Killer at 70,000 Feet
The occupational hazards of flying the U-2.
- By Mark Betancourt
- Air & Space magazine, May 2012
A pilot takes a self-portrait aboard the U-2. The Air Force is retrofitting the airplaneās cockpit so it is pressurized to a more comfortable 15,000-foot equivalent.
Lt. Col. (Ret.) Jeff Olesen
(Page 2 of 5)
But the U-2 program has seen more cases of DCS over the last decade than at any other time in its 56-year history. Since the war in Afghanistan started, in 2001, the average number of cases reported each year has almost doubled. More important, before 2002, no cases severe enough to hinder U-2 operations were reported, but between 2002 and 2009, there were 16 confirmed severe cases, five of which were deemed life-threatening. Nine of the pilots who experienced serious DCS symptoms reported long-lasting or permanent brain damage.
A study published in the July 2011 issue of the journal Aviation, Space, and Environmental Medicine analyzed 40 years of the military’s medical records to find possible reasons for the shift. Three major factors seem to be contributing to the increase. First, pilots are flying more often. With a demanding new role—providing ground combat support in Afghanistan—U-2 pilots are flying 70 percent more hours on 122 percent more sorties than they did during the cold war.
U-2 pilots are also flying for longer stretches. During the cold war, flights rarely lasted longer than eight hours; now ground operations require U-2s to stay in the air for up to 12 hours. As a result, severe DCS cases over the last decade are concentrated among the pilots flying out of the primary support base for combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Finally, fundamental changes in the work pilots are doing may also be making things worse. The study found that even mild exercise, including motions as simple as pressing foot pedals or raising an arm to flip a switch, can greatly increase the risk of DCS. Unlike cold war reconnaissance, today’s missions require pilots to do much more in the cockpit—operating a radio, inputting navigational data, adjusting sensors—so the new mission itself could be partly responsible for releasing nitrogen bubbles through a pilot’s bloodstream.
Lieutenant Colonel Sean Jersey, a physician and one of the study’s authors, cites a potential fourth factor: stress. In the Soviet flyover days, U-2 pilots would head out to a target, snap pictures, and fly back. They could even sleep part of the way, letting the airplane fly on autopilot. Today, pilots must quickly react to changes on the battlefield, acting as a mobile relay station for communications and an eye in the sky for troops fighting on difficult terrain. They’re also in constant contact with the soldiers on the ground, often during combat.
“Emotionally, I think they’re wrung out from that,” says Jersey. “When you’re talking to somebody on the radio and there’s gunfire in the background…you’re not taking a nap while that’s happening.”
Lieutenant Colonel Blake Smith is a U-2 pilot who retired early last year. He often served as director of operations for the 99th Expeditionary Reconnaissance Squadron, to which the U-2 is assigned, during the shift toward combat support missions, and he knew the pilots and their problems well. He remembers that when he joined the program in 1998, DCS was mostly a non-issue. Pilots might complain of minor joint pain, but once they were back on the ground and rested, their symptoms would generally get better.
“Years ago, whenever you mentioned you had a little bit of DCS, the reaction from the medical forces, and the reaction from the Air Force for that matter, was not as thorough and robust as it is now,” says Smith.
What changed, he says, was the sudden appearance of DCS cases that affected the pilots’ central nervous systems, something no one in the program was used to handling. On the way home from flying a long-duration combat mission for Enduring Freedom in late 2002, Major Greg Kimbrough suffered severe symptoms. Having been trained to expect joint pain and a headache, he had no idea that his inability to read fine print or recognize his landing field was indicative of decompression sickness. “What we got when we went through our initial training was the basics of it,” says Kimbrough, “and that was all based on past events,” when the cases were minor.
By the time he was having major symptoms at altitude, Kimbrough’s cognition was so compromised that it never occurred to him to call for help. Somehow he was able to land his U-2 safely, but he has little memory of the last hours of the flight.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »





Comments (17)
I am sure that others, like me, appreciate the safety value in this presentation. Although we do not fly at extreme altitudes, it's like Captain Sully once said, "we learn by our experiences, and the experiences of others; and we keep them in our bank of knowledge because someday we may have to make a big withdrawal." All pilots and crew are blessed to have these kinds of experiences shared with us. Thank you NASA.
