It's one o'clock in the morning on December 17, 1998, a cool crystalline night at Thumrait Air Base in the Persian Gulf sultanate of Oman. Two Rockwell B-1B bombers idle on Runway 17. Cleared for takeoff, the first jet begins to roll, its afterburners washing the rocky desert landscape in a faint orange glow. Quickly gathering speed, the Lancer lifts off the runway and banks into a sharp turn to the right, heading west. Forty-five seconds later, the second B-1B follows. The two jets join up in a loose formation and turn north into the starry blackness.
For the B-1, this is an historic moment: the long anticipated first combat mission of the complex, expensive, and oft-maligned bomber delivered to the Air Force 13 years earlier. Born amid controversy in the 1960s, twice canceled, and plagued early by technical problems, the B-1 had seemingly gotten lost in the shadows—caught between the Boeing B-52, the iconic bomber of the past, and the Northrop B-2, the stealthy bomber of the future. In 1990, the B-1 had suffered the ultimate humiliation: staying Stateside during the first Gulf War, while the plodding, antique B-52s answered the call to duty.
But now, in Operation Desert Fox, the four-day 1998 air campaign against Iraqi president Saddam Hussein, the B-1 was finally getting a chance to prove its worth. "Failure was not an option that night," recalls Lieutenant Colonel Gordon Greaney, a back-seat weapon systems operator on the trail aircraft. "We all had very big chips on our shoulders after the Gulf War." The B-1s were to take out the main barracks of Saddam's elite Republican Guard at Al Kut, 100 miles southeast of Baghdad. The two big jets would be escorted by a dozen carrier-based fighters and an EA-6B Prowler.
Joining up with the Navy aircraft, the two B-1s crossed the Iraqi border at 26,000 feet and 550 mph. They navigated around an Iraqi SA-2 surface-to-air-missile site, but two more sites, equipped with the more dangerous SA-3 missiles, awaited near Al Kut. Greaney, chewing tobacco and occasionally spitting to the side of his dangling oxygen mask, monitored the SA-3 tracking radars on his instrument panel displays. He watched as the SAM radars flicked on briefly, then shut down, the operators apparently fearful of the radar-homing missiles carried by the EA-6B. He breathed a sigh of relief: No SAMs tonight.
Approaching the target, the B-1 crews watched as orange streaks of anti-aircraft artillery fire arced far below them. Seven miles out from Al Kut, Greaney's B-1, nicknamed "Watchdog," released its load of 64 500-pound "dumb" bombs. The drop took only five seconds; the B-1 immediately racked into a steep 3-G right bank and headed back toward Thumrait.
It hadn't been a perfect mission—sand in the bomb release mechanism had caused 20 bombs to hang up—but all in all, things had gone smoothly. After landing around 6:30 a.m., with the sun just rising off the left wing, Greaney crawled into his tent to sleep, exhausted and exhilarated. Not until the next night did he see the satellite photo that showed a tight cluster of marks centered on the barracks, with nearly a dozen direct hits. In the close, competitive world of bomber crews, Greaney and his mates had earned bragging rights.
For the B-1, the destruction of the Republican Guard barracks that night was the first step back toward respectability. (Two other Desert Fox missions were also successful.) Subsequent combat in Kosovo, Afghanistan, and Iraq confirmed its comeback. And last year, the B-1's tale of redemption reached an unlikely zero-to-hero ending: In Southwest Asia, the former Rodney Dangerfield of warplanes became the bomber of choice. Since April 2006, the fancy $2 billion stealth bombers have sat meekly in climate-controlled Missouri hangars or deployed to Guam for training exercises, and the B-52s have rested their weary combat wings Stateside, while B-1s have been flying almost daily against the Taliban. Tony Straw, a B-1 pilot with the Seventh Bomb Wing at Dyess Air Force Base in Texas, says proudly, "We're now in demand."
