Share
Digg
StumbleUpon
RedditThe idea of thrust vectoring dates to the early 1980s, when Wolfgang Herbst of the German aerospace group Messerschmitt-Bölkow-Blohm (MBB) envisioned a new class of aircraft that could maintain complete control while flying at airspeeds and angles of attack that would stall most aircraft. Such “post-stall maneuvers” could, in theory, be achieved with raw thrust alone when the airplane no longer had lift to fly in the conventional sense.
Normally, even the best-designed wings can stall at angles of attack above 20 degrees because normal control surfaces lose their effectiveness. The ability to rear up like a cobra in mid-flight would offer a huge tactical advantage to a fighter aircraft, predicted William Siuru in a paper published in 1988 by Airpower Journal.
“Let us look at an engagement between two fighters, one with post-stall maneuvering capability and one without it," he wrote. "The supermaneuverable fighter could turn much faster and dissipate much less energy in the process. Quite conceivably, it would have the adversary in its weapon system field of view several critical seconds before the other has completed its turn and is in firing position.”
Siuru warned that state-of-the-art Soviet fighters such as the Sukhoi Su-27 Flanker, the MiG-29 Fulcrum, and the MiG-31 Foxhound were nearing the capability of the U.S. fleet. “To give our pilots the edge, new designs incorporating advanced technologies are needed as well as revised tactics to get the most out of the improvements,” he suggested. “Enhanced maneuvering is high on the list.”
Early research for U.S. fighters centered on the Rockwell-MBB X-31 enhanced fighter maneuverability (EFM) program at NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center in California. The first flight came in April, 1992. Within a year, the X-31 could fly a 180-degree turn in the minimum radius, a trick well beyond the aerodynamic limits of a conventional aircraft. The maneuver was called the Herbst, to honor the German scientist. The X-31 was soon joined at NASA Dryden by an F-18 and an F-16, which continued research on thrust vectoring in more than one axis.
In the U.S., research focused on rectangular, two-dimensional nozzles, such as those adopted for the Pratt & Whitney F-119 engine in the Lockheed Martin F-22 Raptor, while designers in Russia used a circular nozzle for the Su-37.
Thrust vectoring may someday give pilots the edge in actual dogfights, but in the meantime the technology has become a top crowd-pleaser at airshows. One move possible only with thrust vectoring is the Kulbit, a somersault performed with the airplane at a full stall, and executed in the smallest possible forward and vertical distance. Russian pilots introduced it, but today every self-respecting thrust-vectoring airplane, including the MiG-29, the Sukhoi 30MK, and, of course, the Raptor has incorporated the sequence into its routine. When it comes to wowing the audience these days, "supermaneuverability" is all but required.
does this mean that the eurofighter is not a new generation aircraft
Posted by kev on May 29,2008 | 05:57AM
This article got the basic idea, but there were too many errors: 1- Wing stall is not caused by "normal control surfaces lose their effectiveness". Stall is caused by the wing losing its ability to generate lift when the airflow over the wing breaks down and separates. The loss of control effectivness is a by-product of the wing stall. 2- The MiG-31 is not a maneuverable aircraft. 3- The MiG-29 is not equipped with thrust vectoring. A final note: The advent of highly manueverable air-to-air missiles, with off-boresight capability coupled with helmet-mounted cueing systems, has greatly reduced the need for super maneuverable fighters to bring their opponents first in their weapon system field of view.
Posted by Sami Mina on May 29,2008 | 06:13PM
Re: comment by Mina Yes, but highly manueverable missiles just aren't the crowd pleasers that highly manueverable airplanes are.
Posted by Mike Rodrian on June 2,2008 | 09:34PM
Almost all 4+ generation fighters can theoreticaly be equip with thrust vectoring engine and thus can theoreticaly perform Kulbit. Like Sami Mina said, the next evolution in maneuvarability will be on the missile design and the accompanying HMS. There's actually no technological limit to the level of maneuvarability an aicraft design can achieve. the limit lies on the human pilot. human body can only tolerate around 7 to 9Gs on average. MIG-31 are pure high-speed interceptor with impressive Mach 3 high altitude speed. it's a formidable missile platform able to launch it's missile a very long range. But the trade-off is that it has very poor dogfighting capability just like it's predessor MIG-25.
Posted by Fadly Abdul Rahman on July 14,2008 | 11:03PM
MIG-31 has a top speed of 2.83 Mach at high altitude.
Posted by Chris on November 5,2008 | 08:25AM