Airman Down
Rescue aircraft are different today, but "surrender" is still a dirty word.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Air & Space magazine, September 2012
“It’s an ugly, nasty business when airplanes get shot down,” says Lieutenant Colonel Doug Baker. He is the commander of the Operations Support Flight of the U.S. Air Force 104th Fighter Squadron, which has deployed five times since September 11, 2001. At his post outside Baltimore, Maryland, the whine of an A-10C Thunderbolt spooling up saturates the morning air. Baker and his fellow A-10 “Sandy” pilots keep their skills sharp at this Air National Guard base, in view of the flapping flags at Chesapeake Bay marinas, for a hazardous mission: protecting the rescuers of U.S. aviators downed in enemy territory. “I don’t know if Sandy missions are more or less dangerous than some of the other things we do in A-10s,” says Baker, who has flown in Bosnia, Iraq, and Afghanistan. “But they’re done with the understanding that, if it does become more dangerous, we’re still going in anyway. Because it’s worthy of doing.”
The Air Force commitment to locate and extract downed pilots dates to World War II. “A good example would be the First Air Commando group in Burma, operating with light aircraft and covered by friendly fighter forces,” says former Air Force historian Richard Hallion. “The rescue crew, flying a lightplane, would attempt to land at a rough strip of some sort and pull the person out.” The 1944 Burma operation, Hallion points out, also marked the first use of helicopters for search-and-rescue.
The establishment of formal, standardized combat search-and-rescue coincided with the Vietnam War, when U.S. pilots were shot down by the thousands.
Col. Randy Brandt, U.S. Air Force (ret.), Jan. 9, 2012: On April 6, 1969, I was Dipper One, leading a mission of four F-4Ds against 13 anti-aircraft sites on the Ho Chi Minh Trail in Laos. At 300 feet above ground level and 550 knots [about 630 mph], I started dispersing [cluster bomb units]. As I pulled up, a Golden BB took off one of my stabilators. The aircraft started to tumble. My backseater and I had a brief conversation like “We gotta get out of here.” The last thing I remember is seeing the blue flame from my ejection rocket taking me out of the cockpit. Unfortunately, the aircraft was inverted when I ejected. There are 65 minutes of my life I can’t recall.
Vietnam also proved the unsuitability of conventional jet fighters for combat search-and-rescue, a mission that requires slow-flying aircraft that can stay aloft for hours. Fast-moving and thin-skinned, jets can loiter over an area for only minutes, take miles to execute a turn, and are vulnerable to ground fire. The answer belonged to another era. Designed near the end of World War II for the U.S. Navy, the Douglas A-1 Skyraider was a prop-driven attack aircraft. Powered by a massive 2,800-horsepower Wright R-3350 engine, the Skyraider had extra armor around the cockpit to protect the pilot and carried 5,400 pounds of fuel to sustain eight-hour loiters above rescues.
If enemy soldiers were closing in on survivors on the ground, A-1 pilots could hold them off with four 20-mm cannon and anti-personnel ordnance carried on 15 weapons stations. “We carried enough stuff to make a hundred passes if we had to,” says John Dyer, who flew 230 A-1 missions in Vietnam, including 42 Sandy flights. (The designation originated with an Air Force rescue pilot based in Thailand whose call sign was Sandy, the name of his dog. Over time, Sandy became a generic term for all A-1 search-and-rescue flights.) Low and slow was part of the job description, “but as long as it was just small arms or 50-caliber type stuff we were getting, the A-1 would survive,” says Dyer.
In 1966, the Air Force began exploring close air support designs that offered greater altitude and speed, as well as deadlier ordnance. The result was the A-10 Thunderbolt. Because the A-10 did not enter service until the late 1970s, “we tend to think of it as a Warsaw Pact tank-killer,” says Hallion, “but the A-10 was actually designed as a replacement for light attack aircraft in Vietnam, specifically the A-1.” Respectfully nicknamed “Warthog,” the single-seat, twin-engine fanjet was designed around a fearsome gun and built to take insult and injury.
Pilots of supersonic aircraft like the General Dynamics F-16 operate with the expectation that they’ll never get hit. “We operate under the assumption we probably will,” says Baker. To survive against the ground fire, both primitive and advanced, that it often encounters in search-and-rescue mode, the A-10 has an industrial-strength superstructure carrying 1,200 pounds of titanium armor plate. The protection “doesn’t make us sexy or fast,” admits Baker, but it gives rescue pilots a degree of confidence. Even more comforting is the Warthog’s most notable feature: its nose-mounted, seven-barrel Gatling gun, with a firing rate of more than sixty 30-mm rounds per second. Should unfriendlies threaten a downed pilot, “that gun solves a lot of your problems,” says Baker.
Capt. Don Dunaway, USAF (ret.), Jan. 10, 2012: I was Sandy Lead at Nakhon Phanom, Thailand, that night. I got my crew to bed early just on the odd chance something might happen. We were called out before dawn. We had an F-4 down. The thing that registered in my mind at the time was that there were some guns out there that managed to bring down an F-4 on his first pass. So they’re either radar-guided or extremely lucky, but they’re big and they’re good.