The B-1 was born in a time of stormy debate about strategic bombing philosophy. Manned bombers or intercontinental ballistic missiles? Penetrate or stand off? High altitude or low? The first casualty of the debate was also the Air Force's first stab at a B-52 replacement: the XB-70, a high-altitude Mach 3 marvel. Its radar cross-section and infrared signature would have made the aircraft an easy target for a new generation of Soviet missiles, however, and in 1961, Air Force planners turned their focus to a low-level, under-the-radar bomber. Numerous design studies ensued, with acronyms like SLAB, ERSA, LAMP, AMPSS, and finally, in 1964, AMSA, for Advanced Manned Strategic Aircraft. (Wags said that it stood for "America's Most Studied Aircraft.") But Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara, a believer in ballistic missiles rather than manned bombers, limited AMSA funding to a trickle. Worried that the B-52s would start suffering structural failures before a new bomber could replace them, the Air Force ordered an interim solution: the General Dynamics FB-111, which presaged many features of the bomber-to-come.


Comments
What a great article. It make us proud an determined more than ever to pursue perfection in our design. The vision of some of our leaders preserved this wonderful flying machine. Let's apply these lessons to the future
Posted by Wilfredo J. Salazar on March 21,2008 | 08:47AM
BEAUTIFUL MEAN MACHINE
Posted by jIM kIDD on March 21,2008 | 12:49PM
Very interesting. If there's a moral here it would be something like 'build a fantastic warbird and you'll find a way to use it'. Interesting, though, that the concept is now forty years old, and some of the planes must be pushing 20 or more. Can you imagine a 1918 bomber fighting in 1938?
Posted by charles warren on March 21,2008 | 05:51PM
Good job, great article.
Posted by Stan on March 21,2008 | 07:21PM
I grew up in Palmdale, CA - the birthplace of the B-1. My father worked on the project for over twenty years. If there was ever a "family" airplane for our family, this was it. We knew some of the pilots and many of the people who put it in the sky. Reading this article brought back pleasant memories for me. However, the plane was never more troubled than any other military aircraft. The B-2 was far more troubled in its R & D than the Bone. It is also far too expensive to be placed in the mission of the B-1. Thank you for finally giving the B-1 the coverage it rightfully deserves.
Posted by Victor Claud on March 22,2008 | 01:08PM
Their were four B1A's, They were not all the same! One had capsule ejection seats! A friend of mine was killed during fuel transfer testing! The CG was outside of the back of the airplane!His name was Thomas "Doug" Benefield! A good friend and great test pilot! Donald R. Curtin Retired Capt.USAF/UAL
Posted by Donald R. Curtin, Capt Retired USAF/UAL on March 24,2008 | 10:43AM
EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!! Those of us that have been around it for a while know that a single B-1 is truly an awesome projection of American military might! I've been part of the B-1 team since 1986 and it is nice to finally see some much-deserved good press!
Posted by Ken Harris, AFETS on March 27,2008 | 12:27PM
Great article. One minor comment regarding the caption for the lower picture on page 63. The bombs released should read parachute retarded MK82s or Mk83s, not a cluster bomb.
Posted by Jose on March 29,2008 | 12:25PM
The B52H may be old and cranky and certainly not as sleek looking as the Bone, but it will be soldiering on long after the B1 is nothing more than a gate guard on a stick.
Posted by G. Stevens on March 31,2008 | 05:27AM
I loved the story & the plane, but when I tryed to view the clip on UTUBE, there was no refferance.
Posted by H A COLE on March 31,2008 | 05:00PM
Finally the BONE is getting the praise it so deserved, it had to sit out the first gulf war due to the fact that at the time it was not certified for conventional weapons, while the B-2 and the B-52 or the BEAK and the BUFF if you prefer were. I had the privelege of working on some of the avionics systems and the deployment of the rotary launcher system both at Palmdale's Plant 42 and at Edwards AFB in the mid to late 90's and I loved every second of it. While the other bombers in service are wonderful aircraft the BONE has a very special place in my heart. It is a wonderful and extremely capable airframe. My brother Mark is still an engineer with Boeing on the B-1 project. The BUFF has undergone countless mods over the years and is finally nearing a well earned retirement and the BONE has some big shoes to fill but I am confident that it will continue to be a big part of our Air Force for years to come. Fighters usually get the glory but when you need something destroyed , call in a Bomber! God Bless all of our men and women defending our nation!
