(Page 4 of 4)
“Negative. I’m very good right now,” came the radioed reply, which was no longer competing with the sound of incoming gunfire. “Have a good day.”
“I felt really good about that,” Whorton says. “We’re not frontline guys. But it was good to know that, after all of our training, my job made a difference and we were able to help the guys who were under fire. The system worked the way it was supposed to.”
The Hawkeye, of course, wasn’t designed for close air support, but time and again during the fighting in the Gulf, ground troops advanced so rapidly that they passed beyond radio contact with the units that were supposed to coordinate close air support for them. Early on in Iraq, E-2s were pressed into a stopgap role as airborne communications relays between ground forces and the U.S. Army’s Air Support Operations Center. But because the battleground was so fluid and so many airplanes had to be re-routed so quickly, Hawkeyes were given more latitude to pair warfighters with targets.
“If the Hawkeye hadn’t been there, I think the [Air Support Operations Center] would have failed,” says Lieutenant Commander Brent Trickel, an E-2 naval flight officer who served as the Navy’s only officer in the Air Support Operations Center during the first few weeks of the war. “It would have been shut down. I don’t think you’ll find a more flexible platform than the Hawkeye.”
These days, in addition to traditional airborne early-warning duty, Hawkeyes are being asked to push their noses closer to the fight to coordinate ground attacks and close air support. Theoretically, these missions ought to be covered by the daily Air Tasking Order, which details every sortie to be flown that day. “But everything never goes exactly according to the ATO, which is why you need an E-2,” says Weathers. Targets move. Attacks are launched unexpectedly. Engines go sour. Bombs fail to explode.
For many years, the E-2 was naval aviation’s version of the pleasant girl in high- school who was everybody’s friend but never got asked to the prom. Light on sex appeal, the Hawkeye was ignored by the fighter jocks, who, as the expression goes, like to fly at 1,000 miles per hour with their hair on fire. Times have changed. The E-2 has shown what it can do in shooting wars, and as members of the Hawkeye community have risen in the naval hierarchy, the airplane’s reputation has gone up accordingly. “We go through training exercises side by side with [Hornet pilots], so they’re used to us,” says Carmen. “They know that we understand how airplanes fly—that they can’t turn on a dime or fly without fuel. So they like hearing from us. We’re like an extension of them. We just fly slower than they do.”
For now, the Navy plans to start retiring its E-2Cs in 2013, when the first of the new E-2Ds are scheduled to reach carrier squadrons. (Mexico, France, Egypt, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore also fly Hawkeyes, but so far none of them has placed an order for the E-2D.) D models will look almost identical to their predecessors, and they should carry the E-2 well into its senior years. “I’m looking forward to the E-2E,” says Northrop Grumman vice president Tom Vice. “And there are plenty of other letters in the alphabet after that.”


Comments
Excellent article! Just a note of comment: The E-2A/B/C has always been the eys and ears of the fleet! In Viet Nam, no Navy aircraft flew over land from the Carrier without the E-2 airborne. We watched the Migs taxi out, but couldn't attack. We watched them turn around at the 12 mile gate...we provided radio relay to all Navy activities in the Gulf of Tonkin. Every flight was checked in and out of their mission by the E-2. We were the on-scene commander for all search and rescues over water. We were held in high respect by every pilot on the ship, no matter how fast or slow he was. We are still doing that today. Great article and I'm glad that I can say "been there, done that!" Even today, those guys with their hair on fire, won't venture far from the the ship without the E-2C airborne, just ask them. Thanks for a great story. CDR. W. Ridge, USN (Retired) 1800 hours E-2A/B, Centurion on the Constellation.
Posted by CDR. W. Ridge on May 14,2008 | 10:26AM
FTA: E-2s, the electronic eyes of the fleet, have been in production longer than any military airplane in U.S. history. Have they not heard of the C130? First flew in 1954, still being produced.
