• Smithsonian
    Institution
  • Smithsonian
    Journeys
  • Smithsonian
    Store
  • Smithsonian
    Channel
  • goSmithsonian
    Visitors Guide
  • Smithsonian
    magazine

AirSpaceMag.com

  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • History of Flight
  • Flight Today
  • Military Aviation
  • Space Exploration
  • Need to Know
  • How Things Work
  • Photos
  • Videos
  • Blogs
  • Space Exploration

Satellite Shoot-Down

The Pentagon plans to knock one of our own out of the sky.

| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email | More
  • By Paul Hoversten
  • AirSpaceMag.com, February 14, 2008
 
The malfunctioning satellite will be taken out by an SM-3 standard missile similar to this one fired last June from the destroyer USS Decatur. In that test the missile successfully intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Hawaii. The malfunctioning satellite will be taken out by an SM-3 standard missile, similar to this one fired last June from the destroyer USS Decatur. In that test, the missile successfully intercepted a ballistic missile launched from Hawaii.

U.S. Navy

In a first for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a U.S. Aegis-class cruiser will fire a missile at a falling U.S. intelligence satellite in an attempt to shatter the spacecraft's fuel tank before it comes crashing to Earth. The shoot-down could take place as early as February 20.

The intercept 149 miles above the Pacific Ocean is intended to disperse the satellite's 1,000 pounds of deadly hydrazine fuel, which could otherwise endanger humans and animals over an area the size of two football fields, U.S. officials said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday.

The 40-inch spherical tank is the largest chunk of the 5,000-pound, schoolbus-size satellite expected to survive the fiery re-entry to Earth. Altogether, 2,800 pounds of debris are predicted to result from the demise of the unidentified National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) spacecraft, which failed within hours of reaching orbit on December 14, 2006. Because ground controllers can't communicate with the satellite, they aren't able to steer it to a safe re-entry in the ocean.

"It's the hydrazine aboard that makes this different" from Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, alluding to blogs that suggest the real reason for the shoot-down was the clandestine nature of the satellite. "It's the hydrazine that is the issue here. It's the only reason we're doing this. We had a similar tank on [space shuttle] Columbia that survived re-entry and came down in a wooded area" (although little hydrazine was left by the end of that mission).

Hydrazine is a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor that is routinely used in rocket fuel. Exposure to it can cause damage to the nervous system, liver, and kidneys. No one knows how much of the satellite's hydrazine will be in gas or liquid form when it begins warming up in the atmosphere, Cartwright said.

The plan is to have three Aegis cruisers (one primary, the others backup) stationed at various Northern hemisphere locations in the Pacific. Once the dead satellite drops to an altitude of 149 miles over the Pacific, one cruiser will fire a single missile, which will close in on its target at an estimated speed of 22,000 mph. Pentagon officials then will have two days or so to assess the shot, and if necessary fire again, Cartwright said.

Cartwright said he had "high confidence" that the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) missile, which he described as "part of the regional/tactical part of MDA," could strike the satellite. "We have a missile that's well-understood. It's the first time we've needed to engage a spacecraft, but it's not the first time we've intercepted something entering the atmosphere," he said. The SM-3 is designed to hit short- and medium-range missiles.

"The worst that can happen is we miss. If we even graze it, it will bring it down sooner," he said. But the likelihood of satellite chunks hitting land is low, he added. Computer models indicate that more than half of all the debris will come down in the satellite's first two circuits around Earth after the missile impact.

"There's a very large amount of uncertainty in predicting a landing zone" for a spacecraft, said NASA Administrator Michael Griffin. A month ahead of time, the best models can only be accurate to within three days. At 10 days out, the uncertainty drops to a day. On landing day, that drops further to within two hours. "Almost anything we can do [on shoot-down day] will turn out to be either neutral…or better. Nothing we can do will make the situation worse."

