• About Air & Space
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
airspacemag.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Smithsonian magazine
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Photos & Videos
  • Subscribe
Before crashing into the moon, the Ranger spacecraft sent back images of the lunar surface 1000 times better than what could be obtained from telescopes on Earth. Before crashing into the moon, the Ranger spacecraft sent back images of the lunar surface 1000 times better than what could be obtained from telescopes on Earth.
(NASA)
  • Space Exploration

A Smashing Success

How the Ranger probes’ moon crashes helped pave the way for Apollo.

  • By Paul Hoversten
  • airspacemag.com, January 21, 2009

Photo Gallery

Kurt Debus (left), head of Cape Canaveral’s Launch Operations Center, and Wernher Von Braun, director of NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama, and architect of Apollo’s giant Saturn V booster, take a break before the April 12, 1962 launch of Ranger 4. The probe reached the moon’s hidden side but failed to transmit any photos.

A Smashing Success

Explore more photos from the story


Video Gallery

Ranger 9 Last Moments

Ranger 9’s Last Moments

A lunar kamikaze’s final plunge, caught on video in 1965


Article Tools

  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
  • Email
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit

    Lunar Smackdown

    Mohi Kumar

    A spacecraft bites the lunar dust.

    Today it’s easy to find a complete map of the moon, from highlands to craters. But in the early 1960s, little was known about the terrain of Earth’s nearest neighbor. It fell to the Ranger probes to find out by transmitting closeup black-and-white photographs—in real time—on a death dive into the lunar surface (see Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California some idea of where to send the Apollo landers a few years later. But getting the pictures would prove difficult.

    Ranger was a product of the space race, which had been kicked off in October 1957 by the Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite. Like many of NASA’s early programs, Ranger had its share of failures. Of the nine Rangers, only the last three succeeded. When Rangers 1 and 2 were launched in 1961, the Atlas-Agena rockets failed, leaving them in an unstable, short-lived orbit of Earth. Rangers 3 and 5, launched the following year, missed the moon altogether, while Ranger 4 had a computer failure and was unable to transmit data before crashing on the back side of the moon.

    By the time Ranger 6 went up, in January 1964, NASA was getting desperate. The Soviet Union had already obtained photographs of the moon’s surface, from Luna 3 in 1959, and by the 1960s was designing Luna probes to make “soft landings” there. NASA’s attempts to reach the moon—with its Pioneer probes in 1958-59—had all met with failure. Unhappily, Ranger 6 joined the list. Its cameras failed before the probe crashed in the area of the Sea of Tranquillity (where the first manned moon lander, Apollo 11, would touch down five years later). Americans were stunned, and a Congressional investigation soon followed.

    In NASA’s official account, Lunar Impact: A History of Project Ranger, historian R. Cargill Hall wrote: “[N]o one at NASA, JPL, or RCA [who made Ranger’s cameras] really understood why the television cameras on Ranger 6 had failed to work. The mystery remained a topic of concern inside the project and out. Cartoonist Chester Gould dispatched detective Dick Tracy and the mechanical genius Diet Smith to the moon’s Sea of Tranquillity in Smith’s ‘space coupe’ to find the answer for themselves. Alighting beside debris in the crater formed by Ranger 6, Diet Smith exclaimed: ‘It’s easy to see why the cameras failed. They were never turned on—look.’ Holding aloft a tangle of wires, the bemused detective replied: ‘People won’t believe us.’ Erroneous as the account was, Life magazine remarked, ‘millions of Americans didn’t find it unbelievable at all.’ Another popular rumor held that NASA and JPL officials had forgotten to take the dust covers off the television camera lenses.”

    So when Ranger 7 was launched in July 1964, the stakes couldn’t have been higher. This time, everything worked. The first picture of the moon by a U.S. spacecraft was transmitted about 17 minutes before the satellite crashed in Mare Cognitum—the Sea That Has Become Known. In all, the probe transmitted 4,308 high-quality images taken by six cameras. It was a seminal moment; Hall wrote: “[L]unar exploration had entered a new era; the project had transformed the centuries-old study of the moon from subtle conjecture to an experimental science.”

    Ranger 8, which was launched in February 1965, added to the scientific bonanza, transmitting thousands more high-quality images before crashing into the Sea of Tranquillity. The next month, Ranger 9 went up on a mission to crash into the crater Alphonsus. The probe sent back more than 5,800 video images during the last 18 minutes of its three-day journey, thrilling a nationwide TV audience that watched the live feed [click here to see video].

    It was the grand finale to the Ranger program, which had cost $267 million and blazed the trail for NASA’s Lunar Orbiters (1966-67) and Surveyor landers (1966-68). Although the Ranger images resolved features as small as 10 inches across (a resolution 1,000 times better than the best telescopes on Earth could do), they provided no definitive conclusions about the formation, structure, or properties of the lunar surface.