Posted by fnf on May 17,2008 | 07:06PM
I may be mistaken, but I believe the Lockheed C-130 Hercules has the longest continuous production run of any military aircraft in history, not the E-2. A minor point. Again, I may be mistaken. Having said that, I like the E-2 and am happy it has such a long career. A VERY valuable aircraft, worth more than it's weight in Gold.
Posted by Rich Robbins on May 17,2008 | 08:55PM
I have been working around the Hawkeye since 1985, transitioned from the old "Group 0" to the "Group 2" and the MCU/ACIS (HE2K without CEC) and now support the E-2D program at NG Corp. What amazing technologies and capabilities in development for the young and future war fighter.
Posted by DH on May 22,2008 | 12:40PM
fnf said "FTA: E-2s, the electronic eyes of the fleet, have been in production longer than any military airplane in U.S. history. Have they not heard of the C130? First flew in 1954, still being produced." Not so fast, the E2-C is a derivative of the E-1 Traceer, which was based on the S-2 Tracker airframe. The S-2 was first flown in 1952. Look it up. http://www.anft.net/f-14/grumman-s2a.htm
Posted by GrumCat on May 27,2008 | 07:53AM
GrumCat is right. S-2 was the original airframe, however the radome looked more like a wing than a flying pizza! You would be hard pressed to match the two aircraft although the lineage is quite apparent.
Posted by HawkeyeMech on May 29,2008 | 01:46AM
FNF... Concept is the only commonality between the E-1 and the E-2. The first E-2 flew it's maiden flight from Bethpage, NY, 21 OCT 1960 as a W2F-1 (pre DOD designation standardization. It was the first aircraft ever designed from the ground up as an AEW platform.
Posted by JMChapman on May 30,2008 | 11:33AM
I was an enlisted (AT) ECM operator in VQ 1 in the 60's. We flew out of Atsugi, Japan. Our main mission was the sea of Japan keeping an eye on Russia and North Korea. We also flew a lot of missions over Viet Nam as things heated up there in the late 60's. Our mission there was locating mobile SAM sites. I was later in an S2 antisubmarine squadron but didn't fly crew on them. I think it was a similar plane. I was surprised that you mentioned that the whole crew were officers on the E2. Most of the technical operators are enlisted with an officer in overall charge. But maybe you included petty officers in your "officers" list. Les Wollam
Posted by Les Wollam on June 2,2008 | 09:23PM
Gentlemen, in 1974 I enlisted in the Navy and my first duty station was at NAS North Island assigned to VAW-110. Right away I learned a great deal about the E2-B Hawkeye. I was a jet engine mech and thought "You gotta be kidding me!" I trained to become a jet mech working on J-79's and the like. But I became to love the E2 for, not only the engines and the performance they had, but the overall persona that plane had. It gained a lot of respect and admiration. Especially once at sea with one and as a Plane Captain. I worked on the one assigned to me and I always had a great deal of respect for the crew. They'd come back just worn down and extremely tired. Many hours but they always had good words and a smile for each of who took care of their bird. We'd work our butts off to make sure they came home safe. So for me gentlemen, I have a different perspective than you and can proudly say, I served my country with great honor and enjoyed being part of an elite team. No matter which ship I went on or which bird was assigned to me. I eventually became a Plane Captain for an F-14 that of course is out of commision now. LONG LIVE THE HAWEYES!!! They'll always be remembered. Now... I work for Northrop.
Posted by Mikey C on June 5,2008 | 09:44AM
JM Chapman has it correct. C-130, not the E-2 is the longest in production aircraft. There are significant structural differences in the E-1 to E-2, and the diffeences are even more signficant between the S-2 and the E-2. The C-130 has certainly been modernized, but the structural design, length and wing span of the YC-130A are no different than the dimensions of the baseline C-130J we build today.
