100 Years of Naval Aviation
The Navy's first pilot and 10 more milestones.
- By The Editors
- Air & Space magazine, March 2011
(Page 5 of 5)
They got it with the 25-percent-larger Super Hornet, operational since 2001 in E (single-seat) and F (two-seat) models. The Super’s jet intakes are squared off and stealthy. With 8,000 pounds more thrust, the Super Hornet increased in maximum takeoff weight to 66,000 pounds, and its range grew to 1,275 nautical miles. Its landing weight increased as well: When the ordnance drop doesn’t happen, 9,000 pounds of those expensive smart bombs get returned to the carrier instead of dumped in the drink. The Super Hornet has replaced the F-14 Tomcat, while an electronic warfare variant, the EA-18G Growler, is replacing the EA-6B Prowler. The Super is a refueler too, replacing A-6 Intruders and S-3 Vikings. The larger wing lowers the landing speed to 144 mph, down 23 mph from that of the legacy Hornet.
Yet it’s still an F/A-18, says Captain Michael “Woody” Peoples, a former test pilot and deputy program manager for mission systems at Patuxent River Naval Air Station in Maryland. “As a Hornet guy who’s spent 20 years flying the legacy airplane, you can jump into an E/F and start it right up and probably fly the airplane with little or no instruction.” That of course doesn’t happen, but legacy pilots do say they make a seamless transition. “Flying it, you don’t feel like you’re in a bigger airplane,” says Peoples. “With roll rate in a bigger airplane, usually you’ll feel a little more sluggish. You don’t feel that.” He adds: “And the new car smell is always nice. On my operational tours, I flew Block 10 legacy Hornets, and loved ‘em. You jump in those airplanes and the paint’s worn off in the cockpit. Hundreds of guys have flown the airplane. Then you jump in a [Super Hornet] that was at St. Louis-Boeing two days before. It’s like getting the 2011 Cadillac Escalade compared to the 1985 version.” —Michael Klesius
9. BATTLE OF THE CORAL SEA History’s first fight between aircraft carriers—the Battle of the Coral Sea—was also the first in which the opposing ships neither saw nor fired directly upon each other. More important, the battle, fought from May 4 to 8, 1942, set the course for the end of Imperial Japan’s sea power in World War II.
In the battle, U.S. and Australian forces, led by the carriers USS Yorktown and Lexington, stopped a Japanese attempt to land at Port Moresby, Papua New Guinea, by turning back Japan’s covering carrier force. In four days of fighting around New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, U.S. Grumman F4F Wildcats, Douglas SBD Dauntless dive bombers, and Douglas TBD Devastator torpedo bombers clashed with Japanese Mitsubishi A6M Zeros and Nakajima B5N2 torpedo-bombers to see who could inflict more damage on the enemy’s fleet.
Allied casualties included two fleet carriers (the Lexington scuttled, the Yorktown damaged) and 69 aircraft. For Japan, the losses included one light carrier, one destroyer, and 92 aircraft. But two of its fleet carriers, Shokaku and Zuikaku, were damaged enough to be unable to fight the following month in the decisive Battle of Midway, the turning point of the Pacific war. Because of Coral Sea, when the Americans entered that carrier battle, they had rough parity with the Japanese—and they won. —Paul Hoversten
10. UAVs IN THE NAVY John VanBrabant is fired up about the Fire Scout, the Navy’s first unmanned helicopter. “If you don’t need to put a crew at risk, why do it?” asks the former U.S. Navy helo pilot. VanBrabant, now Northrop Grumman’s business development manager for maritime unmanned aerial systems, likes the vehicle’s eight-hour endurance too, more than twice what his Sikorsky SH-60 Seahawk offered. “At 3.5 hours, you just had to go back to get gas. If you were on a mission where you’re tracking somebody, you lose situational awareness.” While it probably won’t fly from aircraft carriers, the 10-foot-tall, 1.5-ton helo can fly from any ship with a decent landing pad. The Navy may take delivery of up to 168 Fire Scouts after trials conclude in the coming year.
The Scouts are one example of how far naval aviation has come since the Navy fielded Pioneer, its first unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), in 1986. The 14-foot-long, twin-tail, 26-horsepower, propeller-driven airplane was a joint venture of AAI Corporation and Israel Aircraft Industries. Pioneer offered peeks over the horizon at 109 mph with a ceiling of 15,000 feet, primitive by today’s standards. Having proven its chops in the Persian Gulf, Bosnia, the former Yugoslavia, Somalia, and Iraq, Pioneer bushwhacked a path that is now seeing some exotic stuff.
“As we turn the corner on the second hundred years of naval aviation, we’ll be taking people out of the airplane,” says Walt Kreitler, a former P-3 Orion pilot now shepherding the Broad Area Maritime Surveillance (BAMS) UAV program, the Navy’s version of the Global Hawk, for Northrop Grumman. “Nobody wants to fly Friday afternoon, or Saturday or Sunday. BAMS will be remarkably obedient.”
