• About Air & Space
  • Email Updates
  • Member Services
  • Shop
  • Archive
airspacemag.com
  • Smithsonian Institution
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • goSmithsonian
  • Smithsonian magazine
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Photos & Videos
  • Subscribe
The malfunctioning satellite will be taken out by an SM-3 standard missile, similar to this one fired last June from the destroyer USS Decatur. In that test, the missile successfully intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Hawaii. The malfunctioning satellite will be taken out by an SM-3 standard missile, similar to this one fired last June from the destroyer USS Decatur. In that test, the missile successfully intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Hawaii.
(U.S. Navy)
  • Space Exploration

Satellite Shoot-Down

The Pentagon plans to knock one of our own out of the sky.

  • By Paul Hoversten
  • airspacemag.com, February 14, 2008

Article Tools

 
  • Font
  • Share/Save/Bookmark Share
     
  • Email
  •  
  • Print
  • Digg Digg
     
  • Comments
  • StumbleUpon StumbleUpon
     
  • RSS
  • Reddit Reddit
     

    Most Popular

    • Viewed
    • Emailed
    1. Welcome to Cyberairspace
    2. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    3. Fear of Floating
    4. Live and Let Fly
    5. The Notorious Flight of Mathias Rust
    6. The Dawn of Discipline
    7. Voices from the Moon
    8. Can We Stop a Nuke?
    9. Red, White, and Blue
    10. Above and Beyond: My Enemy, My Friend
    1. Above and Beyond: My Enemy, My Friend
    2. Apollo’s Army
    3. Aviation's Jackie Robinson
    4. B-36: Bomber at the Crossroads
    5. Torture Chamber
    6. Above & Beyond: Shooting Up a Shooting Star
    7. A&S Interview: Captain Eric Brown
    8. Where the Sun Does Shine
    9. The Dawn of Discipline
    10. Travels with Churchill

    In a first for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a U.S. Aegis-class cruiser will fire a missile at a falling U.S. intelligence satellite in an attempt to shatter the spacecraft's fuel tank before it comes crashing to Earth. The shoot-down could take place as early as February 20.

    The intercept 149 miles above the Pacific Ocean is intended to disperse the satellite's 1,000 pounds of deadly hydrazine fuel, which could otherwise endanger humans and animals over an area the size of two football fields, U.S. officials said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday.

    The 40-inch spherical tank is the largest chunk of the 5,000-pound, schoolbus-size satellite expected to survive the fiery re-entry to Earth. Altogether, 2,800 pounds of debris are predicted to result from the demise of the unidentified National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) spacecraft, which failed within hours of reaching orbit on December 14, 2006. Because ground controllers can't communicate with the satellite, they aren't able to steer it to a safe re-entry in the ocean.

    "It's the hydrazine aboard that makes this different" from other crashing spacecraft, said Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, alluding to blogs that suggest the real reason for the shoot-down was the clandestine nature of the satellite. "It's the hydrazine that is the issue here. It's the only reason we're doing this. We had a similar tank on [space shuttle] Columbia that survived re-entry and came down in a wooded area" (although little hydrazine was left by the end of that mission).

    Hydrazine is a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor that is routinely used in rocket fuel. Exposure to it can cause damage to the nervous system, liver, and kidneys. No one knows how much of the satellite's hydrazine will be in gas or liquid form when it begins warming up in the atmosphere, Cartwright said.

    The plan is to have three Aegis cruisers (one primary, the others backup) stationed at various Northern hemisphere locations in the Pacific. Once the dead satellite drops to an altitude of 149 miles over the Pacific, one cruiser will fire a single missile, which will close in on its target at an estimated speed of 22,000 mph. Pentagon officials then will have two days or so to assess the shot, and if necessary fire again, Cartwright said.

    Cartwright said he had "high confidence" that the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) missile, which he described as "part of the regional/tactical part of MDA," could strike the satellite. "We have a missile that's well-understood. It's the first time we've needed to engage a spacecraft, but it's not the first time we've intercepted something entering the atmosphere," he said. The SM-3 is designed to hit short- and medium-range missiles.

    "The worst that can happen is we miss. If we even graze it, it will bring it down sooner," he said. But the likelihood of satellite chunks hitting land is low, he added. Computer models indicate that more than half of all the debris will come down in the satellite's first two circuits around Earth after the missile impact.

    1 2

    In a first for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a U.S. Aegis-class cruiser will fire a missile at a falling U.S. intelligence satellite in an attempt to shatter the spacecraft's fuel tank before it comes crashing to Earth. The shoot-down could take place as early as February 20.

    The intercept 149 miles above the Pacific Ocean is intended to disperse the satellite's 1,000 pounds of deadly hydrazine fuel, which could otherwise endanger humans and animals over an area the size of two football fields, U.S. officials said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday.

    The 40-inch spherical tank is the largest chunk of the 5,000-pound, schoolbus-size satellite expected to survive the fiery re-entry to Earth. Altogether, 2,800 pounds of debris are predicted to result from the demise of the unidentified National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) spacecraft, which failed within hours of reaching orbit on December 14, 2006. Because ground controllers can't communicate with the satellite, they aren't able to steer it to a safe re-entry in the ocean.

