Secret Space Shuttles
When you’re 200 miles up, it’s easy to hide what you’re up to.
- By Michael Cassutt
- Air & Space magazine, August 2009
All five NASA astronauts on the classified STS-28 mission had military backgrounds. But only two of the defense department’s corps of 27 shuttle payload specialists made it to orbit.
NASA
(Page 3 of 6)
The Air Force-NRO control center for shuttle missions was located in Sunnyvale, California. While Houston and Columbia conversed frequently, no one had come up with a way to refer to the classified control center over the open channel. Payload communicator DeTroye recalled a last-minute panic about the mere mention of “Sunnyvale.” “What were we supposed to say? ‘Columbia, this is…Saratoga’? I can’t imagine what [Mattingly] would have done if he’d heard that.”
The use of code words occasionally got comical. On the seventh day of the mission, Mattingly and pilot Hank Hartsfield were getting ready to return to Earth and had just stored the classified checklists in Columbia’s safe. Sunnyvale then asked them to perform “Tab Echo.” The astronauts looked at each other; neither could remember what Tab Echo was. They opened the safe, removed the checklist, and began paging through it. Sure enough, there was Tab Echo: “Store checklist.”
A few years later, when NASA astronaut Kathy Thornton was preparing for her classified mission, STS-33, “training schedules were coded,” she recalls. “They would say things like ‘Event 7012.’ You had to open up the safe every morning to find out that Event 7012 was food tasting in another building, and you were already five minutes late.”
After STS-4, an ambitious schedule of military missions loomed, and in 1982 the Air Force recruited 14 more MSEs. But the first fully classified flight, STS-10, got delayed due to problems with the new Air Force-built Inertial Upper Stage, used to boost satellites to their designated orbit. Other military experiments flew on NASA missions in the meantime. On flight STS-41G, launched in October 1984, the crew conducted a satellite refueling test “hatched by some Air Force general,” according to journalist Henry S.F. Cooper Jr. in his 1986 book Before Liftoff. Oceanographer Paul Scully-Power was also on board, observing ship wakes on the surface of the sea for the U.S. Navy.
Meanwhile, the crew of STS-10 (renamed STS-51C and commanded by Mattingly) continued to train, all the while pioneering the security procedures that classified missions mandated. A ready room was set up in the astronaut office, complete with a secure telephone that had a secret number. “If certain people need to get hold of you,” Mattingly was told, “they’ll call.” The phone rang just once: The caller asked if Mattingly was interested in subscribing to MCI long distance service.
Another time, Mattingly and three STS-51C crewmates—Onizuka, Loren Shriver, and Jim Buchli—had to take a trip to Sunnyvale. The astronauts were ordered to disguise their destination by filing a flight plan for Denver, then diverting to the San Francisco Bay area. They landed their T-38s at NASA’s Ames Research Center in Mountain View, rented a “junky old car that could hardly run,” according to Mattingly, and drove to an out-of-the-way motel arranged by their secretary. As they pulled up, Buchli, in the back seat, called a halt. “We made extra stops to make sure we wouldn’t come here directly,” he said. “We didn’t tell our families, we didn’t tell anybody where we are. Look at that motel.” On the marquee was written “Welcome STS-51C Astronauts,” with all four names in big type.
Mattingly’s crew—including MSE payload specialist Payton—finally got off the ground in January 1985. For the first time in NASA history, there was no pre-launch public affairs commentary until nine minutes before liftoff. During the flight, the Air Force lifted the veil of secrecy only to admit that the payload was successfully deployed, and that an Inertial Upper Stage was used.
According to most accounts, STS-51C’s payload was ORION, an eavesdropping satellite for signals intelligence. Parked in geosynchronous orbit, it unfurled a dish almost as wide as a football field is long (hence the need for the shuttle’s large payload bay) to listen in on ground communications and telemetry. No one involved with the mission will comment beyond this recent statement from Payton: “It’s still up there, and still operating.”
