The Christmas Bombing
In December 1972, the B-52 bombers that North Vietnamese missile crews had been waiting for came to Hanoi. Night after night. Over virtually the same track.
- By Marshall Michel
- Air & Space magazine, January 2001
A munitions specialist prepares a bomb to be used during Operation Linebacker ove North Vietnam.
USAF
(Page 3 of 11)
The SA-2 Guideline system had been used for the entire war but had achieved mixed success against highly maneuverable U.S. fighters. Overall, the system was reliable but unsophisticated, using vacuum tubes and slow, mechanical computers, and the Fan Song guidance radar had proved vulnerable to various types of electronic jamming. The success of the system depended almost entirely on the skill of its seven-man crew.
The experienced Hanoi missile crews had been defending against U.S. air attacks for years, and they were especially anxious to shoot down a B-52. The big bombers had devastated North Vietnamese forces at Khe Sanh and recently pummeled North Vietnamese units fighting elsewhere in the south. North Vietnamese experts had been studying the B-52s' standardized tactics and jamming procedures almost daily as the aircraft attacked targets in Laos and southern North Vietnam, and at an October 1972 conference the Hanoi missile battalion commanders reviewed hundreds of feet of Fan Song and Spoon Rest radar film of B-52 jamming, provided primarily from units in southern North Vietnam. After that conference, the air defense headquarters produced a book entitled "How to Fight the B-52" and distributed it to all the SA-2 units.
While the weather on the ground was cold and rainy, above the solid cloud deck it was a beautiful night, with clear skies and a full moon that reflected on the clouds. U.S. support forces shepherded the B-52s in. The strike package included F-4s—some dropping strips of metal foil, or chaff, and others acting as fighter escorts—EB-66 electronics jamming aircraft, and the much-feared Wild Weasels, aircraft specially configured with electronics and the anti-radiation Shrike and Standard ARM missiles, which could home in on the SA-2's Fan Song radar (see "Counterpunch," Aug./Sep. 1998). As the force approached Hanoi, low-flying FB-111 fighter-bombers attacked North Vietnamese MiG airfields. The B-52s followed in three-ship cells.
At the command post plotting map, Dong Thi Van, one of three women who worked as plotters in the headquarters, became very nervous as the B-52s approached. "At first…one flight, then two flights, then several flights coming like a swarm," she recalls, "but my soldier's sense of responsibility helped me regain my composure and continue to plot the flights." The 361st Division headquarters watched the raids approach, then began to allocate numbers to cells of bombers and assign them to the battalions to attack.
The missile crews had been alerted that the B-52s were inbound, and trucks in the missile sites had long since started up their noisy diesel engines to provide power to the radar and command vans, each about the size of an 18-wheeler. The un-air-conditioned command van was the heart of the SA-2 battalion. Inside the van were the battalion commander, a fire control officer, three guidance officers, a plotter, and a missile technical officer, who was responsible for monitoring the status panels of each of the six launchers and their missiles. The battalion commander was in phone contact with the regimental headquarters and sat in front of the radar scope of a Spoon Rest acquisition radar, where he watched the raids come in while waiting for orders assigning the battalion a target. Next to him was a transparent plotting board showing his battalion's area of responsibility, overlaid with the same grid references as the map at headquarters, and standing behind it was the plotter, also connected by phone to headquarters. When the battalion was assigned a target, the commander located the aircraft with the Spoon Rest search radar while the plotter tracked the raid manually on the plotting board; this process ensured that, if jamming prevented the battalion commander from locating the assigned target on his radar scope, he could watch the target's position and course on the plotting board and determine when he could began the engagement.
The fire control officer sat a few feet away on the commander's extreme right; in front of him was a Fan Song radar scope that he used to locate and track the target. In front of him the three guidance officers—each one responsible for one coordinate (elevation, azimuth, and range) of the missile—had radar scopes with large control wheels beneath them. The officers turned the wheels to keep crosshairs on the target's radar return.
The van was tightly sealed to keep out light so the operators could focus on their radar scopes, and the only sound other than the voices of the crew was that of loud cooling fans, necessary to control the temperature of the vacuum tubes in the relatively primitive electronics of the SA-2 system. "The background noise of the fans was not a big problem," recalls a battalion commander who asked not to be indentified. "It was quite noisy, but you got used to it. The tone of voice set the tone for the crew, and each battalion commander had his own style, based on his personality and how he trained his crew."