    “But, along with besting the Soviet Union in sending back to Earth the first television pictures of the lunar surface, Ranger had eliminated any doubts about the adequacy of the design for the Apollo lander,” Hall wrote. “It had also taught many space scientists that in space exploration, engineering would often have to come first. Homer Newell, Mr. Science at NASA, had learned that lesson and now patiently explained to scientists and Congressmen alike the knowledge to be won from the spectacular engineering task of Apollo. Who first stepped on the moon, he insisted, was not the issue; the individuals could stay but a short time. The scientific instruments they would use, those they would leave behind on the surface, and the soil samples they would retrieve would all yield rich scientific dividends. He was, as events were to prove, absolutely right.”

    Today it’s easy to find a complete map of the moon, from highlands to craters. But in the early 1960s, little was known about the terrain of Earth’s nearest neighbor. It fell to the Ranger probes to find out by transmitting closeup black-and-white photographs—in real time—on a death dive into the lunar surface (see Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California some idea of where to send the Apollo landers a few years later. But getting the pictures would prove difficult.

    Ranger was a product of the space race, which had been kicked off in October 1957 by the Soviet launch of the Sputnik satellite. Like many of NASA’s early programs, Ranger had its share of failures. Of the nine Rangers, only the last three succeeded. When Rangers 1 and 2 were launched in 1961, the Atlas-Agena rockets failed, leaving them in an unstable, short-lived orbit of Earth. Rangers 3 and 5, launched the following year, missed the moon altogether, while Ranger 4 had a computer failure and was unable to transmit data before crashing on the back side of the moon.

    By the time Ranger 6 went up, in January 1964, NASA was getting desperate. The Soviet Union had already obtained photographs of the moon’s surface, from Luna 3 in 1959, and by the 1960s was designing Luna probes to make “soft landings” there. NASA’s attempts to reach the moon—with its Pioneer probes in 1958-59—had all met with failure. Unhappily, Ranger 6 joined the list. Its cameras failed before the probe crashed in the area of the Sea of Tranquillity (where the first manned moon lander, Apollo 11, would touch down five years later). Americans were stunned, and a Congressional investigation soon followed.

    In NASA’s official account, Lunar Impact: A History of Project Ranger, historian R. Cargill Hall wrote: “[N]o one at NASA, JPL, or RCA [who made Ranger’s cameras] really understood why the television cameras on Ranger 6 had failed to work. The mystery remained a topic of concern inside the project and out. Cartoonist Chester Gould dispatched detective Dick Tracy and the mechanical genius Diet Smith to the moon’s Sea of Tranquillity in Smith’s ‘space coupe’ to find the answer for themselves. Alighting beside debris in the crater formed by Ranger 6, Diet Smith exclaimed: ‘It’s easy to see why the cameras failed. They were never turned on—look.’ Holding aloft a tangle of wires, the bemused detective replied: ‘People won’t believe us.’ Erroneous as the account was, Life magazine remarked, ‘millions of Americans didn’t find it unbelievable at all.’ Another popular rumor held that NASA and JPL officials had forgotten to take the dust covers off the television camera lenses.”

    So when Ranger 7 was launched in July 1964, the stakes couldn’t have been higher. This time, everything worked. The first picture of the moon by a U.S. spacecraft was transmitted about 17 minutes before the satellite crashed in Mare Cognitum—the Sea That Has Become Known. In all, the probe transmitted 4,308 high-quality images taken by six cameras. It was a seminal moment; Hall wrote: “[L]unar exploration had entered a new era; the project had transformed the centuries-old study of the moon from subtle conjecture to an experimental science.”

    Ranger 8, which was launched in February 1965, added to the scientific bonanza, transmitting thousands more high-quality images before crashing into the Sea of Tranquillity. The next month, Ranger 9 went up on a mission to crash into the crater Alphonsus. The probe sent back more than 5,800 video images during the last 18 minutes of its three-day journey, thrilling a nationwide TV audience that watched the live feed [click here to see video].

    It was the grand finale to the Ranger program, which had cost $267 million and blazed the trail for NASA’s Lunar Orbiters (1966-67) and Surveyor landers (1966-68). Although the Ranger images resolved features as small as 10 inches across (a resolution 1,000 times better than the best telescopes on Earth could do), they provided no definitive conclusions about the formation, structure, or properties of the lunar surface.

    “But, along with besting the Soviet Union in sending back to Earth the first television pictures of the lunar surface, Ranger had eliminated any doubts about the adequacy of the design for the Apollo lander,” Hall wrote. “It had also taught many space scientists that in space exploration, engineering would often have to come first. Homer Newell, Mr. Science at NASA, had learned that lesson and now patiently explained to scientists and Congressmen alike the knowledge to be won from the spectacular engineering task of Apollo. Who first stepped on the moon, he insisted, was not the issue; the individuals could stay but a short time. The scientific instruments they would use, those they would leave behind on the surface, and the soil samples they would retrieve would all yield rich scientific dividends. He was, as events were to prove, absolutely right.”


