Secret Space Shuttles
When you’re 200 miles up, it’s easy to hide what you’re up to.
- By Michael Cassutt
- Air & Space magazine, August 2009
All five NASA astronauts on the classified STS-28 mission had military backgrounds. But only two of the defense department’s corps of 27 shuttle payload specialists made it to orbit.
NASA
(Page 2 of 6)
Paul Sefchek, one of those who didn’t (he retired from the Air Force in 1989 and died in 1997 at the age of 51), told me in an interview years ago that his colleagues were like “old Army scouts who were sort of aimed at NASA by the Air Force and told to find out whatever they could find out. They returned to the fort bleeding and full of wounds.”
One fundamental problem was how the two agencies perceived “payload specialists.” NASA thought of them as outsiders, almost guests—engineers or scientists who tended one particular satellite or experiment, and typically flew just once. The MSEs thought their job was to help bridge the gulf between the military and civilian space agencies.
It didn’t work. Gary Payton, now deputy undersecretary of the Air Force for space, is the only one of the first group of military astronauts to fly; he recalls, “I was naive enough to believe that the payload side would be treated by NASA the same way the Air Force launch people treated us. In the world I came from, payload requirements would drive the time of day you launched, the time of year, everything. In 1980, NASA was still worried about getting the shuttle to fly. So we were not paid much attention to. It was a rude awakening.”
In addition to cultural differences, there were plain old turf battles. According to Dave Vidrine, director of the military astronaut program in the early 1980s, one eager MSE, whom he didn’t want to name for publication, was “coming up with a lot of new projects and carving out his own turf.” On one occasion, NASA astronaut Ellison Onizuka was training underwater at the Johnson Space Center for a spacewalk when the MSE, a qualified scuba diver, decided he needed to measure a piece of equipment. He and another member of the Air Force team in Houston jumped into the training pool and went to work. The NASA test conductor spotted the two unauthorized divers and ordered them out of the pool. A shouting match ensued, and the offending MSE was banned temporarily from the center.
T.K. (Ken) Mattingly, an Apollo-era astronaut who also reached the rank of rear admiral before retiring from the Navy in 1989, commanded the shuttle’s fourth mission, in June 1982, which carried the program’s first classified payload. He describes the relationship between the NASA astronauts and the MSEs in those early days as “sour.”
Nor did the MSEs have much support within the Pentagon. Jeff DeTroye, one of the first 13 military astronauts, was assigned to escort General Lew Allen, Air Force chief of staff, during a visit to Los Angeles for the 20th anniversary of the NRO in 1981. Upon learning of DeTroye’s involvement in the shuttle, Allen was blunt. He had played “a primary role in canceling the Manned Orbiting Laboratory [a proposed military space station of the 1960s], and had he had his way, would have canceled the shuttle,” DeTroye says. Allen made it clear he thought there was no role for man in space, period, according to DeTroye.
Mattingly says, “I sometimes thought the only people in the Air Force really interested in the shuttle were the MSEs.”
Still, the classified payloads had to be launched—not just on the secret flights, but as secondary payloads on NASA-sponsored shuttle flights too. Once the two sides started working together on actual missions, things improved, according to Payton, who was part of the support team for Mattingly’s STS-4 flight. “We found that once the shuttle had flown, there were people inside NASA who were eager to satisfy military requirements,” he remembers. “We saw that the [NASA] folks were pretty damn good!”
On the other hand, the STS-4 payload, identified only as “P82-1,” didn’t impress Mattingly. “It was a rinky-dink collection of minor stuff they wanted to fly,” he recalls. P82-1 turned out to be the Cryonic InfraRed Radiance Instrumentation for Shuttle (CIRRIS) and the Ultraviolet Horizon Scanner (UHS), two sensors designed to test missile detection from space. A cover failed to open, so neither worked.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (13)
I absolutely love the magazine and look forward to every issue!
As a Orbiter APU System Engineer for 10 years during the height of the military missions for both the Air Force and NRO, I would like to make a minor correction to the article on page 49. Firing room 3 was our dedicated DOD secured firing room, not firing room 4. At that time, Firing Room 4 was an extremely small firing room that supported the KSC management team and Orbiter Processing Facility testing when firing room configuration changes were being implemented for either maintenance or launch configuration changes. As a side note, any time we had to use Firing Room 4 during that timeframe, everyone had to bring in Parkas to keep warm as the HVAC system kept the room, (due to its size), like an icebox.
Also, my career with the Shuttle Program began at Vandenberg AFB and I really would have liked to seen more on the DOD coverage of that side of the Shuttle Program. The launch facility was very unique and many people never knew that side of the Shuttle program. Maybe you can do a follow-on article in the future!
Posted by David B. Neuner on July 22,2009 | 05:25 PM
The ultimate demise of the MSE program was that it was easier to train a spacecraft expert to fly on the shuttle, than to train a shuttle expert (MSE) on a spacecraft.
Posted by Jim on July 30,2009 | 08:24 PM
A humorous note. Spacecraft require ground support equipment (GSE)to support testing. The shuttle use airborne support equipment (ASE) to hold a spacecraft. An MSE flew on an expendable launch vehicle (Mission Support Equipment)
Posted by Anon on July 30,2009 | 08:29 PM
I had some conversations with Jerry Ross and I once jokingly said, "Jerry, the Cold War is over now. How about telling us what you were doing up there on your classified mission?"
It was the first time anyone ever said to me, "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you."
