100 Years of Naval Aviation
The Navy's first pilot and 10 more milestones.
- By The Editors
- Air & Space magazine, March 2011
Before the U.S. Navy had airplanes or pilots, it had an interest in aviation. As aviation pioneers demonstrated their inventions in the United States and Europe, naval planners attended airshows to watch the new technology develop. By 1910, the Navy had appointed an aviation officer, and a civilian pilot, Eugene Ely, demonstrated that an airplane could take off from a ship. About the same time, Glenn Curtiss proposed free flight instruction to the Navy, and Lieutenant Theodore Ellyson was ordered to the Glenn Curtiss Aviation Camp at North Island, San Diego, to accept his offer. By 1911, naval aviation was under way. That year, the U.S. Navy bought its first airplane, the Curtiss A-1 Triad. From these humble beginnings the Navy’s aircraft inventory has grown to more than 30 types of fixed-wing, rotary, and remotely piloted aircraft today. We’ve highlighted a few in this list of 10 milestones, assembled to kick off the centennial. Well aware that 10 milestones can’t cover a full 100 years, we invite you to suggest what you consider the most significant aircraft or events in naval aviation history. Visit our Web site, airspacemag.com, and add your comments to this feature. The Web site also has a special section: 100 ways to celebrate 100 years of naval aviation—our suggestions of events, activities, exhibits, and further reading for the centennial year. — The Editors
SOME PEOPLE MAKE their way into history through hard work and perseverance. Others show up by accident. Theodore Gordon “Spuds” Ellyson, the Navy’s first aviator, made history both ways.
On December 16, 1910, at the urging of aviation visionary Ken Whiting, Ellyson submitted a request for flight training to the Secretary of the Navy. At the same time, Glenn Curtiss sent a note to the Navy offering to train an officer—at no charge—in the construction and operation of his airplane. The air-minded Captain Washington Irving Chambers thought the proposal a fine idea, but by the time his recommendation got kicked down the food chain to the detail officer, it was December 23, and folks were trying to leave early for Christmas. The harried detail officer grabbed the first request at hand—Ellyson’s—and sent out the orders that afternoon.
Two weeks later, Ellyson was on North Island in San Diego Bay, learning the intricacies of the Curtiss biplane. At a local airshow, Ellyson sat in the aircraft—only the second time he had done so—and as the surprised crowd watched, he inadvertently took off on his first solo flight. A governing mechanism on the biplane malfunctioned, causing the airplane to soar 15 feet into the air before crunching down on one wing.
For chance acquaintances, Curtiss and Ellyson got along well. Ellyson happily tinkered with carburetors and leaky valves in addition to learning piloting basics. The two also collaborated on the seaplane, or “hydroaeroplane,” which Ellyson felt to be the future of naval aviation. He compiled an impressive list of firsts: He was the first passenger to go aloft in a seaplane, and was aboard on the first flight of Curtiss’ A-1 aircraft. He was the first naval airman to fly at night, and flew the first airplane successfully launched from a wire cable.
In March 1912, Ellyson tried out the A-2. Curtiss suggested a cautionary air test, but Ellyson ignored his advice, taking off over the two-mile straightaway. In a letter to Chambers (now in the Library of Congress) recounting what happened next, fellow student Jack Towers wrote: “[Ellyson’s aircraft shot] straight into the ground at an angle of about 45º and from a height of about twenty-five feet. It was so sudden that he did not have time to do anything and there was not enough room to recover anyway.” It took Ellyson more than five weeks to mend, but in September of that year, he added another accomplishment to his list: He piloted the first floatplane successfully launched from a catapult.
Something changed—we don’t know precisely what—over the next few months to turn Ellyson away from flying. In March 1913, Ellyson wrote to his wife, “I have decided to quit flying for good and all, that is never to get in a machine again for any reason. Things have come to such a pass here that I had to decide, either to go to Annapolis and take charge of the camp or quit for good. I have not told anyone yet of my decision, nor will I for the present. I cannot do the job half way.”
The next month would find him aboard the battleship South Carolina, where he seemed content: “I took the bridge today for about an hour, my first watch, and it did seem nice to be in charge of a ship underway once again,” he wrote to his wife on April 29. (Ellyson added, “I am really feeling fit and in good condition for the first time since I bumped my head out at San Diego.”)
A chance meeting with an aviator aboard the South Carolina reveals Ellyson’s conflicted feelings about flying, as outlined in a January 1914 letter to his wife: “B.S. Smith is here with two flying boats and is flying his head off. He must have been in the air over five hours today. I was sorely tempted to go up with him to get an idea of what Culebra [Puerto Rico] is like, but decided I had no right to with present responsibilities, since I am not in the game at present. Another thing I don’t like to go up when anyone else is doing the driving.”





Comments (16)
I think that the B-25 Mitchell should have appeared as one of the milestones, considering that it was the first land-based bomber to take off from a carrier.
Posted by Avery Tyrrell on January 29,2011 | 09:56 AM
I was stationed at NAS Pensicola during the selebration of the 50 years of Naval Aviation. I spent 5 years working on and teaching the DASH (Drone Anti Submarine Helicopter) system only to be dissapointed in the ommision of this whole historic system as a part of The Navy's 100th year celebration. To even mention the new FIRE SCOUT, as the "Navy's First Unmanned helicopter is very dissapointing to those of us that spent a large part of our Navy experience working on the Navy's first Unmanned Helicopter.
Posted by John Williams on February 1,2011 | 09:33 AM
The Navy's most significant aircraft? Thanks for the easy question.
While it is difficult to separate one plane from the herd of many landmark machines, it is my opinion that the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk has to rank high, if not at the top. When we look at:
*Cost
*Simplicity
*Durability
*Longevity
*Capability
*Effectiveness
there may not be another like it.
There was a famous face and name over at Lockheed that most folks point to as the designer of really great and unique airplanes, and that's true. But the Ed Heinemann Team at Douglas can hold their heads high for their many great designs, the A-4 among them.
The A-4 is sort of the DC-3 of fighters. People were born and died in the lifespan of this aircraft. Would anybody be surprised to learn that in 2056 some third world military was still flying it? I'd smile and shake my head but it would not surprise me.
Posted by Martin Coddington on February 1,2011 | 04:27 PM
When I think of naval aviation I can't help but think of the succession of rugged and deadly Grumman 'Cats that have always seemed to be the great flying icons of the US Navy. From the Wildcat to the Tomcat and all in between, who can look at some old carrier photo and not pick a bunch out.
Posted by Bob Fiesser on February 2,2011 | 02:22 PM
A candidate for one of the Navy's most unusual (ugly) aircraft is the PB-1W. It is a modifird B-17G with all armor, armanent and bomb racks removed, outboard wing fuel blatters added and an APS-20 radar installed. The bomb bay was converted into an airborne CIC with two ground stabilazed 12 inch radar scopes, a plot table and carrier aircraft communications. It was the second Navy Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW) aircraft, the TBM-3W was the first, the first top-mount radar search aircraft (BuNo 77234), the first operational user of FM TV (Bellhop), the first aircraft that provided 24/7 all-weather radar protection of NATO and US fleet operations and the first desigated hurrican hunter. Twenty-four PB-1Ws were configured and served in the Atlantic and Pacific fleets from 1946 through 1954.
Posted by Richard W. Parker Jr. LCdr., USN Ret. NAO-C on February 3,2011 | 10:25 PM
John Williams' comments about the DASH were interesting. I suspect it could not be classified as a Naval Aviation system but as a shipboard off-board system to increase the reach of the torpedoes being employed. It was very reliable when the gun director radars were used as the data link but international maritime complaints came up when the radar was pointed at a ship while controlling the DASH, since the COs being scanned didn't know whether it was being used to control the DASH or to target their ship. I actually met a Navy Captain in 1977 who had allowed himself to be hauled around in a Bo'suns chair slung below the DASH. Then the Navy reverted to an omni-directional data link antenna at great loss of gain, and reduced the maintenance detachment aboard to three people from 12. Poor operational reliability and availability ensued. DASH had a great life at China Lake where over 150 were used as targets. I've always felt that LAMPS was just a manned version of DASH, still subservient to the host ship's weapons employment scheme but with reliability restored by the airborne crew.
Posted by Joe Stewart on February 3,2011 | 12:43 AM
Regarding FIRE SCOUT, PIONEER and Mr Williams' comments regarding the QH-50 DASH: Whether by omission or inaccuracy, the editors of Air and Space Magazine have done great disservice to everyone in Industry and the Naval service who were involved in the design, manufacture, operation and maintenance of an aircraft as unique as the QH-50 DASH. This particular rotorcraft was a weaponized UAS which was operational and employed from U.S. Navy surface combatants nearly a half century ago. You not only have ignored history but also have failed to recognize the contribution to the U.S. Navy and our aviation heritage which the QH-50, it's capabilities, and the individuals involved with the program provided so many years ago.
Posted by Lance Bills on February 3,2011 | 12:59 AM
The Navy's most significant aircraft? In my opinion would be the F-14 Tomcat. The Tomcat was the ultimate aircraft, born as the fleet defender with its Phoenix missles, proven dogfighter (Tomcats-4, Libya-0) and finishing its career as a very capable fighter bomber.Nothing more impressive than seeing a Tomcat from VF-84 The Jolly Rogers, with the skull and crossbones on the tail, or a VF-111 Sundowner F-14 with the sharks mouth painted under it's nose. The F-14 was the star of the show for over 30 years, to bad all good things must come to an end! Go Navy and Tomcats Forever Baby!