     
    Comments

    The "[click here to see video]" link doesn't work. Otherwise, an excellent article.

    Posted by John Semenec on February 28,2009 | 01:24PM

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement


    Most Popular Video

    • Newest
    • Most Viewed
    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    Jetting Through the Grand Canyon

    An RAF pilot takes his T-33 on a joyride in 1959.

    Armstrongs Close Call

    Armstrong’s Close Call

    A fiery bailout while training to land on the moon.

    Ares I-X Launch

    NASA tests a prototype of its new Ares 1 crew launcher.

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    Watch Boeing technicians repair an airliner—in two minutes.

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    In the winter of 1912, Frank Coffyn filmed the first silent motion pictures of New York ever taken from an airplane.

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Take a narrated tour of the station with the same animation astronauts use in training.

    “A Very Unusual Machine”

    Former astronaut Fred Haise talks about the Lunar Module, the world's first moonship.

    Dodging Missiles

    Dodging Missiles

    F-105 pilots recall the dangers of flying over North Vietnam.

    Lunar Run

    How a plasma-powered rocket would shoot for the moon.

    Chuck Yeager Press Conference, 1953

    Chuck Yeager Press Conference, 1953

    The X-1's pilot describes what it feels like to fly supersonic.

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    PTQ: Put Together Quickly

    Watch Boeing technicians repair an airliner—in two minutes.

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Space Station Fly-Around

    Take a narrated tour of the station with the same animation astronauts use in training.

    Dodging Missiles

    Dodging Missiles

    F-105 pilots recall the dangers of flying over North Vietnam.

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    In the winter of 1912, Frank Coffyn filmed the first silent motion pictures of New York ever taken from an airplane.

    Souped-Up Seahawk

    An oddball aircraft outflies its helicopter forefathers.

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    • Commented
    1. Helo Halo
    2. The Last of the Mohawks
    3. Reno Wrap-up
    4. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    5. The Nightmare of Voskhod 2
    6. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    7. Passing the Torch
    8. Jumping Ship
    9. Secret Space Shuttles
    10. Spooky Enterprise
    1. Oldies and Oddities: Blown Away
    2. The Bear Is Back
    3. Plausible Denial
    4. The Black Eagle of Harlem
    5. "My Body Will Collapse Like a Falling Cherry Blossom"
    6. It All Started with Sputnik
    7. The Astronaut Jeweler
    8. Is Winning Everything?
    9. Above & Beyond: Canadian Helicopter Force, Afghanistan
    10. The Nightmare of Voskhod 2
    1. Vang's War
    2. Amelia's Astronaut Connection
    3. Why do we have to turn off iPods during takeoff?
    4. Batplane
    5. Leroy's Launch
    6. Space Suits Past and Future
    7. Did Australians light signal fires for the astronauts?
    8. Glacier Girl
    9. Steichen's Navy
    10. Welcome to Cyberairspace

    Advertisement

    Marketplace

    SmithsonianStore

    Night at the Museum Adult Collage Tee
    Item no: 28206

    Window Shopping

    Gifts, Gadgets and Great Finds!

    Travel & Adventure

    A Family Weekend in Washington, D.C.: Featuring "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian"

    Spend a fun-filled weekend with your family discovering the magic of the new feature film, "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" (Jul. 24 - 26, 2009)

    In the Magazine

    In his portrait of the storied racer Rare Bear and its crew, photographer Tyson Rininger captures the sense of anticipation that surrounds air races. “Something’s coming,” this quiet night scene seems to suggest. “Tomorrow, it’s win or lose.”

    November 2009

    • The Bear Is Back
    • Now You See It, Now You Don’t
    • Sweet 17
    • The Shining
    • How the Spaceship Got Its Shape
    • The Book of Hours

    View Table of Contents »

    Snapshot

    Helo Halo

    It's called the Kopp-Etchells Effect.

    Reader Scrapbook

    Send In Your Photos

    Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.

    Need to Know

    What determines an airplane’s lifespan?

    Some keep flying for decades, while others end up on the scrap heap.

    Smithsonian Journeys

    • Shop
    • Travel
    In the Cockpit

    In the Cockpit: Inside 50 History-Making Aircraft

    Item No. 10304

    Astronomy in Hawaii

    Astronomy in Hawaii

    Gaze at the stars and learn about the Universe from the beautiful island of Hawaii (Apr 29 - May 6, 2010)



    View full archiveRecent Issues

    • In his portrait of the storied racer Rare Bear and its crew, photographer Tyson Rininger captures the sense of anticipation that surrounds air races. “Something’s coming,” this quiet night scene seems to suggest. “Tomorrow, it’s win or lose.”
      Nov 2009


    • Sep 2009


    • Aug 2009

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability