The Last Shuttle Flight
On board Atlantis, the closing of an era.
- By Tony Reichhardt
- Air & Space magazine, January 2013
Final Four (left to right): Doug Hurley, Sandy Magnus, Rex Walheim, and Chris Ferguson on the flight deck of Atlantis, just before leaving the International Space Station.
NASA
Inside the space station’s U.S. lab module, the four Atlantis astronauts should have been starting to assemble, but they weren’t. Space shuttle commander Chris Ferguson kept eyeing his watch. “Everybody get in here! We’ve gotta be ready!” he yelled. It was the eighth day of the 135th and final space shuttle mission, and President Obama was scheduled for a televised call in just five minutes.
The shuttle astronauts and the six members of the station crew should have been milling in front of the camera, tucking in their shirts and straightening their hair. Instead, they were all still rushing around trying to finish their tasks.
At the last minute, the final person slipped into place—by now they were pros at this floating press conference formation—and the call went through. The president opened with a joke, then told the astronauts how proud he was of them and the shuttle workforce, asked about a robotics experiment, and said: “I also understand that Atlantis brought a unique American flag up to the station?”
Ferguson gave a little start and his eyes widened. You can actually see it on the video. The flag! There were thousands of tiny American flags tucked into every crevice of the shuttle, souvenirs to be given out later, but the one the president referred to was special. The Atlantis crew had brought it up to the station to leave behind, so that some day, years from now, the next American spacecraft to dock there would be able to retrieve it. The symbolism was important to Ferguson, and he had planned to hold up the flag during the presidential phone call. But in all the commotion he forgot, and he had to settle for describing it instead.
Hardly a big deal, and only a few insiders would even have noticed. Besides, everything had gone pretty much perfectly on this flight so far. With only five days left—five days in the entire 30-year history of the shuttle program—he was finally starting to relax. He was lucky to be here. They all were.
When the last shuttle astronauts began training in the summer of 2010, there was no guarantee they’d get a chance to fly. The mission had originally been STS-335, a “launch on need” flight that would wait on the ground to rescue the crew of STS-134—the last scheduled flight—in case that vehicle was unable to return from the station. Since the 2003 Columbia accident, NASA had required this safeguard for every launch; there was little likelihood that a rescue flight would be needed.
Behind the scenes, though, agency planners had long considered turning STS-335 into a real mission. With the shuttle retiring, new commercial companies like SpaceX were supposed to take over the job of supplying the station, but their launch schedules had been slipping badly, and NASA faced the possibility of a critical break in the logistics chain. One more shuttle flight—loaded with five tons of supplies—would buy some insurance.
In September 2009, Ferguson, as the new deputy chief of the astronaut office, had been asked to look at what it would take to pull off the additional supply mission from the perspective of crew training and safety. There were several concerns. First, this crew would have no rescue shuttle—NASA didn’t have the money and had no more usable external tanks. In the unlikely case that their orbiter, Atlantis, was disabled, the crew would have to stay on the station until smaller Russian Soyuz capsules could bring them home, one by one. The last person wouldn’t get back for more than a year.
After much study and an outside safety review, shuttle managers were satisfied that four people could pull off a last supply mission. Their training would have to be compressed, and their timeline would be packed. But it was doable. And the four astronauts could begin training before a final decision was made, because a rescue mission to the station had a lot in common with a supply mission; one big difference was the number of astronauts riding the shuttle home.
Before he started working on the plan that would turn into STS-135, says Ferguson, “I thought the last flight had come and gone.” Now, by good fortune, another mission had materialized. His boss, chief astronaut Peggy Whitson, decided that Ferguson, a former Navy test pilot, was the logical person to command the crew of STS-335/STS-135. The pilot chosen was Doug Hurley, a Marine aviator who had returned from his first spaceflight in July 2009, and so had been through training recently. Like Ferguson, Hurley had expected to be on one of the last shuttles; both had been disappointed to be bypassed.
The two mission specialist slots went to a couple of veterans: Rex Walheim, a former Air Force flight test engineer and head of the astronaut office’s spacewalking branch, and aerospace engineer Sandy Magnus, who in the summer of 2010 was detailed to NASA headquarters, working on future mission studies and hoping for another tour on the space station, having lived there for four months—and loved it—in 2008 and 2009. Training for the contingency mission meant giving up her place in line for another station assignment. But she told Whitson, “Use me where you need to use me.”
***





Comments (9)
Sorry to be pedantic but strictly speaking the ground crews hadn't safed the vehicle 134 times before. Don't forget, two flights didn't make it back.
Posted by Lee on November 21,2012 | 04:45 AM
Sadly this is a factually poor reflection on our final flight. Shame on NASA PAO for retweeting this mess of an article. EDITORS' REPLY: Please tell us specifically which facts you believe are in error.
Posted by Dan Smith on December 12,2012 | 01:40 PM
Lee: You're absolutely right, thanks -- I corrected the article to say "many." I hadn't been thinking about the non-Florida landings, either!
Posted by Tony Reichhardt on December 12,2012 | 02:08 PM
I was a member of the training team that worked with the STS-135 crew in the simulators at JSC, where among the things I taught was the crew's life support systems. Your article says that when they got a cabin leak indication during ascent, "This particular scenario had never come up in training, and the astronauts began to make the mental switch from routine to emergency." In fact, my training notes show that we did practice the cabin leak scenario at least 8 times between October 2010 and June 2011, so the crew was well-prepared for whether it was a real leak or just a misleading sensor.
Nice article, I'm glad I had the privilege of working with the crew on that last flight.
Posted by Michael Grabois on December 12,2012 | 04:14 PM
Great article Mr. Reichhardt. We all miss the "grandeur" of the space shuttle program, probably the last piece of the magnificent and crazy dream started with the words "We choose to go to the moon [...] and do the other things not because they're easy but because they're hard" one day of 1962. Thanks for sharing this intimate insight on the very final moments of such a unique human enterprise.
J.
Posted by Jonah on December 12,2012 | 06:31 PM
Reflective read....thank you.
Posted by Ibrahim Jadoon on December 12,2012 | 11:54 PM
Interesting. Forty years (approximately) after Kennedy threw down the gauntlet in the race to get into space the only way americans can get there is using a Russian rocket.
Posted by Ernest Payne on December 21,2012 | 04:36 PM
I've been blessed to have lived during the time when Chuck Yeager and Neil Armstrong and all the those brave guys and gals that followed, shared their experience with us. Thank you for sharing the last shuttle flight.
Posted by Jim Normandeau on December 21,2012 | 09:12 PM
I've been following the space program and have seen nearly every launch in US space history including 2 live launches of the shuttle at the Cape. When I was young, my parents would wake me up in the middle of the night to watch preperations for the early Mercury launches, I've been a space nut ever since.
What a terrible ending to the manned US space program as we've known it for over 52 years. To depend on another country to launch our astronauts to the ISS while we are supposed to be in an active partnership with other nations is a tradgedy in the highest order. We have lost forever the lead as a nation in space exploration. NASA seems so proud to announce they will be able to bring US astronauts to the ISS possibly by 2017 after a 6 year hiatus, what is there to be proud of? You prematurely cancelled an incredible manned program for only political reasons driven by a government that is totally out of touch with reality.
Posted by Ted Tryke on January 11,2013 | 04:36 PM