The 104th comprises six to eight A-10s designated Sandys. You don’t join—you’re selected. In the squadron conference room with Baker (in civilian life, a Southwest Airlines pilot) and Major Paul Kanning, the squadron’s chief of weapons and tactics, you understand why. “Basically, we’re going to throw at you the most difficult problem to solve,” explains Kanning, a veteran of Iraq and Afghanistan missions. “A guy’s on the ground and people are trying to get to him before you can. It’s the ultimate tactical problem for an A-10 pilot. As a result, our Sandy Ones are the best pilots in the squadron, the best problem-solvers, the best critical thinkers.”
In Vietnam, the line-drawing was similar. Some A-1 Skyraider pilots, says John Dyer, gravitated to conventional-strike sorties instead of the highly choreographed combat search-and-rescue missions.





Comments (6)
My sincere thanks to author Steve Joiner, who did a great job in crafting this piece. I'm so very proud to be Randy's older (fifteen months!) brother. It was a distinct pleasure to meet Don Dunaway and "brass-balled" Vietnam-era Jolly drivers at a CSAR reunion a few years ago at Moody AFB, GA.
Herman P. (Phil) Brandt II
Maj, USAF (Ret.)
Austin, TX
Posted by Phil Brandt on August 18,2012 | 12:33 PM
Great piece by Steve Joiner. I was a Jolly Green pilot in Vietnam '67-'68 and participated in the rescue of Major Jerry (?) Dyer near Saravane, Laos, it was a hotly contested pickup. If I remember correctly it was the second time Dyer had been shot down. I was flying with Capt Jim Miears and we got all shot up on our first attempt at a pickup. On the second attempt we had our hoist and fuel lines shot up and we lost our hydraulic servos which put us out of the fight. The combat photographer we had on board was wounded. After the Sandy's and a bunch of F-105s and F-4 bombed the hell out of the area an H-3 from Danang arrived - flown by Capt Fred Otte - and made the pickup with little resistance. An F-4 escorted us back to Ubon where we landed safely. Our Jolly was out of commission for four months as I recall. Incidentally, the FAC controlling the rescue mission did a magnificent job! If "Dyer Jr." is related I'd love to hear from him. Joe Panza, Colonel, USAF (Ret) jpanza@knology.net. 3012 Bankhead Ave. Montgomery, AL 36106.
Posted by Colonel Joe Panza on August 22,2012 | 10:38 AM
As a reader of history and outside observer, this is a great article and very positive. I think it needs to be noted how much sacrifice the CSAR teams willingly accepted in their rescues, especialy in VN. Often times in the attempt to rescue one or two pilots, several others in the A-1s and helos would lose their lives, in what I feel is the best demonstration of the American military sentiment of never abandoning a troop. Successful or not, the knowledge that a rescue will be attempted, is a shining example of why we have the best people in the world defending our nation.
Posted by Robert on August 22,2012 | 12:42 PM
What a great article! The sacrifice this of men and women on don´t let a buddy behind is a big one!
However and I want to mention this very clearly: in the aviation media is a huge lack regarding the A-10 Warthog community.
I certanly would like to know more about this topic.
I consider their mission a scary and very hard one; to fly NOE shooting tanks, convoys and been very exposed to enemy fire in the mood of AAA or SAM´s.
And yet, their is little about them.
Why is that ? Is their sacrifice and contribution not worthy enough? Or their role is considered a little not to glamorous just because they fly down and slow?
I will really like a lot to hear more about the A-10 community, their mission roles and to know more about their incredible aircraft.
And as a formal reader of this magazine for quite some years know, I think this is an unexplored source of information on your magazine.
Best regards. EDITORS' REPLY: You might enjoy THIS INTERVIEW.
Posted by Federico Trejos on September 10,2012 | 04:44 PM
In response to Mr. Federico Trejos comments. The March 1999 issue of this magazine has an outstanding article on the A-10, the people who operate it, and another one on the SR-71. You can also download a version of the unclassified parts of the A-10 flight manual at:
http://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/downloads/documentation/dcs_a-10c_flight_manual_en/
The parts on the newest A-10C variant are still classified which are mainly night operation equipment and GPS guided munitions which were added as part of the "C" upgrade. The Discovery Communications show "Future Weapons" also did part of a show on the upgrades involved in the "C" variant in season 3. Hope this helps. Thanks to all our service personnel and to Smithsonian for making such fine publications.
Posted by John Bennett on December 22,2012 | 11:56 PM
If you are looking for the FACS who supported the SAR efforts in Laos or Cambodia from NKP go to the FACNET or Google Forward Air Controllers. We are alive and well and you can post your inquiry on our net and we will help you locate your answer. We were quietly there as Nails, Coveys or Rustics. Museum and FAC headquarters in Fort Worth, Texas.
Posted by Walter W.Want on February 3,2013 | 02:53 PM