The Mojave Launch Lab
A community of alternative rocketeers who may one day dominate the space biz.
- By Stephen Joiner
- Photographs by Chad Slattery
- Air & Space magazine, May 2011
It lacks the glamour of Canaveral, but for Cal State students, an engine test stand in the desert beats the classroom.
Chad Slattery
(Page 4 of 5)
A former Jet Propulsion Laboratory engineer, Mungas formed Firestar Technologies and moved to Mojave to make rocket science greener. “We started playing around with the idea of blending fuels with nitrous oxide for deep-space applications,” he says. A research contract from NASA’s Mars Advanced Technology Program resulted in NOFBX, Firestar’s patented mono-propellant.
“Nitrous oxide just decomposes into oxygen-rich air,” Mungas says. And monopropellants don’t require separate tanks of liquid oxygen. Mungas likens the propellant to “the propane bottle you take on camping trips,” something that fuels the camp stove, lights lanterns, and runs a generator. NOFBX from the tank that fuels a spacecraft’s rockets could also generate onboard electricity and drive turbine-powered equipment on a planet’s surface.
For a contract with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, Firestar developed a NOFBX-fueled piston engine for high-altitude, long-endurance drones. “It’s the unmanned equivalent of the U-2 spyplane,” Mungas says. Piston engines, powering everything from generators to small aircraft, have been modified in-house to run at altitudes with almost no oxygen.
Firestar engineers Ken Doyle and Greg Peters show me around the spaceport test site, north of the runways. “Big bangs happen here all the time,” Doyle says. “You never know whether it’s something at the [Soledad Mountain] gold mine over there or a test in progress.” Firestar’s site includes a 40-foot drop tower to shock-test propellants and a burn pit to cook them. A static stand for 10,000-pound-thrust engines throws fire out toward the scrub. “Depending on the amount of stuff that might explode,” Doyle says, the control room—an air-conditioned, computer-equipped, microwave-linked, steel shipping container—can be transported to safe distances.
Not everything else can. “My cousin’s got an old Firebird up on blocks,” says Greg Peters. “I tell him, ‘Guess what I’ve got up on blocks?’ It’s an 80,000-pound vacuum chamber made by General Dynamics in the 1960s to simulate deep space for satellites.” Mungas, who rescued the behemoth from a San Diego boatyard, is renovating the rare asset. Says Peters: “We can put sand and rocks inside, pump it down to Mars pressure, backfill it with CO2, and essentially create the Mars environment. Right here in Mojave.”
It’s “spaceflight participants,” not “space tourists.” XCOR’s Mike Massee is talking about booking suborbital spins in the Lynx Mk. II rocketplane. Compared to Virgin Galactic’s six-passenger SpaceShipTwo, Lynx is the scrappy two-seater down the block. Last September it completed supersonic wind tunnel tests at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Alabama. Co-founded by Jeff Greason and several Rotary Rocket alums, XCOR targeted human “participation” from the get-go. The company’s EZ-Rocket is a Rutan Long-EZ homebuilt aircraft modified with twin rockets powered by isopropyl alcohol and liquid oxygen. “We made this just to prove we could make a rocket-powered airplane and fly it,” Massee says. And finding a pilot was EZ—Dick Rutan, Burt’s brother, has more hours in the Long-EZ than anyone. “That’s another cool thing about Mojave,” he says. “You walk a few doors down to your neighbor and say, ‘Hey, wanna fly the world’s first rocket-powered Long-EZ?’ ”
A few feet from EZ-Rocket stands a full-size Lynx mock-up, on which cockpit ergonomics are tweaked. The delta-wing aircraft, fueled by kerosene and liquid oxygen, will take off and land horizontally. Between those conventional events: 37 miles straight up at Mach 2. An interlude of weightlessness—with panoramic overhead windows providing killer inverted Earth views—then a 4-G pullout and a circling, dead-stick reentry. Thank you for flying XCOR.
Jeff Greason came to Mojave via Intel. Why are so many space entrepreneurs Silicon Valley expats? “We’re all people who grew up in an era when the promise of the Apollo program was that it would keep going,” he says. But computers, not NASA careers, were the magnet for tech-minded whiz kids. “Once we got free to do what we really wanted to do, some of us looked back at the space industry and started asking, ‘Why is this not progressing?’
Single Page « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next »





Comments (6)
Suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUS.
Posted by gaetano marano on March 18,2011 | 08:26 AM
I had trouble getting past the opening of Stephen Joiner’s article “The Mojave Launch Lab”.
I’m surprised and disappointed that a magazine of A&S’s stature that has a long record of promoting the true grit of America’s aeronautical and aerospace entrepreneurs and their achievements would find amusement, even apparent enjoyment, in bashing the Roton.
What happened to the celebrations and cheers of what my current employer calls “confidence in nonsense”? Burt Rutan has always maintained that if you’re going to realize breakthroughs in the engineering arena you have to position yourself, in that precarious void, where the fearful and faint of heart have to be dragged over the finish line.
I don’t recall similar, deriding comments being written about Lockheed Martin’s, $1.3B, X-33 effort that produced some eye-watering launch facilities out by Edwards Air Force Base and a busted composite LOX tank. The Roton, though, was designed, built and flown for less than $8M. The remainder of the company’s $30M budget went into the propulsion side of the house which never saw the light of day. If Rotary Rocket was a “failure” it was not because of the Roton.
Museums across this great country are filled with hardware that stretched the thinking of their time. They are not there because they were financially successful or had large production runs and certainly not to be ridiculed. They are there to stimulate fresh and unfettered ideas and to hopefully reach out to young minds and say there’s still a lot to be tried.
We don’t know all that’s under the sun.
Posted by Brian Binnie on March 20,2011 | 12:59 PM
XCOR's Jeff Greason is right. The civilian astronauts flying on NewSpace rockets will open the space frontier.
If I were not an XCOR investor, I'd buy a ticket. Since I am an investor,I don't need to: the larger investors fly as flight test engineers.
Based on my first rocket flight in 2008, I am very much looking forward to a flight in the right seat of the Lynx spacecraft in 2012.
Posted by Lee Valentine on March 20,2011 | 09:04 PM
Really enjoyed this story, except for the digs at Rotary Rocket company.
For deeper insight, see this interview with Rotary co-founder Gary Hudson
The Roton Rocket (orphansofapollo.com)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qxh4ZhpIRh0
Of historical interest: 1998 promotional video for Rotary Rocket -
Rotary Rocket Company: Revolution To Orbit
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=So3d_JfGrMQ
As it says on the commemorative plaque at the foot of the Roton in Mojave's Legacy Park, "Far better it is to dare mighty things, to win glorious triumphs even though checkered by failure, than to rank with those poor spirits who neither enjoy nor suffer much because they live in the gray twilight that knows neither victory nor defeat."
Theodore Roosevelt
26th president of US (1858 - 1919)
Posted by Robin Snelson on March 21,2011 | 11:19 PM
The smarmy comments regarding the Roton were quite surprising in an otherwise fine article. Aerospace history is littered with vehicles which never made it into production, but yet accomplished significant things. Relatively little $ was spent on the Roton landing system test vehicle. 3 times more was spent on the failed development of the spinning engine to have been on the base. Ask Mr. Greason just who was in charge of THAT..
Posted by Ken Doyle on March 22,2011 | 02:00 AM
gaetano marano wrote:
"Suborbital space tourism is TOO DANGEROUS."
Stairs and climbing out of a bathtub are dangerous and people die every year doing it.
Automoblies kill 50,000 people a year in the US alone.
EVERYTHING is dangerous; that's life.
Posted by Vladislaw on May 4,2011 | 01:32 PM