The Bone is Back
Too trouble-prone for nuclear alert and sidelined in the first Gulf War, the B-1 is today the busiest bomber in the fleet.
- By David Noland
- Air & Space magazine, May 2008
In a typical two-ship formation, B-1Bs fly a 1998 training mission near Meteor Crater in Arizona, one of the few holes in the ground bigger than a B-1 could make.
Ted Carlson/Fotodynamics.net
(Page 3 of 4)
Unlike its pilots, however, the B-1's ground crews have a decidedly mixed opinion of their complex, finicky, and trouble-prone charge. "It's a love-hate relationship," concedes Staff Sergeant Walker Grant, a Seventh Bomb Wing crew chief at Dyess. "It's a high-performance vehicle. You're always tinkering. Comparing what it takes to keep a B-1 in the air to, say, a C-130 is like comparing a NASCAR racer to a go-cart." On many Bone missions, it's standard procedure to keep a second aircraft standing by with engines running in case the primary aircraft has some last-second problem.
To keep glitches to a minimum, Dyess ground crews ritually rub certain spots on their B-1s before each takeoff. (Just which spot depends on the particular aircraft.) "I've never been in a culture as superstitious as Bone crew chiefs," admits one of them. Even when everything's working, about 90 man-hours of labor are needed to prepare a B-1 for a training sortie—double the number for a B-52.
Because of its very shaky start and high maintenance, the Bone had very low combat readiness rates during its early years on nuclear alert. The nadir came in 1990, when a series of engine fires grounded the entire fleet just before Iraq invaded Kuwait. Bone pilots watched in envy and disgust as the B-52s flew off to the Gulf and glory.
But even had its engines been reliable and its defensive avionics working, the B-1 simply had no role to play in the first Iraq war. It was strictly a nuclear bomber, never intended for limited conventional wars, and not even capable of dropping conventional weapons. "It was horrible," recalls Colonel Jeff Taliaferro, a Bone pilot at the time who later flew the second Desert Fox mission. "Most of us had never been in combat, and we really wanted to go. When the nation's at war, you want to be part of it. The whole B-1 crew force was very disappointed."
After Desert Storm, the B-1 began the remarkable resurrection to its current status as America's go-to bomber. The first change in its fortunes was the 1991 collapse of the Soviet Union, which made the Bone's original nuclear deterrent role moot. Responding to the new strategic reality, the Air Force began to convert the B-1 fleet to carry conventional weapons. (The START arms reduction treaty later made the changeover mandatory.)
The following year, to compensate for the B-1's intensive maintenance requirements, the Air Force put 21 Bones on "attrition reserve," reducing the number of operational B-1s from 74 to 53. This allowed the available maintenance money, spare parts, and manpower to be spread over fewer aircraft. (Later, most of the "attrition-reserve" aircraft were retired altogether.) And a long-term program was initiated to improve the aircraft's computers, avionics, and weapons.
By the time of the 1998 Desert Fox operation, the upgrade was completed. Mission-capable rates had risen to the 70 percent range. And B-1 pilots, long steeped in SAC-style, low-level training, were now proficient in a whole new style of bombing: precision strikes with conventional weapons. This time when Saddam turned ornery, the Bones were ready.
The Desert Fox success earned the B-1 a big role in the Kosovo, Serbia conflict a few months later. Flying almost daily from Royal Air Force Base Fairford in England and using the same Mark 82 500-pounders and carpet-bombing tactic used in Desert Fox, a half-dozen B-1s dropped 20 percent of the total tonnage released by Allied air forces over Kosovo, while flying just two percent of the strike sorties. The B-1's first Kosovo mission, a raid on the Novi Sad oil refinery, was a baptism by fire; both aircraft were attacked by a SAM-6 missile. But the B-1s' new radar decoys, towed by the bombers on long cables, worked. The SAMs nailed the decoys, not the Bones.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »





Comments (24)
What a great article. It make us proud an determined more than ever to pursue perfection in our design. The vision of some of our leaders preserved this wonderful flying machine. Let's apply these lessons to the future
Posted by Wilfredo J. Salazar on March 21,2008 | 11:47 AM
BEAUTIFUL MEAN MACHINE
Posted by jIM kIDD on March 21,2008 | 03:49 PM
Very interesting. If there's a moral here it would be something like 'build a fantastic warbird and you'll find a way to use it'. Interesting, though, that the concept is now forty years old, and some of the planes must be pushing 20 or more. Can you imagine a 1918 bomber fighting in 1938?