The second dedicated military flight was STS-51J, the following October. Karol Bobko commanded the crew of five, and Bill Pailes, a member of the second military astronaut group, was on board as a payload specialist. Even before the launch, outside analysts deduced that Atlantis would release a pair of Defense Satellite Communications System spacecraft in orbit.
When STS-51J landed, the first launch from the new west coast shuttle pad at Vandenberg was just a year away. The mission, STS-62A, was to have been commanded by four-time shuttle astronaut Robert Crippen, with Air Force undersecretary Edward “Pete” Aldridge and MSE Brett Watterson along as payload specialists.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »





Comments (13)
I absolutely love the magazine and look forward to every issue!
As a Orbiter APU System Engineer for 10 years during the height of the military missions for both the Air Force and NRO, I would like to make a minor correction to the article on page 49. Firing room 3 was our dedicated DOD secured firing room, not firing room 4. At that time, Firing Room 4 was an extremely small firing room that supported the KSC management team and Orbiter Processing Facility testing when firing room configuration changes were being implemented for either maintenance or launch configuration changes. As a side note, any time we had to use Firing Room 4 during that timeframe, everyone had to bring in Parkas to keep warm as the HVAC system kept the room, (due to its size), like an icebox.
Also, my career with the Shuttle Program began at Vandenberg AFB and I really would have liked to seen more on the DOD coverage of that side of the Shuttle Program. The launch facility was very unique and many people never knew that side of the Shuttle program. Maybe you can do a follow-on article in the future!
Posted by David B. Neuner on July 22,2009 | 05:25 PM
The ultimate demise of the MSE program was that it was easier to train a spacecraft expert to fly on the shuttle, than to train a shuttle expert (MSE) on a spacecraft.
Posted by Jim on July 30,2009 | 08:24 PM
A humorous note. Spacecraft require ground support equipment (GSE)to support testing. The shuttle use airborne support equipment (ASE) to hold a spacecraft. An MSE flew on an expendable launch vehicle (Mission Support Equipment)
Posted by Anon on July 30,2009 | 08:29 PM
I had some conversations with Jerry Ross and I once jokingly said, "Jerry, the Cold War is over now. How about telling us what you were doing up there on your classified mission?"
It was the first time anyone ever said to me, "I could tell you, but then I'd have to kill you."
Posted by Robert Morwell on August 1,2009 | 05:10 PM
I absolutely love the fact that this nation can keep Mr. Atlas` measurements a classified secret for the next several centuries, but when it comes to keeping secrets of Intelligence, we have a hard time doing it. All the precautions, yet someone knew the astronauts were on the way and who they were. That is really sad. Makes you wonder if the Manhattan Project had been done in today`s society, what would be the outcome?
Posted by John E. Truitt on August 18,2009 | 09:15 PM
I recently read an article concerning STS 27 (Atlantis). Upon reviewing launch video, ground controllers determined that a significant amount of foam debris had impacted on the Shuttles' heat shield tiles. However, since the mission was so secretive, NASA was unable to use any ground based equipment to image Atlantis to see the extent of the damage. The commander of that mission stated that there were serious doubts as to whether they would make it back through re-entry safely. When the crew were finally safe on the ground, during the walk-about, they viewed the damage, and were shocked to see the extent of it. To this day, the damage that Atlantis suffered on lift-off is deemed as the most extensive of any shuttle mission, except, of course, that of Columbia, which led to her break up during re-entry.
Posted by Michael Lonergan on December 9,2009 | 03:18 AM
my uncle wilton fraley was a big wig at nasa for twenty five years. he taught the astronauts how to read the monitorsand such. i used to get signed flight pictures of all the first thirty or so shuttle flights.so once as was working in northern california ,i was listening to a local high powered radio station back in sacramento calif in 2005 . when out of the blue a local science reporter stated he had gone up to vandenburg to watch several shuttle launches. he worked for the station and i was floored. i used to see rocket flights in l.a by the con trails they left. i moved out of l.a in 1985 so i was pissed off that i might of missed a space shuttle launch. he spoke of the flights in an enduring way as a comment of how cool they were. why did he say vandenburg? did they really ever fly there? i will guess the public will never know.
