The Bombing of Waziristan
In this rugged hiding place, outlaws like Osama bin Laden are rarely run to ground. The British learned that lesson in 1939.
- By Graham Chandler
- Air & Space magazine, July 2011
A formation of Westland Wapitis flies over the mountainous landscape of the North-West Frontier Province. In 1933, a Wapiti became the first airplane to fly over Mt. Everest.
Imperial War Museum
(Page 3 of 3)
In the campaign to capture the faqir, one of the largest operations became known as the Bhittani Blockade. In September 1937, Holloway flew 22 Wapiti sorties against Bhittani, usually carrying four 20-pound and two 112-pound bombs and terrorizing enemy livestock with his front and rear guns. Logbook entries read: “Cattle dispersed with casualties”; “Camels and sheep dispersed.”
The faqir shifted from village to village and group to group, with each protecting him in turn; through 1939, the Brits attacked in a cat-and-mouse game. Most of the RAF strength took part: Five squadrons from Miram Shah, Arawali, Kohat, and other bases flew Wapitis, Audaxs, Harts, Bristol Fighters, and Valencia bombers. Once a local council had satisfied the British Political Agent that no more hostiles were being protected, leaflets were dropped announcing “Whereas the government are satisfied that the tribe desires peace and have dissociated themselves from their hostiles...it is safe for you to return to your home....” Kindly, the notices added “TAKE CARE: do not touch any unexploded bombs....” In some areas, such as the Tori Khel, the RAF bombed, on and off, for eight months, expending 1,650 flying hours, 1,600 bombs, and 68,000 machine gun rounds.
The faqir was never caught. By 1939 he was operating from across the border in Afghanistan, and increasing tensions in Europe were drawing the RAF away from Waziristan. In the 1930s, the British colonial rule in India began to fade. Already by 1932, the Indian air force had been created in anticipation of independence; indeed, many Indian units flew alongside the RAF in punitive strikes against the militant tribes. In January 1935, the parliament in London introduced the Government of India Bill, granting India self-government.
In 2010, Royal Air Force Flight Lieutenant Duncan Swainston of 39 Squadron flew MQ-1 Reapers monitoring the area of the world where the Great Game had been played. He said that the Royal Air Force is conducting missions only in Afghanistan, and that he is not flying over any part of Pakistan. The United States is. Although the Pentagon and Department of State don’t acknowledge the attacks, Pakistani security organizations as well as the Associated Press and Reuters have reported 75 missile strikes in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas between September 1, 2010, and the end of February. Many of them targeted the same villages that protected the faqir in the 1920s: Datta Khel, for example, which was once a garrison staffed by recruits from local tribes led by British officers, and Mohammed Khel, just 20 miles west of the old RAF base at Miram Shah. The drones targeted supporters of Osama bin Laden, the new faqir who for almost 10 years escaped his hunters.
A U.S. Naval Test Pilot School graduate, Calgary-based freelance writer Graham Chandler spent eight months in Pakistan's North-West Frontier Province conducting research for a Ph.D. in archaeology.





Comments (8)
Very interesting, By brother served with the RAF on the NW Frontier, early in WWII. The article brought back memories of stories he told me.
Posted by Ken Green on May 24,2011 | 08:51 PM
This goes to prove that the British should have stayed out of there in the first place. They wanted to "conquer the world " in colonialism.
They messed up every place they went, with their "superior than thou" attitude and mentality.
Their "class" status way of life was (is) a joke.
Posted by william tuthill on May 25,2011 | 05:39 PM
Sadly, it is the same old story - subjugation by whatever means available. the Red Indians, the Australian Aboriginies, The Africans, the Chinese, Vietnamese, India - just look around the world map. Has anyone been spared? Shoving your 'freedom' down the throats of anyone and everyone; wiping their genes from the face of the earth in the name of 'freeing them'?
When peoples fight for their freedom and independence, they are termed mutineers' and 'terrorists'. To quote from this historical article: "'STIRRED by' Britain's two INVASIONS....."
"Stirred up by Britain’s two invasions of Afghanistan in the 1800s, tribesmen in the insular, autonomous district of Waziristan challenged British forces in the North-West Frontier, even after the 1919 armistice ending the third British-Afghan War."
Would the Americans or the British not challenge anyone that ingresses into their territory or way of life?
“The problem of controlling the tribal territory… has always needed special treatment by reason of the psychology, social organization and mode of life of the tribesmen and the nature of the country they inhabit.”
(R) .."the country THEY inhabit." so what are YOU doing there?
The question is: WHY ARE YOU THERE? IT IS THEIR WAY OF LIFE. Are you FREEING THEM FROM THEMSELVES, IMPOSING YOUR OWN WAYS - WHY?
I wonder why God created man in the first place - so evil, so greedy.
Posted by Arif on May 26,2011 | 10:07 PM
"They messed up every place they went, with their 'superior than thou' attitude and mentality". That is a very broad and overreaching statement that ignores some basic realities.
Britain took throughout the world the idea of a civil society, an organized government with a competent civil service, and rule of law. Places that heretofore had been the stage of stone age tribal massacres or brutal dynasties were brought into the civilized world and a rule of law. Was it all benevolent and altruistic? Clearly not. But would large successful democracies such as India and much of southeast Asia come to exist without the British? No chance.
Posted by Chris Moon on May 27,2011 | 10:32 PM
A truly incredible story. Who would have known? War without end, amen. Empire after Empire, invasion after invasion. We desperately need to stop killing ourselves. It really does hurt to get shot, or to suffer a ghastly bomb wound, or to lose your "balls" over someone else's turf. What was gained by this operation, in the big picture?
Posted by Philip Monroe on June 4,2011 | 11:49 AM
During he mid 1950s I visited India on several occasions.
On one occasion i was talking to an Indian friend who
remarked that he wish that the British were still running
the government of India.I was shocked and asked him why?
He replied that when the British were in charge Indians hated them. But now that they are independent we Indians hate each other!
Posted by Bernard Parsons on June 24,2011 | 10:57 AM
my late father-in-law (HEH Glenn)served with the Punjabi's in this part of the world and my wife was born in Jehlum. While all of this sounded almost absurd, the British soldier and airman along with Indian troops did bring more than a degree of civilization to this region. To this day, much of what was learned in the late 19th and early 20th centuries applies. Too many US military personnel regard the Afghans and others as "sand ns...." But, the Afghan with far less military support can more than match the heavily over armed American. Somone should learn a lesson from this.
Posted by TERENCE GETS on June 25,2011 | 07:56 PM
It is so tragic that the so called civilised whites still don't understand that they can not subjugate the Pashtuns by might of their military power...They are ready to spend trillions of dollars on military operations but dont want to spend a fraction of that amount to finish poverty, disease and illiteracy in these parts of the world. The unfortunate Pashtuns are a victim of their geography..they have always been used as cannon fodder by the great powers and their proxies like Pakistan
Posted by Farhad Yousafzai on August 7,2011 | 04:17 PM