Posted by charles warren on March 21,2008 | 08:51 PM
Good job, great article.
Posted by Stan on March 21,2008 | 10:21 PM
I grew up in Palmdale, CA - the birthplace of the B-1. My father worked on the project for over twenty years. If there was ever a "family" airplane for our family, this was it. We knew some of the pilots and many of the people who put it in the sky. Reading this article brought back pleasant memories for me. However, the plane was never more troubled than any other military aircraft. The B-2 was far more troubled in its R & D than the Bone. It is also far too expensive to be placed in the mission of the B-1. Thank you for finally giving the B-1 the coverage it rightfully deserves.
Posted by Victor Claud on March 22,2008 | 04:08 PM
Their were four B1A's, They were not all the same! One had capsule ejection seats! A friend of mine was killed during fuel transfer testing! The CG was outside of the back of the airplane!His name was Thomas "Doug" Benefield! A good friend and great test pilot! Donald R. Curtin Retired Capt.USAF/UAL
Posted by Donald R. Curtin, Capt Retired USAF/UAL on March 24,2008 | 01:43 PM
EXCELLENT ARTICLE!!!
Those of us that have been around it for a while know that a single B-1 is truly an awesome projection of American military might! I've been part of the B-1 team since 1986 and it is nice to finally see some much-deserved good press!
Posted by Ken Harris, AFETS on March 27,2008 | 03:27 PM
Great article. One minor comment regarding the caption for the lower picture on page 63. The bombs released should read parachute retarded MK82s or Mk83s, not a cluster bomb.
Posted by Jose on March 29,2008 | 03:25 PM
The B52H may be old and cranky and certainly not as sleek looking as the Bone, but it will be soldiering on long after the B1 is nothing more than a gate guard on a stick.
Posted by G. Stevens on March 31,2008 | 08:27 AM
I loved the story & the plane, but when I tryed to view the clip on UTUBE, there was no refferance.
Posted by H A COLE on March 31,2008 | 08:00 PM
Finally the BONE is getting the praise it so deserved, it had to sit out the first gulf war due to the fact that at the time it was not certified for conventional weapons, while the B-2 and the B-52 or the BEAK and the BUFF if you prefer were. I had the privelege of working on some of the avionics systems and the deployment of the rotary launcher system both at Palmdale's Plant 42 and at Edwards AFB in the mid to late 90's and I loved every second of it. While the other bombers in service are wonderful aircraft the BONE has a very special place in my heart. It is a wonderful and extremely capable airframe. My brother Mark is still an engineer with Boeing on the B-1 project. The BUFF has undergone countless mods over the years and is finally nearing a well earned retirement and the BONE has some big shoes to fill but I am confident that it will continue to be a big part of our Air Force for years to come. Fighters usually get the glory but when you need something destroyed , call in a Bomber! God Bless all of our men and women defending our nation!
Posted by Robert McCabe on April 1,2008 | 06:26 PM
We should give thanks to Ed Schnakenberg, Chief Design Engineer, and his North American-Rockwell Advance Design team who configured the B-1 in the Proposal Phase of the competition for the initial B-1 contract. moke
Posted by Ed Mokslaveskas on April 6,2008 | 07:10 PM
Beats the hell out of our WW2 bombers.
Posted by John A Baldwin on April 9,2008 | 10:33 PM
I have been in the Aerospace Industry since 1958 and have seen phenominal evolution. One was the B1! I participated in the contract negotiations of the Hanger Bay & all Ground Handling Equipment (GHE) at Edwards which accommodates FOUR (4) B1s. Yes, the whole program was massive and expensive, but was also part of the process to perfection.
Continual Kudos to the designers (& redesigners), sub contractors, QA & Final Assembly groups, the final craft itself, flight crews, and especially to the Maintenance Crews.
A belated thanks to Washington DC for belatedly recognizing reality. You can not get a Cadillac or Cady performance on a Chevy budget ....
Posted by Bryce Jerlow on April 24,2008 | 06:11 PM
An impressive aircraft, as all in the arsenal are. If you want to read about another very neat aircraft, go to maggiesfarm.com and look up the piece by Maj. Brian Shul, entitled "I loved that jet." Maj. Shul is one of the few pilots rated to fly the Blackbird.
Posted by Bill T. on April 27,2008 | 04:41 PM
Very impressive technology. Meanwhile, we're losing a war to a bunch of guys who plant bombs in the dirt.
Posted by Nick V on May 5,2008 | 07:02 PM
What, nary a word about the most important part of an aircraft -- the engines? I know it's had GE's so far, but the B-1R is being proposed with Pratt & Whitney F119's that would push it up to Mach 2.