Posted by jim king on May 26,2010 | 10:04 AM
What makes me mad is that NASA was supposed to be a civilian space agency, And with out tax payers hard earned money going to that agency they wouldn't be able to do ****, It makes me mad that they can keep secrets about what they have discovered on the moon, or in orbit, and that Space shuttles OWNED by the American taxpayer are used for secret military missions, I do not agree with that. Even though I know that some of the time the secrecy was needed in regards to payloads. But the one thing that should NEVER be a secret from the public is ANY and ALL pictures taken during ALL of the Apollo missions to the moon, Any missions involving pictures taken by the mars rovers, Anything non military. and dont give me that crap that stuff found on Mars and the moon and throughout the solar system is military because that is a bogus as hell claim, The American taxpayers pay for these moon and mars missions, Therefor the American Taxpayer OWN any and all films and pictures taken during all those missions, And should ALL be released to the American public, including copy's of any voice recordings made from mission control to the moon and from the moon back to mission control AND conversations taped between the astronauts during their stay's on the moon and their voyages to and from the moon. The American taxpayer paid for all that stuff and they own it and should have access to ALL of it, not just some of the crap that NASA "decides" what is safe for people to see, We want it ALL, and there should be some kind of petition started about it.
Posted by Al on May 18,2012 | 06:58 PM
The SPACE Shuttle was a WASTE and a DEBACLE.It was supposed to be a cheap alternative to throw a way boosters to LEO,...and it was anywhere from 10-100x more expensive than conventional LEO boosters.PLUS Nasa lost two crews...!!!The International Space Station is the next Waste and Debacle. It is over budget, does less science than its intended purpose, plus we have secretly paid Russia, Hundreds of Millions of Dollars for " their participation" in the ISS. Read "Star Crossed Orbits"...it will tell you all about the International Space station...MESS..We need a rational Space Program,...not more NASA boon doggles. Its time for a rational program to get us to Mars in 10 years,...read "The Case for Mars"...NASA wants to do it at 10X the cost and in 20-30 years...WASTE. Obama is using the ISS, like previous Presidents used the Shuttle. He wants all R & D to go thru the ISS, before we can apply it to the Moon or MARS...Not necessary...read the above books. Remember the hyper inflation of the 1970s? It was about no business and
Oil,.same situation we are in now but 10X worse.
Posted by anthony barbuto on November 16,2012 | 02:55 PM
I think they should release the aliens.
Posted by Keith on December 20,2012 | 01:43 PM
I remember when Vandenberg was building SLC-6 to handle the Shuttle launches. Like a lot on the program, it had problems being built and was never used. Would be interesting to have an article on what was built by the AF and never used for the shuttle. It was to have had Polar orbital flights with landing back at the launch site. But reliability issues on the shuttle, as well as building problems, in one case work was done on two ends to a middle, when they met they were off by 6 inches. Oops.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 06:52 PM
One of the wierder things NASA did was come up with flight numbers, STS-1, STS-2, and so on. I worked on STS-2 through STS-7. For some foggy reason they added on mission numbers 51C or 51L, always jumbled and out of order. Nobody ever understood what they were doing, the flight numbers made a lot more sense. It seemed that a lot was juggling what flight missions they wanted to fly when as shuttles were always slipping flights or taking too long to get back to flight. The whole idea of being a space bus never materialized. And the launches like clockwork fell apart when Challenger blew up. Though the flight crew was not told in their FRR (Flight Readiness Review) about the problems with icing on the pad. We had heard about O-Ring burn through on earlier flights, and again, the crew was not briefed. Which was criminal, on the test programs I worked at Edwards, the crew was always told everything, and they had the final vote on whether or not to go on with the flight test. But NASA had determined that the Shuttle was no longer in flight test status after STS-4. North American Rockwell thought that was the stupidest idea ever. The X-15 was NEVER out of flight test status.
Posted by Frank on December 20,2012 | 07:06 PM