The giant gold and silver satellite glittered against the black sky as space shuttle Atlantis closed in on it from below. Commander Hoot Gibson and pilot Guy Gardner flew the approach, while mission specialist Mike Mullane, at the other end of the flight deck, readied the shuttle’s robot arm for a capture. Downstairs in the airlock, mission specialists Jerry Ross and Bill Shepherd waited in their spacesuits for Gibson’s order to go outside and attempt a rescue.
The mission of STS-27 had been to deploy the first in a series of new spy satellites that used radar to observe ground targets, in any kind of weather, day or night. But shortly after the astronauts released the spacecraft, called ONYX, from the shuttle’s cargo bay, on December 2, 1988, one of its antenna dishes had failed to open. Without intervention by the crew, the billion-dollar satellite would become a hunk of space junk. As it turned out, they succeeded in grabbing, fixing, and re-releasing ONYX, for which they later received a medal from the U.S. intelligence community.
At least that’s one possible scenario for what happened. The astronauts may just as well have fixed the satellite without a spacewalk by Ross and Shepherd. We don’t know because not a word of the ONYX rescue was reported in newspapers or on television. Why not?
Because STS-27 was—and remains—a secret mission.
Between 1982 and 1992, NASA launched 11 shuttle flights with classified payloads, honoring a deal that dated to 1969, when the National Reconnaissance Office—an organization so secret its name could not be published at the time—requested certain changes to the design of NASA’s new space transportation system. The NRO built and operated large, expensive reconnaissance satellites, and it wanted a bigger shuttle cargo bay than NASA had planned. The spysat agency also wanted the option to fly “once around” polar missions, which demanded more flexibility to maneuver for a landing that could be on either side of the vehicle’s ground track.
“NRO requirements drove the shuttle design,” says Parker Temple, a historian who served on the policy staff of the secretary of the Air Force and later with the NRO’s office within the Central Intelligence Agency. The Air Force signed on to use the shuttle too, and in 1979 started building a launch pad at Vandenberg Air Force Base in northern California for reaching polar orbits. Neither the Air Force nor the NRO was ever comfortable relying exclusively on NASA’s vehicle, however. Delays in shuttle launches only increased their worry; even before the 1986 Challenger accident, they were looking for a way off the shuttle and back onto conventional rockets like the Titan.
The uneasy relationship between the Air Force, NRO, and NASA assumed a human face in 1979, when the military chose its first group of shuttle astronauts. Two years before the shuttle’s first launch, the NRO selected 13 Manned Spaceflight Engineers as potential payload specialists, all but one from the Air Force. The new military astronauts ranged in age from 24 to 36. Most had advanced degrees in engineering; one was a Ph.D. They were experienced in satellite flying and acquisition. And they believed they were the vanguard of the Air Force in space.
Only one of that first group ever made it to orbit.


Comments
I absolutely love the magazine and look forward to every issue! As a Orbiter APU System Engineer for 10 years during the height of the military missions for both the Air Force and NRO, I would like to make a minor correction to the article on page 49. Firing room 3 was our dedicated DOD secured firing room, not firing room 4. At that time, Firing Room 4 was an extremely small firing room that supported the KSC management team and Orbiter Processing Facility testing when firing room configuration changes were being implemented for either maintenance or launch configuration changes. As a side note, any time we had to use Firing Room 4 during that timeframe, everyone had to bring in Parkas to keep warm as the HVAC system kept the room, (due to its size), like an icebox. Also, my career with the Shuttle Program began at Vandenberg AFB and I really would have liked to seen more on the DOD coverage of that side of the Shuttle Program. The launch facility was very unique and many people never knew that side of the Shuttle program. Maybe you can do a follow-on article in the future!
Posted by David B. Neuner on July 22,2009 | 02:25PM
The ultimate demise of the MSE program was that it was easier to train a spacecraft expert to fly on the shuttle, than to train a shuttle expert (MSE) on a spacecraft.
Posted by Jim on July 30,2009 | 05:24PM
A humorous note. Spacecraft require ground support equipment (GSE)to support testing. The shuttle use airborne support equipment (ASE) to hold a spacecraft. An MSE flew on an expendable launch vehicle (Mission Support Equipment)
Posted by Anon on July 30,2009 | 05:29PM
I had some conversations with Jerry Ross and I once jokingly said, "Jerry, the Cold War is over now. How about telling us what you were doing up there on your classified mission?" It was the first time anyone ever said to me, "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you."
Posted by Robert Morwell on August 1,2009 | 02:10PM
I absolutely love the fact that this nation can keep Mr. Atlas` measurements a classified secret for the next several centuries, but when it comes to keeping secrets of Intelligence, we have a hard time doing it. All the precautions, yet someone knew the astronauts were on the way and who they were. That is really sad. Makes you wonder if the Manhattan Project had been done in today`s society, what would be the outcome?
Posted by John E. Truitt on August 18,2009 | 06:15PM
I recently read an article concerning STS 27 (Atlantis). Upon reviewing launch video, ground controllers determined that a significant amount of foam debris had impacted on the Shuttles' heat shield tiles. However, since the mission was so secretive, NASA was unable to use any ground based equipment to image Atlantis to see the extent of the damage. The commander of that mission stated that there were serious doubts as to whether they would make it back through re-entry safely. When the crew were finally safe on the ground, during the walk-about, they viewed the damage, and were shocked to see the extent of it. To this day, the damage that Atlantis suffered on lift-off is deemed as the most extensive of any shuttle mission, except, of course, that of Columbia, which led to her break up during re-entry.
Posted by Michael Lonergan on December 9,2009 | 12:18AM