Posted by Robert McCabe on April 1,2008 | 03:26PM
We should give thanks to Ed Schnakenberg, Chief Design Engineer, and his North American-Rockwell Advance Design team who configured the B-1 in the Proposal Phase of the competition for the initial B-1 contract. moke
Posted by Ed Mokslaveskas on April 6,2008 | 04:10PM
Beats the hell out of our WW2 bombers.
Posted by John A Baldwin on April 9,2008 | 07:33PM
I have been in the Aerospace Industry since 1958 and have seen phenominal evolution. One was the B1! I participated in the contract negotiations of the Hanger Bay & all Ground Handling Equipment (GHE) at Edwards which accommodates FOUR (4) B1s. Yes, the whole program was massive and expensive, but was also part of the process to perfection. Continual Kudos to the designers (& redesigners), sub contractors, QA & Final Assembly groups, the final craft itself, flight crews, and especially to the Maintenance Crews. A belated thanks to Washington DC for belatedly recognizing reality. You can not get a Cadillac or Cady performance on a Chevy budget ....
Posted by Bryce Jerlow on April 24,2008 | 03:11PM
An impressive aircraft, as all in the arsenal are. If you want to read about another very neat aircraft, go to maggiesfarm.com and look up the piece by Maj. Brian Shul, entitled "I loved that jet." Maj. Shul is one of the few pilots rated to fly the Blackbird.
Posted by Bill T. on April 27,2008 | 01:41PM
Very impressive technology. Meanwhile, we're losing a war to a bunch of guys who plant bombs in the dirt.
Posted by Nick V on May 5,2008 | 04:02PM
What, nary a word about the most important part of an aircraft -- the engines? I know it's had GE's so far, but the B-1R is being proposed with Pratt & Whitney F119's that would push it up to Mach 2. Y'all are right about the sound level. They lit the augmentors on a fly-by at a Kelly AFB air show I attended years ago, and it was the loudest. And, oh, Nick V, haven't you heard the latest? We ain't losing to those guys in the dirt any more.
Posted by Jerry Hyndman on June 20,2008 | 12:32PM
Wow, gee whiz. Gosh, with all the "devastating" power in "destroying the caves", why is it that Sheikh Omas and dead-or-alive by very-much-alive Osama bin Laden are sill directing a global war on terror from same caves via with hand written messages while we buy plans whose main use is giving aviators their next star or bar. How much is spent on special forces, the total war budget in Afhghanistan, vs. keeping these relics in the air? Question: does Smithsonian abide by ANY journalist standards, or do you just read DOD press releases and verbatim quotes from Generals?
Posted by Richard on August 26,2008 | 09:43PM
This is a really interesting article that fills in a void for someone like me, a person who would have loved to have been a pilot but blocked by the obvious: vision. I had little idea of the versatility of the B-1 before reading this article. The pilots who fly them along with the ground crews must be justifiably proud. There's an object lesson here for the brass in the Pentagon as well: when you end up with a boondoggle, turn it into a bonanza -- use the B-1's history as a template!
Posted by Mekhong Kurt on December 14,2008 | 01:31PM
I worked on the B-1A's in 1981 thur 1985 while I was stationed at edwards AFB. then i was discharged from the A.F. and i went to work for rockwell and built ship 2 thur 100 it was the most rewarding job i've ever done. we had some of the best mechanics at that plant. there was always such pride when we would deliver an airplane. the pilots always did a flyby at high speed. I'm glad the bone is getting some good press also, everyone would always rag us about the b-1 being a maintenance nightmare. GO BONE!!!!
Posted by nick gramm on March 4,2009 | 09:14AM