• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Smithsonian
    magazine

AirSpaceMag.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Need to Know
  • How Things Work
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Air Candy
  • Reader Scrapbook
  • Snapshot
  • Photos

The Bone Yard Project

Street art revives ancient airplanes.

  • By Heather Goss
  • Air & Space magazine, April 2012
«« Previous | 4 of 8 | Next »»

Andrew Brown


Brooklyn duo Faile stenciled a C-45 Expeditor.


«« Previous | 4 of 8 | Next »»



Tweet Digg

 
Comments (10)

This is just so, well, wrong!

Posted by D. Cole on April 8,2012 | 09:16 PM

It's not wrong . . . just different. Besides, if any of these were likely candidates for restoration to airworthy status, they would have been already.

Posted by Sean S. on April 9,2012 | 01:43 AM

The purpose of art is supposedly to create an emotional response in the person that is exposed to that art. In that regard, they succeeded. My response is, I don't like it. A DC-3 or a C-45, even an old one, is a work of art by itself. They don't need a bunch of graffitis.

Posted by Victorinox on April 11,2012 | 04:44 PM

My husband and I just returned from a visit to this exhibit. We spent quite a bit of time enjoying the artwork, but we noticed that most other visitors spent virtually no time at all admiring or commenting, perhaps even noticing much. Alas, this is the fate of much art--to be cast before the Philistines, of whom a couple of the previous commenters seem to be examples. C'mon guys, don't you have any sense of fun or whimsey? Did you even look at what had been painted on the aircraft? If you had inspected the work, instead of dismissing it out of hand, you might have noticed what the artists were trying to express. Or not (sigh).

Posted by Linda on April 12,2012 | 07:07 PM

I don't like it. It's disrespectful to those who served. boneyard or not these aircraft represent guys that served their country. Through the blood sweat and tears, in god awfull conditions, they hauled our wounded and dead. Even in peacetime they still mean something to me. It's just not art to me.

Posted by Tim on April 19,2012 | 09:53 PM

Aw, come on guys! Lighten up!
These are old machines, machines that once flew, but MACHINES!!!
Yeah, some of the art work I'm not crazy about, some of it's just slightly cool, some of its pretty cool.
Getting upset because they once served the country... well, how many 32 Fords once served to get your grandaddy around that wound up with flames painted on them?
As far as being disrespectful goes, that doesn't really come into play here
How many P 51's, Corsairs, and other Unlimited Class Reno Racers fly in their original colors?
Come to think of it, ever check out the paint jobs on some of the Tiger Meet fighters? Way cool paint jobs! You know that those wrench benders who keep those birds flying have a lot of hot rodder in them, (and yeah... that's my idea of ART!) and it's fun.
You can't say that a fighter is designed as anything besides a machine that deals out death, that is it's sole purpose in existing. That doesn't mean that they can't be fun though, does it?

Posted by Tom Barron on May 6,2012 | 02:38 AM

OUTSTANDING!
All the naysayers should go to airliners.net and check out some of the hundreds of aircraft that have been painted since planes have been built. Then go look up some of the sites that show the hundreds and hundreds of planes that are setting in the dry desert areas of the U.S. never to be used again except maybe for scrap, and those are the lucky ones.

Posted by Nick on May 24,2012 | 08:36 PM

These folks should find a better canvas and parade it in front of those that might like their work. It's bad enough that these wonderful aircraft are sitting in the bone-yard in the first place. There should be more protection available. Aircraft in the bone-yard could be subject to damage that could be difficult and costly to any future restoration.

It's simply wrong!

We have free speech which is great, but do we have to have free art? Graffiti is graffiti it has negative appeal to the masses. Do we really want the whole world to look like the inner-city. I think not.

Posted by steve cagle on October 10,2012 | 12:29 PM

I do not like it! I love DC-3s. To have graffiti all over them is an insult to these great airplanes, It's a good thing I wasn't there when this was done...

Posted by Phil Shellabarger on December 18,2012 | 11:05 PM

I a veteran of the Air Force, & I agree, its sicking, its does not look good, does the planes no justice. They should put their energy, talent, time, towards something useful, & that's beneficial.

Posted by Jerry Smith on March 1,2013 | 01:50 AM

Post a Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



Advertisement


  • Email
  •  
    Tweet

    Article Tools

     
  • Font
  •  
  • Email
  •  
  • Print
  •  
  • Comments (10)
  •  
  • RSS
  •  
           

    Related Topics

    Aerospace Films

    Commercial Aircraft

    Airliners and airfreight carriers

    Video Gallery

    Art From the Bone Yard

    Artists decorate derelict airplanes.


    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    • Topics
    1. Area 51: Origins
    2. Inside a Flying Fortress
    3. Canaveral Junior
    4. A Family Affair
    5. Inside the Enola Gay
    6. The Legacy of Flight
    7. Taming the Viper
    8. The Gosh of Oshkosh
    9. Bird’s-Eye View
    10. The Jet as Art
    1. Refueling Angel Thunder
    2. A Family Affair
    1. Bombers
    2. Cold War Era
    3. Vietnam War
    4. Experimental Aircraft
    5. 21st Century Aviation
    6. Aerospace Inventions
    7. Golden Age of Flight
    8. 20th Century Aviation
    9. Aerospace Technology
    10. Air Racing
    11. Aviators

    View All Most Popular »

    Follow Us

    Air & Space Magazine
    @airspacemag
    Follow Air & Space Magazine on Twitter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

    Advertisement


    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • May 2013


    • Mar 2013


    • Jan 2013

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Student Travel
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Subscribe
    • RSS
    • Topics
    • Member Services
    • Copyright
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Ad Choices

    Smithsonian Institution