Posted by Robert Morwell on August 1,2009 | 05:10 PM
I absolutely love the fact that this nation can keep Mr. Atlas` measurements a classified secret for the next several centuries, but when it comes to keeping secrets of Intelligence, we have a hard time doing it. All the precautions, yet someone knew the astronauts were on the way and who they were. That is really sad. Makes you wonder if the Manhattan Project had been done in today`s society, what would be the outcome?
Posted by John E. Truitt on August 18,2009 | 09:15 PM
I recently read an article concerning STS 27 (Atlantis). Upon reviewing launch video, ground controllers determined that a significant amount of foam debris had impacted on the Shuttles' heat shield tiles. However, since the mission was so secretive, NASA was unable to use any ground based equipment to image Atlantis to see the extent of the damage. The commander of that mission stated that there were serious doubts as to whether they would make it back through re-entry safely. When the crew were finally safe on the ground, during the walk-about, they viewed the damage, and were shocked to see the extent of it. To this day, the damage that Atlantis suffered on lift-off is deemed as the most extensive of any shuttle mission, except, of course, that of Columbia, which led to her break up during re-entry.
Posted by Michael Lonergan on December 9,2009 | 03:18 AM
my uncle wilton fraley was a big wig at nasa for twenty five years. he taught the astronauts how to read the monitorsand such. i used to get signed flight pictures of all the first thirty or so shuttle flights.so once as was working in northern california ,i was listening to a local high powered radio station back in sacramento calif in 2005 . when out of the blue a local science reporter stated he had gone up to vandenburg to watch several shuttle launches. he worked for the station and i was floored. i used to see rocket flights in l.a by the con trails they left. i moved out of l.a in 1985 so i was pissed off that i might of missed a space shuttle launch. he spoke of the flights in an enduring way as a comment of how cool they were. why did he say vandenburg? did they really ever fly there? i will guess the public will never know.
Posted by jim king on May 26,2010 | 10:04 AM
What makes me mad is that NASA was supposed to be a civilian space agency, And with out tax payers hard earned money going to that agency they wouldn't be able to do ****, It makes me mad that they can keep secrets about what they have discovered on the moon, or in orbit, and that Space shuttles OWNED by the American taxpayer are used for secret military missions, I do not agree with that. Even though I know that some of the time the secrecy was needed in regards to payloads. But the one thing that should NEVER be a secret from the public is ANY and ALL pictures taken during ALL of the Apollo missions to the moon, Any missions involving pictures taken by the mars rovers, Anything non military. and dont give me that crap that stuff found on Mars and the moon and throughout the solar system is military because that is a bogus as hell claim, The American taxpayers pay for these moon and mars missions, Therefor the American Taxpayer OWN any and all films and pictures taken during all those missions, And should ALL be released to the American public, including copy's of any voice recordings made from mission control to the moon and from the moon back to mission control AND conversations taped between the astronauts during their stay's on the moon and their voyages to and from the moon. The American taxpayer paid for all that stuff and they own it and should have access to ALL of it, not just some of the crap that NASA "decides" what is safe for people to see, We want it ALL, and there should be some kind of petition started about it.
Posted by Al on May 18,2012 | 06:58 PM
The SPACE Shuttle was a WASTE and a DEBACLE.It was supposed to be a cheap alternative to throw a way boosters to LEO,...and it was anywhere from 10-100x more expensive than conventional LEO boosters.PLUS Nasa lost two crews...!!!The International Space Station is the next Waste and Debacle. It is over budget, does less science than its intended purpose, plus we have secretly paid Russia, Hundreds of Millions of Dollars for " their participation" in the ISS. Read "Star Crossed Orbits"...it will tell you all about the International Space station...MESS..We need a rational Space Program,...not more NASA boon doggles. Its time for a rational program to get us to Mars in 10 years,...read "The Case for Mars"...NASA wants to do it at 10X the cost and in 20-30 years...WASTE. Obama is using the ISS, like previous Presidents used the Shuttle. He wants all R & D to go thru the ISS, before we can apply it to the Moon or MARS...Not necessary...read the above books. Remember the hyper inflation of the 1970s? It was about no business and
Oil,.same situation we are in now but 10X worse.
Posted by anthony barbuto on November 16,2012 | 02:55 PM
I think they should release the aliens.
Posted by Keith on December 20,2012 | 01:43 PM
I remember when Vandenberg was building SLC-6 to handle the Shuttle launches. Like a lot on the program, it had problems being built and was never used. Would be interesting to have an article on what was built by the AF and never used for the shuttle. It was to have had Polar orbital flights with landing back at the launch site. But reliability issues on the shuttle, as well as building problems, in one case work was done on two ends to a middle, when they met they were off by 6 inches. Oops.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 06:52 PM
One of the wierder things NASA did was come up with flight numbers, STS-1, STS-2, and so on. I worked on STS-2 through STS-7. For some foggy reason they added on mission numbers 51C or 51L, always jumbled and out of order. Nobody ever understood what they were doing, the flight numbers made a lot more sense. It seemed that a lot was juggling what flight missions they wanted to fly when as shuttles were always slipping flights or taking too long to get back to flight. The whole idea of being a space bus never materialized. And the launches like clockwork fell apart when Challenger blew up. Though the flight crew was not told in their FRR (Flight Readiness Review) about the problems with icing on the pad. We had heard about O-Ring burn through on earlier flights, and again, the crew was not briefed. Which was criminal, on the test programs I worked at Edwards, the crew was always told everything, and they had the final vote on whether or not to go on with the flight test. But NASA had determined that the Shuttle was no longer in flight test status after STS-4. North American Rockwell thought that was the stupidest idea ever. The X-15 was NEVER out of flight test status.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 07:06 PM