How Things Work: Electromagnetic Catapults
From zero to 150 in less than a second.
- By Tim Wright
- Air & Space magazine, January 2007
Steam-powered catapults, expensive and difficult to maintain, are operating near their limits and will not be able to accommodate heavier aircraft planned for the future.
PH3 Jason A. Fults / US Navy
(Page 2 of 2)
An electromagnetic catapult can launch every 45 seconds. Each three-second launch can consume as much as 100 million watts of electricity, about as much as a small town uses in the same amount of time. “A utility does that using an acre of equipment,” says lab engineer Mike Doyle, but due to shipboard space limitations, “we have to take that and fit it into a shoebox.” In shipboard generators developed for electromagnetic catapults, electrical power is stored kinetically in rotors spinning at 6,400 rpm. When a launch order is given, power is pulled from the generators in a two- to three-second pulse, like a burst of air being let out of a balloon. As power is drawn off, the generators slow down and the amount of electricity they produce steadily drops. But in the remaining 42 seconds between launches, the rotors spin back up to capacity, readying themselves to release another burst of energy.
Working from the scale model in the Naval Air Warfare lab, designers developed the electronic hardware and software needed to build an EMALS prototype, which can accelerate dead-weight test articles (massive metal frames on wheels) to 165 mph in three-quarters of a second on a track just 100 feet long.
Care has been taken to make the launch process as similar as possible to current steam systems to help launch crews ease into the new technology. Pilots, as they position their aircraft for a catapult shot, won’t be able to tell if they are launching with electromagnetics unless they happen to notice the absence of steam escaping from the deck.
Electromagnetic catapult technology already has the ability to launch any aircraft now in the Navy inventory and any the Navy has ordered. With the new launch system’s potential to achieve acceleration forces reaching 14 Gs, human endurance may be one of the few limitations it faces.





Comments (3)
we wood lie to know if this can be used on other things besided a catapult w j goodwin 1604 cr 3425 wills pt tx 75169
Posted by w j goodwin on July 14,2008 | 11:44 AM
Could larger EMALS be designed to launch land-based aircraft including commercial aircraft? Could larger EMALS serve as the first stage in launching spacecraft?
Posted by James Cochran on March 8,2009 | 01:56 PM
Of course electric catapults were tested back in the 1940s at the Naval Aircraft Factory in Phila and at the Naval Air Test Center down in Maryland. Required a lot of power and a long track. Deemed at that time not practical for Aircraft. Was illustrated in Popular Mechanics or Popular Science at the time as I recall.
Posted by R. deCastongrene on May 31,2010 | 08:43 PM
Perhaps this is a question best already answered elsewhere, but has there been any serious progress on adapting this to military purposes? I imagine that would fall under the designation of rail gun. It would be extremely powerful.
Posted by Timothy on January 4,2011 | 01:59 PM