The first B-52s flying into North Vietnam that night were a group of 21 from U-Tapao, Thailand. The 28 B-52s from Andersen fell in behind, and the 49 bombers moved single file from the northwest corner of Vietnam down to the southeast toward Hanoi.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next »





Comments (9)
I was a navigator on Crew E-28 from Blytheville, AR. I flew 61 missions back in Nov'68 to May'69. At that time we were not bombing anything in the north but we must have hit MuGia Pass at least once a week. After reading this article I have to take my hat off to those crewmembers who survived this campaign. I quite frankly do not know how they did it.
I left the service in March of 1970. To this day I do not like to fly!
Posted by Bob Montgomery on November 25,2008 | 11:24 PM
I lived those days in Ha noi but so young and sheltered by family remembered only few details: the lit up sky, the thundering sound, the rattling windows. It was only when hearing the sound of B52 roaring over my head one day in SF, US that memory suddenly rushed forth and upon returning home I started searching for info on the war. Thank you for another lesson. My people had lived through so much.
Posted by Xuan Cao on December 21,2010 | 06:47 PM
Enjoyed the article but isn't it ironic that a nation like the DRV could so quickly master the jet fighter and SAM to fight against the world's only superpower - the US.
In fact a nation that has NEVER invented anything, only the Vietnamese language.
Yet they were able - if you believe their vision of history to hold their own against a nation that invented the airplane, Atomic weapons etc.
That Vietnam alone could do this is not a miracle. It is a FAIRY TALE.
The full story about how they turned defeat into victory at Dien Bien Phu in the air will be interesting.
And the Americans. THEY JUST WOULD NOT STOP! Gee I guess they went through their revolution and the Civil War and other those other conflicts and learned the hard way. Paul MCM
Posted by paul mcmullen on May 13,2011 | 09:50 PM
Loved the article. Thanks!
Posted by Wipeout2012 on April 17,2012 | 12:51 PM
It was another era. Cold War, The Domino Theory and Better Dead Than Red. The far left and the young would not understand what we lived through. In retrospect, maybe we should not have been there. The Vietnamese yearned for independence, regardless of politics. EDITORS' REPLY: Though the military undoubtedly had people of all political philosophies, right wing, left wing, and everything in between.
Posted by jppumper7273 on December 1,2012 | 10:02 PM
A war of nationalism mistakenly identified as a war about communism.
Tragedy.
Posted by Gixxerman001 on December 7,2012 | 04:01 PM
Fantastic article Marshall. Great insight on both sides of the conflict. I've read many articles/books on the Vietnam Air War, this is one of the best. Thanks.
Posted by Jeff M. on December 16,2012 | 11:15 PM
"But now, after a few days in Hanoi, I saw that the North Vietnamese had a different perception of the bombing. They considered Linebacker II the final Vietnamese victory over the United States, a victory on the scale of the battle that had forced the French from Indochina. I had come to the museum to try to resolve these dual and dueling images of a battle, and I left with my questions unanswered."
It's a pity that western notion of "facts-based" judgment of events must be the basis for historical accounts, or even for actual tactical or strategic decisions in an on-going war is the only way to look at things.
For VC, facts are not important as perceptions of their people which is everything in order to win the war; and in this case, it is fitting that the American "have lost" in Linebacker II because even before the bombing, American citizenry has already given up on VN, and the bombing by Nixon - despite causing lots of damage to North VN but did not destroy them - was just a desperate attempt before finally giving up to complete withdrawal in signing the Paris Treaty.
That's not too different in 54 with Dien Bien Phu, right? The little detail about the VC leaders feeling compelled to come back to the table need not be admitted publicly, and instead completely subverted for their propaganda was a brilliant psychological tactic. Devilish, lying bastards they were definitely, but brilliant for their cause nevertheless.
Posted by Brian on December 27,2012 | 10:01 PM
Being a Vietnamese, I'd like to contribute to this article with some spelling corrections.
"Bas'tang Cheu Thang B52" should be written as "Bao tang Chien thang B52" or even better as "Bảo tàng Chiến thắng B52".
Bảo tàng means Museum
Chiến thắng means Victory,
Posted by Giang Son on December 31,2012 | 04:02 AM