• About Air & Space
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
airspacemag.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Smithsonian magazine
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Photos & Videos
  • Subscribe

(Courtesy movieposter.com)
  • History of Flight

X-15: The Hollywood Version

Charles Bronson starred. The Pentagon had a few minor corrections.

  • By airspacemag.com
  • Air & Space Magazine, August 01, 2007

Article Tools

  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit
    More from AirSpaceMag.com
    • Need for Speed
    • X-15 Walkaround

    Although the movie X-15, starring Charles Bronson and Mary Tyler Moore, is today viewed unfavorably by movie and aviation fans, it was well received by critics in November 1961. The Washington Evening Star raved, “Whatever its serious scientific intentions, the X-15 is an almost unbelievable screen spectacular.”

    Scripted by Tony Lazzarino and James Warner Bellah, X-15 underwent several name changes including Exit, Time of Departure, and Beyond the Unknown. In March 1958, when Lazzarino first approached the Department of Defense for assistance, he had just come from working on the 1950s TV series, NORAD. In his initial correspondence with the DoD, he requested access to X-2 footage. As the following letter notes, U.S. Air Force Major Stockton Shaw recommended that the subject be the X-15, which had rolled out of North American hangars just four weeks previous. Some $350,000 was put aside for primary shooting, with an additional $72,500 for post-production work. By August 1960, production had moved from Bob Hope’s company to Frank Sinatra’s Essex Productions.

    In September 1960, producer Hank Sanicola at Essex requested access to X-15 footage. At this point, Lazzarino was in the middle of a rewrite, presumably to add the latest X-15 data. The final shooting script is dated April 7. Richard Donner (best known today for the Lethal Weapon and Superman franchises) directed. Narrator Brigadier General James Stewart introduced the film to moviegoers.

    The following letter shows just how involved the Pentagon was in helping the producers do justice to the subject.

    Department of the Air Force, Washington
    Office of the Secretary
    18 November 1958
    Memorandum for Chief, Production Branch Audio-Visual Division, Office of News Services
    Subject: “Exit”

    Objections

    1. The story outlines placing a man in orbit on a crash basis because of a desire on the part of the government to “top” the Russian Sputnik. Neither promise does credit to the government or the U.S. Air Force and the latter is no longer valid. We recommend that some other premise be established and suggest that the reason for the fast pace is a breakthrough in propellants which makes space flight possible.

    2. The participating pilots appear to add very little to the program except their presence. They are tested, probed and finally given the seal of approval with almost no evidence of having contributed to the program itself. This trend is noted in the following dialogue. Scene 132, page 67: Dr. Anthony says, “I’ll have someone ready by Saturday.” Scene 134, page 67, Dr. Anthony again says, “If anything at all goes wong before the drop…I want you to abort the mission.” The pilot answers, “Right, Sir, thank you!” The total impression is that the pilot is another piece of complicated equipment that is to be modified, perfected, and then brought out to take its place at the right time with the rest of the machinery. We believe this downgrades our pilots to a great extent considering the fact that they are engineers and have worked with the factory throughout the production of the aircraft. In addition the pilot’s tests seem solely to be concerned with their physical aptitude and ability. Nothing indicates either a mental aptitude, ability, or any contribution which they had made to the project.

    1 2 3 4

    Although the movie X-15, starring Charles Bronson and Mary Tyler Moore, is today viewed unfavorably by movie and aviation fans, it was well received by critics in November 1961. The Washington Evening Star raved, “Whatever its serious scientific intentions, the X-15 is an almost unbelievable screen spectacular.”

    Scripted by Tony Lazzarino and James Warner Bellah, X-15 underwent several name changes including Exit, Time of Departure, and Beyond the Unknown. In March 1958, when Lazzarino first approached the Department of Defense for assistance, he had just come from working on the 1950s TV series, NORAD. In his initial correspondence with the DoD, he requested access to X-2 footage. As the following letter notes, U.S. Air Force Major Stockton Shaw recommended that the subject be the X-15, which had rolled out of North American hangars just four weeks previous. Some $350,000 was put aside for primary shooting, with an additional $72,500 for post-production work. By August 1960, production had moved from Bob Hope’s company to Frank Sinatra’s Essex Productions.

