Secret Space Shuttles
When you’re 200 miles up, it’s easy to hide what you’re up to.
- By Michael Cassutt
- Air & Space magazine, August 2009
All five NASA astronauts on the classified STS-28 mission had military backgrounds. But only two of the defense department’s corps of 27 shuttle payload specialists made it to orbit.
NASA
The giant gold and silver satellite glittered against the black sky as space shuttle Atlantis closed in on it from below. Commander Hoot Gibson and pilot Guy Gardner flew the approach, while mission specialist Mike Mullane, at the other end of the flight deck, readied the shuttle’s robot arm for a capture. Downstairs in the airlock, mission specialists Jerry Ross and Bill Shepherd waited in their spacesuits for Gibson’s order to go outside and attempt a rescue.
The mission of STS-27 had been to deploy the first in a series of new spy satellites that used radar to observe ground targets, in any kind of weather, day or night. But shortly after the astronauts released the spacecraft, called ONYX, from the shuttle’s cargo bay, on December 2, 1988, one of its antenna dishes had failed to open. Without intervention by the crew, the billion-dollar satellite would become a hunk of space junk. As it turned out, they succeeded in grabbing, fixing, and re-releasing ONYX, for which they later received a medal from the U.S. intelligence community.
At least that’s one possible scenario for what happened. The astronauts may just as well have fixed the satellite without a spacewalk by Ross and Shepherd. We don’t know because not a word of the ONYX rescue was reported in newspapers or on television. Why not?
Because STS-27 was—and remains—a secret mission.
Between 1982 and 1992, NASA launched 11 shuttle flights with classified payloads, honoring a deal that dated to 1969, when the National Reconnaissance Office—an organization so secret its name could not be published at the time—requested certain changes to the design of NASA’s new space transportation system. The NRO built and operated large, expensive reconnaissance satellites, and it wanted a bigger shuttle cargo bay than NASA had planned. The spysat agency also wanted the option to fly “once around” polar missions, which demanded more flexibility to maneuver for a landing that could be on either side of the vehicle’s ground track.
“NRO requirements drove the shuttle design,” says Parker Temple, a historian who served on the policy staff of the secretary of the Air Force and later with the NRO’s office within the Central Intelligence Agency. The Air Force signed on to use the shuttle too, and in 1979 started building a launch pad at Vandenberg Air Force Base in northern California for reaching polar orbits. Neither the Air Force nor the NRO was ever comfortable relying exclusively on NASA’s vehicle, however. Delays in shuttle launches only increased their worry; even before the 1986 Challenger accident, they were looking for a way off the shuttle and back onto conventional rockets like the Titan.
The uneasy relationship between the Air Force, NRO, and NASA assumed a human face in 1979, when the military chose its first group of shuttle astronauts. Two years before the shuttle’s first launch, the NRO selected 13 Manned Spaceflight Engineers as potential payload specialists, all but one from the Air Force. The new military astronauts ranged in age from 24 to 36. Most had advanced degrees in engineering; one was a Ph.D. They were experienced in satellite flying and acquisition. And they believed they were the vanguard of the Air Force in space.
Only one of that first group ever made it to orbit.
Single Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (13)
I absolutely love the magazine and look forward to every issue!
As a Orbiter APU System Engineer for 10 years during the height of the military missions for both the Air Force and NRO, I would like to make a minor correction to the article on page 49. Firing room 3 was our dedicated DOD secured firing room, not firing room 4. At that time, Firing Room 4 was an extremely small firing room that supported the KSC management team and Orbiter Processing Facility testing when firing room configuration changes were being implemented for either maintenance or launch configuration changes. As a side note, any time we had to use Firing Room 4 during that timeframe, everyone had to bring in Parkas to keep warm as the HVAC system kept the room, (due to its size), like an icebox.
Also, my career with the Shuttle Program began at Vandenberg AFB and I really would have liked to seen more on the DOD coverage of that side of the Shuttle Program. The launch facility was very unique and many people never knew that side of the Shuttle program. Maybe you can do a follow-on article in the future!
Posted by David B. Neuner on July 22,2009 | 05:25 PM
The ultimate demise of the MSE program was that it was easier to train a spacecraft expert to fly on the shuttle, than to train a shuttle expert (MSE) on a spacecraft.
Posted by Jim on July 30,2009 | 08:24 PM
A humorous note. Spacecraft require ground support equipment (GSE)to support testing. The shuttle use airborne support equipment (ASE) to hold a spacecraft. An MSE flew on an expendable launch vehicle (Mission Support Equipment)
Posted by Anon on July 30,2009 | 08:29 PM
I had some conversations with Jerry Ross and I once jokingly said, "Jerry, the Cold War is over now. How about telling us what you were doing up there on your classified mission?"
It was the first time anyone ever said to me, "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you."
Posted by Robert Morwell on August 1,2009 | 05:10 PM
I absolutely love the fact that this nation can keep Mr. Atlas` measurements a classified secret for the next several centuries, but when it comes to keeping secrets of Intelligence, we have a hard time doing it. All the precautions, yet someone knew the astronauts were on the way and who they were. That is really sad. Makes you wonder if the Manhattan Project had been done in today`s society, what would be the outcome?
