(Page 2 of 5)
Things didn’t go as well the next day, however, when Lieutenant Colonel Selmon Wells, flying Hobo Queen II, led three other B-32s to the Japanese capital. Although just 25 at the time, Wells was a seasoned commander who had flown more than a dozen combat missions aboard a Douglas A-20 Havoc. He told me in 1998 that, despite the absence of Japanese activity the day before, he was “uneasy” about the August 17 mission. “I’d been at war for nearly two years by then, and I knew the Japanese were tenacious fighters who had no problem pulling dirty tricks on their enemies,” Wells said. “I think I was subconsciously expecting something to happen.”
Though Wells could not have known it at the time, events in Tokyo were virtually ensuring that something would.
By August 13, it was obvious to die-hards within Japan’s government and military that Emperor Hirohito—shaken by the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki just days earlier—intended to accept the Allies’ demand for unconditional surrender. Though an attempted coup against the emperor had been foiled by loyal troops on the night of August 14, hardliners in the military swore to fight on. On August 15, Hirohito addressed his country by radio, announcing his intention to “bear the unbearable” and surrender to the Allies, intensifying the anger and sense of dishonor many in Japan’s military felt.
Among those most capable of translating those feelings into action were the Japanese navy fighter pilots at Atsugi and Yokosuka airfields, outside Tokyo. At Atsugi, the 302nd Air Group was openly rebelling against Hirohito’s cease-fire order. And the Yokosuka Air Group included many pilots—such as aces Saburo Sakai and Sadamu Komachi—who felt Japan’s airspace should remain inviolate until a formal surrender document had actually been signed.
Both Atsugi and Yokosuka were home to some of Japan’s best fighter aircraft, including the Mitsubishi A6M5 Zero-Sen (known to the Allies as “Zeke”), the J2M3 Raiden (“Jack”), and the N1K2-J Shiden-Kai (“George”). The presence in the Tokyo area of such fighters, and of pilots skilled in attacking U.S. heavy bombers, practically guaranteed that Wells’ formation would receive a hostile response.
As the four B-32s made their way northeast along the coast of Kyushu on the August 17 mission, they were tracked by Japanese radar. Over Tokyo Bay, a few bursts of flak trailed the Dominators as they broke formation to begin their individual photo runs over different targets.
On the ground, pilots at Atsugi and Yokosuka had been warned of the approach of what were described as four B-24s. Aircraft lifted off from both airfields and raced to gain altitude, their pilots seeking to position themselves above the incoming bombers. While no one is certain as to which Japanese pilots took part in the attacks that day (in Saburo Sakai’s 1995 autobiography, for example, he says he participated, though other sources say he flew only on the 18th), there’s no doubt about what happened next.
Beginning at 10:30 a.m. and lasting for two hours, three of the B-32s were attacked by what their crews later described as Japanese army Ki.44 “Tojo” and Ki.61 “Tony” fighters (which looked somewhat like the Japanese navy’s “George” and “Jack,” respectively). The interceptors made multiple attacks, but the Dominators’ gunners largely kept them at bay with .50-caliber machine guns (each aircraft had 10). Though the B-32s suffered minor damage, no Americans were injured. Nor, apparently, were any of the Japanese: Though the B-32 gunners later claimed to have damaged one fighter and “probably destroyed” two others, surviving Japanese records list no losses for that day or the next.


Comments
I was an instructor at Ft. Worth AAF in 1945 when several top officers from a SW Pacific B-24 Group arrived to be checked out in the new B-32's after which they were to take delivery of new "32's" and return to their Pacific Base(s). I was fortunate in that I was assigned to these men to take them through the orientation AND fly with them as they "checked-out" in the new B-32. We flew landings, formation and emergency procedures after which they were ready-- I did hear from them after their return and flying missions to Japan (Tokyo)and their comments about the B-32's "flyabilities" paralleled those contained within the article, "THE Last To Die".
Posted by Roger C. Bowlus on September 23,2008 | 02:09PM
With all the navy and airforce aircraft available in the area at the time , why did'nt these photo-recon flights have a fighter escort?
Posted by mike kohutka on September 29,2008 | 04:30PM
How many B-32s were operational with the 386th BS? What Bomb Wing were they allocated to. What little I have read about the B-32 describes the aircraft as a "widow-maker". If this is true, why didn't the unit employ F-13s for the job?
Posted by John Holt on October 16,2008 | 03:25AM
Mike, I can tell you why: for the same reason 8th Air Force bombers were sent over occupied Europe without escort -- incompetence of senior officers. In both cases, they should have been held accountable.
Posted by Philip Lanier on October 23,2008 | 02:25PM
It would almost appear that since the official armistice was not signed until Sept 2, higher echelon would have taken better care about flights into an area which might still be listed as "dangerous" and still possessing elements of enemy action.
Posted by George Spear AUS 1944-46 on October 23,2008 | 08:24PM
Does anyone know the names of the crew members of the second B-32 that went on mission 230 A-8, on August 18? I am asking because my father, who has passed, was a radio operator on a B-32 during WW II and mentioned this story to me shortly after I returned from Vietnam. I believe he may have been on the second plane.
Posted by Jim Brace on January 4,2009 | 05:46PM
As a pilot member of the F-7 squadron which arrived in the SWP in early 1944, (20TH CMS), we flew all of our missions in New Guinea and the Philipines Without fighter cover. Only time I saw a fighter was on a mission to Leyte prior to THE LANDING when we encounterd a fighter who requested clearance to hang on to us as he would like to us our navigater to provide a path home.
Posted by Bill Wrenn on April 4,2009 | 08:07AM
My father, Edwin "Ted" Angle was in the same regular crew as Tony Marchione's, and was the radio operator. He is to Tony's right in the above photo. My father never talked much about the war. He died in 1974. Yet he did talk about "Marsh". He said everyone liked him, and was so upset about his death saying "it should have never happened". Even after all these years, I still feel bad for my father--losing his friend in this way--and for Tony's family and friends and all the living he never got to do.
Posted by Sharon Angle on June 9,2009 | 09:14PM
I did not know Tony very well but my memory is that there was a group of us gathered at the Wheel House that morning and the word was that 4 th Charting needed a photographer. Tony said "I'll go," and that was all there was to it at the time. That evening we heard that he had been killed by enemy fire and that someone had asked to have the bomb bay doors opened so that they could get a better picture. we were all upset about this. Several years later I wrote to VFW Magazine about the incident. I then received a phone call and a note from the plane's copilot that we had been misinformed and that the doors had not been opened. I still remember that morning and how casual we were. The war was over--we were going home.
Posted by John A. Zinn on August 12,2009 | 03:15PM