(Page 2 of 4)
The new Nixon administration, however, revived the strategic bomber design, renamed it the B-1, and selected North American Rockwell to build it. The bomber on Rockwell's drawing board was in every way different from a B-52: a highly maneuverable Mach 2.2 low-level penetrator packed with advanced electronic countermeasures. Its mission: a terrain-hugging, under-the-radar nuclear attack on Moscow. And the B-1 looked like a weapon of mass destruction.
Its blended wing/body design and sinuous fuselage, shaped by the area rule, cut supersonic drag. The variable-geometry wing swept forward to 15 degrees for takeoff and landing, and back to a dart-like 67.5 degrees for supersonic dash. Its advances included terrain-following radar that enabled hands-off flying as low as 400 feet in any weather. To relieve the structural stresses of low-level turbulence on the long slim fuselage, small canard vanes below the cockpit automatically swiveled in response to gusts. To stay within center-of-gravity limits during wing sweep or weapons release, an automatic fuel-balancing system rapidly redistributed fuel among various tanks. A complex Defensive Avionics System was intended to detect and jam enemy radars.
The first prototype B-1A flew in 1974. Initial flight testing proceeded smoothly, but the B-1 continued to stir controversy on Capitol Hill, where critics sniped at its mission philosophy and constantly escalating cost. But its backers, led by right-wing firebrand Congressman Robert "B-1 Bob" Dornan, had managed to spread the B-1 subcontractor pork among many Congressional districts, a tactic that helped keep the project alive—until once again, political change rocked the B-1 program. Jimmy Carter, riding a post-Vietnam wave of skepticism about military power and citing budget concerns, scrapped the B-1 in 1977 in favor of the air-launched cruise missile (and, unbeknownst to the public, the stealth bomber, then in the early planning stages). But Carter did allow the four B-1A prototypes to continue testing.
Then came the presidency of the hawkish, free-spending Ronald Reagan, who revived the program. The new B-1B was beefier and could carry 50,000 more pounds of bombs and more fuel. A simplification of its engine inlets and a coating of radar-absorbing material would cut the jet's radar cross-section by 90 percent. The new inlets' design limited top speed to Mach 1.25, but it was decided that stealth (or at least semi-stealth) trumped speed.
Even though testing at Edwards Air Force Base in California was barely half finished, the B-1B stood its first nuclear alert in 1986, at Dyess Air Force Base. The rush to duty had predictable results: Even as their price tags were rising past $250 million each—the most expensive warplanes in history at that point—the B-1s were plagued with teething problems. Engines failed. Fuel leaked. The ballyhooed radar-jamming system had an unfortunate tendency to disrupt the B-1's own offensive radar, prompting the Armed Forces Journal to award the bomber the mortifying title "World's First Self-Jamming Bomber."
For all its initial problems, though, the B-1 was loved by its pilots, who affectionately call it the Bone (for B-One). "Never call it a Lancer," one Bone jockey cautioned me. With a fighter-style stick control, a relatively snappy 40-degrees-per-second roll rate, afterburners for instant kick-in-the-pants power, and a generous 3-G combat maneuvering limit, the Bone flies more like a fighter than a bomber. During a ride in the left seat of the B-1 flight simulator at Dyess, I got a feel for the Bone's agility. A firm yank on the stick triggered a roll rate that left me dizzy.
At airshows, B-1s have done barrel rolls, maneuvers unthinkable in a B-52 or B-2. (Search youtube.com for "Inverted Bone.") Major Dave Arnold, a Bone weapons systems officer with the Seventh Bomb Wing at Dyess, smugly points out that the stealth bomber, for all its vaunted electronic gizmos, is limited to sedate 25-degree banks and typically flies programmed missions almost entirely on autopilot.
And of course Bone jocks are the only U.S. bomber pilots who can bust the Mach. A favorite B-1 combat maneuver in the Gulf is the "show of force" run, a low-level, full-afterburner flyby to let the bad guys know who's in the neighborhood. "It breaks some eardrums," says Arnold. "And it's a great morale booster for our guys on the ground." Even at subsonic speeds, a Bone at full afterburner is almost certainly the world's loudest aircraft.


Comments
What a great article. It make us proud an determined more than ever to pursue perfection in our design. The vision of some of our leaders preserved this wonderful flying machine. Let's apply these lessons to the future
Posted by Wilfredo J. Salazar on March 21,2008 | 08:47AM
BEAUTIFUL MEAN MACHINE
Posted by jIM kIDD on March 21,2008 | 12:49PM
Very interesting. If there's a moral here it would be something like 'build a fantastic warbird and you'll find a way to use it'. Interesting, though, that the concept is now forty years old, and some of the planes must be pushing 20 or more. Can you imagine a 1918 bomber fighting in 1938?
Posted by charles warren on March 21,2008 | 05:51PM
Good job, great article.
Posted by Stan on March 21,2008 | 07:21PM
I grew up in Palmdale, CA - the birthplace of the B-1. My father worked on the project for over twenty years. If there was ever a "family" airplane for our family, this was it. We knew some of the pilots and many of the people who put it in the sky. Reading this article brought back pleasant memories for me. However, the plane was never more troubled than any other military aircraft. The B-2 was far more troubled in its R & D than the Bone. It is also far too expensive to be placed in the mission of the B-1. Thank you for finally giving the B-1 the coverage it rightfully deserves.