    "It's the hydrazine aboard that makes this different" from other crashing spacecraft, said Marine Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, alluding to blogs that suggest the real reason for the shoot-down was the clandestine nature of the satellite. "It's the hydrazine that is the issue here. It's the only reason we're doing this. We had a similar tank on [space shuttle] Columbia that survived re-entry and came down in a wooded area" (although little hydrazine was left by the end of that mission).

    Hydrazine is a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor that is routinely used in rocket fuel. Exposure to it can cause damage to the nervous system, liver, and kidneys. No one knows how much of the satellite's hydrazine will be in gas or liquid form when it begins warming up in the atmosphere, Cartwright said.

    The plan is to have three Aegis cruisers (one primary, the others backup) stationed at various Northern hemisphere locations in the Pacific. Once the dead satellite drops to an altitude of 149 miles over the Pacific, one cruiser will fire a single missile, which will close in on its target at an estimated speed of 22,000 mph. Pentagon officials then will have two days or so to assess the shot, and if necessary fire again, Cartwright said.

    Cartwright said he had "high confidence" that the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) missile, which he described as "part of the regional/tactical part of MDA," could strike the satellite. "We have a missile that's well-understood. It's the first time we've needed to engage a spacecraft, but it's not the first time we've intercepted something entering the atmosphere," he said. The SM-3 is designed to hit short- and medium-range missiles.

    "The worst that can happen is we miss. If we even graze it, it will bring it down sooner," he said. But the likelihood of satellite chunks hitting land is low, he added. Computer models indicate that more than half of all the debris will come down in the satellite's first two circuits around Earth after the missile impact.

    "There's a very large amount of uncertainty in predicting a landing zone" for a spacecraft, said NASA Administrator Michael Griffin. A month ahead of time, the best models can only be accurate to within three days. At 10 days out, the uncertainty drops to a day. On landing day, that drops further to within two hours. "Almost anything we can do [on shoot-down day] will turn out to be either neutral…or better. Nothing we can do will make the situation worse."

    Griffin and Cartwright both said the satellite shoot-down has no comparison with China's anti-satellite test in January 2007, in which an object fired from Earth smashed into a Chinese weather satellite (see "Satellite Smashers," February/March 2008). "First, we're notifying the world that we're doing this," said Cartwright. "The Chinese test left debris that will be up there for 20 to 40 years. All our debris will be down in a day."


     
    Comments

    Post a Comment


    Name: (required)

    Email: (required)

    Comment:



    Advertisement

    Air & Space Videos

    Wright B Over Manhattan, 1912

    In the winter of 1912, Frank Coffyn filmed the first silent motion pictures of New York ever taken from an airplane.

    A Space Suit Ahead of Its Time

    More flexible than the Apollo suit, the EX-1A never flew.

    Marines Test the Joint Strike Fighter

    A Marine takes the new F-35 for a spin.

    On the Prowl

    On the Prowl

    Climb into the cockpit for a flight in an EA-6B Prowler.

    The Human Price

    Apollo veteran Lynn Radcliffe recalls the constant stress and long hours.

    Mercury Astronauts Meet the Press, 1959

    ...and answer the question: "What was your least favorite test?"

    Advertisement

    Marketplace

    SmithsonianStore

    Night at the Museum Adult Collage Tee
    Item no: 28206

    Window Shopping

    Gifts, Gadgets and Great Finds!

    Travel & Adventure

    A Family Weekend in Washington, D.C.: Featuring "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian"

    Spend a fun-filled weekend with your family discovering the magic of the new feature film, "Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian" (Jul. 24 - 26, 2009)

    In the Magazine

    July 2009

    • Step Outside
    • Where the Wild Things Are
    • The Six
    • Travels with Churchill
    • Tumbling with the Stars
    • The Billy Mitchell Court-Martial
    • Fire Hazard

    View Table of Contents

    Snapshot

    Max Abort

    We hope it'll never be more than a test.

    Reader Scrapbook

    Send In Your Photos

    Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.

    Need to Know

    What determines an airplane’s lifespan?

    Some keep flying for decades, while others end up on the scrap heap.

    Smithsonian Journeys

    Moorish Treasures of the Mediterranean

    Follow the ancient trade route and discover the civilizations that flourished in its wake



    View full archiveRecent Issues


    • Jul 2009


    • May 2009


    • Mar 2009

    Newsletter

    Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

    Subscribe Now

    About Us

    Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

    Explore our Brands

    • goSmithsonian.com
    • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
    • Smithsonian Institution
    • Smithsonian Catalogue
    • Smithsonian Journeys
    • Smithsonian Channel
    • Site Map
    • Privacy Policy
    • Copyright
    • About Air & Space
    • Contact Us
    • Advertising
    • Reader Panel
    • Subscribe
    • RSS

    Smithsonian Institution

    Produced by Clickability