Posted by Stephen Wargo on February 5,2011 | 04:05 PM
Most significant event in Naval Aviation history must be Pearl Harbor. Pacific Fleet (minus carriers) trapped in confined space in shallow water attacked by carrier aviation. Primacy of aviation in sea warfare finally achieved appropriate comprehension by top Navy leadership, confirmed by Midway and Coral Sea. Not a new idea to naval aviators but was to the existing high command.
A technology candidate: The canted carrier deck. Not an American originated concept, but can one imagine a modern battle carrier without?
Posted by KENDALL RUSSELL, Maj. Gen. USAF(ret.) on February 5,2011 | 06:27 PM
While reading your March 2011 issue AIr & Space I noticed a possible error on page 52 in the article titled U.S.Navy 100 years of flight . The article on that page describes how a flight of Grumman 3 F6F-5 Hellcats performed some precision flying for Vice Admiral Frank Wagner. The article implies that the aircraft shown at the top of the page is a Grumman F6F Hellcat . I believe the the aircraft shown ,is a later and more formidable model know as the Grumman Bearcat .I'm not sure of the actual number assigned to the Bearcat but just by looking at the wider stance of the landing gear and the air intakes in the leading edge of the left wing seems to identify it as a Bearcat .
I love your magazine you do such a great such a great job with that I look forward to each issue
sincerely
Tom Prendergast
EDITORS' REPLY: We did not identify the aircraft. It is a Bearcat.
Posted by Tom Prendergast on February 6,2011 | 10:10 PM
I read the top 10 list over and over and kept hoping that somehow the list would morph in front of my eyes to include the most recognizable aircraft in the history of the Navy, the F-14 Tomcat. How an aircraft with such a distinguished career could be overlooked is somewhat baffling. The raw power, size and payload capacity of the big cat has no peer in naval history-an aircraft of the same size during WWII would have had several turrets and gun positions. Yet the performance capability of the big cat reminded foes and friends alike that it was very much a fighter...Dont quote me but I remember reading somewhere many years ago, that the F-14 flew circles around the Hornet, while the F-18 was in its infancy in mock engagements, even when outnumbered.
It's adaptablility later in it's career made the "Bombcat" a formidable air to ground threat and it was the only aircraft with the capability to tote the AIM-54 Phoenix into combat...with standoff ranges of over 100 miles.
I would also remind you that the real star of the movie "TopGun" was also responsible for enlisting generations of new Naval Aviators eager to be shot off of a boat. Long live the Cat!
Posted by Chris Mullins on February 7,2011 | 06:23 AM
What about the Stringbag? - The Fairey Swordfish (Taranto AND The Bismark)
Posted by Richard Scott on February 18,2011 | 01:35 PM
Regarding Fire Scout UAV's in the Navy, The USS Carpenter, DD-825 received a drone antisubmarine helicopter (DASH) system on 28 May, 1964. This was not the first ship to receive the DASH so your statenment: 'The Scouts are one example of how far naval aviation has come since the Navy fielded Pioneer, its first unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), in 1986.' is incorrect as the DASH would have been the first form of a UAV helicopter.
Posted by Dan Hargraves on March 10,2011 | 09:10 PM
During my second cruise to the Far East aboard the Aircraft
Carrier USS Kearsage CVA-33 during the Korean War we had
completely exchanged all of our prop planes, including Corsairs and ADs for all jets such as Panthers and Banshees. This was quite a shock but I believe very necessary and effective,to meet the demand to compete with Russian Migs,which were on the prowl out of North Korea.
Our first cruise in the fall of 1952, we had just been recommissioned for overseas duty, out of dry dock in Bremerton, WA before making our homeport in San Diego with only prop planes on board.
All the other carriers in Task Force 77 had already completed this project or soon would be doing so.
Richard Kennison Backus
Corvallis, OR
Aboard the USS Kearsarge 1952-1955
PS- They changed the numbers on our flight deck from 33 to
34 while filming a segment of Bridges of Toko Ri, starring
William Holden and Mickey Rooney. The Oriskany had already
left for home at that time.
The Kearsarge had become a Movie Set for other movies as
well. Including Caine Mutiny with Humphrey Bogart and Fred
Mc Murray.
Posted by Richard Kennison Backus on March 14,2011 | 06:39 PM
Have a look at this article.
World's oldest aircraft carrier discovered rusting by the River Thames.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361523/Worlds-oldest-aircraft-carrier-discovered-rusting-River-Thames.html
Posted by David Washington on March 19,2011 | 05:25 PM
I'm sure with all the material available for the '100 Years of Naval Aviation' article it must have been difficult to decide what to include to give the most diverse picture possible. However, like the others that have commented I too have my favorite. An aircraft that many may 'what the hell is that? The AJ Savage, first operational bomber designed specifically for the atomic bomb. It may have had a short career but I still like to think a distinguished one.
For my Dad, AT-2 M.A. Montecalvo, VC-9
Posted by Michael Montecalvo on March 28,2011 | 02:45 PM