Posted by DR Cooper on June 12,2008 | 10:37AM
Marty McCord is my hero
Posted by Lisa Smith on June 18,2008 | 12:27PM
The E-2B had an enlisted radar operator (In-Flight Tech). Starting in the early 1980's with the then new E-2C, the junior man in the back was a regular Naval Officer. I think the thought was that they didn't really need an in-flight tech anymore with the new E-2C's.
Posted by George on June 18,2008 | 02:53PM
FLIGHT TECH - I joined the Navy as an AT in 1969 and was stationed at North Island in RVAW-110 with the E2-A. The old drum computer and other electronics were not that reliable. We changed to the E2-B and I became a Flight Tech as a 2nd Class. I had milti deployments to Viet Nam on the Coral Sea, Constellation (VAW-116), and finally the Midway out of Japan with VAW-115. Our squadron was one of the last to use Enlisted Flight techs in the E2-B. When the E-2C came along they gave our seat to an officer. The Flight Tech did more than turned on and monitored the systems. The cat shot would jar the link –11, computer or radar and we would spend the first 45 mins reseating cards and boxes to get things running, or by-passing what would not work. When systems were running we did some air control or follow the Vigilante on it photo missions. It was a great job and very elite group of Flight Techs. The enlisted Flight tech on the E2-A/B is not mentioned in to many places. The E2-C’s better electronics did do away with us. I logged over 2000 hours and 250+ traps.
Posted by Rob on July 2,2008 | 11:00PM
During a long, hard 1984 deployment on the USS America (CV-66), to the Indian Ocean, Carrier Air Wing 1 decided break up the daily routine by conducting a bombing derby. The ground attack squadrons were invited to drop practice bombs on a target towed by the carrier. Not to be excluded, the commander of VAW-123, the "Screwtops" entered the derby. They used grease pencil to draw a bomb sight on the pilot's windshield. The rear door was opened in flight and one of the crew, using a gunner's strap borrowed from the helicopter squadron, stood at the door and threw out a 25lb practice bomb on command. With practice, they became amazingly accurate and it was impressive as all get out to see the big E-2c in a dive and pull out with the little bomb falling to the target below. If memory serves me right, I believe VAW-123 came in 2nd in the derby. Who was first? Why the HS-15, the helicopter squadron, of course!
Posted by Bob B on July 4,2008 | 06:49AM
I always liked it when the E-2 drivers would come into the AF officers clubs and brag about being the most heavily armed aircraft in the fleet. The AF guys would bite and ask what they were armed with. The pilots would say "Four F-14s". Their patches had the Hawk with the Tomcat perched on the wing saying "Sic Em!". Navy Humor...gotta love it.
Posted by Armor on July 28,2008 | 12:56PM
I was an E-2c flight tech for 15 years. Ended up with over 2000 hours in them. What a great job, until we got the system so reliable they felt they could do with enlisted fliers. Didn't help when the squadrons stopped home growing flight techs and we ended up with bureau inputs. Really ruined the program ) I was an instructor in RVAW-120 at the time). Still, what could be better, getting to fly in them, fix them when you got back, and work the flight deck when you were off the flight schedule. David B. Brown ATC(AW) USN
Posted by David B. Brown on November 27,2008 | 01:27PM
Is that Mike Vogel who used to study at Auburn and trained in Florida? If so please tell him Brenda from the London flight is trying to get in touch. Thank you
Posted by brenda on February 14,2009 | 01:20PM
I've had the privilege of maintaining avionics system on both the E-2C and C-130E/H airframes during my military career. While the bulk of my time has been spent on the latter, I truly miss working with the myriad of electronics packed into the Hawkeye's sheetmetal. CMDR Carmen may be accurate in stating that, "it’s not the sexiest aircraft on the flight deck," but you'd have a hard time convincing an AT attached to a VAW squadron of that. I hope to someday soon get a chance to check out the latest-and-greatest E-2D first-hand. Daniel Moldenhauer, TSgt, 934AW (USAF)
Posted by D. Moldenhauer on March 6,2009 | 11:44AM