Posted by John E. Truitt on August 18,2009 | 09:15 PM
I recently read an article concerning STS 27 (Atlantis). Upon reviewing launch video, ground controllers determined that a significant amount of foam debris had impacted on the Shuttles' heat shield tiles. However, since the mission was so secretive, NASA was unable to use any ground based equipment to image Atlantis to see the extent of the damage. The commander of that mission stated that there were serious doubts as to whether they would make it back through re-entry safely. When the crew were finally safe on the ground, during the walk-about, they viewed the damage, and were shocked to see the extent of it. To this day, the damage that Atlantis suffered on lift-off is deemed as the most extensive of any shuttle mission, except, of course, that of Columbia, which led to her break up during re-entry.
Posted by Michael Lonergan on December 9,2009 | 03:18 AM
my uncle wilton fraley was a big wig at nasa for twenty five years. he taught the astronauts how to read the monitorsand such. i used to get signed flight pictures of all the first thirty or so shuttle flights.so once as was working in northern california ,i was listening to a local high powered radio station back in sacramento calif in 2005 . when out of the blue a local science reporter stated he had gone up to vandenburg to watch several shuttle launches. he worked for the station and i was floored. i used to see rocket flights in l.a by the con trails they left. i moved out of l.a in 1985 so i was pissed off that i might of missed a space shuttle launch. he spoke of the flights in an enduring way as a comment of how cool they were. why did he say vandenburg? did they really ever fly there? i will guess the public will never know.
Posted by jim king on May 26,2010 | 10:04 AM
What makes me mad is that NASA was supposed to be a civilian space agency, And with out tax payers hard earned money going to that agency they wouldn't be able to do ****, It makes me mad that they can keep secrets about what they have discovered on the moon, or in orbit, and that Space shuttles OWNED by the American taxpayer are used for secret military missions, I do not agree with that. Even though I know that some of the time the secrecy was needed in regards to payloads. But the one thing that should NEVER be a secret from the public is ANY and ALL pictures taken during ALL of the Apollo missions to the moon, Any missions involving pictures taken by the mars rovers, Anything non military. and dont give me that crap that stuff found on Mars and the moon and throughout the solar system is military because that is a bogus as hell claim, The American taxpayers pay for these moon and mars missions, Therefor the American Taxpayer OWN any and all films and pictures taken during all those missions, And should ALL be released to the American public, including copy's of any voice recordings made from mission control to the moon and from the moon back to mission control AND conversations taped between the astronauts during their stay's on the moon and their voyages to and from the moon. The American taxpayer paid for all that stuff and they own it and should have access to ALL of it, not just some of the crap that NASA "decides" what is safe for people to see, We want it ALL, and there should be some kind of petition started about it.
Posted by Al on May 18,2012 | 06:58 PM
The SPACE Shuttle was a WASTE and a DEBACLE.It was supposed to be a cheap alternative to throw a way boosters to LEO,...and it was anywhere from 10-100x more expensive than conventional LEO boosters.PLUS Nasa lost two crews...!!!The International Space Station is the next Waste and Debacle. It is over budget, does less science than its intended purpose, plus we have secretly paid Russia, Hundreds of Millions of Dollars for " their participation" in the ISS. Read "Star Crossed Orbits"...it will tell you all about the International Space station...MESS..We need a rational Space Program,...not more NASA boon doggles. Its time for a rational program to get us to Mars in 10 years,...read "The Case for Mars"...NASA wants to do it at 10X the cost and in 20-30 years...WASTE. Obama is using the ISS, like previous Presidents used the Shuttle. He wants all R & D to go thru the ISS, before we can apply it to the Moon or MARS...Not necessary...read the above books. Remember the hyper inflation of the 1970s? It was about no business and
Oil,.same situation we are in now but 10X worse.
Posted by anthony barbuto on November 16,2012 | 02:55 PM
I think they should release the aliens.
Posted by Keith on December 20,2012 | 01:43 PM
I remember when Vandenberg was building SLC-6 to handle the Shuttle launches. Like a lot on the program, it had problems being built and was never used. Would be interesting to have an article on what was built by the AF and never used for the shuttle. It was to have had Polar orbital flights with landing back at the launch site. But reliability issues on the shuttle, as well as building problems, in one case work was done on two ends to a middle, when they met they were off by 6 inches. Oops.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 06:52 PM
One of the wierder things NASA did was come up with flight numbers, STS-1, STS-2, and so on. I worked on STS-2 through STS-7. For some foggy reason they added on mission numbers 51C or 51L, always jumbled and out of order. Nobody ever understood what they were doing, the flight numbers made a lot more sense. It seemed that a lot was juggling what flight missions they wanted to fly when as shuttles were always slipping flights or taking too long to get back to flight. The whole idea of being a space bus never materialized. And the launches like clockwork fell apart when Challenger blew up. Though the flight crew was not told in their FRR (Flight Readiness Review) about the problems with icing on the pad. We had heard about O-Ring burn through on earlier flights, and again, the crew was not briefed. Which was criminal, on the test programs I worked at Edwards, the crew was always told everything, and they had the final vote on whether or not to go on with the flight test. But NASA had determined that the Shuttle was no longer in flight test status after STS-4. North American Rockwell thought that was the stupidest idea ever. The X-15 was NEVER out of flight test status.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 07:06 PM