The Bombing of Waziristan
In this rugged hiding place, outlaws like Osama bin Laden are rarely run to ground. The British learned that lesson in 1939.
- By Graham Chandler
- Air & Space magazine, July 2011
A formation of Westland Wapitis flies over the mountainous landscape of the North-West Frontier Province. In 1933, a Wapiti became the first airplane to fly over Mt. Everest.
Imperial War Museum
(Page 2 of 3)
But not having brakes, the aircraft were a challenge to taxi. “The only way to change direction was to put on full rudder and blip the throttle,” wrote the RAF pilot, meaning to toggle it quickly fore and aft. “If this was not judged perfectly, inertia would exaggerate the turn. Opposite rudder and more engine power had to be applied to retrieve the situation. This led to a buildup of speed.” If the pilot instinctively throttled back, the Wapiti would ground loop.
The tribal combatants had no aircraft to counter British bombers, of course, but just as the Taliban today manage to pilfer 7.62-mm ammunition intended for Afghan government forces, tribesmen in the interwar years captured .303 rifles and cartridges. So unless an aviator was on a dive bombing or strafing run, the rule was to stay above 3,000 feet, out of the range of the enemy’s rifle fire. “The tribesman is a good natural shot, and is fully alive to the necessity for deflection when shooting at fast moving aircraft,” warns the pocket-size 1939 manual Frontier Warfare—India (Army and Royal Air Force). However, if detailed reconnaissance required pilots to fly lower, they should “make full use of their speed, fly an irregular course, [and] use their weapons to keep down hostile fire....”
If a pilot were forced down over hostile territory, he was advised to “first remove the bolt from the Lewis gun and throw [the bolt] overboard.” On reaching the ground, every effort was to be made to burn the airplane “by firing a bullet or [flare] into the petrol tank.” And, if escape was out of the question, some advice was given, with typical British understatement: “It will be wisest to surrender with good grace and a bold demeanour, preferably to the older and more important-looking men among the crowd; the younger element is liable to be hot-headed and unpleasant.”
The British offered a reward of 9,000 rupees for return of a downed airman, and the promise generally resulted in fair treatment in captivity. Crash-landing in “black clouds and heavy rain” over western Waziristan in the summer of 1924, A.J. (Jack) Capel—later Air Vice Marshal—“tried to set alight the machine, but before we got it to burn we were surrounded on all sides by tribesmen, who quickly got hold of us,” he wrote to his sister. He reported that because of the reward offered, the Wazirs and Mahsuds fought over him. The Wazirs won, and a several days later, “I got sent up from the camp a good box of tinned food, a bottle of whisky and some beer and some clothes....” After three days, the ransom was paid, and he was released with a 1,000-rupee note from his abductors, which they included, he said, for his “inconvenience.”
Such hospitality couldn’t always be expected, so the RAF invented what they nicknamed “goli chits”—safe conduct letters for air crew. Goli is the Pashto word for ball. Rumor had it that tribesmen often castrated their captives. The chits promised a reward if the bearer were returned with all parts intact. A beer-drinking song in the mess summed up the ghastly prospect: “No balls at all. No balls at all. When your engine cuts out, you’ll have no balls at all.”
Although histories of the period recount ambushes and massacres of Indian and British Army ground troops, the surviving diaries and letters of pilots in the RAF squadrons indicate that the airmen managed to enjoy the gentleman’s life, even amid the mayhem of the frontier. G.M. Knocker, who spent 1918 to 1922 in India, recounted in his diary a jolly life with darts, dances (“only eight girls” at one), a bearer—personal servant—to attend his daily baths and press his uniforms, soccer and rugby games, and lots of “afternoon snoozes.” Wing Commander D.L. Allen, who flew DH.9A light day bombers and Bristol Fighters out of Risalpur from 1927 to 1929, wrote of Sunday afternoon tennis parties, “good hockey and football grounds, tennis and squash courts, polo, picnics and dances for all ranks.” Being stationed at a larger base, he had a better chance than Knocker did at female companionship: “there were usually some 70 eligible young women staying with relatives and friends, termed irreverently, the Fishing Fleet,” he wrote. “They were always in demand for dances and parties.”
By the mid-1930s, the RAF’s air policing campaign was in full swing and integrated with British Army ground action. In November 1936, the conflict intensified. Mirza Ali Khan, a rebel fighter from the village of Ipi, led an ambush against two British marching columns in Waziristan’s long-peaceful Khaisora Valley, trapping the units and killing 14 soldiers. RAF air drops of ammunition and supplies saved the day, but the incident launched a multi-year campaign to capture Ali Khan, a Sufi mystic who became known as the faqir of Ipi.
Up to this point, Sergeant Albert Edward Holloway of 60 Squadron, who had arrived at Kohat at the end of 1934, had seen little offensive action. His logbook records reconnaissance and cross-country trips, drogue attack practice, and photo missions in Westland Wapitis. On New Year’s Eve 1936, however, he finally got a taste of air policing. “Active operations—bombing Arsal Kot,” reads his entry that day. Arsal Kot was the fortified hideout of the faqir, and Holloway didn’t do much reveling that night. Next morning, New Year’s Day, he “re-armed at Miram Shah” with 230-pound, high-explosive bombs and flew two more missions in his Wapiti, blasting the faqir’s headquarters.