Y'all are right about the sound level. They lit the augmentors on a fly-by at a Kelly AFB air show I attended years ago, and it was the loudest.
And, oh, Nick V, haven't you heard the latest? We ain't losing to those guys in the dirt any more.
Posted by Jerry Hyndman on June 20,2008 | 03:32 PM
Wow, gee whiz. Gosh, with all the "devastating" power in "destroying the caves", why is it that Sheikh Omas and dead-or-alive by very-much-alive Osama bin Laden are sill directing a global war on terror from same caves via with hand written messages while we buy plans whose main use is giving aviators their next star or bar. How much is spent on special forces, the total war budget in Afhghanistan, vs. keeping these relics in the air?
Question: does Smithsonian abide by ANY journalist standards, or do you just read DOD press releases and verbatim quotes from Generals?
Posted by Richard on August 26,2008 | 12:43 AM
This is a really interesting article that fills in a void for someone like me, a person who would have loved to have been a pilot but blocked by the obvious: vision.
I had little idea of the versatility of the B-1 before reading this article. The pilots who fly them along with the ground crews must be justifiably proud.
There's an object lesson here for the brass in the Pentagon as well: when you end up with a boondoggle, turn it into a bonanza -- use the B-1's history as a template!
Posted by Mekhong Kurt on December 14,2008 | 04:31 PM
I worked on the B-1A's in 1981 thur 1985 while I was stationed at edwards AFB. then i was discharged from the A.F. and i went to work for rockwell and built ship 2 thur 100 it was the most rewarding job i've ever done. we had some of the best mechanics at that plant. there was always such pride when we would deliver an airplane. the pilots always did a flyby at high speed. I'm glad the bone is getting some good press also, everyone would always rag us about the b-1 being a maintenance nightmare. GO BONE!!!!
Posted by nick gramm on March 4,2009 | 12:14 PM
I worked on the B-1 data team out of Ridley Mission Control Center at Edwards in the 1980s. When the Gulf War broke out, we had no idea why the B-1 was not used. It had been tested for carrying conventional Mk-82 bombs a lot. The famous photo of the load dropping over the desert was shot at Edwards.
We were told they had to be on nuclear alert in case 'something' happened. Probably more of a political decision not to use them. The CTF never got a straight story on why they never were used, and there were a lot of upset engineers and maintenance troops.
It also did one test flight to drop Naval mines off the coast of Southern California for the Navy. They were happy when it was over.
A lot of the interface problems were due to the USAF deciding it would be 'prime contractor'. Usually Rockwell, the builder of the bomber would have that title. They thought they could save money having the USAF do it. Well, officers come and go and decisions on problems that would crop up were never made. Probably one of the dumber procurement decisions made out at Wright Pat, then again Systems Command was full of Commie infiltrators, as opposed to the real AF, SAC.
Posted by Frank Schiffel on August 25,2010 | 06:30 PM
Nice article.
One point not mentioned about this program is that the B-1Bs were all delivered ahead of schedule and about $1 billion under budget. I think that is probably unique in the annals of major DoD contracts.
Posted by Addison Thompson on January 15,2011 | 07:27 PM
This bomber illustrates quite well an often overlooked fact. When designing a weapons platform to meet a current threat, many complain it was a wasted effort if the enemy suddenly becomes neutral or even a friend. Think the USSR and the B-1. Truth is, the enemy of today may well be the competitor in the arms market of tomorrow! Since Russia sold it's air defense systems to many third world countries, the B-1 is, in effect, facing the same air defenses it was designed to overcome when the USSR existed! Given the history of the B-52, it would serve the US well if the B-1 fleet was expanded and a program of regular updates was instituted. Money spent in defense of the nation should never be considered 'wasted'.
Posted by Kenneth Johns on January 24,2013 | 04:03 AM
Great Article.
Was in absolute awe that sunny day when I saw the B1 come across Dyess AFB from the front gate roaring over the main hanger, engines roaring like an angry lions, when it came fast and low over the main taxiway to the center of the runway and pulled straight up into a vertical climb. Eventually, rolling off the vertical climb into an inverted roll. Not many pilots could pull that feat off I'm sure. It was definitely show and tell that day.
Sitting out the Gulf War was hell, all those years of training. We were like MMA fighters waiting for the title match. Those that stayed with the B1 finally got their day though, I envy them for that. No one wants or enjoys a war, but you are ready to do your part if it comes.
Posted by David Roy on March 28,2013 | 01:48 AM