Posted by Anson L. Stelmak on March 22,2012 | 03:49 PM
There are four types of decompression sickness, Central Nervous System disorders, Chokes (gas bubbles between the lungs and chest wall) Bends or joint pain, and gas bubbles between the skin and tissue. One of the rules about decompression sickness onset reductions is to limit the exercise prior to flight or exposure to altitude above 25,000 ft and no exercise after exposure to 25,000 ft for 24 hours. Your article describes an onset point or date that DCS problems started to increase. That date is the date that the pilot pre-takeoff routine was changed to a per-breathe program that included a period of exercise while breathing oxygen. Studies done at Brooks AFB School of Aerospace Medicine for NASA on a de-nitgronatization study were able to show that exercise helped to remove nitrogen if the pre-breathe period was short, 15 minutes or less, for periods for as long as one hour there was no difference in the amount of residugal N2 in the blood in excersie or non exercise subjects. The difference was that subjects that exercise durning pre-breathing were treated for decompression sickness at a greater rate than non-exercise subjects. The single change is exercise while prebreathing. Maybe the individual task is different but the workload is about the same, arm and hand movement is restricted to a set of motions that were set when the aircraft was designed in 1968. Even in the days when the U-2 flew with a 30 minute pre-breathing routine and a 10+ hour flight time the DCS problem was some joint pain and that incident rate was reduced when the pre-breathing time went to one hour. The Air Force physiological Training program goes back to pre-WW II and sometimes old issues that were put to bed have to be relearned and the bad part is that they have to be relearned the hard way.
Posted by Thomas Urie on March 22,2012 | 03:52 PM
I have seen many incidents that also went unreported due to knowledge of being booted out.
Posted by Chris on March 23,2012 | 11:40 AM
I wonder if you considered how we managed not to get the bends (nitrogen narcosis; Caision disease) when deep diving.
We used a helium-oxygen breathing mixture. It works.
Posted by VF Garry.,MD.,BABT on March 23,2012 | 04:22 PM
It would be interesting to know why the cabin pressure altitude was designed originally for 29,000 feet. At the end of the article, it's mentioned that this will be substantially reduced. So what were the engineering decisions that led to choosing the 29K foot pressure altitude to begin with? One thought would be that it would have something to do with strengthening the structure to maintain a larger pressure difference would add weight, but since the pressurized area is small in relation to the size of the plane, it seems this would be negligible. Any other thoughts/answers?
Posted by Mark Puscas on March 24,2012 | 01:07 PM
Please don't underestimate the severity of Kevin Henry's DCS episode. This article hints that it was serious, but it was the worst DCS case in the Air Force's history. The skills and reactions he had developed over almost 20 years flying the aircraft kept him alive. There are a multitude of factors that caused Kevin and numerous other U-2 pilot's decompression episodes. The war we are fighting and the truly unique role the U-2 pilot plays in supporting our forces in harms way prevent the Air Force from eliminating all of those factors; they are doing all they can, without decreasing capabilities. None of us who flew the U-2 were unaware of these risks; we volunteered to take them in order to deliver intelligence no other aircraft, manned or unmanned, can deliver. During the same time frame as Kevin Henry's incident, I was proud to receive numerous letters from deployed commanders on the ground in the war zone thanking the U-2 pilots from my squadron for the part they played in providing time critical intelligence that allowed the safe return of their forces to base. While this article highlights the significance of the dangers of decompression sickness, sadly, the determination of the cost of that exposure will likely never be known. A review of the medical records of pilots who, as the article stated, did not report DCS will not deliver the needed answers, especially for those who suffered central nervous system DCS. The only way to determine how much damage was suffered is to examine the pilots for lingering effects such as vascular damages that may only be seen by special MRI, not a review of medical records filled with partial reporting; the Air Force should spend the money it takes to properly document any damage done. Those pilots that suffered DCS will have a better quality of life and receive appropriate disability ratings after years of incredibly dangerous service.
Posted by Dave Russell on March 24,2012 | 06:20 PM
In the original U-2 Program the cockpit was pressurized to stay at about 23,000 ft at altitude. We wore partial pressure suits and pre-breathed for one hour before flight. Although the organization I was assigned to seldom flew missions over 8-9 hours, I remember no ill effects as discussed in the article.
