Mars Journal
From the people who know Mars best, a collection of close encounters.
- By The Editors
- Air & Space magazine, August 2012
Tracks left by the Opportunity rover created a Mars moment for scientist Gian Ori, who picks the image as his favorite Mars photo.
NASA/JPL/Cornell
(Page 4 of 4)
Michael Collins, Gemini and Apollo astronaut and author, Mission to Mars.
Of the many authors who have imagined human missions to Mars, former astronaut Michael Collins was the first to speak with the authority of someone who had traveled in space. He published his book Mission to Mars in 1990, four years after NASA suffered its first space shuttle accident, but on many pages it reads as though it were written last week—in its assessment, for example, that a lack of political will to pay the high cost of a human trip to Mars is more daunting than the technological challenge. “The only thing I know for certain,” Collins writes, “is that starting a human colony on a second planet will cost much less than the weapons we buy to destroy the first one.”
Recently, Collins spoke about his book and his outlook on a human mission to Mars.
Air & Space: You sometimes joked that the Apollo program sent you to the wrong planet. How did your fascination with Mars begin?
Mars has just always seemed to be a more interesting place than the moon. It’s the closest thing to a sister planet that we have, and if you put two photographs up on a wall—one of Mars and one of the moon—with a little blurb saying This is the moon and this is what it’s all about and This is Mars and what it’s all about, and you poked someone in the ribs, and said, “Choose!” I would say 99 out of 100 people would choose Mars.
You published your book Mission to Mars 22 years ago. Do you think we are any closer to a human mission to Mars than we were in 1990?
No, I think we’re probably farther away today than we were 20 years ago. Because the current White House and the current NASA administration don’t really have a clear-cut vision of where they want to go. Perhaps to some asteroid is about as close as they get. And I think without a very clear vision and an accompanying timetable, we’re just not going to get there any time soon.
What have you thought of the images from the rovers Spirit and Opportunity?
I thought less about Mars and more about the machine. I thought those two machines were marvels of engineering, and to see them and their tracks was very enjoyable to me. I think the disappointment is that I thought we’d get a more extensive chemical analysis of the Martian surface with some sort of an indication fairly clearly one way or the other whether there was evidence of life present or past—or whether that should be ruled out.
When you addressed Congress after your Apollo mission, and again in 2009, in your press release on Apollo’s 40th anniversary, you expressed hope for a manned Mars mission. That’s a long time to keep hope alive. Is there any reason for optimism?
If you take a very long, long view, I like to steal the phrase “outward bound.” I think humankind will go away from the surface of this planet and go outward bound, exploring the solar system and perhaps even beyond. So I’m optimistic in the very, very long run. I think the urge to go to different places will continue. I think the urge will intensify: to see, to touch, to smell, to feel. But in the short or intermediate term, no. I don’t see anything too hopeful. It’s too expensive right now.
So can you guess when humans will land on Mars?
No time soon. Not in my lifetime certainly.
Editors’ Picks
”Every space mission to a new place—whether human or robotic—has to carry a camera,” Cornell University astronomer Jim Bell writes in the preface to his book Postcards from Mars, which gathers images from the rovers Spirit and Opportunity. “These cameras are the eyes that have to tell the stories of new alien worlds to the people back home who couldn’t go.”
We asked the scientists and writers who contributed to our Mars Journal to pick their favorite photos of Mars, the pictures that best tell the planet’s story. Some liked images that evoke thoughts of a violently formed, forbidding planet. Others preferred pictures of a more placid, almost serene place. Together, they reveal a portrait of a world that is in some ways alien and in other ways as familiar as some mountain and desert vistas on Earth.
The story of Mars, however, would be incomplete without a few images that in their own way and time stirred up new interest in our neighboring planet. We picked several that generated headlines worldwide and challenged our previous conceptions of Mars.
—The editors
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4
Gian Ori, planetary scientist, University d’Annunzio, Pescara, Italy. Director of the International Research School of Planetary Sciences.
Scott Maxwell, rover driver, NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California.
John Grant, geologist, Center for Earth and Planetary Studies, National Air and Space Museum. Co-chaired the community process that selected landing sites for the Spirit and Opportunity rovers, and the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity.
Elon Musk, founder and CEO, Space Exploration Technologies. Advocate of human colonization of Mars.
Matt Golombek, senior research scientist, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, California. Chief scientist on Mars Pathfinder mission and landing site scientist for the Mars Exploration Program.
Kim Stanley Robinson, author of The Mars Trilogy and 2312.
Candice Hansen-Koharcheck, Planetary Science Institute, Tucson, Arizona. Deputy principal investigator for the HiRISE camera on the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter.
Peter Smith, professor of planetary sciences, University of Arizona.
Ruslan Kuzmin, leading research scientist, Laboratory of Comparative Planetology, Vernadsky Institute of Geochemistry and Analytical Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow.
Mary Roach, author of Packing for Mars.




Comments (2)
My memorable Mars moment: being with the Mars Exploration Rover Science team the night Opportunity landed. Spirit's landing site had looked much like Viking and Pathfinder. But when the very first Opportunity Pancam image flashed on the screen, and I and all the other geologists in the room instantly perceived that she had landed in view of intact bedrock, the triumphant roar was deafening! Layered rock, intact, forms the pages from which geologists read the history of a place. We knew instantly that Mars would be giving up secrets to Opportunity.
Posted by Emily Lakdawalla on August 10,2012 | 11:48 PM
Memorable moment: I spent 22 months working on a study of Mars rovers in 1986 to 1988 with JPL. I was responsible for vehicle mobility design. Our team was given a package of terrain requirements that were to be negotiated with whatever types of mobility devices we could envision. We designed wheeled, tracked, walking, crawling and flying vehicles. We did systems analyses on all these concepts to determine propulsive energy, navigation equipment and computational speed and energy needs. We enlisted the aid of former astronaut Harrison Schmidt to relate how his lunar soil experience would translate to a Martian soil with respect to vehicle mobility demands.
Biggest surprise: The latest Mars rover, Curiosity, approximates the size and capability of the wheeled vehicles we proposed. JPL did not appreciate the mobility limitations created by its requirements given to us for our studies. They had to go back and reassess their terrain mobility needs and as a result of computational capability, propulsive power availability and launch vehicle packaging size, came up with the series of smaller rovers and missions leading up to the curent Curiosity mission.
Human landing: I don't think our politicians have the will or urgency to propose any sustained plan to accomplish a manned mission. It would make sense to make this an international endevour and share the cost and engineering knowledge to benefit the world and not just one country. I don't see this happening in the next 30 years.
Tom LIsec, systems engineer, Retired, Lockheed Martin.
Posted by Tom Lisec on January 29,2013 | 11:03 PM