Finally, for autonomous and anonymous, there’s the X-47B, a creature resembling a throwing star and expected to make its first autonomous landing on an aircraft carrier in 2013. A tailless stealth fighter/bomber with no pilot, it’s an unmanned combat air system, as large as an F-14 Tomcat, able to reach an altitude of 40,000 feet and cruise at high-subsonic speed with 4,500 pounds of ordnance. The demonstrator is now being flight-tested at Edwards Air Force Base in California. —Michael Klesius
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5





Comments (16)
I think that the B-25 Mitchell should have appeared as one of the milestones, considering that it was the first land-based bomber to take off from a carrier.
Posted by Avery Tyrrell on January 29,2011 | 09:56 AM
I was stationed at NAS Pensicola during the selebration of the 50 years of Naval Aviation. I spent 5 years working on and teaching the DASH (Drone Anti Submarine Helicopter) system only to be dissapointed in the ommision of this whole historic system as a part of The Navy's 100th year celebration. To even mention the new FIRE SCOUT, as the "Navy's First Unmanned helicopter is very dissapointing to those of us that spent a large part of our Navy experience working on the Navy's first Unmanned Helicopter.
Posted by John Williams on February 1,2011 | 09:33 AM
The Navy's most significant aircraft? Thanks for the easy question.
While it is difficult to separate one plane from the herd of many landmark machines, it is my opinion that the Douglas A-4 Skyhawk has to rank high, if not at the top. When we look at:
*Cost
*Simplicity
*Durability
*Longevity
*Capability
*Effectiveness
there may not be another like it.
There was a famous face and name over at Lockheed that most folks point to as the designer of really great and unique airplanes, and that's true. But the Ed Heinemann Team at Douglas can hold their heads high for their many great designs, the A-4 among them.
The A-4 is sort of the DC-3 of fighters. People were born and died in the lifespan of this aircraft. Would anybody be surprised to learn that in 2056 some third world military was still flying it? I'd smile and shake my head but it would not surprise me.
Posted by Martin Coddington on February 1,2011 | 04:27 PM
When I think of naval aviation I can't help but think of the succession of rugged and deadly Grumman 'Cats that have always seemed to be the great flying icons of the US Navy. From the Wildcat to the Tomcat and all in between, who can look at some old carrier photo and not pick a bunch out.
Posted by Bob Fiesser on February 2,2011 | 02:22 PM
A candidate for one of the Navy's most unusual (ugly) aircraft is the PB-1W. It is a modifird B-17G with all armor, armanent and bomb racks removed, outboard wing fuel blatters added and an APS-20 radar installed. The bomb bay was converted into an airborne CIC with two ground stabilazed 12 inch radar scopes, a plot table and carrier aircraft communications. It was the second Navy Airborne Early Warning and Control (AEW) aircraft, the TBM-3W was the first, the first top-mount radar search aircraft (BuNo 77234), the first operational user of FM TV (Bellhop), the first aircraft that provided 24/7 all-weather radar protection of NATO and US fleet operations and the first desigated hurrican hunter. Twenty-four PB-1Ws were configured and served in the Atlantic and Pacific fleets from 1946 through 1954.
Posted by Richard W. Parker Jr. LCdr., USN Ret. NAO-C on February 3,2011 | 10:25 PM
John Williams' comments about the DASH were interesting. I suspect it could not be classified as a Naval Aviation system but as a shipboard off-board system to increase the reach of the torpedoes being employed. It was very reliable when the gun director radars were used as the data link but international maritime complaints came up when the radar was pointed at a ship while controlling the DASH, since the COs being scanned didn't know whether it was being used to control the DASH or to target their ship. I actually met a Navy Captain in 1977 who had allowed himself to be hauled around in a Bo'suns chair slung below the DASH. Then the Navy reverted to an omni-directional data link antenna at great loss of gain, and reduced the maintenance detachment aboard to three people from 12. Poor operational reliability and availability ensued. DASH had a great life at China Lake where over 150 were used as targets. I've always felt that LAMPS was just a manned version of DASH, still subservient to the host ship's weapons employment scheme but with reliability restored by the airborne crew.
Posted by Joe Stewart on February 3,2011 | 12:43 AM
Regarding FIRE SCOUT, PIONEER and Mr Williams' comments regarding the QH-50 DASH: Whether by omission or inaccuracy, the editors of Air and Space Magazine have done great disservice to everyone in Industry and the Naval service who were involved in the design, manufacture, operation and maintenance of an aircraft as unique as the QH-50 DASH. This particular rotorcraft was a weaponized UAS which was operational and employed from U.S. Navy surface combatants nearly a half century ago. You not only have ignored history but also have failed to recognize the contribution to the U.S. Navy and our aviation heritage which the QH-50, it's capabilities, and the individuals involved with the program provided so many years ago.
Posted by Lance Bills on February 3,2011 | 12:59 AM
The Navy's most significant aircraft? In my opinion would be the F-14 Tomcat. The Tomcat was the ultimate aircraft, born as the fleet defender with its Phoenix missles, proven dogfighter (Tomcats-4, Libya-0) and finishing its career as a very capable fighter bomber.Nothing more impressive than seeing a Tomcat from VF-84 The Jolly Rogers, with the skull and crossbones on the tail, or a VF-111 Sundowner F-14 with the sharks mouth painted under it's nose. The F-14 was the star of the show for over 30 years, to bad all good things must come to an end! Go Navy and Tomcats Forever Baby!