Posted by Lachlan Macleay on March 25,2012 | 01:32 PM
I can see the objection to VF Gary, MD's comment on helium breathing since, on the face of it, it is the upside down version of the threat. However: I think it valid to research the possibilities. I have a neighbour who works in refrigeration and air conditioning. After about twenty years of service he was diagnosed with being saturated with R22 refrigerant to the extent of 40% in his bloodstream.
Exactly what that percentage means, I do not know, but his ankles are the size of his calves and he could barely walk. Now, after extensive and serious treatment he is slowly recovering.
The point of this story is the solution of miscible gases in the bloodstream. You suffer from carbon monoxide poisoning not from lack of oxygen, but from asphyxiation by gas replacement in the haemoglobin bonds.
It seems that a replacement gas could take the place of nitrogen the way helium does in deep diving.
Then again, warriors are per force trained to react quickly. How does it happen that the Air Force "takes such a long time to react" to such a dire threat to combatants and equipment?
Posted by Chris Kirsten on March 26,2012 | 05:07 PM
Having worked on both the U-2 Dragon Lady and the SR-71 Blackbird, the conditions these crews endure is beyond comprehension. During active missions (non-training) some flight profiles would boggle the mind: time, distance, altitude, situational conditions, all while trying to execute on technical activities that over-task any normal person just sitting at their desk.
Every crew I spent time with (pre-flighted, debriefed, supported) were the best of the best. I believe the knowledge they were given about their flight profile(s) was extensive, as was their training. The dedication to serve in support of the entire mission is why they do what they do. Their mission supports everyone, and I mean everyone, even those who are lost at sea or trapped by enemy fire.
Ground crews face harsh chemicals, dangerous situations specific to the aircraft (intakes, exhaust, power, ejection equipment, metals and coatings, electronics and emissions), and long hours stressing over whether our crews are safe. We take extra pains to ensure what we do will not jeopardize our crews as they execute the most dangerous missions - and so they can come home safe to their families.
Thank You for providing all the readers a closer look at one of the most unbelievable opportunities any one person could ever dream being a part!
Posted by Steve Glaiser on March 27,2012 | 01:30 AM
Thank you, Steve, you make my point exactly. I am trained and has served as a flight safety officer - air steward in the vernacular, Hazchem road transport and passenger driver and several other people related jobs. Mostly under shift working conditions.
I know, understand and appreciate the exacting standards and execution of the American aerospace industry; as can be seen for instance in Boeing and other types of aircraft. Oh yes, I can fly too. I am habitually under the impression of the value of people's lives. I also understand public liability. Nothing gets done in a haphazard fashion. One does have to be careful of paralysis by analysis, though.
Just recently I was presented with two books; Molecules of Emotion by Candace Pert and The Biology of Belief by Bruce H Lipton, Ph.D's both in cell biology/biochemistry. Besides the research reported, the slews of references to the work of other similarly inclined scientists show one thing only. The depth of technology and research is there.
My question is addressed to the upper echelons. Or is it more of the same as seen in the treatment of Vietnam, Afghan and Iraq vets who are dismissed under specific diagnoses to save the administration money in retirement funds? What value now the policy to bring every body home?
Posted by Chris Kirsten on March 28,2012 | 04:28 PM
"It would be interesting to know why the cabin pressure altitude was designed originally for 29,000 feet. At the end of the article, it's mentioned that this will be substantially reduced. So what were the engineering decisions that led to choosing the 29K foot pressure altitude to begin with?"
The U-2 flies at very high altitudes and is sensitive to weight gain. According to another U-2 article here, every additional pound of weight means 1 foot lower operating altitude. Lowering the cabin altitude means it has to withstand a higher pressure, which in turn requires a heavier structure. That hurts performance, but so does having your pilots get sick. It may also be a factor with how much air you can bleed off of your engine to increase the cabin pressure and if that will impact performance.
Posted by Larry J on April 4,2012 | 05:07 PM
On another note, a couple of UAL pilots had a problem with the bends. I flew the ORD-HNL route many, many times - in the DC8-62, The DC-10, and the 747. It was about 9 hrs. over and 8 hrs, back. We left HNL in the late afternoon so had most of the day to fool around. A couple of the guys in other crews went SCUBA diving on their layover, dried off, jumped in the plane and started home. I never heard just how they were affected, but the company put a stop to the diving, and the FAA came out with some rule about flying after diving.
