November 10,2009 | 09:25 PM
thanks for a swell story. i was weaned on the "6" at mcchord 318fis 325th omsq,in 1961 and spent the project white shoes deployment at galena ak. sharred birchwood hangar with the boys from the 317th aac and their deuces. if memory serves me right, there were only 4 cells there. we had 2 sixs on 5 and 2 deuces on 15min. scrambles were a frequent event, and lots of pictures were sharred with hq at aac and adc. gen, jensen was the aac commander at the time, and he came to visit us at galena on one fine day to find out why a couple of bears made it past us. well as you know that was the dew line boys problem, not adc/aac. left reggies in '65, went to lockhead air service in '66 to install i/f/r in the "6" at dover a.f.b. so the "6" could go to korea, during the pueblo incident. from there i went went to njang, c/c f-106 it was a treat to see some of the old mcchord birds funnel through,spent up to '88 on "6's" then on to f-16. all in all i spent 20 years on the "6". when geiger(first operational f-106 sq) got rid of theirs and we got them at mcchord we had 40 f-106's on the ramp at one time. it was a nightmare. in '88 we said goodby to the last "ultimate interceptor" and like the bible says, "when your out of sixes, your out of interceptors" i had the good fortune to be with the 1st op "6" outfit and the last, 177fis/fig new jersey. what a memory. rich
Posted by RICH RYAN on January 13,2010 | 08:19 PM
Pop-up ad problems can be addressed by disabling "pop-ups" in the internet browser's settings. Look to the browser's Help menu for details. It may also indicate that there is a 'malicious' adware running on your computer (akin to a virus.) Search using Google for "SpyBOT" which is a free scanner (when for personal use) that can check your computer for just that sort of thing. Hope this helps!
Regards.
Posted by Robert Beach on February 18,2010 | 06:11 PM
You've done a good job but any story has to leave out something..the F-86D is not profiled at all..it was the standard, short range interceptor. Yes, it was CONUS based but still part of the aluminum umbrella. The F-89 was a stopgap for F-89 delays. Pilots I knew who flew the Scorpion past the "D" variant liked it. Maintenance men knew it as a nightmare with it's low powered J-35s and primitive MG-3 firecontrol but that technology was in it's infancy. Also not mentioned are the picket ships, Texas Towers, and patrol aircraft that also served, filling the gaps at both ends of the DEW and PINETREE lines. I've not ever seen the total number of stations mentioned in the same article so you've done well there. For more info folks should check out Radomes.org and the Online Radar Museum. MJR
Posted by Mark R. on March 25,2010 | 11:53 PM
I remember well the CF-101B/F Voodoo's in Canadian service. It was my privilege to know several of the crews that flew and maintained the One-Oh-Wonder. The aircraft served NORAD and Canada well. I think the saddest day was when 414 Squadron ceased flying the last operational Voodoo in the world. Kudo's to all who stood guard during the Cold War.
Posted by Keith Clifford on May 17,2010 | 06:42 AM
I was a SAGE height-finder radar operator at Klamath Air Force Station, CA (777th RADRON [SAGE])from about 18Mar63 to 4Nov66. We were connected to the Block House at Portland Sector in Corvallis, OR. Our primary mission at Klamath, CA was to provide radar measured aircraft altitudes to the Direction Center on an as requested basis utilizing the AN/FPS-90 and FPS-26 height-finder radars requiring the use of the AN/FST-2 Data Processor to move the information from our radar site to the Direction Center at Corvallis OR by way of a push of ONE button on our radar console. All the necessary information to satisfy a height request was sent automatically at the push of that button. The actual aircraft in question would be being painted on our radar screen as a long thin line which we would bisect in the center with an on-scope cursor which we would position with a nice, hand sized finger wheel. Once the "target" was bisected, a little square "read-in" button was pushed, along with a "number of aircraft" button for that group of aircraft. The "T-2" would then take this information automatically to the computer at the Direction Center (at Sector HQ). The automatic system was set up so that the radar operator (me) had only ten seconds to evaluate the information and select the proper buttons to push until the T-2 cleared out the request and sent it on its way automatically. At the time of my service at Klamath AFS, I really didn't have any idea I was working on equipment that would someday turn into a desktop or laptop or cellphone. The radar and T-2 equipment we used was made by Burroughs which later turned into Unisys. I was blessed to have witnessed this period in history.
Posted by Norm Shafer on September 22,2011 | 01:51 AM