The Mojave Launch Lab
A community of alternative rocketeers who may one day dominate the space biz.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Photographs by Chad Slattery
- Air & Space magazine, May 2011
It lacks the glamour of Canaveral, but for Cal State students, an engine test stand in the desert beats the classroom.
Chad Slattery
(Page 2 of 5)
Eric Besnard, a Cal State Long Beach professor of mechanical and aerospace engineering, assures in a faint French accent, “If it fails, it should only be a burn-through, not a catastrophic failure.” Mounted horizontally on a test stand at the Friends of Amateur Rocketry site, the Cal State Long Beach engine vents vapor in the morning air. Designed and constructed by Besnard’s students, it will be tested in 20-second burns, building toward a total of 120 to 150 seconds, necessary to launch an orbital first stage. Each second accumulated brings the project a little closer to the approval to launch at a NASA facility like Wallops Island in Virginia.
For students, it’s out of the classroom and into real-world rocketry. “There aren’t many 22-year-olds who’ve loaded LOX [liquid oxygen] and ethanol into liquid rockets,” says Garvey. New guys get assigned to fuel loading: “That’s kind of the cool, macho thing to do, you know. They can say, ‘Hey, I’m working with LOX.’ ” The experience separates the more theoretical-minded from those having “the field test mentality,” as he calls it. Things aren’t clean, it’s not pretty, “and you may be working late.” A student using coarse language in range of videocams recording the test catches his notice. “Hey, no seven-letter words,” he barks.
Garvey already has one minute on the engine; he hopes to double that today. “By getting 60 seconds of burn, even in three chunks, we’ll know the chamber is pretty robust.” There’s a trade-off between burn time and weight: Each burn erodes the combustion chamber more. “If you build enough material into it, it will last longer. But as you add more material, it also gets heavier.” And requires more fuel. “So we’ve got to find the right mix.”
The scent of ethanol from the Cal State Long Beach engine drifts over the site. Kevin Baxter, Friends of Amateur Rocketry president, revels in it. “We’re five miles from the nearest human being,” he says. “It’s a magical place.” It’s also an amateur facility unlike most: Surrounding a Quonset structure are horizontal and vertical test stands, two launch towers, propellant storage vaults, and an underground blockhouse with electrical and network connections—all built by volunteers, usually at launch-and-work events. “People come watch a rocket fire,” Baxter says, “then a cement truck shows up.”
FAR’s mission statement promotes rocketry education, for everyone from Boy Scouts to university students. Its mentoring process links amateurs with space industry pros, many of whom launch here recreationally. “Think of all the frustrated engineers shuffling papers in the big aerospace corporations,” Baxter says. Mark Holthaus, an FAR founder, is an example. At Boeing in Huntington Beach, he engineers exotic projects like the X-51A hypersonic engine. Meanwhile he’s got an amateur rocket “in pieces on the living room floor” and spends weekends mentoring students at FAR.
FAR holds high-explosives manufacturing permits from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives, as well as Federal Aviation Administration clearance for weekend launches up to 50,000 feet. Solid-propellant amateur rockets have flirted with maximum permissible altitude: a dirt-biker found a university’s 12-foot vehicle, three months after launch, miles from the FAR site. (The higher the altitude, the more the downrange drift, and, ultimately, the more difficult to find.)
Down in the blockhouse, Garvey Spacecraft test conductor Chris Bostwick (a Cal State Long Beach grad) monitors engine status on computer screens and executes the test sequence. John Garvey mans the red kill switch to shut down the engine if a computer locks up. Final propellant temperatures and pressures are logged. A voice on the loudspeakers orders everyone behind cinder-block observation bunkers, earplugs in. Moments later, terminal countdown squawks over the speakers.
The shock wave from 4,500 pounds of thrust rocks the earth. A pale blue exhaust plume lunges more than 20 feet, and an enormous cloud of dust roils across the desert. Ethanol and liquid oxygen rage; seconds click by. After 20, the computer shuts down the engine.
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »





Comments (6)
Suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUS.
Posted by gaetano marano on March 18,2011 | 08:26 AM
I had trouble getting past the opening of Stephen Joiner’s article “The Mojave Launch Lab”.
I’m surprised and disappointed that a magazine of A&S’s stature that has a long record of promoting the true grit of America’s aeronautical and aerospace entrepreneurs and their achievements would find amusement, even apparent enjoyment, in bashing the Roton.
What happened to the celebrations and cheers of what my current employer calls “confidence in nonsense”? Burt Rutan has always maintained that if you’re going to realize breakthroughs in the engineering arena you have to position yourself, in that precarious void, where the fearful and faint of heart have to be dragged over the finish line.
I don’t recall similar, deriding comments being written about Lockheed Martin’s, $1.3B, X-33 effort that produced some eye-watering launch facilities out by Edwards Air Force Base and a busted composite LOX tank. The Roton, though, was designed, built and flown for less than $8M. The remainder of the company’s $30M budget went into the propulsion side of the house which never saw the light of day. If Rotary Rocket was a “failure” it was not because of the Roton.
Museums across this great country are filled with hardware that stretched the thinking of their time. They are not there because they were financially successful or had large production runs and certainly not to be ridiculed. They are there to stimulate fresh and unfettered ideas and to hopefully reach out to young minds and say there’s still a lot to be tried.
We don’t know all that’s under the sun.
Posted by Brian Binnie on March 20,2011 | 12:59 PM
XCOR's Jeff Greason is right. The civilian astronauts flying on NewSpace rockets will open the space frontier.
If I were not an XCOR investor, I'd buy a ticket. Since I am an investor,I don't need to: the larger investors fly as flight test engineers.
Based on my first rocket flight in 2008, I am very much looking forward to a flight in the right seat of the Lynx spacecraft in 2012.
Posted by Lee Valentine on March 20,2011 | 09:04 PM
Really enjoyed this story, except for the digs at Rotary Rocket company.
For deeper insight, see this interview with Rotary co-founder Gary Hudson
The Roton Rocket (orphansofapollo.com)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxh4ZhpIRh0
Of historical interest: 1998 promotional video for Rotary Rocket -
Rotary Rocket Company: Revolution To Orbit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So3d_JfGrMQ
As it says on the commemorative plaque at the foot of the Roton in Mojave's Legacy Park, "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt
26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Posted by Robin Snelson on March 21,2011 | 11:19 PM
The smarmy comments regarding the Roton were quite surprising in an otherwise fine article. Aerospace history is littered with vehicles which never made it into production, but yet accomplished significant things. Relatively little $ was spent on the Roton landing system test vehicle. 3 times more was spent on the failed development of the spinning engine to have been on the base. Ask Mr. Greason just who was in charge of THAT..
Posted by Ken Doyle on March 22,2011 | 02:00 AM
gaetano marano wrote:
"Suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUS."
Stairs and climbing out of a bathtub are dangerous and people die every year doing it.
Automoblies kill 50,000 people a year in the US alone.
EVERYTHING is dangerous; that's life.
Posted by Vladislaw on May 4,2011 | 01:32 PM