I remember we were supposed to get fitted for pressure suits when we got the F-8 but that fell through. I remember the lecture that blood boiled at 68M and I tried a zoom climb to go higher just to say I'd done it. If I had flamed out up there I thought I would be SOL, but the cockpit would probably have kept enough pressure to get back below 68. Reading about those U-2 pilots reminds me how dumb a 1st Lt. let loose with an F-8 rocket can be.
I still remember the U-2s in the hanger next to us at Atsugi - taking off straight up in the morning and coming back in the evening. Getting arrested if you walked by their hanger on the way to group headquarters. My claustrophobia would have done me in in that pressure suit and small cockkpit for that long. True heroes.
Posted by Rick Carlton on April 5,2012 | 08:46 AM
I did the usual hot scramble FJ-4 quick start, hitting the crank button while coming over the side of the cockpit, and strapping in while the engine fired up and ready to give the pull chocks signal by the time it was at idle.
I was running the cockpit closed as we turned onto the runway and we made a rolling blast-off. We were climbing out, getting vectors, and scanning for the slant-eyed bogey. Going through about 30M I started to feel funny. I then realized I couldn't move my right arm and it was all numb. I had to pick up my arm with my left hand, set it aside on the console, and fly with my left. I was pretty confused. I radioed the lead that I had to break off and about then I looked at that little gauge half hidden under the gear handle that i never looked at - the cockpit altitude gauge. My cockpit was at the same altitude I was - I had never pressurized. In the haste of the hot scramble, my bailout oxygen bottle hose - that little thin, black hose - had kinked up and gotten caught between the canopy and windshield frame as the canopy slid forward, preventing the cockpit from pressurizing.
Coming back to base, I declared an emergency and landed OK using my left hand for both stick and throttle. The Skipper, squadron flight surgeon, and some others met me (I wish I could remember his name), and when I described what had happened he said I had the bends. He said I was really lucky because the nitrogen bubble had blocked the nerve in my shoulder. If the bubble had been in a slightly different place I would have been in extreme pain. I was a pretty heavy smoker back then and he said that, and the fast climb to altitude both contributed to the the bubble forming. He grounded me for a couple of days and I was OK after that.
I know we all went through the altitude chamber in training and knew about lack of oxygen and all of that, but nobody ever mentioned the bends that I remember.
Posted by Rick Carlton on April 5,2012 | 08:50 AM
I've seen a reference by a Space Station astronaut to "the space stupids", a loss of mental acuity in orbit. Could that be a mild case of the same phenomenon?
Posted by Alan Rocker on April 5,2012 | 05:49 PM
@VF Garry - as you say, helium in the breathing mix guards against nitrogen narcosis for deep diving where ppN2 is elevated. however, nitrogen narcosis is not an issue at altitude where the ppN2 is lower than at ground level, & hence helium is no advantage.
Posted by Andy Harding on April 16,2012 | 08:41 PM
I was amazed by the stories told, it put me in a postion like I was really there! I would like to become a pilot when I grow up! Let's hope some day I will be able to fly a U-2...without the dcs, which is surely taken care of now thanks to today's technology. good luck to aspiring U-2 pilots.
Posted by cullen joseph on April 25,2012 | 10:26 AM
The older you are, the less circulation in the joints you have and the longer it takes to de-nitrogenate the body. Back in the 80's it wasn't uncommon for the older guys to experience the bends on the long ops sorties. So, where are you gonna go? Down? I don't think so. Lots of us just dialed up pressure on the suits and forged ahead. It relieved the symptoms some but, eventually, you were in a rigid suit and just watching the clock's second hand until you could finally start down.
Some genius allowed a researcher to do a study where he placed a little sonar on our chests in the altitude chamber and took us up to about 25K without oxygen. Long before you had any symptoms, you could hear on the sonar the little hiss, hiss of bubbles in the blood going through your heart. The drivers quit the study after just a few of us went through this. Damned goofy to intentionally induce crap like that after preaching to us for years that a case of the bends would ground us.
Posted by Mike Danielle on January 20,2013 | 11:46 AM