The faqir escaped, and called for a jihad against the British. Emboldened by his intransigence, other tribes and groups, notably the Bhittanis of Waziristan, joined his effort. Thousands of tribesmen were soon conducting raids all over the frontier. The British stepped up their efforts to get the faqir by conducting what they called “blockades”: keeping the tribes suspected of sympathy with the faqir from their livelihoods. Bombing operations prevented the watering of livestock and thwarted the plowing or harvesting of crops, according to Waging War in Waziristan: The British Struggle in the Land of Bin Laden, 1849–1947, a book recently published by Andrew M. Roe. For the first 10 days of March 1937, Pilot Officer A.M.A. Birch, also flying Westland Wapitis, flew several missions of “convoy escort,” or “road recce to Jandola,” often from 8,000 feet, all the while fully loaded with bombs. Later he pasted a photo in his logbook captioned “20-pound bombs bursting among cattle in Razmak area.”
The Karesti area, southeast of Miram Shah, was one of the first to be blockaded. Again Holloway joined the fray. Fresh from a three-month leave in England and loaded up with four 112-pound bombs, he hit the village while spraying 216 rounds from his Lewis gun. As he wheeled around his rear gunner shot off 384 rounds. Pulling away, he wrote later, he noticed he had been “shot through strut, spark plug blown out.” He flew low along the Tochi River Valley to the base at Miram Shah for repairs.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 Next »





Comments (8)
Very interesting, By brother served with the RAF on the NW Frontier, early in WWII. The article brought back memories of stories he told me.
Posted by Ken Green on May 24,2011 | 08:51 PM
This goes to prove that the British should have stayed out of there in the first place. They wanted to "conquer the world " in colonialism.
They messed up every place they went, with their "superior than thou" attitude and mentality.
Their "class" status way of life was (is) a joke.
Posted by william tuthill on May 25,2011 | 05:39 PM
Sadly, it is the same old story - subjugation by whatever means available. the Red Indians, the Australian Aboriginies, The Africans, the Chinese, Vietnamese, India - just look around the world map. Has anyone been spared? Shoving your 'freedom' down the throats of anyone and everyone; wiping their genes from the face of the earth in the name of 'freeing them'?
When peoples fight for their freedom and independence, they are termed mutineers' and 'terrorists'. To quote from this historical article: "'STIRRED by' Britain's two INVASIONS....."
"Stirred up by Britain’s two invasions of Afghanistan in the 1800s, tribesmen in the insular, autonomous district of Waziristan challenged British forces in the North-West Frontier, even after the 1919 armistice ending the third British-Afghan War."
Would the Americans or the British not challenge anyone that ingresses into their territory or way of life?
“The problem of controlling the tribal territory… has always needed special treatment by reason of the psychology, social organization and mode of life of the tribesmen and the nature of the country they inhabit.”
(R) .."the country THEY inhabit." so what are YOU doing there?
The question is: WHY ARE YOU THERE? IT IS THEIR WAY OF LIFE. Are you FREEING THEM FROM THEMSELVES, IMPOSING YOUR OWN WAYS - WHY?
I wonder why God created man in the first place - so evil, so greedy.
Posted by Arif on May 26,2011 | 10:07 PM
"They messed up every place they went, with their 'superior than thou' attitude and mentality". That is a very broad and overreaching statement that ignores some basic realities.
Britain took throughout the world the idea of a civil society, an organized government with a competent civil service, and rule of law. Places that heretofore had been the stage of stone age tribal massacres or brutal dynasties were brought into the civilized world and a rule of law. Was it all benevolent and altruistic? Clearly not. But would large successful democracies such as India and much of southeast Asia come to exist without the British? No chance.
Posted by Chris Moon on May 27,2011 | 10:32 PM
A truly incredible story. Who would have known? War without end, amen. Empire after Empire, invasion after invasion. We desperately need to stop killing ourselves. It really does hurt to get shot, or to suffer a ghastly bomb wound, or to lose your "balls" over someone else's turf. What was gained by this operation, in the big picture?
Posted by Philip Monroe on June 4,2011 | 11:49 AM
During he mid 1950s I visited India on several occasions.
On one occasion i was talking to an Indian friend who
remarked that he wish that the British were still running
the government of India.I was shocked and asked him why?
He replied that when the British were in charge Indians hated them. But now that they are independent we Indians hate each other!
Posted by Bernard Parsons on June 24,2011 | 10:57 AM
my late father-in-law (HEH Glenn)served with the Punjabi's in this part of the world and my wife was born in Jehlum. While all of this sounded almost absurd, the British soldier and airman along with Indian troops did bring more than a degree of civilization to this region. To this day, much of what was learned in the late 19th and early 20th centuries applies. Too many US military personnel regard the Afghans and others as "sand ns...." But, the Afghan with far less military support can more than match the heavily over armed American. Somone should learn a lesson from this.
Posted by TERENCE GETS on June 25,2011 | 07:56 PM
It is so tragic that the so called civilised whites still don't understand that they can not subjugate the Pashtuns by might of their military power...They are ready to spend trillions of dollars on military operations but dont want to spend a fraction of that amount to finish poverty, disease and illiteracy in these parts of the world. The unfortunate Pashtuns are a victim of their geography..they have always been used as cannon fodder by the great powers and their proxies like Pakistan
Posted by Farhad Yousafzai on August 7,2011 | 04:17 PM