Griffin and Cartwright both said the satellite shoot-down has no comparison with China's anti-satellite test in January 2007, in which an object fired from Earth smashed into a Chinese weather satellite (see "Satellite Smashers," February/March 2008). "First, we're notifying the world that we're doing this," said Cartwright. "The Chinese test left debris that will be up there for 20 to 40 years. All our debris will be down in a day."

In a first for the Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, a U.S. Aegis-class cruiser will fire a missile at a falling U.S. intelligence satellite in an attempt to shatter the spacecraft's fuel tank before it comes crashing to Earth. The shoot-down could take place as early as February 20.

The intercept 149 miles above the Pacific Ocean is intended to disperse the satellite's 1,000 pounds of deadly hydrazine fuel, which could otherwise endanger humans and animals over an area the size of two football fields, U.S. officials said at a Pentagon briefing Thursday.

The 40-inch spherical tank is the largest chunk of the 5,000-pound, schoolbus-size satellite expected to survive the fiery re-entry to Earth. Altogether, 2,800 pounds of debris are predicted to result from the demise of the unidentified National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) spacecraft, which failed within hours of reaching orbit on December 14, 2006. Because ground controllers can't communicate with the satellite, they aren't able to steer it to a safe re-entry in the ocean.

"It's the hydrazine aboard that makes this different" from Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, alluding to blogs that suggest the real reason for the shoot-down was the clandestine nature of the satellite. "It's the hydrazine that is the issue here. It's the only reason we're doing this. We had a similar tank on [space shuttle] Columbia that survived re-entry and came down in a wooded area" (although little hydrazine was left by the end of that mission).

Hydrazine is a colorless liquid with an ammonia-like odor that is routinely used in rocket fuel. Exposure to it can cause damage to the nervous system, liver, and kidneys. No one knows how much of the satellite's hydrazine will be in gas or liquid form when it begins warming up in the atmosphere, Cartwright said.

The plan is to have three Aegis cruisers (one primary, the others backup) stationed at various Northern hemisphere locations in the Pacific. Once the dead satellite drops to an altitude of 149 miles over the Pacific, one cruiser will fire a single missile, which will close in on its target at an estimated speed of 22,000 mph. Pentagon officials then will have two days or so to assess the shot, and if necessary fire again, Cartwright said.

Cartwright said he had "high confidence" that the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) missile, which he described as "part of the regional/tactical part of MDA," could strike the satellite. "We have a missile that's well-understood. It's the first time we've needed to engage a spacecraft, but it's not the first time we've intercepted something entering the atmosphere," he said. The SM-3 is designed to hit short- and medium-range missiles.

"The worst that can happen is we miss. If we even graze it, it will bring it down sooner," he said. But the likelihood of satellite chunks hitting land is low, he added. Computer models indicate that more than half of all the debris will come down in the satellite's first two circuits around Earth after the missile impact.

"There's a very large amount of uncertainty in predicting a landing zone" for a spacecraft, said NASA Administrator Michael Griffin. A month ahead of time, the best models can only be accurate to within three days. At 10 days out, the uncertainty drops to a day. On landing day, that drops further to within two hours. "Almost anything we can do [on shoot-down day] will turn out to be either neutral…or better. Nothing we can do will make the situation worse."

Griffin and Cartwright both said the satellite shoot-down has no comparison with China's anti-satellite test in January 2007, in which an object fired from Earth smashed into a Chinese weather satellite (see "Satellite Smashers," February/March 2008). "First, we're notifying the world that we're doing this," said Cartwright. "The Chinese test left debris that will be up there for 20 to 40 years. All our debris will be down in a day."


| | | Reddit | Digg | Stumble | Email | More
 
Comments

Post a Comment


Name: (required)

Email: (required)

Comment:

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until Smithsonian.com has approved them. Smithsonian reserves the right not to post any comments that are unlawful, threatening, offensive, defamatory, invasive of a person's privacy, inappropriate, confidential or proprietary, political messages, product endorsements, or other content that might otherwise violate any laws or policies.