Posted by Victor Claud on March 22,2008 | 01:08PM
Their were four B1A's, They were not all the same! One had capsule ejection seats! A friend of mine was killed during fuel transfer testing! The CG was outside of the back of the airplane!His name was Thomas "Doug" Benefield! A good friend and great test pilot! Donald R. Curtin Retired Capt.USAF/UAL
Posted by Donald R. Curtin, Capt Retired USAF/UAL on March 24,2008 | 10:43AM
EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!! Those of us that have been around it for a while know that a single B-1 is truly an awesome projection of American military might! I've been part of the B-1 team since 1986 and it is nice to finally see some much-deserved good press!
Posted by Ken Harris, AFETS on March 27,2008 | 12:27PM
Great article. One minor comment regarding the caption for the lower picture on page 63. The bombs released should read parachute retarded MK82s or Mk83s, not a cluster bomb.
Posted by Jose on March 29,2008 | 12:25PM
The B52H may be old and cranky and certainly not as sleek looking as the Bone, but it will be soldiering on long after the B1 is nothing more than a gate guard on a stick.
Posted by G. Stevens on March 31,2008 | 05:27AM
I loved the story & the plane, but when I tryed to view the clip on UTUBE, there was no refferance.
Posted by H A COLE on March 31,2008 | 05:00PM
Finally the BONE is getting the praise it so deserved, it had to sit out the first gulf war due to the fact that at the time it was not certified for conventional weapons, while the B-2 and the B-52 or the BEAK and the BUFF if you prefer were. I had the privelege of working on some of the avionics systems and the deployment of the rotary launcher system both at Palmdale's Plant 42 and at Edwards AFB in the mid to late 90's and I loved every second of it. While the other bombers in service are wonderful aircraft the BONE has a very special place in my heart. It is a wonderful and extremely capable airframe. My brother Mark is still an engineer with Boeing on the B-1 project. The BUFF has undergone countless mods over the years and is finally nearing a well earned retirement and the BONE has some big shoes to fill but I am confident that it will continue to be a big part of our Air Force for years to come. Fighters usually get the glory but when you need something destroyed , call in a Bomber! God Bless all of our men and women defending our nation!
Posted by Robert McCabe on April 1,2008 | 03:26PM
We should give thanks to Ed Schnakenberg, Chief Design Engineer, and his North American-Rockwell Advance Design team who configured the B-1 in the Proposal Phase of the competition for the initial B-1 contract. moke
Posted by Ed Mokslaveskas on April 6,2008 | 04:10PM
Beats the hell out of our WW2 bombers.
Posted by John A Baldwin on April 9,2008 | 07:33PM
I have been in the Aerospace Industry since 1958 and have seen phenominal evolution. One was the B1! I participated in the contract negotiations of the Hanger Bay & all Ground Handling Equipment (GHE) at Edwards which accommodates FOUR (4) B1s. Yes, the whole program was massive and expensive, but was also part of the process to perfection. Continual Kudos to the designers (& redesigners), sub contractors, QA & Final Assembly groups, the final craft itself, flight crews, and especially to the Maintenance Crews. A belated thanks to Washington DC for belatedly recognizing reality. You can not get a Cadillac or Cady performance on a Chevy budget ....
Posted by Bryce Jerlow on April 24,2008 | 03:11PM
An impressive aircraft, as all in the arsenal are. If you want to read about another very neat aircraft, go to maggiesfarm.com and look up the piece by Maj. Brian Shul, entitled "I loved that jet." Maj. Shul is one of the few pilots rated to fly the Blackbird.
Posted by Bill T. on April 27,2008 | 01:41PM
Very impressive technology. Meanwhile, we're losing a war to a bunch of guys who plant bombs in the dirt.
Posted by Nick V on May 5,2008 | 04:02PM
What, nary a word about the most important part of an aircraft -- the engines? I know it's had GE's so far, but the B-1R is being proposed with Pratt & Whitney F119's that would push it up to Mach 2. Y'all are right about the sound level. They lit the augmentors on a fly-by at a Kelly AFB air show I attended years ago, and it was the loudest. And, oh, Nick V, haven't you heard the latest? We ain't losing to those guys in the dirt any more.
Posted by Jerry Hyndman on June 20,2008 | 12:32PM
Wow, gee whiz. Gosh, with all the "devastating" power in "destroying the caves", why is it that Sheikh Omas and dead-or-alive by very-much-alive Osama bin Laden are sill directing a global war on terror from same caves via with hand written messages while we buy plans whose main use is giving aviators their next star or bar. How much is spent on special forces, the total war budget in Afhghanistan, vs. keeping these relics in the air? Question: does Smithsonian abide by ANY journalist standards, or do you just read DOD press releases and verbatim quotes from Generals?
Posted by Richard on August 26,2008 | 09:43PM
This is a really interesting article that fills in a void for someone like me, a person who would have loved to have been a pilot but blocked by the obvious: vision. I had little idea of the versatility of the B-1 before reading this article. The pilots who fly them along with the ground crews must be justifiably proud. There's an object lesson here for the brass in the Pentagon as well: when you end up with a boondoggle, turn it into a bonanza -- use the B-1's history as a template!
Posted by Mekhong Kurt on December 14,2008 | 01:31PM
I worked on the B-1A's in 1981 thur 1985 while I was stationed at edwards AFB. then i was discharged from the A.F. and i went to work for rockwell and built ship 2 thur 100 it was the most rewarding job i've ever done. we had some of the best mechanics at that plant. there was always such pride when we would deliver an airplane. the pilots always did a flyby at high speed. I'm glad the bone is getting some good press also, everyone would always rag us about the b-1 being a maintenance nightmare. GO BONE!!!!
Posted by nick gramm on March 4,2009 | 09:14AM