Posted by Stephen Wargo on February 5,2011 | 04:05 PM
Most significant event in Naval Aviation history must be Pearl Harbor. Pacific Fleet (minus carriers) trapped in confined space in shallow water attacked by carrier aviation. Primacy of aviation in sea warfare finally achieved appropriate comprehension by top Navy leadership, confirmed by Midway and Coral Sea. Not a new idea to naval aviators but was to the existing high command.
A technology candidate: The canted carrier deck. Not an American originated concept, but can one imagine a modern battle carrier without?
Posted by KENDALL RUSSELL, Maj. Gen. USAF(ret.) on February 5,2011 | 06:27 PM
While reading your March 2011 issue AIr & Space I noticed a possible error on page 52 in the article titled U.S.Navy 100 years of flight . The article on that page describes how a flight of Grumman 3 F6F-5 Hellcats performed some precision flying for Vice Admiral Frank Wagner. The article implies that the aircraft shown at the top of the page is a Grumman F6F Hellcat . I believe the the aircraft shown ,is a later and more formidable model know as the Grumman Bearcat .I'm not sure of the actual number assigned to the Bearcat but just by looking at the wider stance of the landing gear and the air intakes in the leading edge of the left wing seems to identify it as a Bearcat .
I love your magazine you do such a great such a great job with that I look forward to each issue
sincerely
Tom Prendergast
EDITORS' REPLY: We did not identify the aircraft. It is a Bearcat.
Posted by Tom Prendergast on February 6,2011 | 10:10 PM
I read the top 10 list over and over and kept hoping that somehow the list would morph in front of my eyes to include the most recognizable aircraft in the history of the Navy, the F-14 Tomcat. How an aircraft with such a distinguished career could be overlooked is somewhat baffling. The raw power, size and payload capacity of the big cat has no peer in naval history-an aircraft of the same size during WWII would have had several turrets and gun positions. Yet the performance capability of the big cat reminded foes and friends alike that it was very much a fighter...Dont quote me but I remember reading somewhere many years ago, that the F-14 flew circles around the Hornet, while the F-18 was in its infancy in mock engagements, even when outnumbered.
It's adaptablility later in it's career made the "Bombcat" a formidable air to ground threat and it was the only aircraft with the capability to tote the AIM-54 Phoenix into combat...with standoff ranges of over 100 miles.
I would also remind you that the real star of the movie "TopGun" was also responsible for enlisting generations of new Naval Aviators eager to be shot off of a boat. Long live the Cat!
Posted by Chris Mullins on February 7,2011 | 06:23 AM
What about the Stringbag? - The Fairey Swordfish (Taranto AND The Bismark)
Posted by Richard Scott on February 18,2011 | 01:35 PM
Regarding Fire Scout UAV's in the Navy, The USS Carpenter, DD-825 received a drone antisubmarine helicopter (DASH) system on 28 May, 1964. This was not the first ship to receive the DASH so your statenment: 'The Scouts are one example of how far naval aviation has come since the Navy fielded Pioneer, its first unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV), in 1986.' is incorrect as the DASH would have been the first form of a UAV helicopter.
Posted by Dan Hargraves on March 10,2011 | 09:10 PM
During my second cruise to the Far East aboard the Aircraft
Carrier USS Kearsage CVA-33 during the Korean War we had
completely exchanged all of our prop planes, including Corsairs and ADs for all jets such as Panthers and Banshees. This was quite a shock but I believe very necessary and effective,to meet the demand to compete with Russian Migs,which were on the prowl out of North Korea.
Our first cruise in the fall of 1952, we had just been recommissioned for overseas duty, out of dry dock in Bremerton, WA before making our homeport in San Diego with only prop planes on board.
All the other carriers in Task Force 77 had already completed this project or soon would be doing so.
Richard Kennison Backus
Corvallis, OR
Aboard the USS Kearsarge 1952-1955
PS- They changed the numbers on our flight deck from 33 to
34 while filming a segment of Bridges of Toko Ri, starring
William Holden and Mickey Rooney. The Oriskany had already
left for home at that time.
The Kearsarge had become a Movie Set for other movies as
well. Including Caine Mutiny with Humphrey Bogart and Fred
Mc Murray.
Posted by Richard Kennison Backus on March 14,2011 | 06:39 PM
Have a look at this article.
World's oldest aircraft carrier discovered rusting by the River Thames.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1361523/Worlds-oldest-aircraft-carrier-discovered-rusting-River-Thames.html
Posted by David Washington on March 19,2011 | 05:25 PM
I'm sure with all the material available for the '100 Years of Naval Aviation' article it must have been difficult to decide what to include to give the most diverse picture possible. However, like the others that have commented I too have my favorite. An aircraft that many may 'what the hell is that? The AJ Savage, first operational bomber designed specifically for the atomic bomb. It may have had a short career but I still like to think a distinguished one.
For my Dad, AT-2 M.A. Montecalvo, VC-9
Posted by Michael Montecalvo on March 28,2011 | 02:45 PM