Advertisement


Most Popular

  • Viewed
  • Emailed
  • Commented
  • Topics
  1. Where Have All the Shuttle Engineers Gone?
  2. Panthers At Sea
  3. The Navy Gets a Panther
  4. The Pilots of Mount McKinley
  5. Area 51: Origins
  6. Alaska and the Airplane
  7. NASA Art on Tour
  8. Off to the Races
  9. Alaska’s Crash Epidemic
  10. Inside a Flying Fortress
  1. The Galileo Project
  2. Where Have All the Shuttle Engineers Gone?
  3. When Pigs Could Fly
  1. Refueling Angel Thunder
  2. The Rocket Ships
  3. Leesburg Air Show
  4. Cause Unknown
  5. Yellow 10
  6. A Family Affair
  7. The Mystery of the Lost Clipper
  8. Where Have All the Phantoms Gone?
  9. Above and Beyond
  10. Legends of Vietnam: Bronco's Tale
  1. Fighters
  2. Vietnam War
  3. Bombers
  4. Cold War Era
  5. Aerospace Inventions
  6. 21st Century Aviation
  7. Experimental Aircraft
  8. Golden Age of Flight
  9. 20th Century Aviation
  10. Air Racing
  11. Aerospace Technology

View All Most Popular »

Advertisement


Follow Us

Air & Space Magazine
@airspacemag
Follow Air & Space Magazine on Twitter

Sign up for regular email updates from Smithsonian.com, including daily newsletters and special offers.

Popular Videos

  • Newest
  • Most Viewed

Flightseeing on Mount McKinley

(01:46)

A New Way to Navigate

(02:01)

X-47B Carrier Launch

(01:25)

SpaceShipTwo Fires Up

(02:58)

View All Newest Videos »

The Mach-2 Bomber That Never Was

(01:21)

SpaceShipTwo Fires Up

(02:58)

X-47B Carrier Launch

(01:25)

How to Bag an Asteroid

(03:52)

View All Videos »

In the Magazine

July 2013

  • Where Have All the Shuttle Engineers Gone?
  • Panthers At Sea
  • Earth-Like Planets Could be Right Next Door
  • Alaska and the Airplane
  • The Pilots of Mount McKinley

View Table of Contents »

Snapshot

Off to the Races

This Lockheed Lightning is ready to go.

Reader Scrapbook

Discovery's Tail-Cone Fitting

Check out our scrapbook of readers' aviation and space pictures. Then add your own.


Smithsonian Store

In the Cockpit and In the Cockpit II

Current and retired curators from our National Air and Space Museum contribute the insightful text and striking images... $48.99

Smithsonian Journeys

Smithsonian at Chautauqua: The Elegant Universe

Join us in western New York and explore the mysteries of the cosmos with experts (Jun 22 - 29, 2013)




View full archiveRecent Issues


  • Jul 2013


  • May 2013


  • Mar 2013

Newsletter

Sign up for regular email updates from Air & Space magazine, including free newsletters, special offers and current news updates.

Subscribe Now

About Us

Air & Space/Smithsonian magazine has been delighting aerospace enthusiasts with the best writing about their favorite subject since April 1986. As an adjunct of the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum, Air & Space matches the grand scope of the Museum, encompassing every era of aviation and space exploration. With stories that range from the Wright Brothers to the design of NASA's next lunar lander, Air & Space emphasizes the human stories as well as the technology of aviation and spaceflight.

Explore our Brands

  • goSmithsonian.com
  • Smithsonian Air & Space Museum
  • Smithsonian Student Travel
  • Smithsonian Catalogue
  • Smithsonian Journeys
  • Smithsonian Channel
  • About Air & Space
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • Subscribe
  • RSS
  • Topics
  • Member Services
  • Copyright
  • Site Map
  • Privacy Policy
  • Ad Choices

Smithsonian Institution