    In September 1960, producer Hank Sanicola at Essex requested access to X-15 footage. At this point, Lazzarino was in the middle of a rewrite, presumably to add the latest X-15 data. The final shooting script is dated April 7. Richard Donner (best known today for the Lethal Weapon and Superman franchises) directed. Narrator Brigadier General James Stewart introduced the film to moviegoers.

    The following letter shows just how involved the Pentagon was in helping the producers do justice to the subject.

    Department of the Air Force, Washington
    Office of the Secretary
    18 November 1958
    Memorandum for Chief, Production Branch Audio-Visual Division, Office of News Services
    Subject: “Exit”

    Objections

    1. The story outlines placing a man in orbit on a crash basis because of a desire on the part of the government to “top” the Russian Sputnik. Neither promise does credit to the government or the U.S. Air Force and the latter is no longer valid. We recommend that some other premise be established and suggest that the reason for the fast pace is a breakthrough in propellants which makes space flight possible.

    2. The participating pilots appear to add very little to the program except their presence. They are tested, probed and finally given the seal of approval with almost no evidence of having contributed to the program itself. This trend is noted in the following dialogue. Scene 132, page 67: Dr. Anthony says, “I’ll have someone ready by Saturday.” Scene 134, page 67, Dr. Anthony again says, “If anything at all goes wong before the drop…I want you to abort the mission.” The pilot answers, “Right, Sir, thank you!” The total impression is that the pilot is another piece of complicated equipment that is to be modified, perfected, and then brought out to take its place at the right time with the rest of the machinery. We believe this downgrades our pilots to a great extent considering the fact that they are engineers and have worked with the factory throughout the production of the aircraft. In addition the pilot’s tests seem solely to be concerned with their physical aptitude and ability. Nothing indicates either a mental aptitude, ability, or any contribution which they had made to the project.

    3. The story relies on quantities of stock footage of the X-2 flights. We realize that there is no other source of footage to make the points required by the story, but the X-2 program ended over two years ago and the aircraft does not exist any longer. The X-15 is now of great interest to the public and will probably be engaged in the contractor demonstration program at the time this picture is released. In this case, fact would overtake fiction and the picture would be out of phase unless the technical advisor who represents the Air Force weighs carefully each bit of dialogue so that the X-2 is used as an airframe only and not identified with its historical flights.

    b. Suggestions

    That the chase planes depicted in the script be updated from the F-86 to the F-100F and F-104 to reflect currently used aircraft if the stock footage will allow.

    General Holden should be referred to as a Brig. Gen. and Commander of the Air Force Flight Test Center, not Commanding General.

    c. Specific changes

    Page 9, Scene 9: Should be aileron roll to the left, instead of slow roll.

    Page 10, Scene 16: “Hold your position” is impossible, suggest instructions to make a 360-degree turn.

    Page 29, Scene 53: NACA should be changed to NASA

    Page 49, Scene 81: Proper terminology would refer to aircraft number or code name, not “B-52 to control.”

    Page 50, Scene 91: Use of check list always requires that the pilot answer with the action taken and not with the word “check” or some other term such as OK, or roger.

    Page 70, Scene 146: Terrminology used would probably be “pull her up,” not “lift her off,” since the airplane is already airborne.

    Page 71, Scene 153: We believe the reference to pulling stick “as far back as it will go” is incorrect. Obviously, no one in the Air Force Flight Test Center has exact knowledge of the X-15, but the stick travel on most airplanes to pull up is very slight and never back as far as it will go.

    Page 73, scene 162: Reference to altitude and % of earth’s atmosphere is incorrect. 95% of the earth’s atmosphere is below 75,000 feet, not 75 miles.

    Page 79, Scene 175: It appears impossible to expect a visual sighting considering the distance between the two aircraft.

    Page 90. Scene 202: Fuel is not measured in inches. Correct terminology is “minimum fuel.”

    Page 91, Scene 208: Two planes flying upside down and side by side during a test operation is rather far fetched and not considered practical.

    Page 92, Scene 211: F-100 engines don’t sputter.

    Page 145, Scene 398: Reference to the Edwards Air Force Base landing area as “pancake” is unknown. Suggest “dry lake” or “lake bed” be used.

    Stockton B. Shaw
    Major, USAF
    Deputy Chief Pictorial Branch Office of Information Services

    Adapted by permission from X-15: The NASA Mission Reports, compiled and edited by Robert Godwin. Apogee Books, 2000.

     


     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement


    Most Popular Video

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed

    Race TV

    The 2009 Reno Air Races were the first to be broadcast live.

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    An RAF pilot takes his T-33 on a joyride in 1959.

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Take a narrated tour of the station with the same animation astronauts use in training.

    Armstrongs Close Call

    Armstrong’s Close Call

    A fiery bailout while training to land on the moon.

    Ares I-X Launch

    NASA tests a prototype of its new Ares 1 crew launcher.

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    An RAF pilot takes his T-33 on a joyride in 1959.

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    Watch Boeing technicians repair an airliner—in two minutes.

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Take a narrated tour of the station with the same animation astronauts use in training.

    Armstrongs Close Call

    Armstrong’s Close Call

    A fiery bailout while training to land on the moon.

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    In the winter of 1912, Frank Coffyn filmed the first silent motion pictures of New York ever taken from an airplane.

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    1. Space Shuttle Jr.
    2. Devils’ Advocates
    3. The First Photo From Space
    4. A&S Interview: Yang Guoxiang
    5. Slim and Bud
    6. The Do-Everything Bomber
    7. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    8. Reno Wrap-up
    9. Sightings: Hazy's Hits
    10. Aircraft That Changed the World
    1. Slim and Bud
    2. Space Shuttle Jr.
    3. Legends of Vietnam: Super Tweet
    4. A&S Interview: Yang Guoxiang
    5. Are aft-facing airplane seats safer?
    6. Out in the Breezy
    7. Humans vs. Robots
    8. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    9. The First Photo From Space
    10. What determines an airplane’s lifespan?
    1. Amelia's Astronaut Connection
    2. What determines an airplane’s lifespan?
    3. Top NASA Photos of All Time
    4. Devils’ Advocates
    5. Space Shuttle Jr.
    6. How Things Work: Electromagnetic Catapults
    7. Over the No-Fly Zone
    8. Legends of Vietnam: Super Tweet
    9. Lake Murray's Mitchell
    10. Slim and Bud

    Advertisement

    Marketplace

    SmithsonianStore

    Night at the Museum Adult Collage Tee
    Item no: 28206

    Window Shopping

    Gifts, Gadgets and Great Finds!

    Travel & Adventure

    A Family Weekend in Washington, D.C.: Featuring "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian"

    Spend a fun-filled weekend with your family discovering the magic of the new feature film, "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" (Jul. 24 - 26, 2009)

    In the Magazine

    January 2010

    • Thanks For the Memories
    • Space Shuttle Jr.
    • The Big Race of 1910
    • The Do-Everything Bomber
    • Legends of Vietnam: Super Tweet
    • Ode on a Canadian Warbird

    View Table of Contents »

    Snapshot

    Nice Save

    This camera's no point-and-shoot. Now, come see it for yourself.

    Reader Scrapbook

    Send In Your Photos

    Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.

    Need to Know

    What determines an airplane’s lifespan?

    Some keep flying for decades, while others end up on the scrap heap.

    • Smithsonian Store
    • Smithsonian Journeys

    In the Cockpit: Inside 50 History-Making Aircraft

    Item No. 10304

    Astronomy in Hawaii

    Gaze at the stars and learn about the Universe from the beautiful island of Hawaii (Apr 29 - May 6, 2010)



    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • Jan 2010

    • In his portrait of the storied racer Rare Bear and its crew, photographer Tyson Rininger captures the sense of anticipation that surrounds air races. “Something’s coming,” this quiet night scene seems to suggest. “Tomorrow, it’s win or lose.”
      Nov 2009


    • Sep 2009

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability